Buddy
The Living Force
I agree with bngenoh about how sentience might be the thing to be looking for in these reports and videos.
Personally, I wouldn't start worrying until we start hearing phrases that mean natural systems development, organic neural nets, etc. The reason is pretty simple. Anyone who is familiar with the development history of Artificial Intelligence or certain other technologies knows about formal systems flaws.
Basically, using software for example, current programming creates closed, formal systems. Envisioning and modelling these 'objects' in their real environment, results in an unlimited fractal recursion of formal possibilities. Meaning in order to stop robot from thinking--to get him to choose--and get him moving, limitations have to be coded in. Sometimes extreme limitations have to be placed on requirements and features before even beginning a project. For this reason, currently all unconstrained formal systems will always have unlimited covert channels and failure modes, constrained formal systems simply won't develop past their built-in limitations and this will always limit performance, no matter what the hype says.
When we start hearing about 'natural systems', then we would look for evidence of 'parts' capable of adaptations to their environments via a sentient mode and a mechanical, object mode. Sentient mode is a main concern because even nature's organic, adaptive capability seems limited, or at least slower than is desired.
Just my thoughts. One could read Satinover's The Quantum Brain for more on this subject.
Personally, I wouldn't start worrying until we start hearing phrases that mean natural systems development, organic neural nets, etc. The reason is pretty simple. Anyone who is familiar with the development history of Artificial Intelligence or certain other technologies knows about formal systems flaws.
Basically, using software for example, current programming creates closed, formal systems. Envisioning and modelling these 'objects' in their real environment, results in an unlimited fractal recursion of formal possibilities. Meaning in order to stop robot from thinking--to get him to choose--and get him moving, limitations have to be coded in. Sometimes extreme limitations have to be placed on requirements and features before even beginning a project. For this reason, currently all unconstrained formal systems will always have unlimited covert channels and failure modes, constrained formal systems simply won't develop past their built-in limitations and this will always limit performance, no matter what the hype says.
When we start hearing about 'natural systems', then we would look for evidence of 'parts' capable of adaptations to their environments via a sentient mode and a mechanical, object mode. Sentient mode is a main concern because even nature's organic, adaptive capability seems limited, or at least slower than is desired.
Just my thoughts. One could read Satinover's The Quantum Brain for more on this subject.