Role of Crypto/Cybercurrencies in the PTB's loss of control?

[Sindy-S.R]

I'm gonna leave this here. So much for the so-called monetary revolution... Well played, the people's revolution is actually their revolution.

Session 18 December, 2021

Q: (L) Okay. We have a lot of questions here, so I guess we might as well get to the first one. Mike has some questions about Bitcoin.

(Mike) In general, who is the person (or people) that created Bitcoin?

A: CIA.

Q: (L) Well, alright.

(Mike) For what purpose did they initially create Bitcoin?

A: Bridge to nowhere.

Q: (L) What do you mean, "Bridge to nowhere"?

A: Digitize, and then deprive common man of resource.

Q: (Joe) The kind of obvious idea about any digital currency despite what they say about them is that it's a transition away from physical money.

(Niall) Cashless society.

(Joe) And more control of people. If anybody thinks that that's not what it's about, you're naive. That doesn't mean you can't make money off it in the interim. But eventually, it's a bridge to, yeah...

(Niall) When the music stops...

(L) Yeah, it's a game of musical chairs.

(Mike) There are currently a lot of interests involved in cryptocurrencies, and cryptocurrencies seem to be heading toward ‘main street’ adoption at some point with ‘Web 3.0’ being worked on, created, and built. Whether or not TPTB (or elements of it) were initially involved in the creation of Bitcoin, what are TPTB’s current plans in relation to cryptocurrencies?

(L) Well, I think we just got the answer to that.

(Joe) The plan is to destroy the current global economy - for all sorts of beneficial reasons for the elite. And obviously when you destroy the economy, you rebuild it on what? A digital currency.

(L) Absolute control!

(Joe) They can shut you off at any time.

(L) Just remember that session where we talked about the Mark of the Beast and 666 and all that stuff. They were moving towards absolute control. You won't be able to eat without being a member under their control.

Well, Tucker Carlson is confirming what the Cass brothers confirmed four years ago.
I wonder how he came to that conclusion...

Tucker Carlson won’t invest in Bitcoin because the CIA “created it”​

In this post:​

• Tucker Carlson says he won’t invest in Bitcoin, claiming the CIA may have created the cryptocurrency’s mysterious founder, Satoshi Nakamoto.
• The former Fox News host shared his skepticism at a Turning Point USA event, questioning Bitcoin’s origins and lack of transparency.
• Despite his doubts, Carlson praised Bitcoin’s idea of financial autonomy and privacy, calling it a “great idea” regardless of its creator.

The Tucker Carlson Show host and former Fox News political commentator, Tucker Carlson, won’t buy Bitcoin because it was created by a “mysterious guy who apparently died.”

During a Turning Point USA event honoring the late political activist Charlie Kirk held on Wednesday, Carlson told attendees he avoids investing in things he cannot fully understand, especially those with questionable origins.

“I try to limit myself to things I understand,” he said, adding that nobody has been able to explain who Satoshi Nakamoto really was. “You know, I grew up in DC primarily, in a government family. So, CIA. That’s my guess. Can’t prove it.”

Carlson: Bitcoin was made by the CIA​

Carlson questioned the logic of investing in a digital currency created by an unidentified figure with access to billions of dollars’ worth of untouched coins.

“You’re telling me to invest in something whose founder is mysterious and has billions of dollars of unused Bitcoin. Like, what is that? And no one can answer the question, including some of the biggest holders of Bitcoin in the world,” he told the audience.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1981135016810983670

 

[BHelmet]

Trump pardons the Binance dude convicted of money laundering. Go maga!

 

[A Jay]

He wasn't convicted of money laundering. He was charged and plead guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act which enabled others, such as Hamas and Iran, to get around sanctions.

Zhao and others were charged with violating the Bank Secrecy Act by failing to implement an effective anti-money-laundering program and for willfully violating U.S. economic sanctions “in a deliberate and calculated effort to profit from the U.S. market without implementing controls required by U.S. law,” according to the Justice Department.

Zhao personally pleaded guilty to violating and causing a financial institution to violate the Bank Secrecy Act.

Considering the Banking Secrecy Act is bogus government overreach to begin with and the people the government is most upset about Binance helping, the Iranians, I say good job Trump.

If Trump had pardoned FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, then I'd be upset and oppose the pardon.

 

[nicklebleu]

Interesting article about cryptocurrencies, block chain encryption and quantum computing.

The author is prone to some exaggeration, but I think overall he is correct with his opinion: Unless cryptography is upgraded forthwith, it’s a matter of time until SHA-256 becomes breakable - and then all hell will break loose, not only for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin’s Game Over Moment: Quantum Computing, Deep State Intrigue, and the Coming Crypto Collapse​

The final bell is tolling for Bitcoin. The grand experiment in digital sovereignty, once touted as “unbreakable” money, now faces a quantum doomsday scenario that even its critics didn’t see coming.
THE SILVER ACADEMY
OCT 25, 2025









Quantum computing has sounded the alarm that could render blockchain—and Bitcoin in particular—fundamentally obsolete. As the technological race hurtles forward, the cryptographic underpinning of digital currencies faces mathematical extinction, not by mere gradual obsolescence but by sudden, irreversible compromise. The countdown to Bitcoin’s judgment day has truly begun as quantum computers approach the capabilities necessary to shatter its security—and the world is running out of time to adapt.

The SHA-256 Breaking Point​

Bitcoin’s security cornerstone, SHA-256 encryption, wasn’t considered breakable for decades. Yet, the ground has shifted. As quantum computing milestones are reached, the vulnerabilities in SHA-256 are no longer theoretical. The chilling reality is encapsulated in this emerging consensus: “the mathematical certainty is now established: 13 million qubits breaks SHA-256 in 24 hours. We’re 99.2% of the way there in qubit count alone.” That quote marks the point at which the quantum threat transcends mere possibility and becomes an impending inevitability.

Google’s Willow chip—a breakthrough quantum processor with 105 qubits—cannot break Bitcoin today. But it has “started a clock that cannot be stopped.” Today’s quantum leap means that each advancement brings us closer to the day when the very foundation of Bitcoin’s encryption will expire. The invisible time bomb ticking in the wallets of every crypto holder is no longer hypothetical; the ongoing progress in quantum hardware means the timer is running.

Wealth Hoards Under Quantum Siege​

The ramifications are catastrophic. Satoshi Nakamoto’s legendary cache of 1 million BTC—almost $35 billion—sits in “exposed public keys” vulnerable to quantum attack. Whoever achieves cryptographically-relevant quantum computing first could instantly become the wealthiest individual on Earth, overnight, in what one observer has called the Satoshi Singularity: a $1 trillion Sword of Damocles hanging over the crypto world.

Nor is this a distant scenario. Nation-states, knowing the writing is on the wall, are already archiving every Bitcoin transaction. The “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later Apocalypse” points to a future where privacy evaporates. What is encrypted today becomes public knowledge tomorrow, as quantum breakthroughs will make historical Bitcoin transactions instantly decipherable—unmasking identities and financial records dating back to Bitcoin’s creation.

The 25% Vulnerability Clock​

The urgency is compounded by Deloitte’s alarming finding: 25% of all circulating Bitcoin—roughly 5 million BTC worth over $300 billion—remains locked in vulnerable address formats. These coins could be emptied the moment a quantum computer crosses the critical threshold. With such a large proportion at risk, Bitcoin faces existential peril.

The Hard Fork Ultimatum​

Bitcoin is now at its ultimate test: can the community coordinate the most complex global hard fork in history to upgrade cryptographic primitives before disaster strikes? With no central authority and over 100 million users, successfully implementing quantum-resistant upgrades may be the greatest decentralized coordination feat ever attempted.

Post-Quantum Renaissance … and Quantum Arms Race​

There is hope—if action is swift. Algorithms like Algorand’s quantum-resistant FALCON signatures and NIST-certified CRYSTALS-Dilithium offer alternatives, but their mere availability is not enough. Bitcoin’s ossified culture and slow-moving consensus mechanisms make adaptation a herculean task. Meanwhile, the quantum arms race has begun: the nation that first achieves 13 million error-corrected qubits will gain unprecedented access to all legacy encrypted data, including Satoshi’s fortune and military secrets. It’s the new space race—only faster, more lucrative, and utterly destabilizing.

The Civilizational Lesson​

Security is no longer static—“it’s a process.” In the quantum era, every encrypted dataset has an expiration date, and Bitcoin’s clock just started ticking. Financial sovereignty and digital privacy now depend on constant evolution of cryptographic standards. The question is not if quantum computing will break Bitcoin’s encryption, but when—and whether adaptation will outpace destruction.

Political Dysfunction and Accelerating Risk​

Compounding this threat, the real-time geopolitical landscape is increasingly dire. The Trump administration’s decision to cut cybersecurity funding—even as quantum threats loom—diverts precious resources away from protecting critical infrastructure. As funding shifts to anti-immigration initiatives, national vulnerability increases just as the quantum clock strikes its final minutes. The disconnect between technological risk and political reaction exacerbates the danger.

Conclusion​

The quantum countdown represents a radical shift in the fate of blockchain and Bitcoin. The technology that once guaranteed digital freedom and financial privacy can now be rendered not just obsolete but utterly compromised. With 13 million qubits poised to break SHA-256 in a single day and critical mass all but achieved, only rapid adaptation and global coordination can keep the crypto dream alive. The clock started today—there is no time left for complacency.

 

[Scottie]

Interesting article about cryptocurrencies, block chain encryption and quantum computing.

The author is prone to some exaggeration, but I think overall he is correct with his opinion: Unless cryptography is upgraded forthwith, it’s a matter of time until SHA-256 becomes breakable - and then all hell will break loose, not only for Bitcoin.

I've been hearing a lot about this, but I think it's a bit of nonsense. SHA-256 is a hashing algorithm, not encryption. The idea is that with hashing, you give it input of any length, and the algorithm will output a 256-bit string that is unique for that input data. Change even one bit of the input data, and you get a totally different output. For example:

"Scottie is a nerd" --> d6df508b2b561a5c22ad19a3ddac7efe3cad927040b0f72f8a408087e3e3be5b
"ScottiE is a nerd" --> 7243a5a89adbfc5b12ea9e51b55d88a9b74f2f284020ae262cffc98d1870a972

And the key is that you can't go backwards - IOW, you can't figure out the original input if given the hash. Well, okay, that's used in cryptography, and breaking it would be super-bad.

The trouble is that - as usual - Google is using Willow and claiming it will be super-awesome... just give us some more time! This is the 'theme' of quantum computing. Willow only has 105 qubits, and millions are needed. That's a big problem because the more qubits you have, the more "noise" is introduced, and suddenly things don't work at all.

So, when Google or whoever shows me an actual functioning 10 million qubit chip, THEN I'll say, "Uh-oh, quantum computers are about to break cryptography!"

I suppose it might not happen that way, but I suspect that they're prepping people for the 'crash' of cryptos (and everything else) while simultaneously getting them to believe crazy narratives. Also, keep in mind that SHA-256 and AES encryption (the most popular type used for everything) were basically designed by the NSA itself in the first place, so... Yeah.

Business as usual!

 

[axj]

Also, keep in mind that SHA-256 and AES encryption (the most popular type used for everything) were basically designed by the NSA itself in the first place, so... Yeah.

The bigger story would be that all of banking becomes hackable, not just crypto. And of course this potential danger has been known for many years and supposedly quantum-proof algorithms exist as well.