Q source / Qanon

[lindrie]

The "Fight Club" comms is what I've been calling it

Welcome to Fight Club. The first rule of Fight Club, you don't talk about fight club. The second rule of Fight Club: You Don't Talk About Fight Club. Third rule is something like you pay to play (actual movie was something like first time, you fight). In terms of a modern "player" example, what happened to Biden's first wife?

These are not Q post/messages decode. I think that ship has sailed. In my opinion, this is a framework of which some of the information was sent and still being sent by many groups:

I hope this give enough context for what I'm going for as I'm planning to use this area to keep tracks of any interesting news/trends as election season ramps up. If it turns out there's nothing really here, it will still be fitting since its in "COINTELPRO" section while keeping the noise down in other threads.

Since its going to be a lot of website forwarding, I'm going to limit it to anything that I can actually try and read (like the wolf post prior) as example as I run across them. Or if there's odd ball articles within the forum that catches my eye.

Mainly so I can avoid doing thing like this:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/09/politics/rfk-jr-parastic-worm-brain/index.html

This a comms piece but I have no idea what its saying since I have no context or frame of reference. So I didnt see the point of adding it here. RFK Jr has been sending a LOT of comms.. none of which I can read.

 

[axj]

I've started watching Dark Journalist recently as a more casual way to learn about the UFO and Esoteric connection. The more I watched, the more it looked like he was tracking the same phenomena as the Q post but under a different banner or scope. He used a term that I think is more fitting for the trend that I've seen, he called Steganography. I was going to start looking through his older videos to see if the "X" marker and Steganography term was the same kind of plain-speak as the Q stuff was alluding to.

I think stegonography should have its own thread, as there is definitely something to it. Maybe the moderators can move your messages regarding it to the new thread too, starting with the quoted post from March.

Stegonography has little to do with Q, it has been in use for a long time. And it is confusing for people to have a discussion about it in the Q thread.

 

[lindrie]

Stegonography has little to do with Q, it has been in use for a long time. And it is confusing for people to have a discussion about it in the Q thread.

While I understand the point you're making, I think I'm still missing on the delivery of a crux component. Because I agree with your statement. Mainly because I'm not sure what I'm trying to outline here would fall into the steganography category. The impression I'm getting is its like a notch down, more fluid and informal, down and dirty kind of framework. Heck, its used for updates on hit jobs...

The whole point of the Q post was a kind of soft disclosure of this communication framework with examples in real time, without violating the internal rules of engagement. At least that's how I see it, and why I placed it here.

If I find that its actually is some kind of sub-category of steganography, I can branch it into its own thread.

 

[axj]

These are not Q post/messages decode. I think that ship has sailed.

You said yourself that your messages have basically nothing to do with Q. Discussing stegonography or something similar in this thread creates unnecessary confusion. You can simply start a new thread and maybe ask the admins to move your messages from here to there.

 

[lindrie]

Was this meant to be strictly a Q post/message decode thread? I thought it was a general discussion on Q source / Qanon which could involve some/lots "decoding" ie trying to unravel the actual message behind the words used? I did read through this entire thread before I made my segments of post and I did not see it as a strictly "decode the Q post" kind thread. I understand why people would want to do so and it seems to be the defacto mentality associated with it.

This puts me in a weird dilemma. To me, saying something to the affect of not discuss background info on Flynn in this thread because its not a Q decode. If you replace "Flynn" with "fight club comms" (my name for it), hopefully that gives some perspective? As far as I'm aware, "fight club" comms wont make much sense without the Q post... there's not really a way to break it out cleanly. Kind of the whole point of hiding messages in plain sight...

Its easy to point to something that has an existing known name, but when something doesnt, then what? The only thing I can think of is to give examples...

I'll refrain from posting anything related to the fight club comms in the meantime, since it seems there's some kind of disconnect.

 

[axj]

I did read through this entire thread before I made my segments of post and I did not see it as a strictly "decode the Q post" kind thread.

I don't understand how you could have read this whole thread and still think that it is about "decoding Q messages". This thread focused on who might be behind Q, how truthful the Q information is and what they might want to achieve with the Q psyop.

Overall, the consensus has been that Q is not a particularly good source or an outright disinformation psyop.

What is more important, again, is that what you are wrting about has basically nothing to do with Q. Is it really so difficult to just start a new thread?

 

[rognaill]

the consensus has been

I personally have not reached a conclusion other than it is indeed a psyop. But that is a very general term these days and even some of the things my kids try to pull would fit that same definition.

I did factor in heavily how the C's said it, "insider" but they did not (AFAIK) specify or attribute any "good" or "bad", which they rarely do as I do not feel that we down here swimming in molasses are qualified sometimes to understand what is "good" or "bad". We are too subjective, all the time, about everything.

I do agree to kick the Stenography topic to another thread as it is like a couple of other threads, creating additional noise while trying to tune into the signal.

 

[FM258]

I've followed the Qanon phenom a long time on the Kitco MB...there were believers and non believers, all people who I felt were intelligent, so I was staying out of it and just observing from a distance.

Ill say that I found myself rooting for Q to be a white hat...but as time went on and there was no good news happening, the phrase was always its a movie...and NCSWIC and trust the plan and wwg1wga.... yet it never delivered. Great catch phrases really drew in some smart folks. Its so frustrating what is happening in this country, to save your own sanity, you need to limit your exposure to it all.

 

[lindrie]

OK, I spun up a new thread "fight club" communications. Not sure how to tag the mod, but could one of them move those related post and other after over to the new thread? Thanks!

 

[FM258]

Was this meant to be strictly a Q post/message decode thread? I thought it was a general discussion on Q source / Qanon which could involve some/lots "decoding" ie trying to unravel the actual message behind the words used? I did read through this entire thread before I made my segments of post and I did not see it as a strictly "decode the Q post" kind thread. I understand why people would want to do so and it seems to be the defacto mentality associated with it.

This puts me in a weird dilemma. To me, saying something to the affect of not discuss background info on Flynn in this thread because its not a Q decode. If you replace "Flynn" with "fight club comms" (my name for it), hopefully that gives some perspective? As far as I'm aware, "fight club" comms wont make much sense without the Q post... there's not really a way to break it out cleanly. Kind of the whole point of hiding messages in plain sight...

Its easy to point to something that has an existing known name, but when something doesnt, then what? The only thing I can think of is to give examples...

I'll refrain from posting anything related to the fight club comms in the meantime, since it seems there's some kind of disconnect.

Its interesting to me, but no longer give it any weight...wont be one who ridicules people who believe or want to believe...who knows, this movie might have a surprise ending.

 

[Joe]

This a comms piece but I have no idea what its saying since I have no context or frame of reference. So I didnt see the point of adding it here. RFK Jr has been sending a LOT of comms.. none of which I can read

He's not sending any "comms" IMO. He's simply relating events from his life.