Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

And regarding the RF and Putin being painted as pure evil in the West, they already are, no 'reputation' stopped that from already been done.

From my perspective, the RF hasn't attacked 'civilian' ships and other transportation means outside of Ukraine, potentially carrying weapons and other military stuff into Ukraine, exactly because they are smart, and more focused on the job at hands and achieving their goal than falling for provocations and Western baits which might make things much worse for everybody. I agree, not because the RF is weak.

It IS a war with NATO, but a covert one, while the population in the EU is being primed as we speak and since the very beginning of the conflict that any minute now the RF and Putin are going to invade.
The RF has its objectives for starting the SMO and they were clearly stated, and they basically haven't changed. Being ruthless and like carpet bombing Ukraine, won't make those objective being met, at least not in the manner that would be more beneficial than detrimental for the RF, but also for Ukraine or at least for those parts of Ukraine that still might gravitate towards good relations with the RF, OSIT.

In a very real sense, there is also the potential future that is wise to keep an eye on.

Hope I made myself a bit more clear this time.
You’re missing the key point—this isn’t about reputation in the West (they’ve been demonizing us by default for ages). It’s about how we’re perceived by actual and potential allies in the Global South and East. These are fundamentally different things.

If Europeans genuinely believe in an imminent Russian invasion, that’s their cognitive problem. Adults ought to distinguish propaganda from reality, especially when the hysteria has surpassed even Soviet-era standards. But then again, critical thinking doesn’t seem to be modern Europe’s strong suit.

About "Carpet Bombing"
Russia systematically dismantles military infrastructure, whereas actual carpet bombing is NATO’s signature move—just ask Yugoslavia. Maybe it’s time to brush up on history?

To truly understand Russians in Ukraine who still feel connected to Russia, you’d need to be Russian yourself. Without that deep cultural code, all speculation remains shallow and theoretical.

P.S.
Speaking of translators—since DeepL left, I had to find alternatives. Google Translate’s output has gotten so deranged it’s borderline comical. Discovered DeepSeek, and turns out machine translation can actually be decent. Though honestly, the real solution is just learning English… but I can’t be bothered. Maybe Europeans should learn Russian instead—kidding (but only kinda).

:shock::lol:
 
You’re missing the key point—this isn’t about reputation in the West (they’ve been demonizing us by default for ages). It’s about how we’re perceived by actual and potential allies in the Global South and East. These are fundamentally different things.

If Europeans genuinely believe in an imminent Russian invasion, that’s their cognitive problem. Adults ought to distinguish propaganda from reality, especially when the hysteria has surpassed even Soviet-era standards. But then again, critical thinking doesn’t seem to be modern Europe’s strong suit.

About "Carpet Bombing"
Russia systematically dismantles military infrastructure, whereas actual carpet bombing is NATO’s signature move—just ask Yugoslavia. Maybe it’s time to brush up on history?

To truly understand Russians in Ukraine who still feel connected to Russia, you’d need to be Russian yourself. Without that deep cultural code, all speculation remains shallow and theoretical.

P.S.
Speaking of translators—since DeepL left, I had to find alternatives. Google Translate’s output has gotten so deranged it’s borderline comical. Discovered DeepSeek, and turns out machine translation can actually be decent. Though honestly, the real solution is just learning English… but I can’t be bothered. Maybe Europeans should learn Russian instead—kidding (but only kinda).

:shock::lol:
So you wrote this in Russian and then used DeepSpeak to translate it to English? I have to say, it did a wonderful job! Not only understandable, but the nuances and humor carried over splendidly. I would never have guessed.⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
 
This is probably so that all sorts of American-Europeans would not be in a hurry to relax. This means that Oreshnik cannot be intercepted because of its speed, but this Burevestnik can fly for years and no one knows where it will "land".

Russia may test the Burevestnik missile within the next 72 hours

No news as far as I know apart from one note on local media (if true).
transl:
(2 days ago)
On the Novaya Zemlya archipelago, located in the Arkhangelsk region, tests of the Burevestnik intercontinental cruise missile, equipped with a nuclear power plant (engine), have been successfully completed. Between 7 and 12 August, an area of 500 square kilometres was closed for flights. It is worth noting that the Pankovo test site on Novaya Zemlya has been used since the late 1950s for nuclear weapons testing.

At present, the airspace over the territory has been reopened for flights. This morning, at 10:34, a flight departed from Arkhangelsk Airport in the direction of Novaya Zemlya, with Amderma-2 Airport as its final destination. Information on the main results and conclusions obtained during the tests will be published shortly.
 
Last edited:
So you wrote this in Russian and then used DeepSpeak to translate it to English? I have to say, it did a wonderful job! Not only understandable, but the nuances and humor carried over splendidly. I would never have guessed.⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
I used AI not just for translation but to simulate a discussion: crafting responses to hypothetical counterarguments, refining them, and structuring the dialogue’s logic. The AI provided facts, while I steered the final outcome. It’s a remarkably effective tool.

I’ve seen its practical benefits through my child’s education: with AI’s help, they learned to write essays, identify key ideas, and finished their literature quarter with top marks. The system functions as a personalized tutor.

That said, I’m a 90s-era honors graduate from one of Kuzbass’s worst schools. Back then, I barely scraped by in Russian with Cs, but analytical thinking got me into TUSUR on a state-funded spot. Decades later, I see how AI bridges gaps left by flawed foundational education.

Crucially, I only recently started using AI but already recognize its potential—including as a tool for cultural exchange. Yes, I’m aware of Grok, though its accessibility in Russia remains unclear.

On literature: contrary to stereotypes, it wasn’t “in our blood” for many in the 90s. My Russian teacher spent more time collecting money for textbooks than teaching. I improved only through self-study—and now, with AI.

:shock:
 
rbc-news: Who will be part of the Russian delegation at the summit in the USA

Lavrov, Ushakov, Belousov, Siluanov and Dmitriev are part of the Russian delegation at the summit in Alaska.

The composition of the American delegation at the talks has also been determined, but it would be more appropriate for the American side to announce it, according to Yuri Ushakov.

Good team. All major topics, such as foreign affairs, military matters and the economy, will be thoroughly covered by experts.
 
Logistically securing Vladimir Putin and his entourage from Moscow to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) in Alaska and back is highly complex due to security, diplomacy, and geopolitical tensions. Below is a concise breakdown:

Route and Transportation:
Moscow to Anadyr (Russia): ~8-hour flight on Ilyushin Il-96-300PU (armored, missile defenses).
Anadyr to Anchorage (JBER): ~2.5-hour flight across Bering Strait, ~5-mile ground transfer to base.
Return: Reverse route, possibly direct Moscow-Anchorage if U.S. airspace opens.
Complexity: Medium (short route, but Arctic weather and custom routing add challenges).

Diplomatic Clearances:
Requires U.S. State Department approval, FAA waivers, NORAD coordination (3-30 days prep).
U.S. flight bans on Russia bypassed for diplomacy; ICC warrant needs U.S. assurances.
Complexity: High (bilateral talks, legal risks).

Security Measures:
Entourage (100-300): Aides, FSO guards, medical/comms teams, possible nuclear briefcase.
In-flight: Il-96 defenses, U.S. F-22 escorts in Alaska airspace, NORAD monitoring.
At JBER: Joint U.S.-Russian security, Secret Service lead, base defenses.
Advance teams vet routes/food; encrypted comms, anti-assassination protocols.
Complexity: Very high (adversarial coordination, extensive vetting).

Additional Challenges:
Prep: 1-3 months, millions in costs, 24/7 ops centers.
Risks: Weather, protests, cyber threats, intelligence leaks on return.
Contingencies: Alternate sites, medical evac, diplomatic hotlines.
Complexity: Very high (Cold War-level stakes).

Overall Complexity: 8-9/10, driven by distrust, security integration, and diplomatic hurdles, but feasible with high-level commitments.

--
MOD EDIT: paragraphs for easier reading
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As for the thousands of sailors, understandably it makes no difference for Russia since the final outcome stays the same. But I think it matters for the individual sailors in karma/moral terms - if they care.
Can you please 'mansplain' me what you mean by the bolded part quoted above, because it escapes my understanding.
(The same goes for what you called "strawman argument", as I'll explain below.)

First of all, I seriously doubt any weapons and military equipment is being transported by ordinary commercial merchant or cargo ships. Almost certainly military itself takes care of that. Nevertheless, for the sake of discussion, let's say that usual cargo ships transport them.

If the sailors don't know what's in the containers their ship's transporting, how does it affect their karma? Is a mere suspicion enough for them to decide to refuse working on such a ship, like f1esk suggested that would be right thing to do? Going with that logic, then all the ships going out of the USA heading across the Atlantic should be devoid of sailors because each one of them might be a suspect for carrying weapons in the containers with their final destination in Ukraine.

Or do you 'restrict' the suspects to only those ships heading to Ukrainian ports, like for example the allegedly sunk ship in that most probably fake news report that was sailing on the so called grain route along Black Sea coast? In that case, what do you suggest the sailors should have done to avoid getting involved with the karma, once they realized that their next destination port is Odessa for example?

The profi sailors, at least here, work in shifts of 6 months minimum, including in most cases also the ship officers like even the captains. They leave home heading for flights to various ports around the world where the ships they're about to work on for next 6 months or more in continuity would be currently located, with maybe only a vague or mostly no knowledge about all the routes their ship's gonna take and all the ports it's gonna visit in those 6 or more months.

Therefore, when it concerns sailors working for Western shipping companies, and not only them as Ukrainian drones are also made with Chinese made components for example, refusing to work on a ship that could potentially be carrying weapons and military equipment to Ukraine at some point on its journey, basically comes down to stop working on (cargo) ships altogether, as pointed out in that passage you replied represented strawman argument. At least that's how I see it, assuming the highly unlikely weapons transport by ordinary cargo ships.

So, once again, can you please point out errors in my thinking displayed above?
 
Detailed article on preparations for the summit; thought it would be worth of having it here.

(MK.RU via browser's in-built translator with some necessary edits)

The Kremlin has broken its silence: What cards does Putin have in Alaska?

Aug 14, 2025, 5 PM (local time)

Details of the Russia-USA Summit were revealed a day before the summit

The day before the meeting in Anchorage, the Kremlin broke its long silence: Vladimir Putin gathered officials and security personnel to tell them what (trump cards) he is bringing to Alaska. In turn, presidential aide Yuri Ushakov held the first briefing for journalists since the summit was announced. Until then, all information had come either from the host country or from various foreign media sources.

The meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump appeared on the political calendar when all the plans for August were already laid out. Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin went on a visit to Kyrgyzstan, and State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin left for Pyongyang. On the day of the Russian-American summit, only Valentina Matviyenko will remain "on the farm" in the country: as speaker of the Federation Council, she occupies the third line in the Russian table of ranks. A number one (President), two (Prime Minister) and four (the head of the lower house ) will be absent. This doesn't happen very often in Russia.

Moreover, the holiday season left journalists without daily briefings from President's Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov, and consequently, without official information or comments. While foreign (and Russian) media outlets were busy quoting Donald Trump, European politicians, and various sources, the Kremlin remained silent. Apart from confirming the fact of the negotiations in Alaska and stating that the location was logical, no other announcements were made after August 10.

However, the work behind closed doors was in full swing. Representatives of the Foreign Ministry literally spent days and nights at the US Embassy to settle all the necessary formalities in record time. This is not just about visa processing. But first of all, the issue of payments (for hotels for the delegation, transport, parking and refueling of aircraft, etc.). Since the problem could not be resolved manually, the American authorities (in an unprecedented move!) had to authorize all operations prohibited under anti-Russian sanctions until 20 August, ‘which are necessary for organizing the meeting between the leaders of Russia and the United States.’ However, there were no hotels available for journalists in Anchorage, as August is the peak tourist season in Alaska, and the agreement on the summit, as we know, was reached suddenly.

It was only on Thursday that the Kremlin decided to break its long silence. Vladimir Putin convened a meeting to prepare for negotiations with Donald Trump, inviting members of the government, representatives of the presidential administration, and security officials, while Yuri Ushakov held a briefing for journalists. However, both the president and his assistant were relatively brief in their remarks. During the open part of the meeting, Putin announced that he intended to inform the attendees about the progress of the negotiations on the Ukrainian crisis.

"Many people know, of course, in general terms, but I will tell you in more detail. This is the first thing," he said. The second topic is the negotiations with the American administration, which, "as everyone knows, is making a lot of effort to stop the fighting" and "reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in the conflict."

However, the dialogue with the United States is not limited to the Ukrainian conflict. According to the president, the next step is to reach an agreement on strategic offensive arms control. This will create "long-term conditions for peace in general," Putin emphasized.

Yuri Ushakov, in turn, provided details about the location and format of the negotiations. "The meeting will take place at the Elmendorf-Richardson Air Force Base and will begin at 11:30 a.m. local time (22:30 Moscow time), said the Kremlin representative, outpacing his colleagues at the White House (who had previously provided all the details about the summit). The meeting will begin with a private conversation between Putin and Trump, with the participation of translators. This will be followed by a working breakfast for the delegations. Since the topics to be discussed are very important and sensitive, the number of participants in the negotiations is limited, as Ushakov noted. On the Russian side, the negotiations will be attended by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and Presidential Special Representative Kirill Dmitriev. The composition of the "American Five" is also known, but according to unwritten diplomatic rules, it must be announced by the White House. Typically, negotiations are conducted on a parity basis, meaning that the members of the delegations hold similar positions. In addition to the officials, a large group of experts in all possible fields is traveling to Alaska. According to Ushakov, they will be "somewhere nearby."

According to local media reports, the United States tried to avoid holding the negotiations at a military base. However, they were forced to agree to this option when it became clear that, despite the availability of other options (Alaska has a well-developed hospitality infrastructure), there was no alternative. This closed territory was the only place that could provide the necessary level of security for the Russian-American meeting. (This is not the first time that the base has hosted high-ranking guests, as it has previously hosted Emperor Hirohito of Japan and Pope John Paul II.)

Yuri Ushakov noted that the base is not only a military facility, but also a memorial site. Nearby are the graves of Russian pilots who died in 1942-45 while transporting aircraft and other cargo from the United States to the Soviet Union under the Lend-Lease program. "Therefore, the meeting will take place near this historically significant site, which serves as a reminder of the military brotherhood between our nations. This is particularly symbolic in the year marking the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany and militaristic Japan," said the Kremlin spokesperson. Yuri Ushakov named the Ukrainian crisis as the central topic of the meeting. The discussion of possible resolutions will take place in light of the preliminary negotiations involving Trump's special envoy, Steve Whitkoff, which took place in the Kremlin on August 6. The assistant to the head of state did not provide details about the Russian position. However, immediately after the negotiations, both sides stated that they had heard proposals that make a face-to-face meeting between the Russian and American presidents possible. (It should be noted that Moscow had previously stated for six months that the conditions for a summit were not ripe.)

Donald Trump initially said that he planned to discuss a "territory exchange" with Vladimir Putin, but after speaking with Vladimir Zelensky and European leaders, he took back his words. Now, the US president is calling the meeting in Alaska a "trial" and expects to understand within two minutes whether the Russian president is ready for peace or not. Experts suggest that the meeting may involve both an exchange and a freeze on hostilities along the entire contact line in exchange for the recognition (de facto) of the territories of Donbas and Novorossiya that are already controlled by the Russian Federation. The option of a deal is also possible, in which case, if the terms are rejected (regardless of whether the rejection comes from Moscow or Kiev), the United States will withdraw from the settlement process. When asked about the mood of the Russian delegation as it flies to the US, Yuri Ushakov did not show excessive optimism, let alone promise a breakthrough. ‘We are primarily in a business mood,’ he emphasised.

In addition to the Ukrainian crisis, the Russian delegation intends to discuss "broader issues of peace and security" with its American counterparts (and Putin personally with Trump), as well as pressing international and regional problems. Bilateral cooperation is also on the agenda. "It has a huge potential that has not yet been fully realized," lamented the Kremlin spokesman.
 
Logistically securing Vladimir Putin and his entourage from Moscow to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) in Alaska and back is highly complex due to security, diplomacy, and geopolitical tensions. Below is a concise breakdown:

Route and Transportation:
Moscow to Anadyr (Russia): ~8-hour flight on Ilyushin Il-96-300PU (armored, missile defenses).
Anadyr to Anchorage (JBER): ~2.5-hour flight across Bering Strait, ~5-mile ground transfer to base.
Return: Reverse route, possibly direct Moscow-Anchorage if U.S. airspace opens.
Complexity: Medium (short route, but Arctic weather and custom routing add challenges).

Diplomatic Clearances:
Requires U.S. State Department approval, FAA waivers, NORAD coordination (3-30 days prep).
U.S. flight bans on Russia bypassed for diplomacy; ICC warrant needs U.S. assurances.
Complexity: High (bilateral talks, legal risks).

Security Measures:
Entourage (100-300): Aides, FSO guards, medical/comms teams, possible nuclear briefcase.
In-flight: Il-96 defenses, U.S. F-22 escorts in Alaska airspace, NORAD monitoring.
At JBER: Joint U.S.-Russian security, Secret Service lead, base defenses.
Advance teams vet routes/food; encrypted comms, anti-assassination protocols.
Complexity: Very high (adversarial coordination, extensive vetting).

Additional Challenges:
Prep: 1-3 months, millions in costs, 24/7 ops centers.
Risks: Weather, protests, cyber threats, intelligence leaks on return.
Contingencies: Alternate sites, medical evac, diplomatic hotlines.
Complexity: Very high (Cold War-level stakes).

Overall Complexity: 8-9/10, driven by distrust, security integration, and diplomatic hurdles, but feasible with high-level commitments.

--
MOD EDIT: paragraphs for easier reading

What is the source of this?
 
Honestly, I’ve enjoyed Nate’s podcasts for awhile now. However bearing in mind that he’s a Prepper Supply retailer, there comes a point where it begins to sound like scaremongering to sell his products. This is his latest, still if you look at his channel and see the titles of his most recent three or four videos, it becomes obvious.

 
Back
Top Bottom