
March 12, 2025 (FEAT. MARIO NAWFAL)
FULL INTERVIEW SERGEY LAVROV ... (1:31:42)
GalaxyAi summary:FULL INTERVIEW BETWEEN SERGEY LAVROV, JUDGE NAPOLITANO AND LARRY JOHNSON
March 12, 2025 (FEAT. MARIO NAWFAL)
FULL INTERVIEW SERGEY LAVROV ... (1:31:42)
Sergey Lavrov Discusses U.S.-Russia Relations and NATO in Exclusive Interview
TLDR: In an extensive interview, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reflects on the changing dynamics of U.S.-Russia relations under President Trump, critiques NATO's expansion, and emphasizes the importance of mutual respect in international diplomacy. He discusses the historical context of NATO's promises, the implications of the Ukraine conflict, and the potential for future cooperation between Russia and the U.S.
In a recent interview with U.S. bloggers, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov shared his insights on the evolving relationship between the United States and Russia, particularly under the Trump administration. He addressed the perception of the U.S. culture, the implications of NATO's expansion, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
## The Changing Perception of the U.S.
Lavrov began by discussing the significant changes in the U.S. political landscape, noting a return to a more polarized environment reminiscent of earlier decades. He highlighted that the division between the two major political parties has deepened, moving beyond traditional issues like taxation and social policies to more contentious cultural debates. He attributed this shift to the rise of neoliberal ideas and the departure from traditional Christian values, which he believes has alienated many Americans, particularly in the Rust Belt.
He remarked that the election of Donald Trump was a surprise, even to Trump himself, and indicated that it represented a reaction against the prevailing cultural trends promoted by the Democratic Party. Lavrov emphasized that many Americans felt disconnected from the values being imposed by the political elite, leading to a significant support base for Trump.
## NATO and Its Historical Context
The discussion then shifted to NATO, where Lavrov expressed his views on the alliance's expansion and its implications for international security. He recounted the historical promises made to Mikhail Gorbachev regarding NATO's non-expansion eastward, which he believes have been violated. Lavrov criticized NATO for its continued expansion, which he argues has contributed to rising tensions between Russia and the West.
He referenced the NATO-Russia Founding Act, which aimed to establish a cooperative relationship based on mutual respect and equality. However, he noted that NATO's actions have often contradicted these principles, leading to a deterioration of trust.
## The Ukraine Conflict
Lavrov provided a detailed account of the Ukraine crisis, tracing its roots back to the 2014 coup and the subsequent actions taken by the Ukrainian government against Russian-speaking populations. He argued that the West's support for Ukraine has exacerbated the conflict, particularly through military aid and political backing.
He emphasized that the Minsk agreements, which were intended to bring peace to the region, have not been honored by Ukraine, leading to ongoing violence and instability. Lavrov criticized Western leaders for failing to engage in meaningful dialogue with all parties involved, particularly the self-proclaimed republics in Eastern Ukraine.
## Future of U.S.-Russia Relations
Looking ahead, Lavrov expressed cautious optimism about the potential for improved relations between the U.S. and Russia. He noted that both countries share a responsibility to avoid military confrontation and to seek common ground on issues of mutual interest. He highlighted the importance of dialogue and respect for each nation's sovereignty and interests.
Lavrov also addressed the notion of a multipolar world, suggesting that the future of international relations will involve multiple powers, including China and India, alongside the U.S. and Russia. He argued that this multipolarity could lead to a more balanced global order, provided that nations respect each other's sovereignty and engage in constructive dialogue.
## Conclusion
In conclusion, Sergey Lavrov's interview sheds light on the complexities of U.S.-Russia relations, the historical context of NATO's expansion, and the ongoing challenges posed by the Ukraine conflict. His insights underscore the need for mutual respect and understanding in international diplomacy, as well as the importance of addressing the root causes of conflicts to pave the way for lasting peace.
---
Generated by Galaxy.ai YouTube Summarizer
Footage report from war correspondent and director of Vesti Lugansk, Nikolai Dolgachev, shows the recent successes of the Russian Army in the Sudzhansky district of the Kursk region, which is currently being liberated. pic.twitter.com/0OBL2pmVfY
— Blackrussian (@Blackrussiantv) March 12, 2025
The whole world is about to realize that Ukraine was nothing more than a training exercise to give a new generation of soldiers combat experience. Russia could have ended this conflict in a day. 🇺🇲🙏🇷🇺
— Alexander Saint Michael (@Konni_Group) March 13, 2025
Yesterday, on March 11, 2025, while leaving the Kursk region, the commander of one of Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces units, Vitaliy Yankovsky, callsign “Sutiner,” was eliminated… March 12, 2025.
— MD (@distant_earth83) March 12, 2025
On March 12, 2025, while leaving the Kursk region, reconnaissance battalion… pic.twitter.com/dqvYjMamSJ
Thank you!FULL INTERVIEW BETWEEN SERGEY LAVROV, JUDGE NAPOLITANO AND LARRY JOHNSON
March 12, 2025 (FEAT. MARIO NAWFAL)
FULL INTERVIEW SERGEY LAVROV ... (1:31:42)
We are in favour of a ceasefire, but there are nuances.
Yesterday I was in the Kursk region. I listened to the report. The situation is completely under the control of the Russian Federation. The group that invaded is in complete isolation under full fire control. Control of the Ukrainian troops inside this zone has been lost.
Under these conditions, it would be good for the Ukrainian side to achieve a truce for 30 days. But there are nuances. What are we going to do with this section in the Kursk region? Will this mean that we have to let everyone out of the Kursk region? It is unclear.
Russia will negotiate an end to the war taking into account the situation on the ground - Putin
Putin:
Putin voiced a number of nuances on the subject of the truce:
1. Issues of ceasefire control.
2. The situation with the encircled AFU grouping in the Kursk region.
3. Ongoing mobilisation in Ukraine
In general, the Russian Federation wants the US (and how the US will impose it on Zelensky is up to them) to fulfil a number of its conditions. The conditions will apparently be communicated to Whitkoff today and if the Americans accept them, Putin and Trump will have phone conversations in the near future.
Russia wants mobilisation, training of soldiers and arms supplies in Ukraine to cease for the duration of the ceasefire.
PS. Regarding those AFU soldiers who remained in the Kursk region, a simple scenario was voiced - either captivity or death. No one will be released.
PPS.
In general, no one is going to give up demands to Ukraine to recognise the loss of 4 regions.
The meeting with Whitkoff will be tonight in closed mode. There he will be briefed on the Russian ‘nuances’. Now the ball is back on the American side. In the meantime, closed diplomacy continues. We need to improve the ‘situation on the ground’ for ourselves, for which there are many prerequisites
Today's meeting between Putin and Witkoff:
— Olga Bazova (@OlgaBazova) March 13, 2025
Witkoff: Good evening Mr. President.
Putin: Good evening Mr. Witkoff. Before we begin, let me tell you some things about the battle of the Pechenegs with the Khazar Kaganate. pic.twitter.com/DGd4unwl3G
Today's meeting between Putin and Witkoff:
Witkoff: Good evening Mr. President.
Putin: Good evening Mr. Witkoff. Before we begin, let me tell you some things about the battle of the Pechenegs with the Khazar Kaganate.
https://x.com/OlgaBazova/status/1900220051661197799/photo/1
![]()
Putin proves that he is a master tactician and diplomat.
The session on July 29, 2023 gave this update:Q: (L) "His feet were like those of a bear..." what do the feet represent?
A: Russia.
Q: (L) Why are the feet like those of a bear?
A: Hidden power center in that geographic location.
Q: (L) What nature this power center?
A: Same as USA. Feet are not so easily seen.
Q: (L) Does this mean that Russia and the US are secretly united?
A: Under same control.
(Ze Germans) What is the nature of the power center in Russia, which is symbolized by a bear as described previously?
A: Partly dismantled. Now in opposition to NWO.