Revisiting The Horrors Of The Holocaust

anart said:
Judas Saduj said:
I understand your point. But it sounds too much like an opinion, though.

I'm curious as to what aspect of what has been explained sounds like 'an opinion'?

Hi anart,
The whole of Laura's post sounds like an opinion to me - although I agree with her - because it is not rooted in primary evidence but on what the Protocols say. I know they're right, but they cannot be used to demonstrate what they claim. The Protocols gives us the big picture but not the historical evidence.

anart said:
judas said:
Reading the Protocols or Reed helped me to understand the big picture, it really helped a lot, but I can't quote it to demonstrate any point. The Protocols are just not serious enough, it offers no documented evidence, which is what I'm looking for.

The fact that past and current history maps perfectly to the Protocols is not evidence enough for you? I find it difficult to understand how anyone who has actually studied this material and observed current reality could say such a thing.
People will not listen to you if you offer the Protocols as evidence. I try to avoid relying on them to prove my point, even though I basically agree with them.

anart said:
judas said:
Reed is not a primary source, and we always must go right to the primary sources.

Why is Reed not a 'primary source'?
Reed is a secondary source, filled with his personal insights. Which is valuable but still remains secondary source. Primary source would be documented historical evidence. This is very hard to find because of the control of the press that we all know about.

anart said:
judas said:
It would be even better if, just like you did with 9/11, you could show solid evidence.

The evidence is all around you - yet you appear to be asking for it to be handed to you on a platter - one does not learn from platters.
I was thinking about something like 911 the ultimate truth. It's not a platter, but still it gives pretty solid evidence that can convince someone.

anart said:
judas said:
I would like to do that on my own, but still, I'm not knowledgeable enough about the whole issue of the Holocaust.

You say you are not knowledgeable enough, yet you relegate the information you have been given to the realm of 'opinion'? Then, how can you be knowledgeable enough to make such a determination?
I said it sounded like an opinion. I did not determine it to such a realm. You know that.

anart said:
judas said:
I thought you should look at Faurisson's "evidence" and see with your own eyes why people tend to get convinced by revisionist theories, and identify the biggest mistakes in their investigations. thanks

It's quite clear that since you are the one who appears to be convinced by Faurisson that you are the best candidate to spend the time and energy to carry out such an exercise. Read - observe and learn.
There are most certainly better candidates than me, even right here on this forum I would guess... but thanks for your insights anyway.

:)
 
Asking for "hard evidence" about the Holocaust this way or that way is like asking for hard evidence of Bush/MOSSAD complicity in 9-11. Or hard evidence in the JFK assassination. Since the perpetrators had control over the crime scene as the "initial investigators," you can be sure that the evidence was destroyed and many stories spun to create chaos and confusion. That's the way it's done.

These are matters where you must use a combination of the Sherlock Holmes method, the Miss Marple method, and the gray cells of Hercule Poirot. And, in all such situations, the best evidence is the testimony taken closest to the time of the event, before the media and mind control machines have had time to go into action, analyzed forensically.

So, like I said, read Haffner, read Arendt - she was actually in a concentration camp - read the Nuremberg testimonies, etc... and forget about Johnny-come-latelys who wake up one day and decide to prove something that they have interpreted a certain way that may have nothing whatsoever to do with what actually happened, getting legalistic and nit-picky and anal retentive.

That legalistic thinking that characterizes people like Faurisson is a symptom of pathology. You can find endless examples of it in the defenders of the Mainstream Conspiracy Theories about both 9-11 and the JFK assassination, the RFK assassination, etc. It's called "straining at gnats and swallowing camels," or "tetraphyloctomy."

Now, if you'll excuse me, there are many other issues that, to me, are far more pressing.
 
I am open to read Arendt and others, but the Nuremberg Trial testimonies, you really believe that ?

Even JFK didn't believe that (Final Judgment, Piper 1994). I'm sorry but IMO, it's worth the same as Guantanamo or Abu Graib "confessions".

Regarding the sources/links I posted above, I am a bit disappointed to see that you refuse to examine them. I will look at Arendt... but I wonder why do you refuse to look at Faurisson's videos and article and other revisionist sources ?
 
Laura said:
There are a number of problems with the approach of the "Holocaust Revisionists," among them being their lack of knowledge of Ponerology.

I don't have the time right now to address all of your arguments, but could you please elaborate on that one?

Please note that many (not all, but some) Holocaust Revisionists are convinced that the Jews, the Americans and the Russians were actually the bad guys during WW2, whereas they see Hitler as the good guy who was forced to defend his country against the forces of "evil". They see his antisemitism and his warfare as defensive rather than offensive. Have you also studied this perspective, of did you stick with the mainstream viewpoint of Hitler as the pinnacle of evil? I'm just wondering....
 
Judas Saduj said:
Regarding the sources/links I posted above, I am a bit disappointed to see that you refuse to examine them. I will look at Arendt... but I wonder why do you refuse to look at Faurisson's videos and article and other revisionist sources ?

I looked at a big pile of that stuff long ago. What's more, I had some correspondence with some revisionists in the U.S., did some research on Willis Carto and his coterie as well as Mark Weber and his take on things - enough to get a handle on the pathology that is running the Holocaust Revisionism/Holocaust Denial show.

That, put together with my own memories - which I am aware are meaningless to anyone else - and the added insight of the Cs, including unpublished material, convinces me that the whole deal is just a manifestation of a "third rank journal" operation as described in Protocol 12. That means that Holocaust Revisionism and Holocaust Denial - despite the fact that there may be sincere people involved who really think they are seeking the truth - is just another tar baby.

For your edification, you can read it here: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=1481.msg7588#msg7588

As for this:
Judas Saduj said:
Even JFK didn't believe that (Final Judgment, Piper 1994).

Please quote the exact excerpt and Piper's source. And keep in mind that JFK was a great guy, but he wasn't as smart as he should have been or he wouldn't have gotten killed the way he did. He didn't know about Ponerology, pathology in high places, in the way that would have made him effective. Neither did RFK and/or others. So, his opinion about the testimony of the Nuremberg trials is really kind of useless. Same with Piper. If he understood pathology as he should, he wouldn't be involved with the IHR crowd.
 
Laura said:
I looked at a big pile of that stuff long ago. What's more, I had some correspondence with some revisionists in the U.S., did some research on Willis Carto and his coterie as well as Mark Weber and his take on things - enough to get a handle on the pathology that is running the Holocaust Revisionism/Holocaust Denial show.

You've been focussing on the wrong people. Check out Harry Elmer Barnes, James J. Martin and David L. Hoggan. Check out Rassinier and Faurisson. Check out David Cole and JG Burg. Check out Jürgen Graf and Carlo Mattogno. Check out the publications of the VHO.

Both Carto and Weber have a fairly poor reputation in Holocaust Revisionist circles. They are hardly stereotypical for all Holocaust Revisionists.

Laura said:
That, put together with my own memories - which I am aware are meaningless to anyone else - and the added insight of the Cs, including unpublished material, convinces me that the whole deal is just a manifestation of a "third rank journal" operation as described in Protocol 12. That means that Holocaust Revisionism and Holocaust Denial - despite the fact that there may be sincere people involved who really think they are seeking the truth - is just another tar baby.

Like I said, you've been focussing on the wrong sources. Holocaust Revisionism is far from another tar baby. Otherwise, there wouldn't be about 10 different countries to make it illegal and there would have been actual debate on the topic, like there is eg. the debate among evolutionary biologists and the Creationist lot. The debate is silenced by means of laws, threats and and fear of social suicide.
 
OOTB said:
Like I said, you've been focussing on the wrong sources. Holocaust Revisionism is far from another tar baby. Otherwise, there wouldn't be about 10 different countries to make it illegal and there would have been actual debate on the topic, like there is eg. the debate among evolutionary biologists and the Creationist lot. The debate is silenced by means of laws, threats and and fear of social suicide.

All of which is designed to focus attention on an ethnicity - even on Zionism (which is nasty enough) - and OFF of pathologicals.

Wake up, people! I really can't believe you are that slow and lack the deeper perception about the real struggle here - that between psychopaths and normal people, between those with soul potential and Organic Portals.

As Boris Mouravieff explains in his three volumes of Gnosis, the next war will be fought between Pre-Adamic and Adamic humanity.

It is only on the esoteric plane that any of this can be understood and that is what the Revisionists and other historians fail to comprehend.

Read this thread in its entirety, please, and keep in mind, it barely covers the topic.
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=1868.0
 
Laura said:
OOTB said:
Like I said, you've been focussing on the wrong sources. Holocaust Revisionism is far from another tar baby. Otherwise, there wouldn't be about 10 different countries to make it illegal and there would have been actual debate on the topic, like there is eg. the debate among evolutionary biologists and the Creationist lot. The debate is silenced by means of laws, threats and and fear of social suicide.

All of which is designed to focus attention on an ethnicity - even on Zionism (which is nasty enough) - and OFF of pathologicals.

The Holocaust myth was orriginally designed to discredit national-socialism as a useful ideology and to mark anti-semitism as evil. Ever since the '60s, it has been used mostly to justify the crimes of zionism and to uphold the image of Jews as eternal victims.

Holocaust revisionists are merely the ones who expose these practices and the lies on which they are built.

Laura said:
Wake up, people! I really can't believe you are that slow and lack the deeper perception about the real struggle here - that between psychopaths and normal people, between those with soul potential and Organic Portals.

The real question is : who are the psychopaths and who are the normal people?

Laura said:
It is only on the esoteric plane that any of this can be understood and that is what the Revisionists and other historians fail to comprehend.

One doesn't need esoterics to find the objective historical truth. Also, a wrong understanding of the spiritual (esoterics just means "hidden knowledge") can be just as dangerous as completely ignoring it... if not more dangerous ! ! !
 
Out of the Box said:
The real question is : who are the psychopaths and who are the normal people?

Assuming you're sincere and this question is not just rhetorical noise, you might want to check this board :
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?board=10.0

as well as read Political Ponerology (Andrew Lobaczewski) and The Sociopath next door (Martha Stout) for starters.
 
Prayers for rain said:
Assuming you're sincere and this question is not just rhetorical noise, you might want to check this board :
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?board=10.0

as well as read Political Ponerology (Andrew Lobaczewski) and The Sociopath next door (Martha Stout) for starters.

The problem with psychology, sociology and "ponerology" is the very subjective nature of these fields. Not only do they allow a lot of room for interpretation and bias, they also depend heavily on credible information. Hence, I think it is quite absurd to make psychological profiles of anyone without having known them personally.

Psychologists and psychiatrists usually do a lot of testing and/or inquiries before they make their diagnosis.... and even they are often wrong because of their own biases.
 
OOB - please get up to speed on this information before generating more noise on this forum attempting to discuss it. In short, you know not of what you speak. That is curable, however, with research. Please read, in their entirety, the threads you have been directed to and Ponerology before creating more noise.

Out of the Box said:
The problem with psychology, sociology and "ponerology" is the very subjective nature of these fields. Not only do they allow a lot of room for interpretation and bias, they also depend heavily on credible information. Hence, I think it is quite absurd to make psychological profiles of anyone without having known them personally.

Psychologists and psychiatrists usually do a lot of testing and/or inquiries before they make their diagnosis.... and even they are often wrong because of their own biases.
 
OOTB said:
The Holocaust myth was orriginally designed to discredit national-socialism as a useful ideology and to mark anti-semitism as evil. Ever since the '60s, it has been used mostly to justify the crimes of zionism and to uphold the image of Jews as eternal victims.

I find it fascinating that you refer to an event in which over 65 million people died and over 1/3 of the planet was left in ruins as a "myth." Your pathology is showing.

I also find it fascinating that you don't seem to have enough neurons firing to figure out that national socialism was was just a cover for a psychopathic agenda - a practice run for the same operation that is being run on humanity at large at the present time. National Socialism was a cheap ideology used to garner support and, the instant the Nazis were in power, was dumped in the rubbish bin for the real agenda - psychopathic totalitarianism.

Finally, you have revealed yourself fully by suggesting that anti-Semitism is not evil. Sorry, but you have just lost your ranking as a potential human being. What you don't know about anti-Semitism would fill a library.

And I guess you think Hitler was a good guy?

Yeah, right. :rolleyes:

Have a look at an excerpt from a contemporary report, one that was classified for a long time, compiled from friends, former friends, companions, witnesses, long before the Holocaust Industry came into being:

From The Secret Wartime Report: The Mind of Adolf Hitler By Walter C. Langer

When we try to formulate a conception of Adolf Hitler as the German people know him we must not forget that their knowledge of him is limited by a controlled press. Many thousands of Germans have seen him in person, particularly in the past, and can use this experience as a basis for their individual conception of him.

Hitler, from a physical point of view, is not, however, a very imposing figure—certainly not the Platonic idea of a great, fighting Leader or the Deliverer of Germany and the creator of a New Reich. In height he is a little below the average. His hips are wide and his shoulders relatively narrow. His muscles are flabby; his legs short, thin and spindly, the latter being hidden in the past by heavy boots and more recently by long trousers. He has a large torso and is hollow-chested to the point where it is said that he has his uniforms padded. From a physical point of view he could not pass the requirements to his own elite guard.

His dress, in the early days, was no more attractive. He frequently wore the Bavarian mountain costume of leather shorts with white shirt suspenders. These were not always too clean, and with his mouth full of brown, rotten teeth and his long dirty fingernails he presented rather a grotesque picture. At that time he also had a pointed beard, and his dark brown hair was parted in the middle and pasted down flat against his head with oil. Nor was his gait that of a soldier. It was a very lady-like walk. Dainty little steps. Every few steps he cocked his right shoulder nervously, his left leg snapping up as he did so. He also had a tic in his face that caused the corner of his lips to curl upward. When speaking he always dressed in a common-looking blue suit that robbed him of all distinctiveness. At the trial following the unsuccessful Beer Hall Putsch Edgar Mowrer, who saw him for the first time, asked himself:

Was this provincial dandy, with his slick dark hair, his cutaway coat, his awkward gestures and glib tongue, the terrible rebel? He seemed for all the world like a traveling salesman for a clothing firm.

Nor did he make a much better impression later on. Dorothy Thompson, upon her first meeting, described him in the following terms:

He is formless, almost faceless, a man whose countenance is a caricature, a man whose framework seems cartilaginous, without bones. He is inconsequent and voluble, ill poised and insecure. He is the very prototype of the little man.

Smith also found him the apotheosis of the little man, funny looking, self-conscious, and unsure of himself.

It may be supposed that this is only the judgment of American journalists who have a different standard of masculine beauty. However, while testifying as a witness in the law court in 1923, Professor Max von Gruber of the University of Munich, the most eminent eugenist in Germany, stated:

It was the first time I had seen Hitler close at hand. Face and head of inferior type, cross-breed; low receding forehead, ugly nose, broad cheekbones, little eyes, dark hair. Expression not of a man exercising authority in perfect self-command, but of raving excitement. At the end an expression of satisfied egotism.

More from XMag

On a spring afternoon in 1930, Hitler wore his favorite uniform when Geli Raubal came for a visit: black trousers and a khaki military lounge jacket without insignia. Geli dished him up his favorite meal, a porridge soup made of flour, butter and caraway seeds seasoned lightly with salt and vinegar. When finished with his soup, Hitler gazed longingly at Geli, a pretty blonde 17-year-old, his half-niece. (Geli’s mother was Hitler’s half-sister.)

Hitler, who had been involved with Geli for about a year, moved next to her, put his arm around her and asked her to do something. “Oh, Uncle Alfy, I don’t know, that’s so disgusting.”

But Hitler always got his way. Geli complied. Hitler took off his uniform and stretched out naked on the floor. Geli squatted over him, pissed on his chest and then took a dump on the face of the Fuehrer.

Millions would have loved to do the same.

Did this happen? Historical evidence suggests Geli and some other frauleins treated Hitler to golden showers, and maybe a brown out or two.

This story of Hitler’s “perversion,” without the specific details, first emerged during World War II. Otto Strasser, an early confidant of Hitler, fled to Canada after Hitler had Strasser’s brother, Gregor, murdered. Both brothers belonged to a radical faction of the Nazi Party which emphasized the socialism in the Nationalist Socialist program. As Hitler gained power, many of the radicals were liquidated.

On May 13, 1943, Strasser was interviewed in Canada by officials of the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA. Geli, he said, had told him what she had done to Uncle Alfy. “Hitler made her undress,” said Strasser. “He would lie down on the floor. Then she would have to squat over his face where he could examine her at close range and this made him very excited. When the excitement reached its peak, he demanded that she urinate on him and that gave him real sexual pleasure."

This item in the OSS report, written by Dr. Walter Langer and other American psychoanalysts, was not made public until 1971, and subsequently published as a book, The Mind of Adolf Hitler. It caused quite a stir at the time among historians who, for the most part, had reached a consensus that Hitler was celibate. Though Geli’s story was well known among historians, they tended to discount Strasser as an unreliable source, due to a tendency to exaggerate on all matters of Hitleriana .

One of Hitler’s guards, Wilhelm Stocker, interviewed in 1973 by Glenn Infield for his book, Eva and Adolf, said "Geli admitted to me that at times Hitler made her commit some acts in the privacy of her room that sickened her but when I asked her why she didn’t refuse to do them she just shrugged and said that she didn’t want to lose him to some woman who would do what he wanted.”

Geli did not live to tell her story. In September, 1931 she was found dead in her bedroom with a bullet through her heart. Hitler’s Walther 6.35 pistol was in her hand. Her death was ruled a suicide, but much mystery still surrounds the case.

Father Bernhard Stempfle, who befriended Hitler and helped edit Mein Kampf for publication, claimed Hitler wrote Geli an explicit letter in 1929 mentioning his favorite form of amusement.

Geli never got the letter. It fell into the hands of Hitler’s landlady’s son who in turn sold it to a man named J.F.M. Rense, a collector of political memorabilia and a friend of Father Stempfle’s. Rense bought the letter for Stempfle, but before turning it over to the good priest, he indulged in a bit of blackmail. He contacted Hitler and demanded a “donation” for his good work: accumulating Nazi artifacts for a future museum, sans the letter, which was returned to Hitler by Father Stempfle.

Stempfle’s story is credible on two counts: 1) he was Hitler’s friend, and 2) Hitler, knowing the priest had the goods on him, probably had him killed. In June, 1934, the Night of the Long Knives, a good many people who were in a position to embarrass Hitler were murdered, including the priest, who was found in the forest with three bullets in his heart.

Stempfle’s account is in The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler by Robert Waite, who unearthed evidence of Hitler’s S/M tendencies. Hitler enjoyed playing a game with his valet, who would tie his tie and tighten it while counting to 10.

In the early 1930’s, shortly before coming to power, Hitler turned his attentions toward another teenage girl. Henny Hoffman was a beautiful, 15-year-old blonde, and the daughter of a photographer. Hitler paid a visit to her house and when he left, asked the pig-tailed girl in a flannel nightgown for a good night kiss. When she refused, he beat his hand with his whip. She continued to see him but talked a little too freely with her parents about her new friend, though exactly what she said is not known. Her father confronted Hitler. He left satisfied, securing a job as Hitler’s personal photographer.

Rich women were among Hitler’s earliest sympathizers. He spent a great deal of time charming them in their salons where they served him tea and walnut cake and gave him money for the Nazi crusade. Victoria von Dirksen, the step-mother of the German ambassador in Moscow and the widow of a wealthy industrialist, gave a good chunk of her fortune to the cause. Winifred Wagner, the widow of Richard Wagner’s son, was thought to be a possible candidate for Mrs. Hitler. Although they never married, she had many wealthy friends whom she convinced to give money to the Nazis. Hitler loved Wagner’s music, but there is no indication that the composer’s daughter-in-law showered the dumpy dictator with anything other than opera.

Other well know women in Hitler’s circle included Leni Riefenstahl, the former actress turned cinema photographer who directed and filmed Triumph of the Will, the infamous 1934 propaganda film; Unity Mitford, an exuberant English blonde studying art in Germany, and Viorica Ursuleac, the dramatic soprano of the Berlin opera.

John Toland, who wrote a two-volume biography on Hitler, says "It was not sex that Hitler sought from such charming women but the stimulation that his suppressed bohemian nature craved.” Toland is among those historians who claim Otto Strasser’s story about Geli Raubal’s golden shower is nothing more than sensational hearsay “given credence only by those who wanted to believe the worst of Hitler.”

But the following tale corroborates Geli’s story. On one occasion, after Hitler became the first superstar in 1933, he invited the actress Renate Mueller to spend the night at the Chancellery. Her director, A. Zeissler, knew something was troubling her when she returned the following day. She told Zeissler that Hitler started off the evening by treating her to all the details involved in the Gestapo techniques of torturing their victims. After this erotic warm-up, both took off their clothes. Mueller assumed they were about to -flick-, but instead, “Hitler fell on the floor and begged her to kick him,” said Zeissler. “She demurred, but he pleaded with her and condemned himself as unworthy, heaped all kinds of accusations on his own head, and just groveled in an agonizing manner. The scene became intolerable to her, and she finally acceded to his wishes and kicked him. This excited him greatly, and he begged for more and more, always saying it was even better than he deserved and that he was not worthy to be in the same room with her.”

The actress did not speak of a golden shower, but clearly Hitler’s need to grovel under a boot indicates a darker desire than merely the stimulation of his bohemian nature. In The Mind of Adolf Hitler Langer builds a strong case for sexual displacement; that is, Hitler got his sexual kicks not through his dick, but with his eyes, his mouth and a babe’s butt.

The famous hypnotic Hitler glare was a substitute for sex. Many of his associates told of Hitler’s craving for strip shows. He could never find enough peelers to satisfy him, and frequently invited them to the Brown House in Munich for private shows. He had an excellent porno collection made for him by the friendly photographer Hoffmann; and had “blue movies” made for his private viewings. His own artist’s hand was fond of drawing dirty pictures.

In addition to Geli squatting over him so he could examine the hidden mysteries of a pure Aryan woman, Langer notes a telling incident from Captain Ernst Roehm, the head of the Brown-shirted SA. At a social gathering Roehm jokingly told a friend in Hitler’s presence that the Fuehrer liked watching girls working in the fields. “When they stand in the fields and bend down at their work so that you can see their behinds, that’s what he likes, especially when they’ve big round ones,” Roehm snickered.

Hearing this, Hitler stiffened and glared at Roehm with compressed lips. Later, Roehm got into all sorts of political hot water with his boss, but held high the swastika until the end. When shot as a traitor under orders from Hitler in 1934 during the Night of the Long Knives, Roehm blurted out his last words, “My Fuehrer! My Fuehrer!”

Stories circulated for years about Hitler’s balls, or the lack of one. A report on February 29, 1936 by Janet Flanner, the Paris-based correspondent for The New Yorker, noted “There is a rumor that Hitler was wounded genitally in the war.”

Hitler was wounded twice and almost blinded by mustard gas in the trenches of the Somme, but his wounds were not of the Sun Also Rises nature. That aside, Flanner, a shrewd observer of politicians, went on to say. "His real abnormality apparently consists of the insignificance of his sexual impulse, probably further deadened by willful asceticism. Emotionally, Hitler belongs to the dangerous, small class of sublimators from which fanatics are frequently drawn.”

Neither Flanner in 1936 or Langer in his OSS report compiled during the war knew for a fact that Hitler was a one-nutter. This was only discovered in May, 1945, when Russian doctors performed an autopsy and found that he was sexually malformed. One-nutters are by no means pathological sex freaks. However, when combined with other infantile disorders, this condition can be a problem.

In The Mind of Adolf Hitler Robert Waite notes that in his reading of psychological studies of disturbed youngsters “I had to keep reminding myself that the studies were concerned with American boys and not with young Adolf Hitler.” He exhibited all their symptoms: hyperactivity, learning difficulties, chronic indecision and the tendency to lie, exaggerate and fantasize.

Though normal sexual intercourse repelled him, a powerful unconscious stream of sexual fantasy came out not only in a perverse way with women but in his tedious tract, Mein Kampf. This book, which runs to a half-million words, is a hodgepodge of Jewish racial nonsense, Marxism, the monarchy, the “stab in the back” theory for Germany losing World War.I, the decline of theater, dadaist art and his fear of syphilis and prostitution–all of this superimposed on Schopenhauer’s philosophical take on the power of blind will overcoming any obstacles at hand.

Hitler said he became an anti-Semite as a young man when he discovered the Jew was the “cold-hearted, shameless and calculating director” of prostitution, though that may not have stopped him from enjoying the pleasures of a hooker. Hitler’s photographer, Heinrich Hoffman, claimed der Fuhrer picked up a prostitute during his early political campaigning in Munich and subjected her to his usual degradations. Knowing he was a rabid anti-semite, she told him she was Jewish and teased him about having intimate relations with a Jew. A week later he returned with several Nazi thugs who gang-banged her while Hitler watched. He then slapped her across the face and left. In addition, rumors were rife when Hitler was in power that he had contracted syphilis from another hooker after World War I. But historians tend to discount both Hoffman’s story and the V. D. rumor.

His long-running affair with Eva Braun was hardly normal, but if there was any coprophilia going on, she didn’t talk about it. Eva, who didn’t give a hoot about politics (but did get turned on by being the number one lady in the Third Reich) concentrated on trying to put him in a good mood. Like Geli Raubal, she met Hitler at age 17, and at one point tried to commit suicide.


In short, the portrait of a very, very, sick individual...

Says a lot about anyone who considers him, his life, his "work" to have been anything other than the product of pathology.

:ban:
 
Things Hitler said:

“Neither threats nor warnings will prevent me from going my way. I follow the path assigned to me by Providence with the instinctive sureness of a sleepwalker. My destination is the peace rooted in the equal rights of the nations.”(Munich, 14 March 1936) Domarus, (38)

“If twelve or fifteen thousand of these Jews who were corrupting the nation had been forced to submit to poison-gas, just as hundreds of thousands of our best German workers from every social stratum and from every trade and calling had to face it in the field, then the millions of sacrifices made at the front would not have been in vain.” Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, pp.373-374 (39)

“The idea of struggle is as old as life itself, for life is only preserved because other living things perish through struggle. In this struggle, the stronger, the more able, win, while the less able, the weak, lose. Struggle is the father of all things. It is not by the principles of humanity that man lives or is able to preserve himself above the animal world, but solely by means of the most brutal struggle.” Fest, p.27 (Speech at Kulmbach on 5 February 1928, quoted in Hitler, A Study in Tyranny)

“The chief function (of propaganda) is to convince the masses, whose slowness of understanding needs to be given time in order that they may absorb information; and only constant repetition will finally succeed in imprinting an idea on their mind ... The success of any advertisement, whether of a business or a political nature, depends upon the consistency and perseverance with which it is employed.” Fest, p.39 (Kubizek)

“I am ready to swear six false oaths every day.”
Fest, p.52 (Rauschning)

“My time in prison was my university at the expense of the state.”
Fest, p.53 (Frank. See also Kershaw, p.240)

“If I had any inkling in 1924 that I should become Reich chancellor I would never have written Mein Kampf.”
Fest, p.54 (Frank)

Marxism ... denies individual worth ... and replaces (it) by numerical mass.”
Fest, p.55 (Mein Kampf)

“The media fabricates more than two thirds of public opinion from which the foam of the parliamentary Aphrodite rises.” Fest, p.56 (Fest gives no source)

“I lead the movement alone, and no one shall set me conditions so long as I personally bear the responsibility.”
Fest, p.59 (Quoted by Heiden)

“When I resume active work it will be necessary to pursue a new policy. Instead of working to achieve power by an armed coup we shall have to hold our noses and enter the Reichstag against the catholic and Marxist deputies. If outvoting them takes longer than outshooting them, at least the results will be guaranteed by their own constitution! Any lawful process is slow. But sooner or later we shall have a majority – and after that Germany.” (While in Landsberg prison.) Fest, p.60 (Lüdecke)

“The masses are like an animal that obeys instincts.”(40) Fest, p.64 (Mein Kampf)

“The masses of our people, whose sheepish docility corresponds to their want of intelligence.”
Mein Kampf, p.335

“These tactics are based on an accurate estimation of human frailties and must lead to success, with almost mathematical certainty.” (An attitude typical of the psychopath(41)) Mein Kampf, p.34

“Only the fanaticised masses can be guided.” Fest, p.65 (Fest gives no source)

“Once in power I will never let power be taken from me.” Fest, p.68 (Fest gives no source)

“The NASDAP Party must not serve the masses, but rather dominate them.” Mein Kampf, p.260

“What luck for the rulers that men do not think.” Fest, p.70 (Fest gives no source)

“This is the miracle of our age, that you have found me, that you have found me among so many millions! And that I have found you, that is Germany’s good fortune!” Fest, p.70 (Fest gives no source)

“Human solidarity is imposed upon men by force and can be maintained only by the same means.”
Fest, p.71 (Picker, entry for 11 April, 1942)

“No country was ever ruined by its debts.” Fest, p.76 (Picker, entry for 4 May, 1942)

To his lawyer: “Let us test the power of the law against my bayonet.” Fest, p.79 (Fest gives no source)

“There can therefore be but one slogan: Victory! If we win, the billions we have spent will weigh nothing in the scales.” Fest, p.82 (Picker, entry for 12 April, 1942)

“Morality is stupidity or decadence.”

“Everlasting peace will come to the world when the last man has slain the last but one.”
Frank

“I shall give a propagandist reason for starting the war, whether it is plausible or not. The victor will not be asked afterwards whether he told the truth or not. When starting and waging war it is not right that matters, but victory.”

“Close your hearts to pity. Act brutally. Eighty million people must obtain what is their right. Their existence must be made secure. The strongest man is right.” Record of the address to the commanders of the Wehrmacht on 22 August 1939, the so-called second speech
Nuremberg trial proceedings, XXVI, 1014–PS

“I am Europe’s greatest actor.” Fest, p.84 (Lutz Graf Schwerin von Krosigk, Es geschah in Deustchland.)

On watching the silent crowds during a military parade in Berlin during the Sudeten crisis, 1938:
“I can’t wage war with this nation yet.” Fest, p.86 (Remark recorded by Walter Hewel, in Kordt, Erich, Nicht aus den Akten. Die Wilheimstrasse in Frieden und Kreig. Erlebnisse, Begegngen und Eindrücke 1928 – 1945, Stuttgart, 1950)

“Cities will become heaps of ruins; noble monuments will disappear forever. This time our sacred soil will not be spared. But I am not afraid of this.”(Pre war) Fest, p.87 (Rauschning )

“The Führer is the supreme judge of the nation….there is no position in the area of constitutional law in the third reich independent of this elemental will of the Führer.” J. Noakes and G Pridham (editors), volume 2: State, Economy and Society 1933 – 1939, a documentary reader

“National socialism derives from each of two camps the pure idea that characterises it: National resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.” (January, 1934) Schoenbaum, p.57

“We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.” Toland (Speech of May 1, 1927), 1976, p. 306 Adolf Hitler : The Definitive Biography

A good short discussion of Hitler:
The psychology and development of Adolph Hitler Schicklgruber
 
More from Walter Langer's Secret Wartime Report on Hitler:

Hitler As His Associates Know Him

Part II

He is unable to maintain any kind of a working schedule. His hours are most irregular and he may go to bed any time between midnight and seven o'clock in the morning and get up anywhere from nine o'clock in the morning and two in the afternoon. In later years the hours tended to get later and it was unusual, just before the war, for him to go to bed before daybreak. The night, however, was not spent in working as his propaganda agents allege, but in viewing one or two feature movies, endless newsreels, listening to music, entertaining film stars or just sitting around chatting with his staff.

He seemed to have a violent dislike for going to bed or being alone. Frequently, he would ring for his adjutants in the middle of the night after his guests had gone home and demand that they sit up and talk to him. It was not that he had anything to say and often the adjutants would fall asleep listening to him talk about nothing of importance. As long as one of them remained awake, however, he would not be offended. There was an unwritten law among his immediate staff never to ask a question at these early morning sessions because to do so might get Hitler off on another subject and force them to remain for another hour.

Hitler sleeps very badly and has been in the habit for some years of taking a sleeping powder every night before retiring. It is possible that he demands someone to be with him in the hope that the powder will take effect and he will be overcome with sleep. His behavior, however, is not in keeping with this hypothesis for he carries on a monologue and frequently gets very much stirred up about the topic.

This is hardly conducive to sleep and we must suppose that there is some other reason for his late hours. Even after he has dismissed his adjutant and goes to bed he usually takes an armful of illustrated periodicals with him. These are usually magazines with pictures concerning naval and military matters and American magazines are usually included. Shirer (280) reports that he has been informed that since the war broke out Hitler has been keeping better hours and regularly has his first breakfast at seven A.M. and his second breakfast at nine A.M. This may have been so during the early days of the war but it is very doubtful that Hitler could keep up this schedule for any length of time.

Rauschning (275) claims that Hitler has a bed compulsion which demands that the bed be made in a particular way with the quilt folded according to a proscribed pattern and that a man must make the bed, before he can go to sleep. We have no other information on this subject but from his general psychological structure such a compulsion would be possible.

His working day before the war was equally disorderly. Rauschning reports, "he does not know how to work steadily. Indeed, he is incapable of working." He dislikes desk work and seldom glances at the piles of reports which are placed on his desk daily. No matter how important these may be or how much his adjutants may urge him to attend to the particular matter, he refuses to take them seriously unless it happens to be a project which interests him. On the whole, few reports interest him unless they deal with military or naval affairs or political matters. He seldom sits in a cabinet meeting because they bore him. On several occasions when sufficient pressure was brought to bear he did attend but got up abruptly during the session and left without apology. Later it was discovered that he had gone to his private theater and had the operator show some film that he particularly liked. On the whole, he prefers to discuss cabinet matters with each member in person and then communicate his decision to the group as a whole.

He has a passion for the latest news and for photographs of himself. If Hoffmann, the official Party photographer, happens to appear or someone happens to enter his office with a newspaper he will interrupt the most inportant meeting in order to scan through them Very frequently he becomes so absorbed in the news or in his own photographs that he completely forgets the topic under discussion. Ludecke (165) writes:

"Even on ordinary days in those times, it was almost impossible to keep Hitler concentrated on one point. His quick mind would run away with the talk, or his attention would be distracted by the sudden discovery of the newspaper and he would stop to read it avidly, or he would interrupt your carefully prepared report with a long speech as though you were an audience...."

And Hanfstaengl reports that "his staff is usually in despair on account of his procrastination.... He never takes their protests in this respect very seriously and usually brushes them aside by saying, 'Problems are not solved by getting fidgety. If the time is ripe, the matter will be settled one way or another.'" (899)

Although Hitler tries to present himself as a very decisive individual who never hesitates when he is confronted by a difficult situation, he is usually far from it. It is at just these times that his procrastionation becomes most marked. At such times it is almost impossible to get him to take action on anything. He stays very much by himself and is frequently almost inaccessible to his immediate staff. He often becomes depressed, is in bad humor, talks little, and prefers to read a book, look at movies or play with architectural models. According to the Dutch report (656) his hesitation to act is not due to divergent views among his advisors. At such times, he seldom pays very much attention to them and prefers not to discuss the matter.

"What is known as the mastery of material was quite unimportant to him. He quickly became impatient if the details of a problem were brought to him. He was greatly adverse to experts and had little regard for their opinion. He looked upon them as mere hacks, as brush-cleaners and color grinders...." (269)

On some occasions he has been known to leave Berlin without a word and go to Berchtesgaden where he spends his time walking in the country entirely by himself. Rauschning, who has met him on such occasions, says:

"He recognizes nobody then. HE wants to be alone. There are times when he flees from human society." (275)

Roehm (176) frequently said, "Usually he solves suddenly, at the very last minute, a situation that has become intolerable and dangerous only because he vacillates and procrastinates."

It is during these periods of inactivity that Hitler is waiting for his "inner voice" to guide him. He does not think the problem through in a normal way but waits until the solution is presented to him. To Rauschning he said:

"Unless I have the incorruptible conviction: THIS IS THE SOLUTION, I do nothing. Not even if the whole party tried to drive me to action. I will not act; I will wait, no matter what happens. But if the voice speaks, then I know the time has come to act." (268)

These periods of indecision may last from a few days to several weeks. If he is induced to talk about the problem-solving this time he becomes ill-natured and bad-tempered. However, when the solution has been given to him he has a great desire to express himself. He then calls in his adjutants and they must sit and listen to him until he is finished no matter what time it happens to be. On these occasions he does not want them to question him or even to understand him. It seems that he just wants to talk.

After this recital to his adjutants Hitler calls in his advisers and informs them of his decision. When he has finished they are free to express their opinions. If Hitler thinks that one of these opinions is worthwhile he will listen for a long time but usually these opinions have little influence on his decision when this stage has been reached. Only if someone succeeds in introducing new factors is there any possibility of getting him to change his mind. If someone voices the opinion that the proposed plan is too difficult or onerous he becomes extremely angry and frequently says:

"I do not look for people having clever ideas of their own but rather people who are clever in finding ways and means of carrying out my ideas." (654)

As soon as he has the solution to a problem his mood changes very radically. He is again the Fuehrer we have described at the beginning of this section.

"He is very cheerful, jokes all the time and does not give anybody an opportunity to speak, while he himself makes fun of everybody."

This mood lasts throughout the period when necessary work has been done. As soon as the requisite orders have bean given to put the plan into execution, however, Hitler seems to lose interest in it. He becomes perfectly calm, ocoupies himself with other matters and sleeps unusually long hours. (654)

This is a very fundamental trait in Hitler's character structure. He does not think things out in a logical and consistent fashion, gathering all available information pertinent to the problem, mapping out alternative courses of action and then weighing the evidence pro and con for each of them before reaching a decision. His mental processes operate in reverse. Instead of studying the problem as an intellectual would do he avoids it and occupies himself with other things until unconscious processes furnish him with a solution.

Having the solution he then begins to look for facts which will prove that it is correct. In this procedure he is very clever and by the time he presents it to his associates, it has the appearance of a rational judgment. Nevertheless, his thought processes proceed from the emotional to the factual instead of starting with the facts as an intellectual normally does. It is this characteristic of his thinking process which makes it difficult for ordinary people to understand Hitler or to predict his future actions. His orientation in this respect is that of an artist and not that of a statesman.

Although Hitler has been extremely successful in using this inspirational technique in determining his course of action (and we are reminded of his following his course with the precision of a sleep-walker) it is not without its shortcomings. He becomes dependent on his inner guide which makes for unpredictability on the one hand and rigidity on the other. The result is that he cannoy modify his course in the face of unexpected developments or firm opposition. Strasser (297) tells us that:

"When he was then confronted by contradictory facts he was left floundering."

And Roehm says that there is:

"No system in the execution of his thoughts. He wants things his own way and gets mad when he strikes firm opposition on solid ground." (176)

This rigidity of mental functioning is obvious even in ordinary everyday interviews. When an unexpected question is asked, he is completely at a loss. Lochner (154) supplies us with an excellent description of this reaction:

"I saw this seemingly super-self-confident man actually blush when I broached the subject of German-American relations.... This evidently caught him off-guard. He was not used to having his infallibility challenged. For a moment he blushed like a school-boy, hemmed and hawed, then stammered an embarrassed something about having so many problems to ponder that he had not yet had time to take up America."

Almost everyone who has written about Hitler has commented on his rages. These are well known to all of his associates and they have learned to fear them. The descriptions of his behavior during these rages vary considerably. The more extreme descriptions claim that at the climax he rolls on the floor and chews on the carpets. Shirer (279) reports that in 1938 he did this so often that his associates frequently referred to him as "Teppichfresser". Not one of our informants who has been close to Hitler, people like Hanfstaengl, Strasser, Rauschning, Hohenlohe, Friedelinde Wagner, and Ludecke, have ever seen him behave in this manner. Moreover they all are firmly convinced that this is a gross exaggeration and the informant of the Dutch Legation (655) says that this aspect must be relegated to the domain of "Greuelmaerchen."

Even without this added touch of chewing the carpet, his behavior is still extremely violent and shows an utter lack of emotional control. In the worst rages he undoubtedly acts like a spoiled child who cannot have his own way and bangs his fists on the tables and walls. He scolds and shouts and stammers and on some occasions foaming saliva gathers in the corners of his mouth. Rauschning, in describing one of these uncontrolled exhibitions, says:

"He was an alarming sight, his hair disheveled, his eyes fixed, and his face distorted and purple. I feared that he would collapse or have a stroke." (110)

It must not be supposed, however, that these rages occur only when he is crossed on major issues. On the contrary, very insignificant matters might call out this reaction. In general they are brought on whenever anyone contradicts him, when there is unpleasant news for which he might feel responsible, when there is any skepticism concerning his judgment or when a situation arises in which his infallibility might be challenged or belittled. Von Weigand (492) reports that among his staff there is a tactic [sic] understanding:

"For God's sake don't excite the Fuehrer - which means do not tell him bad news -- do not mention things which are not as he conceives them to be."

Voigt (591) says that:

"Close collaborators for many years said that Hitler was always like this - that the slightest difficulty or obstacle could make him scream with rage...."

Many writers believe that these rages are just play acting. There is much to be said for this point of view since Hitler's first reaction to the unpleasant situation is not indignation, as one would ordinarily expect under these circumstances. He goes off into a rage or tirade without warning. Similarly, when he has finished, there is no aftermath. He immediately cools down and begins to talk about other matters in a perfectly calm tone of voice as though nothing had happened. Occasionally he will look around sheepishly, as if to see if anyone is laughing, and then proceeds with other matters, without the slightest trace of resentment.

Some of his closest associates have felt that he induces these rages consciously to frighten those about him. Rauschning (261), for example, says it is a:

"...technique by which he wouldthrow his entire entourage into confusion by well-timed fits of rags and thus make them more submissive."

Strasser (377) also believes this to be the case for he says:

"Rage and abuse became the favorite weapons in his armory."

This is not the time to enter into a detailed discussion concerning the nature and purpose of the rages. It is sufficient, for the present time, to realize that his associates are well aware that Hitler can and does behave in this way. It is a part of the Hitler they know and are forced to deal with. We may point out, however, that they are not conscious acting alone since it is quite impossible for an actor to actually become purple in the face unless he really is in an emotional state.

There are many other aspects of Hitler's personality, as it is known to his associates, which do not fit into the picture of the Fuehrer as it is presented to the German people. A few of the more important of these merit mention. Hitler is represented as a man of great courage, with nerves of steel who always is in complete control of every situation. Nevertheless, he often runs away from an unpleasant, unexpected or difficult situation.

Bayles (2) reports two incidents that illustrate this reaction:

"Particularly noticeable is his inability to cope with unexpected situations, this having been amusingly revealed when he laid the cornerstone of the House of German Art in Munich. On this occasion he was handed a dainty, rococo hammer for delivering the three traditional strokes to the cornerstone, but not realizing the fragility of the rococo, he brought the hammer down with such force that at the very first stroke it broke into bits. Then, instead of waiting for another hammer, Hitler completely lost his composure, blushed, looked wildly about him in the manner of a small boy caught stealing jam, and almost ran from the scene leaving the cornerstone unlaid. His enjoyment of the Berlin Olympic Games was completely spoilt when a fanatical Dutch woman who had achieved a personal presentation suddenly clasped him in two hefty arms and tried to kiss him in plain view of 100,000 spectators. Hitler could not regain his composure or stand the irreverent guffaws of foreign visitors, and left the Stadium."

This type of behavior is illustrated even more clearly in relation to Gregor Strasser because the occasion was one of extreme importance to Hitler. Strasser threatened to split the Party if a definite program could not be agreed upon. Hitler avoided the situation as long as he possibly could in the hope that something might happen, that the situation would somehow solve itself. When it did not he agreed to Strasser's demand for a meeting in Leipzig at which their differences could be thrashed out. Strasser was in the restaurant at the appointed hour. Hitler came late. Hardly had he sat down to the table when he excused himself in order to go to the toilet. Strasser waited for some time and when Hitler did not return he began making inquiries. To his amazement he discovered that instead of going to the toilet Hitler had slipped out of the back door and driven back to Munich without discussing a single point. (378)

Heiden (527) also tells us that in 1923 he was in conference with Ludendorff when he suddenly rushed off without as much as an apology. In the spring of 1932 he ran out on a meeting of the Verband Bayrischer Industrieller before which he was to speak. This group was not kindly disposed to him but it was important for Hitler to win them over. He got up to speak:

"..er stookt, sieht auf den Tisch, Schweigen alles sieht sich verbluefft an. Peinliche Minuten. Ploetzlich dreht sich Hitler auf dem Absatz um und geht ohne ein Wort an die Tuer."

The same thing happened a year later when, as Chancellor, he was to speak to the Reichsverband der Deutschen Presse, Again he sensed opposition in the group and again he fled from the scene, Olde (611) says:

"Das ist ein Trick, den der Fuehrer noch oft anwerden wird: wenn die Situation peinlich wird, versteckt er sich."

At other times, when he finds himself in difficult situations, the great dictator who prides himself on his decisiveness, hardness and other leadership qualities, breaks down and weeps like a child appealing for sympathy. Raischning (267) writes:

"In 1934 as in 1932 he complained of the ingratitude of the German people in the sobbing tones of a down-at-the-heel music-hall performer! A weakling who accused and sulked, appleaed and implored, and retired in wounded vanity ('If the German people don't want me!') instead of acting."

Otto Strasser reports that on one occasion:

"He seized my hands, as he had done two years before. His voice was choked with sobs, and tears flowed down his cheeks." (381)

Heiden (280) reporting a scene at which the Party leaders were waiting for the arrival of gregor Strasser:

"'Never would I have believed it of Strasser,' he (Hitler) cried, and he laid his head on the table and sobbed. Tears came to the eyes of many of those present, as they saw their Fuehrer weeping. Julius Streicher, who had been snubbed by Strasser for years, called out from his humble place in the background: 'Shameful that Strasser should treat our Fuehrer like that!'"

In extremely difficult situations he had openly threatened to commit suicide. Sometimes it seems that he uses this as a form of blackmail while at other times the situation seems to be more than he can bear. During the Beer Hall Putsch he said to the officials he was holding as prisoners:

"There are still five bullets in my pistol - four for the traitors, and one, if things go wrong, for myself," (253)

He also threatened to commit suicide before Mrs. Hanfstaengl directly after the failure of the Putsch, while he was hiding from the police in the Hanfstaengl home. Again in Landsberg he went on a hunger strike and threatened to martyr himself - an imitation of the Mayor of Cork. In 1930, he threatened to commit suicide after the strange murder of his niece, Geli, (302) of whom we shall speak later. In 1932, he again threatened to carry out this action if Strasser split the (98) Party. In 1933 he threatened to do so if he was not appointed Chancellor (63), and in 1936, he promised to do so if the Occupation of the Rhineland failed. (255)

These, however, are relatively infrequent exhibitions although his associates have learned that they are always a possibility and that it is wise not to push the Fuehrer too far. More frequent are his depressions about which a great deal has been written. It is certain that he does have very deep depressions from time to time. During his years in Vienna (1907-1912), after his mother's death, he undoubtedly suffered from them a great deal. Hanisch reports (64):

"I have never seen such helpless letting down in distress."

It is probably also true that he suffered from depressions during the war as Mend (199) reports.

After the death of his niece, Geli (193O), he also went into a severe depression which lasted for some time. Gregor Strasser actually feared that he might cnmmit suicide during this period and stayed with him for several days. There is some evidence (Strasser, 302) that he actually tried to do so and was prevented from carrying it out. It is also interesting to note that for several years after her death he went into a depression during the Christmas holidays and wandered around Germany alone for days on end (957).

Rauschning gives us a vivid description of his condition after the Blood Purge of 1934. He writes (716):

"Aber zunaechst machte auch er nioht den Eindruck des Siegers. Mit gedunsenen, verserrten Zuegen sass er mir gegenueber, als ich ihm Vortrag hielt. Seine Augen waren erloschen, er sah mich nicht an. Er spielte mit seien Fingern. Ich hatte nicht den Eindruck, dass er mir zuhoerte....Waehrend der ganzen Zeit hatte ich den Eindruk, dass Ekel, Ueberdruss und Verachtung in ihm herumstritten, und dass er mit seinen Gedanken ganz wo anders war.... Ich hatte gehoert, er sollte nur noch studenweis schlafen koennen...Nachts irrte er ruhelos umber. Schlafmittel halfen nicht.... Mit Weinkraempfen sollte er aus dem kurzem Schlaf aufwachen. Er haette sich wiederholt erbrochen. Mit Schuettelfrost habe er in Decken gehuellt im Seesel gesessen...Einmal wollte er alles erleuchtet und Menschen, viel Menschen um sich haben; im gleichen Augenblick haette er wieder neimanden sehen wollen...."

These are major crises in his life and we can assume that they probably represent his worst depressions. Undoubtedly he very frequently has minor ones when he withdraws from his associates and broods by himself, or periods when he refuses to see anyone and is irritable and impatient with those around him. On the whole, however, it appears that the reports of Hitler' s depressions have been grossly exaggerated. Not one of our informants who has had close contact with him has any knowledge of his ever retiring to a sanatarium during such times and there is only one source which indicates that he ever sought psychiatric help and that was not accepted. We must assume that the many reports that have flourished in the newspapers have been plants by the Nazi Propaganda agencies to lure us into false expectations.

There are a number of other respects in which Hitler does not appear before his associates as the self-confident Fuehrer he likes to believe himself to be. One of the most marked of these is his behavior in the presence of accepted authority. Under these circumstances he is obviously nervous and very ill at ease. Many times he is downright submissive. As far back as 1923, Ludecke (166) reports that:

"In conference with Poehner, Hitler sat with his felt hat crushed shapeless in his hands. His mien was almost humble..."

Fromm (371) writes that at a dinner:

"Hitler's eagerness to obtain the good graces of the princes present was subject to much comment. He bowed and clicked and all but knelt in his zeal to please oversized, ugly Princess Luise von Sachsen-Meiningen, her brother, hereditary Prince George, and their sister, Grand Duchess of Sachsen-Weimar. Beaming in his servile attitude he dashed personally to bring refreshments from the buffet."

On his visit to Rome, Hues (408) writes:

"When leading Queen Helene in Rome he was like a fish out of water. He didn't know what to do with his hands."

To Hindenburg, he was extremely submissive. Pictures taken of their meetings illustrate his attitude very clearly. In some of them it looks almost as though he were about to kiss the President's hand. Flannery (698) also reports that when Hitler first met Petain he took him by the arm and escorted him to his car. Hanfstaengl (912) reports that he found Hitler outside the door of the banquet hall in which a dinner and reception were being given to the former Kaiser's wife. He was unable to bring himself to go in and meet her Highness alone. When Hanfstaengl finally persuaded Hitler to go in he was so ill at ease that he could only stammer a few words to Hermine and then excused himself. Many other examples could be cited. From the weight of evidence it seems certain that Hitler does lose his self-confidence badly when he is brought face to face with an accepted authority of high standing, particularly royalty.

This subservient attitude is also obvious in his use of titles. This is well described by Lania (148) reporting on Hitler' s trial:

"In the course of his peroration he came to speak of Generals Ludendorff and von Seeckt; at such moments, he stood at attention and trumpeted forth the words 'General' and 'Excellency'. It made no difference that one of the generals was on his side, while the other, von Seeckt, Commander-in-Chief of the Reichswehr, was his enemy; he abandoned himself entirely to the pleasure of pronouncing the high-sounding titles. He never said 'General Seeckt', he said 'His Excellency Herr Colonel General von Seeeke, letting the words melt on his tongue and savoring their after-taste."

Many others have also commented on this tendency to use the full title. It also fits in with his very submissive behavior to his officers during the last war which has been commented upon by several of his comrades. It seems safe to assume that this is a fundamental trait in his character which becomes less obvious as he climbs the ladder but is present nevertheless.

The Fuehrer is also ill at ease in the company of diplomats and avoids contact with them as much as possible. Fromm (369) describes his behavior at a diplomatic dinner in the following words:

"The Corporal seemed to be ill at ease, awkward and moody. His coat-tails embarrassed him. Again and again his hand fumbled for the encouraging support of his sword belt. Each time he missed the familiar cold bracing support, his uneasiness grew. He crumpled his handkerchief, tugged it, rolled it, just plain stage-fright."

Henderson (124) writes:

"It will always be a matter of regret to me that I was never able to study Hitler in private life, as this might have given me the chance to see him under normal conditions and to talk with him as man to man. Except for a few brief words at chance meetings, I never met him except upon official, and invariably disagreeable, business. He never attended informal parties at which diplomats might be present, and when friends of mine did try to arrange it, he always got out of meeting me in such a manner on the ground of precedent... But he always looked self-conscious when he had to entertain the diplomatic corps, which happened normally three times a year."

Hitler also becomes nervous and tends to lose his composure when he has to meet newspapermen. Being a genius of propaganda he realizes the power of the press in influencing public opinion and he always provides the press with choice seats at all ceremonies. When it comes to interviews, however, he feels himself on the defensive and insists that the questions be submitted in advance. When the interview takes place he is able to maintain considerable poise because he has his answers prepared. Even then he gives no opportunity to ask for further clarification because he immediately launches into a lengthy dissertation, which sometimes develops into a tirade. When this is finished, the interview is over (0echsner, 665).

He is also terrified when he is called upon to speak to intellectuals (Wagner, 487) or any group in which he feels opposition or the possibility of criticism.

Hitler's adjustment to people in general is very poor. He is not really on intimate terms with any of his associates. Hess is the only associate, with the possible exception of Streicher, who has ever had the privilege of addressing him with the familiar "Du". Even Goering, Goebbels and Himmler must address him with the more formal "Sie" although each of them would undoubtedly be willing to sacrifice his right hand for the privilege of addressing him in the informal manner. It is true that outside of his official family there are a few people in Germany, notably Mrs. Bechstein and the Winifred Wagner family who address him as "Du" and call him by his nickname, "Wolf", but even these are few and far between. On the whole, he always maintains a considerable distance from other people. Ludecke, who was very close to him for a while, writes:

"Even in his intimate and cozy moments, I sensed no attitude of familiarity towards him on the part of his staff; there was always a certain distance about him, that subtle quality of aloofness...."(180)

And Fry (577) says:

"He lives in the midst of many men and yet he lives alone."

It is well-known that he cannot carry on a normal conversation or discussion with people. Even if only one person is present he must do all the talking. His manner of speech soon loses any conversational qualities it might have had and takes on all the characteristics of a lecture and may easily develop into a tirade. He simply forgets his companions and behaves as though he were addressing a multitude. Strasser (297) has given a good, brief description of his manner:

"Now Hitler drew himself erect and by the far-away look in his eyes showed plainly that he was not speaking merely to me; he was addressing an imaginary audience that stretched far beyond the walls of the living room."

This is not only true in connection with political matters. Even when he is alone with his adjutants or immediate staff and tries to be friendly he is unable to enter into give-and-take conversation. At times he scans to want to get closer to people and relates personal experiences, such as, "When I was in Vienna," or "When I was in the Army,". But under these circumstances, too, he insists on doing all the talking and always repeats the same stories over and over again in exactly the same form, almost as though he had memorized them. The gist of most of these stories is contained in MEIN KAMPF. His friends have all heard them dozens of times but this does not deter him from repeating them again with great enthusiasm. Nothing but the most superficial aspects of these experiences are ever touched upon. It seems as though he is unable to give more of himself than that (Hanfstaengl, 898).

Price (230) says: "When more than two people are present, even though they are his intimate circle, there is no general discourse. Either Hitler talks and they listen, or else they talk among themselves and Hitler sits silent." And this is the way it seems to be. He is not at all annoyed when members of the group talk to each other unless of course he feels like doing the talking himself. But ordinarily he seem to enjoy listening to others while he makes believe that he is attending to something else. Nevertheless, he overhears everything which is being said and often uses it later on. (Hanfstaengl, 914) However, he does not give credit to the individual from whom he has learned it and simply gives it out as his own.

Rauschning (266) says:

"He has always been a poseur. He remembers things that he has heard and has a faculty for repeating them in such a way that the listener is lead to believe that they are his own."

Roehm also complained of this:

"If you try to tell him anything, he knows everything already. Though he often does what we advise, he laughs in our faces at the moment, and later does the very thing as if it were all his own idea and creation. He doesn't even seem to be aware of how dishonest he is." (176)

Another one of his tricks which drives people and particularly his associates to distraction is his capacity for forgetting. This trait has been commented upon so much that it scarcely needs mentioning here. We all know how he can say something one day and a few days later say the opposite, completely oblivious to his earlier statement. He does not only do this in connection with international affairs but also with his closest associates. When they show their dismay and call his attention to the inconsistency he flies off into a rage and demands to know if the other person thinks he is a liar. Evidently the other leading Nazis have also learned the trick, for Rauschning (266) says:

"Most of the Nazis, with Hitler at their head, literally forget, like hysterical women, anything they have no desire to remember."

Although Hitler almost invariably introduces a few humorous elements into his speeches and gives the impression of considerable wit, he seems to lack any real sense of humor. He can never take a joke on himself. Heyst (600) says, "He is unable to purify his gloomy self with self-irony and humor." Von Wiegand (492) says he is extremely sensitive to ridicule and Huss says (408) "He takes himself seriously and will flare up in a tempermental rage at the least impingement by act or attitude on the dignity and holiness of state and Fuehrer." When everything is going well he sometimes gets into a gay and whimsical mood in a circle of close friends. His humor then is confined almost wholly to a kind of teasing or ribbing. The ribbing is usually in connection with alleged love affairs of his associates but are never vulgar and only hint at sexual factors (Hanfstaengl 910). Friedelinde Wagner provides us with an example of his teasing. Goering and Goebbels were both present at the time that he said to the Wagner family:

"You all know what a volt is and an ampere, don't you? Right. But do you know what a goebbels, a goering are? A goebbels is the amount of nonsense a man can speak in an hour and a goering is the amount of metal that can be pinned on a man's breast." (632)

His other form of humor is mimicking. Almost everyone concedes that he has great talent along these lines and he frequently mimics his associates in their presence much to the amusement of everyone except the victim. He also loved to mimic Sir Eric Phipps and later Chamberlain.

Hitler's poor adaptation to people is perhaps most obvious in his relations to women. Since he has become a political figure, his name has been linked with a great many women, particularly in the foreign press. Although the German public seem to know very little about this phase of his life, his associates have seen a great deal of it and the topic is always one for all kinds of conjectures. Roughly speaking, his relations to women fall into three categories; (a) much older women; (b) actresses and passing fancies, and (c) more or less enduring relationships.

A. As early as 1920 Frau Carola Hofman, a 61 year old widow, took him under her wing and for years played the part of [00010083.gif">[Page 77] foster mother. Then came Frau Helena Bechstein, the wife of the famous Berlin piano manufacturer, who took over the role. She spent large quantities of money on Hitler in the early days of the party, introduced him to her social circle and lavished maternal affection on hm, She often said that she wished that Hitler were her son and while he was imprisoned in Landsberg she claimed that she was his adopted mother in order that she fight visit him. Strasser (300) says that Hitler would often sit at her feet and lay his head against her bosom while she stroked his hair tenderly and murmured, "Mein Woelfchen".

Since he came to power things have not gone so smoothly. She seemed to find fault with everything he did and would scold him unmercifully, even in public. According to Friedelinde Wagner (939) she is the one person in Germany who can carry on a monologue in Hitler' s presence and who would actually tell him what she thought. During these violent'scoldings Hitler would stand there like an abashed schoolboy who had committed a misdemeanor. According to Hanfstaengl, Mrs. Bechstein had groomed Hitler in the expectation that he would marry her daughter, Lottie, who was far from attractive. Out of sense of obligation, Hitler did ask Lottie, but was refused, (904). Mrs. Bechstein was disconsolate over the failure of her plans and began to criticize Hitler's social reforms as well as his actions. Nevertheless, Hitler mde duty calls fairly regularly even though he postponed them as long as possible (939).

Then there was also Frau Victoria von Dirksen, who is alleged to have spent a fortune on him and his career (554), and a number of others. In more recent years, Mrs. Goebbels has taken over the role of foster-mother and looks after his comforts, supervises his household and bakes delicacies of which he is particularly fond. She, too, has been acting as a matchmaker in the hope that he might marry one of her friends and thereby draw the bond between them even tighter. To Ludecke, (177) she complained, "I am no good as a matchmaker. I would leave him alone with my most charming friesnds but he wouldn't respond." There was also his older half-sister, Angela, who kept house for him at Munich and Berchtesgaden and, for a time, seemed to play a mother's role.

Winifred Wagner, the daughter-in-law of Richard Wagner, has also caused a great deal of comment. She is English by birth, and, from all accounts, is very attractive and about Hitler's own age. She met Hitler in the early 1920's and since that time has been one of his staunch supporters. He became a frequent visitor at the Wagner home in Bayreuth and after his accession to power, built a house on the Wagner estate for himself and his staff. After the death. of Siegfried Wagner, reports all over the world had it that she would become Hitler's wife. But nothing happened in spite of the fact that it seemed like an ideal union from the point of view of both parties.

Nevertheless, Hitler continued to be a frequent guest at the Wagner's. It probably was the nearest thing to a home he has known since his own homebroke up in 1907. Mrs. Wagner undoubtedly did everything in her power to make him comfortable and Hitler felt very much at home. There were three small children, a boy and two girls (one of them is our informant, Friedelinde) which added considerably to the home atmosphere. The entire family called him by his nickname "Wolf" and addressed him as "Du". He felt so secure in this house that he often came and stayed without his bodyguard. He sometimes spent his Christmas holidays with the family and became very much a part of it. But further than that he was unwilling to go, even though the marriage would have been exceedingly popular with the German people.

B. Then there were a long line of 'passing fancies'. For the most part these were screen and stage stars. Hitler likes to be surrounded with pretty women and usually requests the moving picture companies to send over a number of actresses whenever there is a party in the Chancellory. He seems to get an extraordinary delight in fascinating these girls with stories about what he is going to do in the future or the same old stories about his past life. He also likes to impress them with his power by ordering the studios to provide them with better roles, or promising that he will see to it that they are starred in some forthcoming picture. Most of his associations with women of this type, and their number, is legion, does not go beyond this point as far as we have been able to discover. On the whole he seems, to feel more comfortable in the company of stage people than with any other group and often came down to the studio restaurants for lunch.

C. There have been several other women who have played a more or less important role in Hitler's life. The first of which we have any knowledge was Henny Hoffmann, the daughter of the official party photographer. Henny, according to reports, was little more than a prostitute and spent most of her time among the students in Munich, who alleged that she could be had for a few marks. Heinrich Hoffmann, her father, was a member of the Party and a closet friend of Hitler. By a queer twist of Fate, Hoffmann had taken a picture of the crowds in Munich at the outbreak of the last war. Later, when Hitler became prominent in Munich politics, Hoffmann discovered Hitler in the picture and called it to his attention. Hitler was delighted and a close relationship sprung up between them. Hoffmann' s wife was also very fond of Hitler and played a mother role towards him for a time.

With the death of Mrs. Hoffmann, the home went to pieces from a moral point of view and became a kind of meeting place for homosexuals of both sexes. There was a good deal of drinking and great freedom in sexual activities of all kinds. Hitler was frequently present at parties given in the Hoffmann home and became very friendly with Hermy. The relationship continued for some time until Henny, who was a very garrulous person by nature, got drunk one night and began to talk about her relationship to Hitler. Her father became enraged and for a time had little to do with Hitler.

Up to this time Hitler had steadfastly refused to have his photograph taken for publication on the grounds that it was better publicity to remain a mystery man and also because if his picture appeared it would be too easy to identify him when he crossed Communist territories. Shortly after the above described episode, Hitler named Hoffmann as the official Party photographer and gave him the exclusive right to his photographs. These privileges, so it is alleged, have, in the course of years netted Hoffmann millions of dollars. Among Hitler's associates, it was supposed that Hitler had committed some kind of sexual indiscretion with Henny and had bought Hoffmann's silence by granting him these exclusive rights.

In any event, Henny was soon married to Baldur von Schirach, the Leader of the Nazi Youth Movement who is reputed to be a homosexual. His family were violently opposed to the marriage but Hitler insisted. All differences between Hitler and Hoffmann seem to have disappeared and today he is one of Hitler's closest associates and exerts a great personal influence on the Fuehrer. We shall consider the nature of Hitler's indiscretion later in our study since it is not a matter of common knowledge and would lead us too far afield at the present time.

After the Henny Hoffmann episode, Hitler began to appear in public with his niece, Geli, the daughter of his half-sister, Angela, who had come to keep house for Hitler in 1924. At the time this relationship matured her mother had gone to Berchtesgaden and Hitler and Geli were living alone in his Munich flat. They became inseparable companions and became the subject of much comment in Party circles. Many of the members, particularly Gregor Strasser, felt that this was poor publicity and was creating a good deal of unfavorable talk. Other members had Hitler brought on the carpet to explain where he was getting the money to clothe Geli and sport her around if he was not using Party funds for this purpose.

Hitler became very jealous of Geli's attention and refused to let her go out with any other men. Some claim that he kept her locked in during the day when he could not take her with him. For several years the relationship continued over the opposition of the Party. Then one day Geli was found dead in Hitler's apartment - she had died from a bullet fired from Hitler's revolver. There was considerable commotion. The coroner's verdict was suicide but Geli was buried in hallowed ground by a Catholic clergy. There was much speculation whether she killed herself or was killed by Hitler. Whatever the facts my be, Hitler went into a profound depression which lasted for months. During the first days after the funeral, Gregor Strasser remained with him in order to prevent him from committing suicide. Ludecke (178) says: "The special quality of Hitler's affection (for Geli) is still a mystery to those closest to him."

For a few years after Geli's death, Hitler had little to do with women except in a very superficial way. Along about 1932, however, he became interested in Eva Braun, Hoffmann's photographic. assistant. This relationship did not develop very rapidly but it has contimed. In the course of time, Hitler has bought her many things including high-powered automobiles and a house between Munich and Berchtesgaden where, it is alleged, he frequently spends the night on the way to or from his country estate. Eva Braun is also frequently a guest at Berchtesgaden and in Berlin.

[transcription note: Bracketed [Page] links provide access to the individual images from which these transcriptions were made]

Oechsner was told that after one of her visits in Berchtesgaden some of her underwear was found in Hitler's bedroom. Wiedemann, according to Hohenlohe, says that she has sometimes spent the entire night in Hitler's bedroom in Berlin. It is reported by Norburt (605) that Eva moved into the Chancellory on December 16, 1939 and it is said that Hitler intends to marry her when the war is over. Beyond that, we know nothing about this affair except that Eva Braun has twice tried to commit suicide and that one of Hitler's bodyguards hurled himself from the Kehlstein because he was in love with her but could not respass [sic] the Fuehrer's domain.

The affair with Eva Braun was not exclusive, however. During this period he has also seen a good deal of at least two moving picture actresses. These have been more enduring than most of his associations with actresses and much more intimate. Both of these girls were frequently invited alone to the Chancellory late at night and departed in the early hours of the morning. During their stay they were alone with Hitler behind closed doors so that not even his immediate staff knows what transpired between them. The first of these relationships was with Renarte Mueller who connitted suicide by throwing herself from the window of a Berlin hotel. The other was with Leni Riefenstahl who continued to be a guest at the Chancellor up to the outbreak of the war.

Hitler's associates know that in respect to women Hitler is far from the ascetic he and the Propaganda Bureau would like to have the German public believe. None of them with the possible exception of Hoffmann and Schaub (his personal adjutant), know the nature of his sexual activities. This has led to a great deal of conjecture in Party circles. There are some who believe that his sex life is perfectly normal but restricted. Others, that he is immune from such temptations and that nothing happens when he is alone with girls. Still others believe that he is homosexual.

The latter belief is based largely on the fact that during the early days of the Party many of the inner circle were well-known homosexuals. Roehm made no attempt to hide his homosexual activities and Hess was generally known as "Fraulein Anna". There were also many others, particularly in the early days of the movement, and it was supposed, for this reason, that Hitler, too, belonged to this category.

In view of Hitler's pretense at purity and the importance of his mission for building a Greater Germany, it is extraordinary that he should be so careless about his associates. He has never restricted them in any way except at the time of the Blood Purge in 1934 when his excuse was that he had to purge the party of these undesirable elements. At all other times, he has been liberal to a fault. Lochner reports:

"The only criterion for membership in the Party was that the applicant be 'Unconditionally obedient and faithfully devoted to me'. When someone asked if that applied to thieves and criminals, Hitler said, 'Their private lives don't concern me.'"

Ludecke (179) claims that in speaking of some of the moralists who were complaining about the actions of his S.A. men, Hitler said:

"He would rather his S.A.men took the women than some fat-bellied moneybag. 'Why should I concern myself with the private lives of my followers ... apart from Roehm's achievements, I know that I can absolutely depend on him.'"

Rauschning says (264) that the general attitude in the Party was: "Do anything you like but don't get caught at it."

This attitude towards his associates certainly did not make for high standards in the Party. Capt. von Mueke resigned from the Party on the grounds that:

"Die Voelkische partei ist nicht mehr die Partei der anstaendigen Leute, sie ist herunter gekommon und korrupt. Kurz, das ist ein Saustall"(614)

Rauschning (276) expresses a similar sentiment:

"Most loathsome of all is the reeking miasma of furtive, unnatural sexuality that fills and fouls the whole atmosphere around him, like an evil emanation. Nother [sic] in this environment is straightforward. Surreptitious relationships, substitutes and symbols, false sentiments and secret lusts - nothing in this man's surroundings is natural and genuine, nothing has the openness of a natural instinct."

0ne of Hitler's reactions which is carefully hidden from the public is his love for pornography. He can scarcely wait for the next edition of DER STUERMER to appear and when it reaches him he goes through it avidly. He seems to get great pleasure out the dirty stories and the cartoons that feature this sheet. (658: 261). To Rauschning Hitler said that the STUERMER "was a form of pornography permitted in the Third Reich". In addition, Hitler has a large collection of nudes and, according to Hanfstaengl and others, he also enjoys viewing lewd movies in his private theatre, some of which are prepared by Hoffmann for his benefit.

He also likes to present himself as a great authority and lover of good music. One of his favorite pastimes is to lecture on Wagner and the beauty of his operatic music. There can be no doubt concerning his enjoyment of Wagnerian music and that he gets considerable inspiration from it. Oechsner (675) reports that he has been able to observe Hitler closely while he was listening to music and saw, "grimaces of pain and pleasure contort his face, his brows knit, his eyes close, his mouth contact tightly." Hitler has said, "For me, Wagner is something godly, and his music is my religion. I go to his concerts as others go to church."

According to Hanfstaengl, however, he is not a lover of good music in general (895). He says that about 85% of Hitler's preferences in music are the normal program music in Vienna cafes. This is probably why Hitler rarely attends concerts and in later years, seldom goes to the opera. His preferences now seem to run to musical comedies and cabarets in addition to the movies he sees at the Chancellory. Pope (229) says that Hitler frequently visited the MERRY WIDOW in which an American actress played the lead. He says, "I have seen Hitler nudge his gauleiter, Wagner, and smirk when Dorothy does her famous backbending number in the spotlight." In this number, Dorothy's costume consists of a pair of transparent butterfly wings, or sometimes nothing at all. Hitler watches the performance through opera glasses and sometimes has command performances for his private benefit.

Much has been written by the Nazi propaganda bureau about his modest way of living. This, through the eyes of his associates, has also been vastly overrated. Although he is a vegetarian, most of them feel that his meals are scarcely to be considered as a form of deprivation. He eats large quantities of eggs prepared in 101 different ways by the best chef in Germany and there are always quantities and a large variety of fresh vegetables prepared in unusual ways. In addition. Hitler consumes incredible quantities of pastries and often as much as two pounds of chocolates in the course of a single day. Nor are his personal tastes particularly inexpensive. Although his clothes are simple, he has an incredible number of each article of clothing. All are made of the finest materials that can be procured and made up by the best workmen.

He also has a passion for collecting paintings and when he has his heart set on one, the sky is the limit is far as price is concerned. The only thing that is really modest about his living arrangements is his bedroom which is extremely simple and contains only a metal bed (decorated with ribbons at the head), a painted chest of drawers and a few straight chairs. Friedelinde Wagner and Hanfstaengl, both of whom have seen the room with their own eyes, have described it in identical terms: namely that it is a room that one would expect a maid to have and not a Chancellor.

Although he is presented to the German public as a man of extraordinary courage, his immediate associates frequently have occasion to question this. Several occasions have been reported on which he has not carried through his own program because he feared opposition. This is particularly true in connection with his Gauleiters. He seems to have a particular fear of these people and rather than meet opposition from them, he usually tries to find out on which side of an issue the majority have aligned themselves before he meets with them. When the meeting takes place, he proposes a plan or course of action which will fit in with the sentiments of the majority. (718)

According to Hohenlohe he also backed down before three Army generals when they protested against the rapid developments in the Danzig question, and that before Munich, he decided to postpone the war because he discovered that the crowds watching the troops marching under the Chancellory windows were unenthusiactic (661).

Furthermore, they must wonder about the necessity of the extreme precautions that are taken for his safety. Most of these are carefully concealed from the German public. When Hitler appears he looks for all the world like an extremely brave man as he stands up in the front seat of his open car and salutes. The people do not inow of the tremendous number of secret service men who constantly mingle with the crowds in addition to the guards who line the streets through which he is to pass. Neither do they know of all the precautions taken at the Chancellory or at Berchtesgaden.

Before the war his house at Berchtesgaden was surrounded with eight miles of electrified wire. Pillboxes and anti-aircraft batteries were set up in the surrounding hills (Morrell, 462). When he visited at Bayreuth, troops were sent in weeks in advance to set up machine-gun nests and anti-aircraft batteries in the hills immediately adjoining (Wagner, 934). Lochner (158) reports that when he travels in a special train he is accompanied by 200 SS guards who are more heavily armed than the retinue of any German emperor. After the war started, his train was heavily armored and equipped with anti-aircraft fore and aft. And, yet, when the newsreels show him at the front, he is the only one who does not wear a steel helmet.

There is, consequently, a considerable discrepancy between Hitler as he is known to the German. people and Hitler as he is known to his associates. Nevertheless, it appears that most of his associates have a deep allegience to Hitler personally and are quite ready to forgive or ignore his shortcomings. In many cases, it seems as though his asociates are quite oblivious to the contradictory traits in his character - to them he is still the Fuehrer and they live for the moments when he actually plays this role.

You can read the entire Secret Report HERE

By: Walter C. Langer
Office of Strategic Services
Washington, D.C.
With the collaboration of-
Prof. Henry A. Murr, Harvard Psychological Clinic
Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research .
Dr. Bertram D. Lawin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute
 
Since we are revisiting the Horrors of the Holocaust, we must, of course, ask the question: Did Hitler Know About the Holocaust

The following is extracted from the compiler quoted in a previous post. This individual seems to have done his homework, going back to original and contemporary sources.

Did Hitler Know About the Holocaust

Introduction

This document is a supplement to The psychology and development of Adolph Hitler Schicklgruber.

As with the main document, my interest is an analysis of Hitler’s state of mind, and the degree of compatibility of that mental state with, what a theologian would call, ‘informed consent’ to the perpetration of the industrial mass-murder known widely as the holocaust. My own judgement, for that is all it can be, is that Hitler’s mental state was indeed compatible with full involvement in willing the deliberate and selective slaughter of ‘Jews’, merely upon the basis of their religious attachment, which attachment Hitler, in his ignorance, interpreted as a ‘race’.

Taken in the context of his historic development and experiences, the timing of Hitler’s utterances lead me to the opinion that he was fully aware of the functioning of the industrial murder machine. However, I do believe it possible that he shielded his full conscious awareness with some degree of denial, so as not to get his own ‘hands’ dirty directly. My view is reinforced by the psychological profile I have drawn in the main document. Other sources have been referenced at the end of this supplement, but they play very little part in my ‘deliberations’.

People are very good at believing what they want to believe, while ignoring reality. “If I think about how dreadful things were, I just get unhappy.[1]” David Irving claims, with increasing stridency, that Hitler did not know. That position, I regard as incredible.

In NSDAP[2] Germany, when hopes did not meet desires, or when the depredations of the government oppressed the idealism of the people more than usual, the excuse commonly heard was,

“It’s the little Hitlers that are to blame, If only Adolph knew about this!”[3].

I regard it as eminently clear that Hitler was fully aware of the holocaust and, that like any mass murderer, step by step, he moved down an inevitable spiral of destruction. Like a street criminal, he steadily and instinctively hid behind layers of subordinates.

It fully suited Hitler to maintain the uncritical loyalty of the population, a matter that would have been impossible if he had acted in the open. He was, after all, forced in 1941 to retreat from his killing of mental defectives and others, when knowledge became too widespread. Likewise, as late as February 1943, he backed down under the pressure and demonstrations of non-Jewish wives of Jewish husbands [4]. This was a politician practicing deniability and self-protection, not an innocent dupe.

All that concerns me is never to take a step that I might later have to retrace and never to take a step which could damage us in any way. You must understand that I always go as far as I dare and never further. It is vital to have a sixth sense which tells you broadly what you can and cannot do. (i.e., ‘I do what ever I can get away with’.) Speech, April 1937 Noakes and Pridham, p.550
[...]

Hitler’s obsession with gas

It is my view that Hitler had a fascination with death, and in particular with gas, aggravated by his wartime experiences.

There is no such thing as coming to an understanding with the Jews. It must be the hard-and-fast ‘Either-Or’. 1925 –26: Mein Kampf, p 121

The British used the yellow gas whose effect was unknown to us, at least from personal experience. I was destined to experience it that very night.

Towards morning I also began to feel pain. It increased with every quarter of an hour; and about seven o’clock my eyes were scorching as I staggered back and delivered the last dispatch I was destined to carry in this war. A few hours later my eyes were like glowing coals and all was darkness around me.

During the last few days I had begun to feel somewhat better. The burning pain in the eye-sockets had become less severe. Gradually I was able to distinguish the general outlines of my immediate surroundings. And it was permissible to hope that at least I would recover my sight sufficiently to be able to take up some profession later on. That I would ever be able to draw or design once again was naturally out of the question.

And, finally, almost in the last few days of that titanic struggle, when the waves of poison gas enveloped me and began to penetrate my eyes, the thought of becoming permanently blind unnerved me; but the voice of conscience cried out immediately: Poor miserable fellow, will you start howling when there are thousands of others whose lot is a hundred times worse than yours? And so I accepted my misfortune in silence, realizing that this was the only thing to be done and that personal suffering was nothing when compared with the misfortune of one’s country. Attributed by Hitler to 1918: Mein Kampf, excerpts: pp. 118-121

If twelve or fifteen thousand of these Jews who were corrupting the nation had been forced to submit to poison-gas, just as hundreds of thousands of our best German workers from every social stratum and from every trade and calling had to face it in the field, then the millions of sacrifices made at the front would not have been in vain. Mein Kampf, pp.373-374

At a Reichstag speech in January 1939, Hitler warned ‘international Jewry’ that if there were another major European war, this time the victims would be the Jews, not the Germans. Eatwell, p.144 Wannsee conference: 20 January, 1942

A plan to kill 11 million Jews was set out. Deportations began in March, 1942 and continued until 1944. By the end, approximately 6 million Jews had been killed. For further details, see Wannsee. 30 January, 1942: 10 days after Wannsee

I predicted on September the 1st 1939 before the German Reichstag, and I am careful to refrain from rash prophesies, that this war will not end the way the jews would have it, namely with the extermination of all European and Aryan peoples, but the result of this war will be the annihilation of the jewish race. Domarus, vol. 1, p. 41

9 February, 1942: 20 days after Wannsee Hitler, in a radio broadcast, said:

The Jews will be liquidated for at least a thousand years. Cornwell, p. 279.

Yet Irving contends that Hitler knew nothing of the holocaust because, as I saw it recently put, ‘no one is able to produce a piece of paper saying, “Dear Heinrich, please kill all the Jews. Yours, Adolph”.

Early 1945:

As the Russians closed in on his Berlin bunker, Hitler began to torture himself that the Russians might pump poison gas down the ventilation shafts. So he ordered a new filter system be installed. Reden und Proklamationem, vol. 2, p.2237; cited in Köhler, p 11.

2 April, 1945:

In his final testament Hitler stated that the world would be eternally grateful to me and to national socialism for having exterminated the Jews in Germany and central Europe. Jackel, p.122; cited in Köhler, p. 8

30 April, 1945:

The cyanide capsules used for suicide by some top NSDAP members, by Hitler’s concubine Eva Braun, and also forced on Hitler’s dog Blondi, relied upon volatilising gas. Hitler, instead, chose to shoot himself. {...}

Wannsee Conference

On 20 January, 1942, a conference of Nazi officials was held in the East Berlin suburb of Grossen-Wannsee, for the purpose of planning the “final solution” (Endlösung) of the “Jewish question” (Judenfrage). On 31 July, 1941, Hermann Göring had issued orders to Reinhard Heydrich to prepare a comprehensive plan for this “final solution”. The Wannsee Conference, held six months later, was attended by 15 Nazi bureaucrats, led by Heydrich and including Adolf Eichmann, chief of Jewish affairs for the Reich Central Security Office (Reichssicherheitshauptamt).

An earlier idea, to deport all of Europe’s Jews to the island of Madagascar, was abandoned as impractical in wartime. Instead, the newly planned “final solution” would entail rounding up all Jews throughout Europe, transporting them eastward and organizing them into labour gangs. The work and living conditions would be sufficiently hard as to fell large numbers by “natural diminution”; those that survived would be “treated accordingly”. The final protocol of the Wannsee Conference never explicitly mentioned extermination, but, within a few months after the meeting, the first poison-gas chambers were installed in Poland, in what came to be called extermination camps. Responsibility for the entire project was put in the hands of Heinrich Himmler, and his SS and Gestapo[6]. [/quote]
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom