Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

[Cosmos]

Putin met with the defense ministry leadership, representatives of the military-industrial complex and missile system developers, giving us more details on the Oreshnik missile that was used:

Especially noteworthy are the following two characteristics of the Oreshnik missile system:

Given the weapon’s designated tasks and range, it can hit targets across Europe, offering significant advantages over other types of long-range precision weapons. As you earlier noted, the mass use of this weapon would be comparable to the use of nuclear weapons.

In other words: As soon as Russia can and will build Oreshnik missiles on mass (which will likely be soon), the systems power and efficiency can be used in ways on ANY target within Europe that are comparable with the use of nuclear weapons. With three big differences: First; it doesn’t leave deadly nuclear radiation behind for ages, second; it can hit targets very precisely and quickly, and thirdly; it doesn‘t have to be nuclear. So, Russia basically told/showed us that they can and will use weapons that can deliver similar objectives/results as the deployment of nuclear weapons without needing to use nuclear weapons! So, in theory, they can use that system, get similar results as nuclear weapons would in Europe, while not risking nuclear war.

 

[Cosmos]

It almost looks to me like if the Oreshnik system would be used either individually or on mass scale, that its effects (and how it looks when it hits) might be somewhat comparable to a bombardment of many pretty small comet fragments that hit the ground? I thought about similar things for quite a while since there are probably other hypersonic systems the russians have too, that have similar effects.

So, here is a nice conspiracy theory:

What if at some level that whole thing about creating and using hypersonic missiles (and the current new cold war in general) is a means to cover up real comet impacts anywhere on earth by “blaming the Russians“?

Can‘t let people on mass know that their leaders are incapable of stopping what is coming, and thus loose control? So they try to calm the masses by making them believe that something can be done, because humans are doing it (aka. the “evil“ Russians)? If so, that might imply that some of the PTB have rather concrete data that something wicked is coming and also more or less a specific timeframe of when it will start to happen.

 

[Ian]

It almost looks to me like if the Oreshnik system would be used either individually or on mass scale, that its effects (and how it looks when it hits) might be somewhat comparable to a bombardment of many pretty small comet fragments that hit the ground? I thought about similar things for quite a while since there are probably other hypersonic systems the russians have too, that have similar effects.

So, here is a nice conspiracy theory:

What if at some level that whole thing about creating and using hypersonic missiles (and the current new cold war in general) is a means to cover up real comet impacts anywhere on earth by “blaming the Russians“?

Can‘t let people on mass know that their leaders are incapable of stopping what is coming, and thus loose control? So they try to calm the masses by making them believe that something can be done, because humans are doing it (aka. the “evil“ Russians)? If so, that might imply that some of the PTB have rather concrete data that something wicked is coming and also more or less a specific timeframe of when it will start to happen.

I think this was mentioned in the transcripts, that "they" cover the cometary bombardment with statements that some kind of technology testing or something similar is being performed, and/or "they" substantiate it with real military actions before and/or after the impact of the comet. If this was the case with the Oreshnik missile, then maybe some more comets are expected today and tomorrow. Some sources are saying that more tests could occur on the 23rd and 24th of november. If they will occur we can expect to see some more "Oreshnik" or maybe some "new missiles" being presented and tested, serving as a cover up for cometary bombardment. But maybe that is not the case here and we could see some technologies that are capable of quick and easy destruction. Whatever the case, the picture isn't the prettiest.
Perhaps there is a way to come to a conclusion through research and comparisons of hypersonic missiles with comets that fall to the ground. Maybe that is something we could look in to if we consider it important?

 

[Adobe]

To add to the conspiracy theory just a bit, I’ll add the David Dubyne is prognosticating for the first quarter of 2025 the earth will be out in front, and the sun and all the other planets will be behind the earth, while a debris field will be incoming and the earth will take the full brunt of the incoming space debris. And that April 15 will be the center of that time and it could look like day and night bombardment of the planet. Also discusses plasma blast will be seen in the skies above. So having some new “meteor like” and “plasma inducing” weapons could work as a cover story.

This forum is well acquainted with Davids work, so I wont post a video. But if someone wants one, just ask, or use the search feature to find his work.

 

[SOTTREADER]

To add to the conspiracy theory just a bit, I’ll add the David Dubyne is prognosticating for the first quarter of 2025 the earth will be out in front, and the sun and all the other planets will be behind the earth, while a debris field will be incoming and the earth will take the full brunt of the incoming space debris. And that April 15 will be the center of that time and it could look like day and night bombardment of the planet. Also discusses plasma blast will be seen in the skies above. So having some new “meteor like” and “plasma inducing” weapons could work as a cover story.

This forum is well acquainted with Davids work, so I wont post a video. But if someone wants one, just ask, or use the search feature to find his work.

Sounds fake to me. This David person is scare mongering for laughs. #shockvalue?

 

[Adobe]

Thanks for your opinion @SOTTREADER. I happen to disagree. I think David’s work has some merit.

FWIW:

(Adobe) And a more specific point would be if he's right about March, April, and May of 2025 being wide open to bolides, that would kind of concur with comets coming in April.

(L) So, how accurate?

A: He is often close, but there are still some surprises.

 

[SOTTREADER]

Thanks for your opinion @SOTTREADER. I happen to disagree. I think David’s work has some merit.

FWIW:

(Adobe) And a more specific point would be if he's right about March, April, and May of 2025 being wide open to bolides, that would kind of concur with comets coming in April.

(L) So, how accurate?

A: He is often close, but there are still some surprises.

Okie doke. I still stand by my intuition that it's scaremongering, utilisation of shock value and the extinction level events described in your post won't happen in the specified dates. Let's revisit this post April 16th + assuming civilization is still around .

 

[Adobe]

@SOTTREADER I couldn’t agree with you more about times and specific dates. I was just speculating with someone who was also speculating. And I do think some speculation helps sort things through. Personally, I don’t take the 15th of April as a significant date, it is just the center point of a movement of the earth. I don’t trust times and date. I think the C’s said some along the lines of never trust them. So, I speculate about timing but I don’t put much stock in it.

Thanks again for your responses, and looking forward to your message on the 16th of April


On more FWIW:

(Adobe) You know that our understanding of time is so-so at best, yet you answer "at times" from our point of reference and it of course rarely works to our understanding of time. So why do you answer us with our time references?

(L) I think that's fairly obvious. Because they're talking to us and they want to communicate. I mean...

(Adobe) Is there a lesson we are supposed to be getting from this? Or is it just noise/static?

(L) I don't understand your question.

(Joe) What do you mean?

(Adobe) Okay. On that question, they often answer, and I'm thinking specifically right now of... It was asked, "is the next real pandemic possibly gonna happen in two months?" The answer was no. "Is it going to happen within two years?" "Yes." And two years passed, so somebody brought it up, and there is regularly something like that, where the Cs will answer with a time reference that we understand (like "within two years") and then, it doesn't happen. So if they know our time reference, why would they even answer that? Why wouldn't they just allude from it and say, you know, wait and see? But they say, like that last time, "within two years", and it doesn't happen within two years. I'm kind of left with "wait for the other shoe to drop." Is there something we should be learning here?

(L) Well, I don't know which specific reference you're talking about. Do you, Niall?

(Niall) Yes. We asked about the likelihood of a plague, in the sense of the Black Death. And it was sometime in the mid-teens, they said "in 18 months to two years" or something like that. Well, there has not been a Black Death in that time period.

(L) Right. I don't know! Okay. What's the answer to that?

A: Reality is open and plans change.

(There is more to this answer, but that about sums it up. And there was another C’s comment about all time / date messages should be considered suspect.) Red Flag.