Ina
The Living Force
I thought it was "Trust the process." At least that's what I hear from my kids when I try to do baking and I must follow recipes.
Q source / Qanon
- Thread starter Rhythmik
- Start date
Sixpack
The Force is Strong With This One
No, "Trust the Plan" appeared in no fewer than 34 "Q" posts, the first of which was #668.
BTW, if you haven't yet read "The Book of Q Proofs", you'll find it here:
It covers the undeniable connection between "Q" and Trump, and "future proves past" predictions made by the "Team of 9" (actually, the Q team consists of "less than 10 people" of whom "only 3 are non-military" as stated in post #60).
BTW, if you haven't yet read "The Book of Q Proofs", you'll find it here:
It covers the undeniable connection between "Q" and Trump, and "future proves past" predictions made by the "Team of 9" (actually, the Q team consists of "less than 10 people" of whom "only 3 are non-military" as stated in post #60).
Thanks, @Sixpack. At least you are giving us some detailed aspects of this strange "Q" development. Even if it is just a Psyop, we need to take perhaps a closer look. I think it may give us more insight into how Trump thinks and possibly there is some truth in there. I am looking at the link you provided,
I was prompted to remember Q recently and thought it a reasonable theory that more than ever, as a psyop, it was meant, with its partial doses of truth, to speed up polarization (primarily in the USA) as the country and others now exhibit unthought-of degrees of civil conflict.
The thought arose with the referral (by Tulsi Gabbard) of Obama and others to the DOJ for prosecution over Russiagate, because just about all she claims was known by the "far right" practically as it was happening due to certain reporters (John Soloman, et al) who were apparently right (and with whom Q agreed) but whose reporting didn't much break through to the mainstream amid the NY Times and Washington Post winning Pulitzer prizes for their Russiagate stories and the MSM hailing Robert Mueller as a godsend.
The thought arose with the referral (by Tulsi Gabbard) of Obama and others to the DOJ for prosecution over Russiagate, because just about all she claims was known by the "far right" practically as it was happening due to certain reporters (John Soloman, et al) who were apparently right (and with whom Q agreed) but whose reporting didn't much break through to the mainstream amid the NY Times and Washington Post winning Pulitzer prizes for their Russiagate stories and the MSM hailing Robert Mueller as a godsend.
The Media Hasn't 'Reckoned With' Its Russiagate Failures: Ex- NY Times Reporter
Former New York Times reporter does a deep dive on what a pundit described as the media's 'scandalously bad' Russiagate reporting.
robertjonathan.com
rognaill
Jedi
Not sure I follow. If the output of the Q board was to give clues to future events that were anticipated (but not guaranteed) [future is open] which from my perspective reduced the overall anxiety of alot of folks in the USA which in turn, reduced polarization.
Absent the Q messages, those that did start doing their own research of data points within the 'drops' would have potentially more angst and prone to actions that would be polarizing. So in a sense, the 'drops' quelled polarization as I have witnessed these past few years.
And again, I am interested to understand the "civil conflict" portion of your statement. The examples I have seen both in person and via alternative sources of media are well organized and most importantly, well funded, coordinated theatrics that serve the 'coordinators' interests by their 'wishful thinking' that they will create civil conflict/unrest.
Perhaps I am not searching wide enough for information but examples of "unthought-of" civil conflicts in the USA might be insightful.
As the majority of the "unthought-of degrees" of anything close to organic conflict, stem from those illegally in the USA. So not really American's but those that came here illegally.
And now they have to leave......
To further clarify:
(1) I wrote "the country and others" because it is a phenomenon of much of the developed West.
(2) I wrote "conflict." Even a controversy about why men are winning Woman of the Year awards was unthought-of conflict until recently. See it in that context and you can think of a hundred more examples. As for degrees, I'm not aware that so many Americans have ever called publicly for the death of their president. Political polarization has gone so far that many people now, noticeably, identify more with a political party/ideology than with their own country. That's extreme. Consider how many are outraged by revelations of fraud, waste, abuse and how many minimize or even deny that it's happening. Taxation, trade, sovereignty, censorship, election fraud, lawfare, Net Zero, CBDCs, health policy, social welfare systems, economic decline, housing costs and shortages, sexism, racism, religionism, transgenderism, transhumanism and other topics are heated battlegrounds. I've personally never seen so many so desperate (or so awake) that they invoke "revolution" (as in civil war) as a near-term step to address problems.
(3) << stem from those illegally in the USA >> Why exclude them? That's what so much of what this is about, and driving it to the extreme of physical conflict - even more so in western Europe. Natives vs. immigrants is civil conflict in itself, and is actually natives vs. their own governments, because immigration is orchestrated by governments. And the fact that every citizenry is split regarding support for immigration extends the complexity of the civil conflict.
You can judge how much is hyperbole or clickbait and how much is serious discussion, but there's no shortage of discussion of the new severity of Western domestic conflicts and even physical unrest to the point of potential civil wars. The following examples, what I could see in about 20 minutes, surely represent far less than 1% of what's out there on social media that is new in just the past few weeks. How much of this, in your view, is organized and funded? Some, perhaps - and what is, still represents internal conflict.
July 22 - "Beto O’Rourke says we’re headed to a civil war"
July 17 - Immigration Invasion Will Spark UK Civil War - GB News Adam Brooks On What Needs to Change
July 21 - Are We Headed for Civil War?
July 21 - Violence Is In The Air - Will It Explode Into Civil War?
July 7 - California WILL SECEDE, Sparking CIVIL WAR Says USCB Professor
July 17 - Media Blasted for lying about Spain riots following violent...
June 24 - 4 Star U.S Army General: Is America Headed To CIVIL WAR?
July 17 - France: "We are rapidly heading for a disastrous civil war in Europe"
July 21 - "Protests erupt, revolution is in the air"
June 22 - Sweden’s Chaos Explained
June 23 - Chaos in Amsterdam: Islamophobia, Riots & Anti-Immigrant Violence EXPOSED
July 9 - "Civil or religious war in UK seems inevitable"
July 22 - "They are clearly prepping the UK for civil war"
July 21 - "the only answer I see at the moment to get us possibly out of the mess we are in is a revolution"
July 12 - Islam Will Bring Civil War to Europe
June 25 - 'Slide Into Chaos': Is Great Britain About to Explode in Civil War?
July 22 - "The most dangerous societal structure for civil conflict is one with a formerly dominant majority ... losing its status"
June 20 - "Many experts say that civil war is imminent"
July 22 - Ireland: "A civil war is perhaps inevitable"
July 19 - The Battle of Epping
July 21 - The Epping Rebellion
July 22 - UK Civil Unrest – Is Britain On The Brink?
July 9 - Is civil war coming to Britain?
July 21 - Civil war-like conditions in Germany
June 22 - Anti-immigrant violence erupts in Northern Ireland for second night
June 24 - Is This the Beginning of a Civil War?
July 21 - "It started in Epping, now it’s spread to Norfolk. The revolution has begun."
July 2 - Britain must prepare for civil war
July 15 - Spain Riots LIVE News: Anti-Migrant Violence In Torre Pacheco, Spain | UK, North Ireland, Europe
July 14 - Northern Ireland Riots – 10 Days of Anti Immigrant Violence
July 8 - Why There’s Unrest in Northern Ireland
July 18 - "Civil wars all over Europe are just a few steps away"
July 1 - Northern Ireland Is Heading To More Violence
July 14 - "The conditions for civil war are locked in"
July 16 - "The British government is actively trying to start a civil war"
Session 12 November 2016
Session 10 February 2018
Session 17 July 2021
Session 8 April 2023
Last edited:
Sixpack
The Force is Strong With This One
Q is talked about on many alternative news sights to various degrees. It continues to come up, running through the alternative, patriot movement. It looks like the idea it was created to make people passive and trust the plan is correct in a certain group and that is being critized by other patriots, get active they say! I've been neutral on the subject not being a follower or believer but I did/do follow certain Q people because they where/are deep researchers. They where very active during the pizzagate exposure and Epstein island raids that fits right in with whats happening now. The pedophile issue was always prominent in the Q drops.
I've noticed something new for me just lately. Q people are pointing out some Truth Social posts Trump has made recently. They look at the time stamps for the post then look at that number in the Q drops. To my surprise, for the first time for me, they are a clear connection with what POTUS said.
Then he's been posting all these pictures of himself with the Q letter which could be read as a message to Q people to "activate". With so much focus on the need for the "Epstein files" to come out lately and the Russiagate reveal, I find myself looking into the past when the Podesta laptop contents where exposed which the Q people where all over.
For the very first time the phrase "future proves past" came to mind (a common comment in the Q drops).. LOL! A quick, mental thought was Trump is in the Q op. It's definitely been a psychological operation. The claim from the Q people is its the plan to save the country from the bad guys but then there's so much distrust of the US government right now others would say Trump himself is a part of the deep state.
I'll just remain neutral and see how it goes. I'm always a "wait and see" person.
I've noticed something new for me just lately. Q people are pointing out some Truth Social posts Trump has made recently. They look at the time stamps for the post then look at that number in the Q drops. To my surprise, for the first time for me, they are a clear connection with what POTUS said.
Then he's been posting all these pictures of himself with the Q letter which could be read as a message to Q people to "activate". With so much focus on the need for the "Epstein files" to come out lately and the Russiagate reveal, I find myself looking into the past when the Podesta laptop contents where exposed which the Q people where all over.
For the very first time the phrase "future proves past" came to mind (a common comment in the Q drops).. LOL! A quick, mental thought was Trump is in the Q op. It's definitely been a psychological operation. The claim from the Q people is its the plan to save the country from the bad guys but then there's so much distrust of the US government right now others would say Trump himself is a part of the deep state.
I'll just remain neutral and see how it goes. I'm always a "wait and see" person.
Yep, maybe some more interesting things there.
Last edited:
I want to clarify this. Commentators on the patriot sites will use critical thinking skills to question what the Trump admin is up to which isn't always of a positive nature. Certain Q people become triggered by this and go on the attack. In other words the critical questions do not fit in the plan where everything is controlled for a certain outcome. This is what is critized by others and is seen as very passive.
rognaill
Jedi
Thanks PopHistorian, your post did help with understanding your viewpoint. Much appreciated!
The list of articles you posted do have a theme/narrative that is certainly 'yelling fire in the theatre' yet personally I feel that the ship sailed on full blown "civil war". The info war is however still very much active.
One thing that is so interesting to me, is that the drops have shown many of the 'injects' into the narrative of the daily news cycle had a masterclass level of orchestration, it should be noted the liberal/socialists are also playing by a script. Ironically their injects that are put into play/revealed are known (ex. Newsom and Pritzker harboring the TX (D) Reps and the identical rhetoric/scripts about Trump single-handedly changing the voting maps) and even repeats of past antics/tactics/playbooks.
The patriot injects are less known in advance but to your point, many clues have been given in the past drops. Which you see how they post contemporary social media posts at certain time, video certain lengths, etc as a way to show the anon community the plan is still on track.
Which I think about the Q board drops stating: no civil unrest, no civil war, clean and swift.
And I wanted to share an observation I have had had many times over the past few years. How different are folks that pull on every thread from the Q board, than those of us that have done the same with the C sessions. The similarities are quite interesting, even in how concepts like 'past proves future' or to put another way, some of the earliest C sessions speak to us and have greater significance today than they did when first published.
Same for the Q board, 2018-2019 drops had relevance when they were first posted, but if you re-read them today, they seem to have even more gravity to them. But maybe my impression of this is because I like most, are very much in the linear time density.
Last thought that again has been an observation over the past few years watching all this unfold, is those of us that were very active with this QFG group back when 911 happened, we were no different than the 'anon's of today in the patriot movement. We are no less patriotic today than we were back during the 911 days, big difference between then and now, is back then we had no hope in the sense that the uni-party seemed impenetrable whereas today, the MAGA/America First is showing us some "hope" that some level of justice can be obtained and Liberty is paramount.
Trending content
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
-
-
