Hi everyone,
I just finished reading The secret Mistress by Mary Balogh, on Amazon it said book 3 but the story actually precedes the other two in the trilogy, so I probably made a mistake there. It didn't ruin the story at all. I have a few thoughts that I wanted to share, I will try to be brief.
Not sure what I will be reading next, maybe I will switch author's perhaps Julia Quinn? Either way, I will be posting my notes here once I finish the next one.
Thank you all for reading.
I just finished reading The secret Mistress by Mary Balogh, on Amazon it said book 3 but the story actually precedes the other two in the trilogy, so I probably made a mistake there. It didn't ruin the story at all. I have a few thoughts that I wanted to share, I will try to be brief.
The story follows Edward and Angeline, she is a Dudley, sister of Jocelyn and Ferdinand the two main characters in the other two books. She runs into Edward and is dazzled by how proper he is, go through their own drama in a very endearing story, and marry, have children 7 years hence and the story ends.
I have been trying to be brief in my notes on these stories, but I have to mention how endearing and likable I found Angeline to be, she is a chatty lady, lord she can talk, but there's something very beautiful and lovely about it. In the other two stories, she was always really funny, she even had a catchphrase when referring to her husband "the provoking man!" but her chattiness is a great way to see through right into her thinking. I really liked her.
Angeline is transparently open, she can't help herself, and that can be a way to be in trouble, but also a great way to remain self assured. Most of us hold our words because we're insecure, and I am not saying that we all become chattering machines by default and unconsciously, but Angeline would pour her heart out and the truth constantly.
When words can be used constructively, as a map of our inner world to others, they are creative, and that's what she strikes me at, a creative mind. Transparent and innocent, however she also talks to hide her insecurities, to explain herself to the world, as she grew to adopt the narrative she had been told by her unloving mother and her bitter governess about herself.
So, our words, our expression of our minds and hearts, can be creative vehicles to give ourselves to the world or to hide away from it behind layers of protective walls.
Edward was all proper, a true gentleman, but a cynical man who did not believe in love, saw reality as a practical business, and Angeline frustrates him, she is his total opposite. He could be described as a bitter and rigid man who was jealous of the life others, with less rules than those he imposed on himself, had.
He had to learn to allow himself out of himself, to break through his vision of life as mere duty and find passion. Angeline had to ground herself from her wild passion and fall in line, not a rigid line but a flowing one with more structure than the emptiness of living things day by day.
Edward's arc is interesting, as he is contrasted with lord Windrow, a rake, who Edward hates... but I think it's because Windrow reminds him of his late brother who was less proper than Edward yet so loved by peers and family. I think we all have experienced this at some pint. the jealousy of feeling like the world is unfair because we follow rules and get less, seemingly, than someone who is willing to break them. But Windrow is simply a man, capable of love and loyalty, just different than Edward.
That is law and faith, that is rigid structure vs necessary sin. Edward lived in law thinking it enough, but it wasn't until he found a way to balance both duty and passion, that he wasn't whole, and who better for this than Angeline, someone so wild and in touch with her inner world and emotions. She knew she wanted to marry him at first sight, he thought that it didn't make sense.
The other thing that I thought about was the good and the bad and context. They're in constant flux, and constantly dancing around one another, being self aware means also recognizing when these things change. Following rules can indeed have a lot of benefit for certain tasks, and certain purposes, but always following rules will only leave you absent from your life.
Breaking the rules will most definitely land you in trouble, but knowing when to break them or bend them, take risks to be wrong is how we meet life. Someone who is good by default because "I have to be good" lacks the choice that makes one a good person, someone who simply refuses to let anyone bend him to their will, is a petulant child who is impossible to rely on, no one knows him.
So following either path unconsciously is just as destructive, or stagnating rather, finding the way to dance in between them and the times in our lives when each is the adequate choice to make is liberating, but also, a life long task.
And so, Edward and Angeline pulled one another, or rather invited, from their extremes into a balanced dance that sways between the two. It was a lovely story about polar oposites, at least I thought so. As it's not just being complimentary and compatible, but choosing to give something yours, that is so yours that is part of your identity, in service of discovering the rest of you, in order to amalgamate it all in a more whole version of yourself.
At the end, the epilogue of this story was a lovey birthing scene, very moving indeed. It was generic, but it was so moving, not sure how many of us had births as the one described in that epilogue.
I have been trying to be brief in my notes on these stories, but I have to mention how endearing and likable I found Angeline to be, she is a chatty lady, lord she can talk, but there's something very beautiful and lovely about it. In the other two stories, she was always really funny, she even had a catchphrase when referring to her husband "the provoking man!" but her chattiness is a great way to see through right into her thinking. I really liked her.
Angeline is transparently open, she can't help herself, and that can be a way to be in trouble, but also a great way to remain self assured. Most of us hold our words because we're insecure, and I am not saying that we all become chattering machines by default and unconsciously, but Angeline would pour her heart out and the truth constantly.
When words can be used constructively, as a map of our inner world to others, they are creative, and that's what she strikes me at, a creative mind. Transparent and innocent, however she also talks to hide her insecurities, to explain herself to the world, as she grew to adopt the narrative she had been told by her unloving mother and her bitter governess about herself.
So, our words, our expression of our minds and hearts, can be creative vehicles to give ourselves to the world or to hide away from it behind layers of protective walls.
Edward was all proper, a true gentleman, but a cynical man who did not believe in love, saw reality as a practical business, and Angeline frustrates him, she is his total opposite. He could be described as a bitter and rigid man who was jealous of the life others, with less rules than those he imposed on himself, had.
He had to learn to allow himself out of himself, to break through his vision of life as mere duty and find passion. Angeline had to ground herself from her wild passion and fall in line, not a rigid line but a flowing one with more structure than the emptiness of living things day by day.
Edward's arc is interesting, as he is contrasted with lord Windrow, a rake, who Edward hates... but I think it's because Windrow reminds him of his late brother who was less proper than Edward yet so loved by peers and family. I think we all have experienced this at some pint. the jealousy of feeling like the world is unfair because we follow rules and get less, seemingly, than someone who is willing to break them. But Windrow is simply a man, capable of love and loyalty, just different than Edward.
That is law and faith, that is rigid structure vs necessary sin. Edward lived in law thinking it enough, but it wasn't until he found a way to balance both duty and passion, that he wasn't whole, and who better for this than Angeline, someone so wild and in touch with her inner world and emotions. She knew she wanted to marry him at first sight, he thought that it didn't make sense.
The other thing that I thought about was the good and the bad and context. They're in constant flux, and constantly dancing around one another, being self aware means also recognizing when these things change. Following rules can indeed have a lot of benefit for certain tasks, and certain purposes, but always following rules will only leave you absent from your life.
Breaking the rules will most definitely land you in trouble, but knowing when to break them or bend them, take risks to be wrong is how we meet life. Someone who is good by default because "I have to be good" lacks the choice that makes one a good person, someone who simply refuses to let anyone bend him to their will, is a petulant child who is impossible to rely on, no one knows him.
So following either path unconsciously is just as destructive, or stagnating rather, finding the way to dance in between them and the times in our lives when each is the adequate choice to make is liberating, but also, a life long task.
And so, Edward and Angeline pulled one another, or rather invited, from their extremes into a balanced dance that sways between the two. It was a lovely story about polar oposites, at least I thought so. As it's not just being complimentary and compatible, but choosing to give something yours, that is so yours that is part of your identity, in service of discovering the rest of you, in order to amalgamate it all in a more whole version of yourself.
At the end, the epilogue of this story was a lovey birthing scene, very moving indeed. It was generic, but it was so moving, not sure how many of us had births as the one described in that epilogue.
Thank you all for reading.