RationalWiki is neither rational nor accurate! Buncha Loonies!

[Il Matto]

Wow, what a deplorable load of bull****.
It strikes me as very sad that such articles may encourage 'traffic' towards this forum, but as you say Natus Vedere, it is an excellent example of how far some will go in an attempt to distract, dissuade and discredit.

 

[Pierre]

It strikes me as very sad that such articles may encourage 'traffic' towards this forum,

As the quotation goes "I don't care what the newspapers say about me as long as they spell my name right". Some wikirational readers might get to know us via this media and end up enjoying our forum. Who knows?

 

[Antony]

Hmm, a lot of clear tooth/nose picking.
Everyone, imo, can be subjected to this either for objective/subjective reasons.
I also still have some discrepancies or better say different point/angle of view on one topic. But i perfectly understand the reasons why it could be that way.
I was able to check so to say the validity of Laura’s and group’s astonishing Work on myself. My life changed 180. All this knowledge, hints, confirmations from Cs and applying it- led me to that point of life, where i can crystal clear state-it Works. And huge thanks again for the Group’s effort

 

[Laura]

Such monstrosities hardly go unnoticed!
There is a thread RationalWiki is neither rational nor accurate! Buncha Loonies! started by Laura in December 2015.

RationalWiki is a prime example of how far some people are willing to go to deny the truth.

Yes. Maybe this thread ought to be merged with the RationalWiki thread just to bring it back to the top?

 

[Alana]

Yes. Maybe this thread ought to be merged with the RationalWiki thread just to bring it back to the top?

Done.

 

[skymargo]

Yes. Maybe this thread ought to be merged with the RationalWiki thread just to bring it back to the top?

“I have heard so much slander against you that I have no doubt: you are a wonderful person!” Oscar Wilde

 

[PabloAngello]

@Natus Videre Sorry, didnt know about such thread ;)