Ina
The Living Force
I thought it was "Trust the process." At least that's what I hear from my kids when I try to do baking and I must follow recipes.
Q source / Qanon
- Thread starter Rhythmik
- Start date
Sixpack
The Force is Strong With This One
No, "Trust the Plan" appeared in no fewer than 34 "Q" posts, the first of which was #668.
BTW, if you haven't yet read "The Book of Q Proofs", you'll find it here:
It covers the undeniable connection between "Q" and Trump, and "future proves past" predictions made by the "Team of 9" (actually, the Q team consists of "less than 10 people" of whom "only 3 are non-military" as stated in post #60).
BTW, if you haven't yet read "The Book of Q Proofs", you'll find it here:
It covers the undeniable connection between "Q" and Trump, and "future proves past" predictions made by the "Team of 9" (actually, the Q team consists of "less than 10 people" of whom "only 3 are non-military" as stated in post #60).
Thanks, @Sixpack. At least you are giving us some detailed aspects of this strange "Q" development. Even if it is just a Psyop, we need to take perhaps a closer look. I think it may give us more insight into how Trump thinks and possibly there is some truth in there. I am looking at the link you provided,
I was prompted to remember Q recently and thought it a reasonable theory that more than ever, as a psyop, it was meant, with its partial doses of truth, to speed up polarization (primarily in the USA) as the country and others now exhibit unthought-of degrees of civil conflict.
The thought arose with the referral (by Tulsi Gabbard) of Obama and others to the DOJ for prosecution over Russiagate, because just about all she claims was known by the "far right" practically as it was happening due to certain reporters (John Soloman, et al) who were apparently right (and with whom Q agreed) but whose reporting didn't much break through to the mainstream amid the NY Times and Washington Post winning Pulitzer prizes for their Russiagate stories and the MSM hailing Robert Mueller as a godsend.
The thought arose with the referral (by Tulsi Gabbard) of Obama and others to the DOJ for prosecution over Russiagate, because just about all she claims was known by the "far right" practically as it was happening due to certain reporters (John Soloman, et al) who were apparently right (and with whom Q agreed) but whose reporting didn't much break through to the mainstream amid the NY Times and Washington Post winning Pulitzer prizes for their Russiagate stories and the MSM hailing Robert Mueller as a godsend.
The Media Hasn't 'Reckoned With' Its Russiagate Failures: Ex- NY Times Reporter
Former New York Times reporter does a deep dive on what a pundit described as the media's 'scandalously bad' Russiagate reporting.
robertjonathan.com
rognaill
Jedi
Not sure I follow. If the output of the Q board was to give clues to future events that were anticipated (but not guaranteed) [future is open] which from my perspective reduced the overall anxiety of alot of folks in the USA which in turn, reduced polarization.
Absent the Q messages, those that did start doing their own research of data points within the 'drops' would have potentially more angst and prone to actions that would be polarizing. So in a sense, the 'drops' quelled polarization as I have witnessed these past few years.
And again, I am interested to understand the "civil conflict" portion of your statement. The examples I have seen both in person and via alternative sources of media are well organized and most importantly, well funded, coordinated theatrics that serve the 'coordinators' interests by their 'wishful thinking' that they will create civil conflict/unrest.
Perhaps I am not searching wide enough for information but examples of "unthought-of" civil conflicts in the USA might be insightful.
As the majority of the "unthought-of degrees" of anything close to organic conflict, stem from those illegally in the USA. So not really American's but those that came here illegally.
And now they have to leave......
To further clarify:
(1) I wrote "the country and others" because it is a phenomenon of much of the developed West.
(2) I wrote "conflict." Even a controversy about why men are winning Woman of the Year awards was unthought-of conflict until recently. See it in that context and you can think of a hundred more examples. As for degrees, I'm not aware that so many Americans have ever called publicly for the death of their president. Political polarization has gone so far that many people now, noticeably, identify more with a political party/ideology than with their own country. That's extreme. Consider how many are outraged by revelations of fraud, waste, abuse and how many minimize or even deny that it's happening. Taxation, trade, sovereignty, censorship, election fraud, lawfare, Net Zero, CBDCs, health policy, social welfare systems, economic decline, housing costs and shortages, sexism, racism, religionism, transgenderism, transhumanism and other topics are heated battlegrounds. I've personally never seen so many so desperate (or so awake) that they invoke "revolution" (as in civil war) as a near-term step to address problems.
(3) << stem from those illegally in the USA >> Why exclude them? That's what so much of what this is about, and driving it to the extreme of physical conflict - even more so in western Europe. Natives vs. immigrants is civil conflict in itself, and is actually natives vs. their own governments, because immigration is orchestrated by governments. And the fact that every citizenry is split regarding support for immigration extends the complexity of the civil conflict.
You can judge how much is hyperbole or clickbait and how much is serious discussion, but there's no shortage of discussion of the new severity of Western domestic conflicts and even physical unrest to the point of potential civil wars. The following examples, what I could see in about 20 minutes, surely represent far less than 1% of what's out there on social media that is new in just the past few weeks. How much of this, in your view, is organized and funded? Some, perhaps - and what is, still represents internal conflict.
July 22 - "Beto O’Rourke says we’re headed to a civil war"
July 17 - Immigration Invasion Will Spark UK Civil War - GB News Adam Brooks On What Needs to Change
July 21 - Are We Headed for Civil War?
July 21 - Violence Is In The Air - Will It Explode Into Civil War?
July 7 - California WILL SECEDE, Sparking CIVIL WAR Says USCB Professor
July 17 - Media Blasted for lying about Spain riots following violent...
June 24 - 4 Star U.S Army General: Is America Headed To CIVIL WAR?
July 17 - France: "We are rapidly heading for a disastrous civil war in Europe"
July 21 - "Protests erupt, revolution is in the air"
June 22 - Sweden’s Chaos Explained
June 23 - Chaos in Amsterdam: Islamophobia, Riots & Anti-Immigrant Violence EXPOSED
July 9 - "Civil or religious war in UK seems inevitable"
July 22 - "They are clearly prepping the UK for civil war"
July 21 - "the only answer I see at the moment to get us possibly out of the mess we are in is a revolution"
July 12 - Islam Will Bring Civil War to Europe
June 25 - 'Slide Into Chaos': Is Great Britain About to Explode in Civil War?
July 22 - "The most dangerous societal structure for civil conflict is one with a formerly dominant majority ... losing its status"
June 20 - "Many experts say that civil war is imminent"
July 22 - Ireland: "A civil war is perhaps inevitable"
July 19 - The Battle of Epping
July 21 - The Epping Rebellion
July 22 - UK Civil Unrest – Is Britain On The Brink?
July 9 - Is civil war coming to Britain?
July 21 - Civil war-like conditions in Germany
June 22 - Anti-immigrant violence erupts in Northern Ireland for second night
June 24 - Is This the Beginning of a Civil War?
July 21 - "It started in Epping, now it’s spread to Norfolk. The revolution has begun."
July 2 - Britain must prepare for civil war
July 15 - Spain Riots LIVE News: Anti-Migrant Violence In Torre Pacheco, Spain | UK, North Ireland, Europe
July 14 - Northern Ireland Riots – 10 Days of Anti Immigrant Violence
July 8 - Why There’s Unrest in Northern Ireland
July 18 - "Civil wars all over Europe are just a few steps away"
July 1 - Northern Ireland Is Heading To More Violence
July 14 - "The conditions for civil war are locked in"
July 16 - "The British government is actively trying to start a civil war"
Session 12 November 2016
Session 10 February 2018
Session 17 July 2021
Session 8 April 2023
Last edited:
Trending content
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
-
