Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

🎤 FULL INTERVIEW BETWEEN SERGEY LAVROV, JUDGE NAPOLITANO AND LARRY JOHNSON
March 12, 2025 (FEAT. MARIO NAWFAL)


FULL INTERVIEW SERGEY LAVROV ... (1:31:42)
GalaxyAi summary:

Sergey Lavrov Discusses U.S.-Russia Relations and NATO in Exclusive Interview

TLDR: In an extensive interview, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reflects on the changing dynamics of U.S.-Russia relations under President Trump, critiques NATO's expansion, and emphasizes the importance of mutual respect in international diplomacy. He discusses the historical context of NATO's promises, the implications of the Ukraine conflict, and the potential for future cooperation between Russia and the U.S.



In a recent interview with U.S. bloggers, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov shared his insights on the evolving relationship between the United States and Russia, particularly under the Trump administration. He addressed the perception of the U.S. culture, the implications of NATO's expansion, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

## The Changing Perception of the U.S.

Lavrov began by discussing the significant changes in the U.S. political landscape, noting a return to a more polarized environment reminiscent of earlier decades. He highlighted that the division between the two major political parties has deepened, moving beyond traditional issues like taxation and social policies to more contentious cultural debates. He attributed this shift to the rise of neoliberal ideas and the departure from traditional Christian values, which he believes has alienated many Americans, particularly in the Rust Belt.

He remarked that the election of Donald Trump was a surprise, even to Trump himself, and indicated that it represented a reaction against the prevailing cultural trends promoted by the Democratic Party. Lavrov emphasized that many Americans felt disconnected from the values being imposed by the political elite, leading to a significant support base for Trump.

## NATO and Its Historical Context

The discussion then shifted to NATO, where Lavrov expressed his views on the alliance's expansion and its implications for international security. He recounted the historical promises made to Mikhail Gorbachev regarding NATO's non-expansion eastward, which he believes have been violated. Lavrov criticized NATO for its continued expansion, which he argues has contributed to rising tensions between Russia and the West.

He referenced the NATO-Russia Founding Act, which aimed to establish a cooperative relationship based on mutual respect and equality. However, he noted that NATO's actions have often contradicted these principles, leading to a deterioration of trust.

## The Ukraine Conflict

Lavrov provided a detailed account of the Ukraine crisis, tracing its roots back to the 2014 coup and the subsequent actions taken by the Ukrainian government against Russian-speaking populations. He argued that the West's support for Ukraine has exacerbated the conflict, particularly through military aid and political backing.

He emphasized that the Minsk agreements, which were intended to bring peace to the region, have not been honored by Ukraine, leading to ongoing violence and instability. Lavrov criticized Western leaders for failing to engage in meaningful dialogue with all parties involved, particularly the self-proclaimed republics in Eastern Ukraine.

## Future of U.S.-Russia Relations

Looking ahead, Lavrov expressed cautious optimism about the potential for improved relations between the U.S. and Russia. He noted that both countries share a responsibility to avoid military confrontation and to seek common ground on issues of mutual interest. He highlighted the importance of dialogue and respect for each nation's sovereignty and interests.

Lavrov also addressed the notion of a multipolar world, suggesting that the future of international relations will involve multiple powers, including China and India, alongside the U.S. and Russia. He argued that this multipolarity could lead to a more balanced global order, provided that nations respect each other's sovereignty and engage in constructive dialogue.

## Conclusion

In conclusion, Sergey Lavrov's interview sheds light on the complexities of U.S.-Russia relations, the historical context of NATO's expansion, and the ongoing challenges posed by the Ukraine conflict. His insights underscore the need for mutual respect and understanding in international diplomacy, as well as the importance of addressing the root causes of conflicts to pave the way for lasting peace.

---
Generated by Galaxy.ai YouTube Summarizer
 
I would tend to see Putin's refusal as being kind of normal. It would be easy to pump it and make it appears as a scandal - just noise. And, after all, if Putin decides one thing, we may want to respect it as being "what he wants to do". The day he starts getting imperialistic and that he bombs & seizes whole countries, we could start to object his capacity for decision-taking.
 
The Russian Armed Forces continue their operation to wipe out Ukrainian troops in the Kursk Region; five settlements were liberated in the past 24 hours
KURSK REGION, March 12. /TASS/. Russian President Vladimir Putin has set the task to defeat the Ukrainian armed forces in the Kursk Region as soon as possible.

"Indeed, our goal for the near future is to defeat the enemy entrenched in the Kursk Region and involved in military operations here, and do that as soon as possible," the president said at a meeting held at a command post in the borderline region.

The Russian Armed Forces continue their operation to wipe out Ukrainian troops in the Kursk Region; five settlements were liberated in the past 24 hours. In particular, Russian forces took control of the central part of the town of Sudzha.

The borderline region came under a massive attack from Ukraine on August 6, 2024. A federal state of emergency is underway in the region and a counterterrorism operation is underway. According to the Russian Defense Ministry, Kiev has lost over 66,800 troops since fighting began in the Kursk area.

The Russian president initially planned to take part in an economic meeting in his Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow, but Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told TASS later that the meeting had been postponed due to changes in the president’s work schedule
KURSK REGION, March 13. /TASS/. The Russian army needs to defeat the Ukrainian army in the Kursk Region as soon as possible and establish a regional security zone, Russian President Vladimir Putin, the supreme commander-in-chief, said during a visit to a command post of Battlegroup Kursk, where he listened to a report by Army General Valery Gerasimov, chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces and first deputy defense minister.

The head of state asked commanders to convey his gratitude to all troops taking part in the Kursk operation and pointed to the terrorist nature of actions by the Ukrainian army and foreign mercenaries.

The Russian president has visited the Kursk Region for the first time since the Ukrainian incursion. Putin initially planned to take part in an economic meeting in his Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow, but Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told TASS later that the meeting had been postponed due to changes in the president’s work schedule. The Kremlin later released footage of Putin’s trip to the Kursk Region.

Goals and further operations

The Russian Armed Forces should defeat "the enemy entrenched in the Kursk Region and involved in military operations here," and do that as soon as possible.

The Kursk Region needs to be fully liberated and the situation along the border needs to be restored. "And, of course, we also need to think about creating a security zone along the state border in the future."

"I do expect that the combat tasks facing our forces will definitely be achieved and the Kursk Region will be fully liberated from the enemy in the near future."

Terrorists and mercenaries

"The people who are here in the Kursk Region, committing crimes against civilians and fighting against our armed forces, law enforcement agencies and security services, are terrorists in accordance with Russian laws."

"This is how the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office classifies their actions, and it is under the [Criminal Code] article on terrorism that the Russian Investigative Committee has launched a criminal investigation into them."

As for the Ukrainian militants captured in the Kursk Region, "based on Russian laws, we should treat these people first and foremost as terrorists."

"We should treat everyone humanely - everyone who falls into our hands. However, I would like to point out that foreign mercenaries aren’t covered by the 1949 Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners."

Supreme commander-in-chief’s gratitude

"I would like to mention the [units] that I’ve been hearing a lot about recently. They are the 76th Guards Airborne Assault Division, the 106th Guards Airborne Assault Division, the 11th Guards Separate Airborne Assault Brigade, the 83rd Guards Airborne Assault Brigade, the 56th Guards Airborne Assault Regiment of the Seventh Airborne Assault Division, the Pacific Fleet’s 155h Guards Separate Marine Brigade and the Black Sea Fleet’s 810th Marine Brigade."

The Supreme commander-in-chief also mentioned the 177th Separate Guards Marine Regiment of the Caspian Flotilla, the 22nd Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 72nd Motorized Rifle Division and the 1220th Motorized Rifle Regiment of the Third Motorized Rifle Division.

"The 34th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade did a special job in the past week," the president noted. "The Akhmat special forces unit and the Veterans volunteer unit have already been named as they have been particularly bold and effective. I would also like to thank the leadership of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff for their work."

Isolating Ukrainian forces

The Ukrainian group of forces in the Kursk Region has been surrounded and "is being steadily destroyed," Gerasimov reported to the supreme commander-in-chief.

"Battlegroup Kursk liberated 24 settlements and 259 square kilometers in the Kursk Region in the past five days alone."

About 19% of Ukraine’s troop losses have been recorded in the relatively small Kursk area, as well as over 40% of equipment losses, "if we count all the losses in six months."

"More than 1,100 square kilometers - that is, over 86% of the territory initially occupied by the enemy - have been liberated in offensive operations. The enemy has lost over 67,000 troops since fighting began in the Kursk area, including some of the most well-trained and motivated Ukrainian servicemen and foreign mercenaries."

As a result, the area occupied by the Ukrainian army has reduced more than 2.5-fold.

"The Russian Armed Forces continue their operation to wipe out Ukrainian troops in the Kursk Region, with the goal being to complete the liberation of the region and reach the Russian border as soon as possible."

Russian forces repelling Ukraine’s attack on the Kursk Region have crossed the state border into the Sumy Region in certain areas, "where they continue to destroy enemy reserves and expand the security zone."

Outstanding achievement

Over 600 Russian service members took part in an operation to creep through a gas pipeline into enemy defenses in the town of Sudzha, with the Akhmat and Veteran units, the 11th brigade and the 30th regiment particularly distinguishing themselves.

"These actions took the enemy by surprise and made them pull back their defenses, while contributing to our offensive in the Kursk Region."

"The actions of the 34th Motorized Rifle Brigade, the 22nd Motorized Rifle Regiment, the Ninth Motorized Rifle Regiment and other units made it possible to liberate Malaya Loknya and its neighboring settlements. The enemy suffered great losses, and small enemy groups started to retreat south, losing more troops from our artillery and drone attacks.".



 
Putin:
We are in favour of a ceasefire, but there are nuances.

Yesterday I was in the Kursk region. I listened to the report. The situation is completely under the control of the Russian Federation. The group that invaded is in complete isolation under full fire control. Control of the Ukrainian troops inside this zone has been lost.

Under these conditions, it would be good for the Ukrainian side to achieve a truce for 30 days. But there are nuances. What are we going to do with this section in the Kursk region? Will this mean that we have to let everyone out of the Kursk region? It is unclear.

Putin voiced a number of nuances on the subject of the truce:

1. Issues of ceasefire control.
2. The situation with the encircled AFU grouping in the Kursk region.
3. Ongoing mobilisation in Ukraine

In general, the Russian Federation wants the US (and how the US will impose it on Zelensky is up to them) to fulfil a number of its conditions. The conditions will apparently be communicated to Whitkoff today and if the Americans accept them, Putin and Trump will have phone conversations in the near future.

Russia wants mobilisation, training of soldiers and arms supplies in Ukraine to cease for the duration of the ceasefire.

PS. Regarding those AFU soldiers who remained in the Kursk region, a simple scenario was voiced - either captivity or death. No one will be released.

PPS.
Russia will negotiate an end to the war taking into account the situation on the ground - Putin

In general, no one is going to give up demands to Ukraine to recognise the loss of 4 regions.

The meeting with Whitkoff will be tonight in closed mode. There he will be briefed on the Russian ‘nuances’. Now the ball is back on the American side. In the meantime, closed diplomacy continues. We need to improve the ‘situation on the ground’ for ourselves, for which there are many prerequisites
 
Last edited:
Putin:


Putin voiced a number of nuances on the subject of the truce:

1. Issues of ceasefire control.
2. The situation with the encircled AFU grouping in the Kursk region.
3. Ongoing mobilisation in Ukraine

In general, the Russian Federation wants the US (and how the US will impose it on Zelensky is up to them) to fulfil a number of its conditions. The conditions will apparently be communicated to Whitkoff today and if the Americans accept them, Putin and Trump will have phone conversations in the near future.

Russia wants mobilisation, training of soldiers and arms supplies in Ukraine to cease for the duration of the ceasefire.

PS. Regarding those AFU soldiers who remained in the Kursk region, a simple scenario was voiced - either captivity or death. No one will be released.

PPS.


In general, no one is going to give up demands to Ukraine to recognise the loss of 4 regions.

The meeting with Whitkoff will be tonight in closed mode. There he will be briefed on the Russian ‘nuances’. Now the ball is back on the American side. In the meantime, closed diplomacy continues. We need to improve the ‘situation on the ground’ for ourselves, for which there are many prerequisites

Witkoff will undoubtedly come to an understanding of Russian history - that he never wanted.


Today's meeting between Putin and Witkoff:

Witkoff: Good evening Mr. President.

Putin: Good evening Mr. Witkoff. Before we begin, let me tell you some things about the battle of the Pechenegs with the Khazar Kaganate.
https://x.com/OlgaBazova/status/1900220051661197799/photo/1
1741889874259.png
 
Putin says that Russia is ready for long-term peace, while pointing to some loopholes in the US' 30-day ceasefire proposal.
Putin proves that he is a master tactician and diplomat.
He is very specific about the very minimum terms he demands to end the conflict.
Either they are satisfied or Ukraine will suffer the consequences along with the others involved.
Ukraine is at its wits end today facing a humiliating collapse.
America has to save face . After years it has lost another war.
Ukraine's much needed respite is for it to receive more deadlier weapons for Russia has neutralised all the "wonder" weapons that it received already. Bellicose advisers wishfully hope.
Some believe Putin can be tricked. He cannot. His military strategies are nothing short of brilliant.
The proof is in the pudding and this ends as it started .
On Russia"s terms.
 
A couple of thoughts on the recent UKN/US/RUSS negotiations:

The US is trying to present itself as the "mediator" between Ukraine and Russia, but its not. Its the instigator and main belligerent force against Russia, with plenty of its own interests involved. So, a little disingenuous positioning there.

"Being a mediator means acting as a neutral, impartial third party to help people involved in a conflict or dispute reach a mutually acceptable resolution through negotiation and communication."

Rubio and Waltz look like they had been duped, and sent out on a misadventure a) on a mission to obtain an instrument that everybody and their Dutch uncle knows would be rejected as stated "forever" by the Russians. And b) the US starts bombing Moscow heavily as they were flying over to SA. It looked foolish to me. Are they out of the loop? Or, was this a strategy to get Russia's rejection to the "ball in their court" and to blame the continuance of the war on Russia? Trump appears to be on the back foot a looking weak.

My first impression on Putin's response was disappointment, but then it stops Russia from being blamed for the failure. "Sure, we like it, now lets just put a few more clauses in it". a) If the clauses are rejected, the ball is back in the US court. Or, b) Putin said: "Russia will negotiate an end to the war taking into account the situation on the ground - Putin" Could that mean stalling with negotiations long enough to finish the war?

On a more esoteric thought, maybe we're all being played?

Q: (L) "His feet were like those of a bear..." what do the feet represent?

A: Russia.

Q: (L) Why are the feet like those of a bear?

A: Hidden power center in that geographic location.

Q: (L) What nature this power center?

A: Same as USA. Feet are not so easily seen.

Q: (L) Does this mean that Russia and the US are secretly united?

A: Under same control.
 
Q: (L) "His feet were like those of a bear..." what do the feet represent?

A: Russia.

Q: (L) Why are the feet like those of a bear?

A: Hidden power center in that geographic location.

Q: (L) What nature this power center?

A: Same as USA. Feet are not so easily seen.

Q: (L) Does this mean that Russia and the US are secretly united?

A: Under same control.
The session on July 29, 2023 gave this update:

(Ze Germans) What is the nature of the power center in Russia, which is symbolized by a bear as described previously?

A: Partly dismantled. Now in opposition to NWO.
 
Thanks @axj I remember that quote also, and my take on it and adding to it time and situations change, is: There is still a one world government "representation or contingency" in every country, and there influence lessens and strengthen as the situations change. So, it's still there but how much control it has ebbs and flows.
 
Back
Top Bottom