Role of Crypto/Cybercurrencies in the PTB's loss of control?

Yes it is a bridge to new reality and a new cycle. And yes it is guided by the powers behind the curtain, just like this current cycle and reality was/is!
The "new cycle" that the WEF and their bosses want is a digital slavery system - are you really not aware of this?

Don't give up, see it and accept it for what it is and if you want maybe even get some value from it.
If you want to accept becoming a slave, that is up to you. I am not planning to take that bridge to nowhere.
 
The "new cycle" that the WEF and their bosses want is a digital slavery system - are you really not aware of this?


If you want to accept becoming a slave, that is up to you. I am not planning to take that bridge to nowhere.

Don't you realize we are already in the slavery system and have been for many decades. If you are working for fiat currency you are by definition a cog in a (financial) system of slavery that drains you of energy/money value over time.
Or do you think that their current system and fiat money is all good and no energy draining is involved by being a participant in it?

And you are still missing the point, which is basically "utilization of knowledge generates energy(can be in the form of money too) which in turn generates light" - paraphrasing the Cs.
 
Yes it is a bridge to new reality and a new cycle. And yes it is guided by the powers behind the curtain, just like this current cycle and reality was/is!

It is what it is. Don't give up, see it and accept it for what it is and if you want maybe even get some value from it. If what I shared proves to be true ofc, it is a valuable info to have available, OSIT.

The problem is that you are contributing a whole lot of noise. By my latest count you are now spamming three different threads with the same long-winded, baked noodle type posts, despite saying that you would stop over a week ago. I have seen many cases of "XRP derangement syndrome" over the years, but this is the worst, and I just don't think it has a place here. The "analysis" you have posted of various things, such as C's quotes, and random images from "riddlers" on the internet, is so schizo and reaching that it belongs in the same category as the deepest Qanon and Flat Earther circles.

You claim to be doing this for a pure STO motive, but when you get any pushback, you act in a most conceited manner, and clearly show what you think of us mere plebs who just can't grasp your grand ideas.

All this despite being somewhat of a rookie in chart analysis and trading. This is shown by you making up whatever Elliot Wave you want to conform to your bias, re-drawing your waves when reality goes against you, going all-in on one trade, adding more leverage based on pure emotion, not even using a stop-loss but relying on the liquidation engine if you're wrong (terribly inefficient and you lose more). As I stated in an earlier post, it will be terrible if this trade actually works for you, because you desperately need a reality check.

I'm sorry if this seems harsh, but you do not seem to be in the right emotional state to assess information in a sober and accurate manner, and it's possible that you will not only harm yourself, but others too.

When it comes to charts, they can go up, down or sideways. You can never know 100% that your interpretation is the correct one. The idea of trading is that you expect to be wrong, often, but through risk management you minimize losses and maximize gains.

Right now XRP could break either up or down. Or it could break down, fakeout and move up, or fake a break up before crashing. Will you re-draw your elliot waves every time and marry this trade idea despite any evidence against it? It's smashed against your entry multiple times, so that's a worrying start.

1749809906944.png


Another thing to consider is the XRP/BTC ratio, which is key. You could make money in XRP, but lose out by not being in BTC, which is on a historic run of dominance right now.

It has spent the past 6 years below the key level around 3k satoshis. Again, this could break up, but you don't know if/when, and history shows it's more likely to slow bleed down, as it has done for the past 14 weeks while BTC has pushed new highs. If it can break the 3k level again then yea it would be a good opportunity.

1749810667795.png

Newbies to trading tend to want to overcomplicate their charts and include all kinds of crazy mystical stuff, but eventually you'll learn to keep things simple. Your "best" ideas will often turn out dead wrong. You just don't have a 6D intelligence, or even 4D. You can't predict years in advance, you have to take information as it flows through your perspective of time.
 
I'm
The problem is that you are contributing a whole lot of noise. By my latest count you are now spamming three different threads with the same long-winded, baked noodle type posts, despite saying that you would stop over a week ago. I have seen many cases of "XRP derangement syndrome" over the years, but this is the worst, and I just don't think it has a place here. The "analysis" you have posted of various things, such as C's quotes, and random images from "riddlers" on the internet, is so schizo and reaching that it belongs in the same category as the deepest Qanon and Flat Earther circles.

You claim to be doing this for a pure STO motive, but when you get any pushback, you act in a most conceited manner, and clearly show what you think of us mere plebs who just can't grasp your grand ideas.

All this despite being somewhat of a rookie in chart analysis and trading. This is shown by you making up whatever Elliot Wave you want to conform to your bias, re-drawing your waves when reality goes against you, going all-in on one trade, adding more leverage based on pure emotion, not even using a stop-loss but relying on the liquidation engine if you're wrong (terribly inefficient and you lose more). As I stated in an earlier post, it will be terrible if this trade actually works for you, because you desperately need a reality check.

I'm sorry if this seems harsh, but you do not seem to be in the right emotional state to assess information in a sober and accurate manner, and it's possible that you will not only harm yourself, but others too.

When it comes to charts, they can go up, down or sideways. You can never know 100% that your interpretation is the correct one. The idea of trading is that you expect to be wrong, often, but through risk management you minimize losses and maximize gains.

Right now XRP could break either up or down. Or it could break down, fakeout and move up, or fake a break up before crashing. Will you re-draw your elliot waves every time and marry this trade idea despite any evidence against it? It's smashed against your entry multiple times, so that's a worrying start.

View attachment 109364


Another thing to consider is the XRP/BTC ratio, which is key. You could make money in XRP, but lose out by not being in BTC, which is on a historic run of dominance right now.

It has spent the past 6 years below the key level around 3k satoshis. Again, this could break up, but you don't know if/when, and history shows it's more likely to slow bleed down, as it has done for the past 14 weeks while BTC has pushed new highs. If it can break the 3k level again then yea it would be a good opportunity.

View attachment 109365

Newbies to trading tend to want to overcomplicate their charts and include all kinds of crazy mystical stuff, but eventually you'll learn to keep things simple. Your "best" ideas will often turn out dead wrong. You just don't have a 6D intelligence, or even 4D. You can't predict years in advance, you have to take information as it flows through your perspective of time.
Yes it is a harsh reaction on your part. I only shared, it's okay to have different ideas. It might be true or false, but I believe that it's okay to share and express. We all have free will. Really no need to react to ideas/info/theories/speculation... whatever you want to call it. Peace bro.
 
I'm

Yes it is a harsh reaction on your part. I only shared, it's okay to have different ideas. It might be true or false, but I believe that it's okay to share and express. We all have free will. Really no need to react to ideas/info/theories/speculation... whatever you want to call it. Peace bro.
For weeks you received very gentle nudges but only doubled and tripled down on the posts, so IMO it had to be said.

The forum is a place people come to read info with good signal to noise ratio. If you want to post wild speculation then it can be done on X, and later if there's something distilled, concrete and readable then maybe be shared on the forum

I've been in your shoes, was there in the true crypto glory days, we were all big into fractal analysis and thought we were geniuses and were discovering the secrets of the universe in the charts. I wish someone would've told me straight like that back then how much of an idiot I was being. So I hope you do not get too ego involved and can take some of that feedback from this morning.

By the way, most of the fractal analysis you see people trying to do in crypto comes from one guy called Kazonomics, so might be worth checking him out if you wanna continue learning about this stuff.
 
For weeks you received very gentle nudges but only doubled and tripled down on the posts, so IMO it had to be said.
...
I've been in your shoes, was there in the true crypto glory days, we were all big into fractal analysis and thought we were geniuses and were discovering the secrets of the universe in the charts. I wish someone would've told me straight like that back then how much of an idiot I was being. So I hope you do not get too ego involved and can take some of that feedback from this morning.

By the way, most of the fractal analysis you see people trying to do in crypto comes from one guy called Kazonomics, so might be worth checking him out if you wanna continue learning about this stuff.

Or I am presenting information that you (and some others ofc) are having a reaction to because of trying to ignore or overcome or shut out part of the reality that doesn't fit with your belief. That is a real possibility and it is wise to be open to it.

Also, just like member daddycat, it seems you are projecting yourself onto me, and it seems that me presenting my ideas (which really could be true or closer to reality than your view on this topic) has made your ego triggered or made feel inferior.


Newbies to trading tend to want to overcomplicate their charts and include all kinds of crazy mystical stuff, but eventually you'll learn to keep things simple. Your "best" ideas will often turn out dead wrong. You just don't have a 6D intelligence, or even 4D. You can't predict years in advance, you have to take information as it flows through your perspective of time.

Yes they do, and so do semi newbies.
My chart idea is very simple and is based on the base code of reality, the fibonacci numbers/cycles/waves. You don't have any fibonacci "base" in your chart. So, from where I stand, you are off base.

The forum is a place people come to read info with good signal to noise ratio. If you want to post wild speculation then it can be done on X, and later if there's something distilled, concrete and readable then maybe be shared on the forum

My main ideas presented are very simple, and pieces of puzzle from the charts, and fibonacci numbers, and current situation in the world, and the riddlers riddles, and news ("the stupid show" like Joe suggested in Israel vs Iran thread) being timed at specific parts of the cycle, the news being correlated with cycle lows for example, all have a supporting evidence and correlation between the puzzle piece. And the idea that we will soon withness the last part of the grand supercycle (epic rise of the markets, and it could happen this summer to early fall... or it could last longer) before the end of the grand supercycle, the total crash of the whole market (which could happen this November). And the idea that the digitization will be happening during that last part of the grand supercylce (maybe this summer), to digitize and transition to a new kind of system/cycle, before the end of the current one.

And even if something seems like wild speculation, it doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong or non valuable information (or at least theory) to have presented and shared here. Don't burn me at the stake for having ideas. Remember who did that throughout the human history. Priests and followers who got triggered by ideas presented by people who were thinking on their own and who presented novel information about reality that the former were choosing to ignore, overcome and burn down.

If you want to tell me to stop sharing ideas I will stop. I think I learned the lesson "Free will is primary".
 
Last edited:
If you want to tell me to stop sharing ideas I will stop. I think I learned the lesson "Free will is primary".
You have been shown how your speculations are not going in the right direction by several members now. You do not seem to be able to ask yourself if they might be correct and take an objective look at your thinking. You just keep running your narratives that you've made up about yourself and going full steam ahead with speculations that don't seem to be wanted.

As has been mentioned, we try to keep the signal ratio high and the noise ratio low so it may be better that if you want to continue in these speculations, you open a blog or substack about it and continue there.

And, yes, there is free will, but also free will of others to ask you to stop with posts that are mostly noise.
 
You have been shown how your speculations are not going in the right direction by several members now. You do not seem to be able to ask yourself if they might be correct and take an objective look at your thinking. You just keep running your narratives that you've made up about yourself and going full steam ahead with speculations that don't seem to be wanted.

As has been mentioned, we try to keep the signal ratio high and the noise ratio low so it may be better that if you want to continue in these speculations, you open a blog or substack about it and continue there.

And, yes, there is free will, but also free will of others to ask you to stop with posts that are mostly noise.

That's a bit disapointing (in my view).
But ofc it is your free will to not want to hear what you perceive to be mostly noise.
No more noise from me.
 
On the right side marked in orange, intermediate wave 1 seems to have been completed, that started at end of the primary wave 2 (blue) at Trump's tariffs announcement and ended with it's C (yellow) wave exactly 59 days later at Trump vs Elon fight. [And 3,4,5 phase in the primary wave 1 (circled in purple) started at the Trump being elected on 5th of November 2024. Just like that Rippleriddler from the video I posted above seems to have predicted.]

And it seems that minor wave 1 (green) is in the process (usually lasts a week to couple of weeks). If the scenario I suggested is going to play out, that means as soon as minor wave 1 (green) completes, the price should start it's parabolic 3,4,5 waves stage (rising in a parabolic pattern from minor to intermediate to primary wave scale...green,orange,blue). And it should start soon
I will risk being reprimanded by writing this in the name of finding truth (our common goal).

1.Green (intermediate) wave 2 completed during Israel bombing Iran 13th Of June, few hours after I made this post.
2. In the markets it's always when things seem most 'dire' and like the sky itself is falling and like the world itself is ending, is when are the most opportune times to buy (a.k.a the cycle lows).
3. I find it interesting that the very last wave 2 correction(elliott wave low), before the theorised waves 3,4 and 5, was marked by the most dire of all the events, mentioned thus far (tariffs low, elon vs trump low), as according to market(wave) cycles it was the most opportune time to buy.
4. I wish someone else here sees what I see, because it really is more than peculiar that all these events were timed so perfectly with markets (especially digital currencies markets) cycle/wave lows, which posits the idea that those events were purposely timed with the markets cycles for some reason.
5. "Things may get dire as summer approaches".. well things are at their most dire exactly now as the summer approaches, and exactly as (seemingly) the metaphorical green summer of the markets approaches (and seems is in its early phases now).
6. If all this is true, then this question posits itself:
"Is all we are witnessing just a perfectly timed show/scenario that is directly related to markets and markets cycles in some way?"

And is it all about the end of the grand cycle itself? ("April drop dead date" perhaps).
And do you think that markets would go out, without a bang? See my point number 2. The opposite is true as well. Markets peak on euphoria and when things seem perfect as a dream. And we are not there yet in the cycle.

Maybe the markets go on a parabolic green summer phase during next approx 4 months, and maybe they crash in November. And crash in a way of "drop dead", fast and sudden.
And maybe the digitization is what happens before the crash (and will be a part of the show during the summer phase), and then maybe after the crash, the new system starts on what symbolised the end of the old (digitization).

Remember this?
the-economist-1988-predicts-digital-world-currency-by-2018-492568052.jpg

Mods, or should I create a new thread in the baked noodles section if I want (and am allowed) to post more about these ideas and connections I believe I made?
 
Or I am presenting information that you (and some others ofc) are having a reaction to because of trying to ignore or overcome or shut out part of the reality that doesn't fit with your belief. That is a real possibility and it is wise to be open to it.

Also, just like member daddycat, it seems you are projecting yourself onto me, and it seems that me presenting my ideas (which really could be true or closer to reality than your view on this topic) has made your ego triggered or made feel inferior.

The triggering thing is that over like 30 posts you have not explained yourself in a coherent way at all, you've just rambled whatever came to mind, no matter how flimsy, and now are still throwing around C's phrases and psychology terms to 'clap back' at me instead of distilling your idea and explaining it.

I'm not an XRP hater by the way, I actually expect (and want) it to go up, so when I see someone marrying their XRP bag with this level of obsession (and worryingly over-leveraged), it's not a good sentiment read on that asset. Like how gold didn't move until most of the loud, confident gold bugs had given up, or even died of old age waiting.


Yes they do, and so do semi newbies.
My chart idea is very simple and is based on the base code of reality, the fibonacci numbers/cycles/waves. You don't have any fibonacci "base" in your chart. So, from where I stand, you are off base.

Some people use fibs successfully, many use them and are wrong, some people don't use them at all and are successful. Again this is just kind of a meaningless half truth. Why not show exactly how you are applying them, exactly how you used them to define price targets, and especially how you are coming up with the timing of your waves, so it is actually readable for others?

My main ideas presented are very simple, and pieces of puzzle from the charts, and fibonacci numbers, and current situation in the world, and the riddlers riddles, and news ("the stupid show" like Joe suggested in Israel vs Iran thread) being timed at specific parts of the cycle, the news being correlated with cycle lows for example, all have a supporting evidence and correlation between the puzzle piece. And the idea that we will soon withness the last part of the grand supercycle (epic rise of the markets, and it could happen this summer to early fall... or it could last longer) before the end of the grand supercycle, the total crash of the whole market (which could happen this November). And the idea that the digitization will be happening during that last part of the grand supercylce (maybe this summer), to digitize and transition to a new kind of system/cycle, before the end of the current one.

And even if something seems like wild speculation, it doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong or non valuable information (or at least theory) to have presented and shared here. Don't burn me at the stake for having ideas. Remember who did that throughout the human history. Priests and followers who got triggered by ideas presented by people who were thinking on their own and who presented novel information about reality that the former were choosing to ignore, overcome and burn down.

If you want to tell me to stop sharing ideas I will stop. I think I learned the lesson "Free will is primary".

I've not even once said that you're wrong, just that you have overconfidence bordering on delusions of grandeur, are overexposed and have shown a thin and bizarre rationale for your position. Burned at the stake? Cmon bro get over yourself.

How can you possibly post something like this and expect to be taken seriously, on this forum:
1750104340858.png

Or taking 2 letters from a C's response, imagining a hint, and completely warping and beating it with a sledgehammer until it resembles something conforming to your pre-existing bias?

Some of your points are rational and I agree with, some are worse than the worst New Age word salad. It's just not considerate to expect people to sift through pages of it.

Either you have a good idea and just can't explain it, or you just like feeling smarter than others, or you're just too excited and are grasping at anything, but if your goal is to help people see your perspective then it's been done the wrong way and is having the opposite effect. It's just not very STO if that's what you're intending.

If you still have this burning urge to share something important, why not rethink your style and write it for the reader instead of it being your disjointed personal notebook. Start from the beginning, distil it down, follow the logic A-B-C.
 
The triggering thing is that over like 30 posts you have not explained yourself in a coherent way at all, you've just rambled whatever came to mind, no matter how flimsy, and now are still throwing around C's phrases and psychology terms to 'clap back' at me instead of distilling your idea and explaining it.

I'm not an XRP hater by the way, I actually expect (and want) it to go up, so when I see someone marrying their XRP bag with this level of obsession (and worryingly over-leveraged), it's not a good sentiment read on that asset. Like how gold didn't move until most of the loud, confident gold bugs had given up, or even died of old age waiting.




Some people use fibs successfully, many use them and are wrong, some people don't use them at all and are successful. Again this is just kind of a meaningless half truth. Why not show exactly how you are applying them, exactly how you used them to define price targets, and especially how you are coming up with the timing of your waves, so it is actually readable for others?



I've not even once said that you're wrong, just that you have overconfidence bordering on delusions of grandeur, are overexposed and have shown a thin and bizarre rationale for your position. Burned at the stake? Cmon bro get over yourself.

How can you possibly post something like this and expect to be taken seriously, on this forum:
View attachment 109489

Or taking 2 letters from a C's response, imagining a hint, and completely warping and beating it with a sledgehammer until it resembles something conforming to your pre-existing bias?

Some of your points are rational and I agree with, some are worse than the worst New Age word salad. It's just not considerate to expect people to sift through pages of it.

Either you have a good idea and just can't explain it, or you just like feeling smarter than others, or you're just too excited and are grasping at anything, but if your goal is to help people see your perspective then it's been done the wrong way and is having the opposite effect. It's just not very STO if that's what you're intending.

If you still have this burning urge to share something important, why not rethink your style and write it for the reader instead of it being your disjointed personal notebook. Start from the beginning, distil it down, follow the logic A-B-C.
Thank you for the feedback. Yes I had the idea to present my idea step by step. I will do my best to do that right.
 
I have been involved with crypto since ETH was 4$. People were saying the exact same things about XRP back then, and they will probably continue to say it for another 10 years(if we make if that far). This is how this market works, it is speculative entirely.. completely intangible. The "next big thing" is always just around the corner.

Sharding, Staking, DAO, On demand liquidity, Yield farming, Governence tokens, Cross chain bridging, NFTs, DEX, Proof of Stake, Delegated staking, AMMs, blah blah blah (None of these things mean much of anything btw)

These are all the things that developers use to give off the idea that these absolutely useless "assets" are anything but a money grab. Crypto is legal fraud. The biggest use case for crypto is a means of transferring money from the hands of the "outsiders" in to the hands of the "insiders".

XRP may be a blue chip crypto, but it isn't much different. Ripple sells 50+ million dollars of their coin per month. They hold 61% of the supply. There isn't a single reason to justify these sell offs either, because look at how slow their development is? They are doing things that are being done by teenagers in their dorm rooms. It is what you would call a "Slow Farm" in the space.

What is the implication here? That these people are honest? They aren't.

Is the implication this has even a remote chance of replacing fiat? It doesn't.

Crypto was made by the PTB to begin with, the chances of it not being entirely controlled and bottlenecked by the same people is slim to none imo. Always expect the worst in this reality. Every avenue will be utilized.
 
Mods, or should I create a new thread in the baked noodles section if I want (and am allowed) to post more about these ideas and connections I believe I made?

I'd recommend creating a substack and posting there if you really feel compelled to write something.

Yes I had the idea to present my idea step by step. I will do my best to do that right.

Writing on Substack would force you to go step by step as no one outside the forum will accept a reference to an obscure channeled material as sufficient evidence for anything and so you'll have to support your ideas without reference to the C's material.

That, I think, would be really good for you.
 
I'd recommend creating a substack and posting there if you really feel compelled to write something.



Writing on Substack would force you to go step by step as no one outside the forum will accept a reference to an obscure channeled material as sufficient evidence for anything and so you'll have to support your ideas without reference to the C's material.

That, I think, would be really good for you.

Thank you for the suggestion. I only wanted to share with you here, with this network of people. My intention was to share/give.
I was thinking to open a baked noodles thread, but it seems it's not welcome/advisable.
I apologise if I caused unnecesary noise.
I think good lesson for me personally is to share less and just focus on my life instead.
 
Just keep this in mind, if it starts to unfold like this: If there is record increases in the markets, stock markets and crypto market especially (and especially if it starts at the beginning of the summer), and if there is a digitization narrative starting to unfold during the summer and early fall (whether it's related or not to Ripple and XRP), and in the same time things in the markets seem ideal and there is a feeling of safety and certainty in the markets and at the world stage (wars ending, new treaties being made), then likely the opposite of "things may get dire as summer approaches" will be true: "all will seem ideal at the fall".
 
Last edited:

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom