Russia Begins Operations in Syria: End Game for the US Empire?

Clueless: Pentagon Loses Count of Arms Supplied to ISIL
http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941104001579

It is no mystery that the United States and its rogue partners have been supplying weapons and ordnance to various terrorist groups in Iraq and Syria for years.

What’s new is that the Pentagon no longer has any clue how many arms have ended up in the hands of its hard-core jihadists. More so, the Pentagon conveniently overlooks the fact that much of it have been supplied to the terrorist outfits by its regional partners in crime.

While it is true that ISIL has captured some US-made weapons and ordnance from the Iraqi army, there have been repeated reports of the CIA, Qatar and Saudi Arabia covertly arming the militants. Although the regime changers claim these weapons are being supplied to “moderate” opposition groups like the Free Syrian Army, much of it ultimately ends up in the hands of extremist outfits. This is because the imaginary “friends of Syria” and “moderate” head-choppers have all joined the proscribed terrorist groups of ISIL and Al-Qaeda.

According to corporate media reports, Turkish intelligence has also been supplying militants fighting against the Syrian government with arms and ammunition. A recent testimony from Turkish military officers in court documents published by the media reveals that rocket parts, ammunition and semi-finished mortar shells are being carried in trucks accompanied by state intelligence agency officials to parts of Syria under ISIL control. Silly enough, the Pentagon officials insist US-supplied arms and other supplies that fall into the hands of militants do so due to shoddy recordkeeping by the Iraqi army!

As is, international law bars the United States and its allies from providing arms to terrorist groups committing human rights violations and genocide in Syria. Despite that, significant amounts of US-made arms are still being deliberately diverted to the terrorist groups there, largely thanks to the CIA-Turkish-Saudi-Qatari patchwork supply system.

This contradicts the official line of US government on its policy in Syria. Together, the regime changers are using the burgeoning threat of ISIL to justify the bogus War on Terror, trigger arms race in the region, and uphold excessive mass surveillance and crackdowns on civil liberties at home.


Meanwhile - back in the States ......
Louisiana Truck Spills Tomahawk Cruise Missiles Onto Roadway After Crash (Video)
http://investmentwatchblog.com/louisiana-truck-spills-missiles-onto-roadway-after-crash/

January 24th, 2016 - According to KNOE.com, the truck that overturned on Highway 167 was carrying explosives, and not just any kind of explosives but KNOE confirms the truck was carrying missiles for the Department of Defense.

The fact that missiles actually fell off the truck and had to be ‘accounted for’ before the highway was reopened may have been the least of our problems with this story; according to the person who was on scene, the missiles that fell off the truck were Tomahawk Cruise Missiles.

We’re aware that nearby Fort Polk in Louisiana has a nuclear support team and we understand that it’s not uncommon for such military items to be transported within the state.


Update: Highway 167 re-opens after truck overturns
http://www.knoe.com/home/headlines/Rollover-closes-Hwy-167-Truck-may-be-carrying-rockets-and-other-explosive-items-366200341.html?device=phone&c=y

Update: January 22, 2016 at 3:15pm:
Fort Polk officials confirms that there were missiles that fell off of the truck.

No injuries were reported from the accident and there was no damage to the truck.
___

Update: January 22, 2016 at 12:15pm:
Danny Smith of the Union Parish Homeland Security confirms it was explosives on the truck.

Officials from Fort Polk are in route to gather the materials.

Original Story:
A rollover involving an 18 wheeler has closed both lanes of Hwy 167 for several hours, just north of Bernice. State Police are investigating the crash and say no one is hurt.

The 18 wheeler has a hazmat placard on it. Louisiana State Police is trying to figure out what the truck is carrying.

The Farmerville Gazette is reporting the following:
"Early reports indicates a vehicle hauling rockets and other explosive items was involved in the accident. Information from Louisiana State Police indicates the trailer carrying the explosives became separated from its tractor and spilled its contents onto the roadway.


Union Parish Sheriff Dusty Gates said his deputies, troopers from the Louisiana State Police and representatives from the U.S. Department of Defense are either on the scene or en route.'

Gates said a company from Missouri has been dispatched to assist in the cleanup. He indicated the roadway may be closed for a good period of time until all the spilled items are recovered."



Report: ISIL's Foreign Fighters Leaving
http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941105000524

"The ISIL's decision to reduce the salaries of its foreign militants by half has immensely impacted them so much that some of them have left the terrorist group," the Arabic-language al-Sumeria news channel quoted a local source as saying on Monday.

The source reiterated the decline in the number of the foreign ISIL militants shows that their impetus is money and not Islam.



France could lift Russia sanctions if Minsk agreements fulfilled
http://rbth.com/international/2016/01/25/france-could-lift-russia-sanctions-if-minsk-agreements-fulfilled_562211

France is hoping that the sanctions will be lifted from Russia after the Minsk agreements are implemented, French Economy, Industry and Digital Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron said.

"You know, the imposed sanctions were closely connected to certain events and their lifting is linked to the observance of the Minsk agreements. We are hoping that our two countries will promote the observance of the Minsk agreements, and if these agreements are implemented, that position was confirmed by the president of the republic [France] several days ago, one can indeed talk about softening and revision of the current situation," Macron told during a briefing following a meeting of the Russian-French council on economic financial, industry and trade issues held in Moscow on Jan. 25.



Syrian opposition says Kerry applies pressure over peace talks
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-opposition-idUSKCN0V20TW

The lead negotiator in the Syrian opposition said on Sunday it was coming under pressure from U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to attend peace talks in Geneva this week in order to negotiate over steps including a halt to air strikes.

The opposition's High Negotiation Committee, which groups political and armed opponents of President Bashar al-Assad, has said it will not attend negotiations until the government halts bombardments, lifts blockades, and releases detainees - steps mentioned in a United Nations Security Council resolution passed last month.

Negotiator Mohamad Alloush said Kerry, who met HNC officials on Saturday, had "come to pressure us to forgo our humanitarian rights ... and to go to negotiate for them".

"There will be a big response to these pressures," he told Reuters, without giving further details. Asked if the peace talks would go ahead this week, he said "we leave this to the coming hours".

The government has meanwhile said it is ready to attend the talks. They had been due to begin in Geneva on Monday, but a Western diplomat said earlier on Sunday that they were unlikely to begin before Wednesday.



Poland clouds NATO's nuanced Russia plan
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nato-poland-analysis-idUSKCN0V01OE

Poland is putting its own spin on a nuanced NATO plan to deter Moscow in eastern Europe without stationing permanent troops on Russia's borders, prompting disquiet from allies including Britain, which needs Warsaw's help in EU reform negotiations.

Poland's defense minister on Thursday seized on Britain's announcement that it is sending troops for exercises in the country, telling local radio that London would station 1,000 military personnel in Poland from next year.

Britain's defense ministry declined to comment, but alliance diplomats say there are no such plans. Britain is providing nearly 1,000 troops for two NATO exercises later this year, as well as 1,000 personnel in four years' time, when Poland will lead the new NATO rapid-reaction spearhead force.

But the subtlety of the language used to promote the new NATO deterrent policy in the east is an opportunity for Poland's new conservative government. Warsaw, which is hosting the NATO summit in July, has called for a permanent NATO troop presence in the past and the new government has intensified those demands.

NATO's current compromise aims to have a "persistent" - rather than "permanent" - military in the east, based on a new network of eight small NATO outposts, more war games, and, if needed, a rapid response force, including air, maritime and special operations components of up to 40,000 personnel. "Some people say 'permanent', others use 'persistent', other people use 'rotation'. In fact we are talking about the same thing," General Petr Pavel, chairman of NATO's military committee, told a news conference on Thursday.

The idea is to reassure the ex-Soviet countries in NATO that they are protected from the kind of annexation Russia orchestrated in February in 2014 in Crimea, while avoiding a return to the Cold War, when the United States had some 300,000 service personnel stationed in Europe.

NATO also wants to keep a 1997 promise to Moscow not to permanently station forces on the Russian border, thereby avoiding antagonizing a newly-assertive Russia and reach a peace settlement in eastern Ukraine, where NATO says Russia supports the rebels with weapons and troops.

Russia responded on Friday by saying it will form four new military divisions this year to strengthen its western and central regions because of the stepped-up exercises, which NATO set out in a calendar published on Thursday.
 
c.a. said:
Putin Is Winning the Final Chess Match With Obama
22.01.2016
PRAVDA.RU
[...]
http://www.pravdareport.com/world/europe/22-01-2016/133137-putin_winning_final_chess_match_with_obama-0/
The world press is filled with violence and sexual attack horror stories about the Islamic refugees escaping from Syria and other war torn countries of the Middle East to Greece and consequently flooding into all areas of Europe. It is actually very easy to travel from Syria to Lebanon and then take the ferry to Turkey and from there to Greece and subsequently the mainland overland to Europe. This is now big business organized like a one-way tour package from the Middle East to Europe.

Although there obviously are some ISIS fighters and Islamic militants slipping into Europe under cover of the humanitarian crises most are simply Sunni Moslems escaping the poverty, death and destruction of foreign military intervention in the region. Yes the sex crimes are a real problem because the majority of those escaping the region are men looking for work coming from a conservative society to the open societies of Europe.

Most immigrants enter Europe through the economic basket case of Greece where the economy has already been destroyed by too much government debt, corruption and EU banking excesses so Greece can afford to do little to stem the Islamic refugee tide. While a case can be made that the location of Syria and Lebanon adjacent to Turkey and the ease of transportation to Greek islands just offshore is helping the flow to Europe. Still the organized nature of the operation makes me wonder if this is also an undercover operation designed to create a new mission for NATO at the same time weakening the economy of Europe to further Washington's economic interests today in the Obama Crash of 2016.

The world is now in recession at best and maybe flirting with a global depression. This means politicians will do what is best for their national political future and the consequences for the national economy, citizens or business future is of little consequence to them. This also suggests that global alliances will mean little when domestic national politicians are fighting for survival.

Here is how the chess matches have turned out so far in the Putin/Obama competition. -

Chess Match 1 - Consider the pattern of Washington actions against Russia. First Washington supported the overthrow of the legitimate but pro Russian government of Ukraine. The goal was three fold, first to control and cut off Russian gas exports to Europe through Ukraine, second to force Russia to vacate their warm water naval base in Crimea or else act militarily against Ukraine and create the fear of a Russian threat against all of Europe. This would force Europe to depend more on NATO that is an extension of the American military power in Europe. Putin's response was checkmate, as he wisely didn't take the bait and this plan failed to create the desired Russian military threat to strengthen NATO and US leadership in Europe against Russia.:

Chess Match 2
- The second attempt was to overthrow Assad allowing ISIS to do the dirty work thus opening up a Qatar gas pipeline to Europe again competing with and ending European dependence on Russian gas. This would have meant curtailing much of the Russian gas profits, taxes and government revenues. Again surprisingly Putin acted to defend Syria and Assad from ISIS and again Putin checkmated Washington.

Chess Match 3 - We are now in the middle of the third chess game between Putin & Obama. This game is the reason for Washington's destruction and desolation of much of the Middle East. Again remember Washington's foreign policy objectives are to control Middle East energy resources and force Russia to stand down against American global hegemony.

A strong and united NATO is necessary to put pressure on Russia and since the collapse of communism and the perceived Soviet threat to Europe, NATO has had little reason to exist. Well now I would suggest that part of the Islamic threat and massive movement of refugees to Europe is being manipulated and manufactured as a means to recreate a mission for NATO forces in Europe. A strong Washington led NATO will allow the United States to bring more pressure against Russia.

If I am right here, then what is the checkmate course of action for Russia in Syria and Lebanon? The ultimate solution is for Russia to stop the movement of refugees and Islamic radicals to Europe by forcing ISIS out of Syria and back into Iraq and effectively blocking off the escape routes to Turkey both overland and by ferry.

This would probably take more than just Syrian troops as it may mean Russian troops on the ground in both countries after military security requests from Syria and Lebanon to halt the exodus and end ISIS occupation of Syria. Security in Syria and Lebanon would help to halt the refugee flow to Europe and Putin and Russia would then get the credit they deserve for this action to protect Europe. This successful outcome would guarantee good relations between the people of Europe and Russia ultimately forcing more European politicians and governments to restore friendly and close relations with Putin's Russia.

This would be the final checkmate needed to force the Obama Administration to reevaluate Neocon policies in the Middle East. American military actions and occupation have already destroyed much of the prosperity of the region. When this is combined with our earlier attempt to weaken Russia and Iran with lower oil prices not taking into account the growing threat of global recession and depression the problem today only gets worse. Today the Middle East is looking at increased instability and a lower standard of living at a time when Europe is suffering economically and can not absorb the inflow of refugees.

Finally, take a look at a map of Europe and you will see the 28 members of the European Union and most are in NATO. Then look at the lone country not in the EU or NATO that can still control it's borders and policies and it is the neutral but still independent Switzerland. Neutral Switzerland can be a safe haven for your personal and retirement wealth in the coming global crash and depression. More information is available by contacting the author here.

Yes Russia and Europe would do well to work together to counter and halt the flood of Middle East refugees to Europe before the current global recession/depression destroys the prosperity of the region. While the refugee threat might have been a reasonable tool or Washington geopolitical tactic to restore NATO and therefore American leadership over Europe under normal economic conditions, the situation is now getting out of control. With today's global economic slowdown and the risk of depression threatening the economy of Europe this tactic borders on economic genocide for Europe and must be countered and restrained for the peace and prosperity of the region. Let us all work together and hope and pray that the Obama Crash of 2016 does not turn into the Obama Global Depression of 2016 because of some poorly timed geopolitical brinkmanship and maneuvering suggested by Washington neocon advisors.
[...]

Just so you know this was just posted by angelburst29 above. It's a lot to read but it helps to follow the whole thread. I don't mean to discourage your efforts.
 
sToRmR1dR said:
Iranian President Heads to Italy for First Visit After Sanctions Relief

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160125/1033653841/rouhani-first-visit-europe.html


Iran, Italy Sign Up Giant Oil, Gas Agreement, 13 MoUs

http://www.shana.ir/en/newsagency/254130/Iran-Italy-Sign-Up-Giant-Oil-Gas-Agreement-13-MoUs

The Italian oil services group Saipem announced that the MoU signed with the Parsian Oil & Gas Development Company includes the revamping and upgrading of the Pars Shiraz and Tabriz refineries in Iran, according to the company’s website.

“In the presence of the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hassan Rouhani, and the Italian Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi, Saipem has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) concerning potential cooperation on major projects in Iran,” said a media release.

“The MoU, signed with the Parsian Oil & Gas Development Company, envisages discussions aimed at Saipem’s potential cooperation in revamping and upgrading the Pars Shiraz and Tabriz refineries,” it read.

The deal was reached along 13 other agreements between the two countries on the first-day of the on-going visit of President Hassan Rouhani to Italy on Monday evening following his meetings with Italian president and prime minister.

Prior to the signing ceremony, unconfirmed media reports also indicated that a pipeline contract worth between 3.6-4.6 billion euros for Saipem, a subsidiary of Italian energy company Eni owning approximately 43% of Saipem's shares, was among the deals.

Minister of Petroleum Bijan Zangeneh and other top-ranking officials as well as business people are accompanying President Rouhani in the visit.

The four-day state visit, the first by an Iranian head of state after implementation of the nuclear Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JPCOA), will also take Rouhani and his entourage to Paris for expansion of bilateral ties with European countries after removal of anti-Iran sanctions.

Negotiations will reportedly focus on bilateral relations as well as regional developments as Iranian and European statesmen in Rome and Paris are expected to confer and sign agreements and contracts on energy, economic, industrial and trade relations.

In recent months, Zangeneh has been receiving numerous delegations headed by European counterparts, CEOs, business people and industrialists including in the field of energy ENI and Total who expressed their interest to cooperate in Iran’s oil, gas, and petrochemical industry.

The meetings took place following the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers last summer in Vienna.


Iran opens its market for Italy — president

http://tass.ru/en/economy/852094

TEHRAN, January 25. /TASS/. With the signing of a number of agreements covering a broad sphere of partnership, Iran is opening its market for Italy, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said in Rome on Monday after the ceremony of signing a package of bilateral documents worth $18.4 billion.

"The geopolitical situation of Iran, its human, energy and industrial resources offer broad possibilities for bilateral cooperation between Italy and Iran," the president said, noting that new contracts marked a new stage in bilateral cooperation.

President Hassan Rouhani also marked the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Middle East and Mediterranean regions, noting that Tehran and Rome had experience in cooperating on issues connected with the settlement in such trouble spots as Afghanistan. ‘"We could also productively cooperate with Italy on the settlement in Libya," the president noted.
 
LIVE:

Lavrov Recaps Year of Russian Diplomacy in Annual Press Conference

http://sputniknews.com/russia/20160126/1033705275/lavrov-press-conference-diplomacy.html

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov holds a press conference to mark the achievements of Russia’s diplomacy and foreign policy in 2015 on Tuesday.

The press conference is broadcast live on the Russian Foreign Ministry’s website in Russian, with simultaneous translations provided in both English and French.

Russia was at the forefront of many of the world’s major events last year, including launching an anti-terrorist aerial campaign in Syria, negotiating the much-anticipated talks between the Syrian government and opposition members, as well as helping Iran reach an agreement on its nuclear program that paved way to the lifting of the anti-Iran sanctions this month.

On Russian Anti-Terrorist Campaign in Syria

"As a permanent member of the US Security Council, and one of the largest countries of the world, Russia exercised its right to get involved in the Syrian conflict."

However, the Minister added, one can't use only a military way to combat terrorism, but should also fight it politically.

Sergei Lavrov reiterated that the international law is the only basis of finding solutions to the conflict, but stressed that Russian aerospace operations in Syria definitely helped to change situation in the country.

"The Russian Aerospace Forces' operations [in Syria] following the Syrian government's request have really helped to change the situation in this country and helped to limit the territory under terrorists' control," Lavrov said at his annual press conference.

According to Lavrov, it became clear what is going on in Syria — who supports or helps terrorists, who fights against them or uses them for "unilateral egoistic purposes."

On the International Partnership

Russia is very active in cooperation with its partners of the Eurasian Economic Union, ASEAN Economic Community and the countries of BRICS.

On Iran Nuclear Program Talks

Russia welcomes all the steps on normalization of the situation around Iran's nuclear program and was very active in pursuing talks on the matter.

On Relationship With Ukraine and Minsk Accords

Russia is open to negotiation on the matter, presuming noninterference into internal matters of each country and strictly stcking to the Minsk accords.

"Policy of restraining Russia continues, though high time to drop this policy and file in historical archives," noted Sergei Lavrov.

He also noted that US, EU continue non-constructive, dangerous policy toward Russia, including fortifying NATO.

On Russia's Foreign Diplomatic Activity and Its Major Challenges

Russian Foreign Minister said that among Russia's major international challenges is to establish a democratic and fair international system. Russia howeve can't achieve it on its own, but only within the international partnership.

On Relationship With Canada

Russian Foreign Minister noted that regardless of ups and downs in the relationship between the two, common sense always prevailed. The rhetoric of the new government points at their readiness to restore relationship with Russia. Lavrov hopes that they will be ready to correct the mistakes of their predecessors.

On Relationship With Germany

"We are engaged in an intensive dialogue, I would not characterize our relations as those being in a crisis or in a gridlock," said the Foreign Minister.

One of the examples of the above statement, Lavrov said, is the dicision to lay down the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The Ukrainian crisis, he acknowledged, is not a hurdle to this cooperation.

Regarding the current refugee crisis in the European Union, the Russian Foreign Minister stressed that Russia is interested in the strong EU and is aware of its current problems. Russia hopes that this crisis will be suvvessfully resolved in the EU and in Germany though being a major challenge to the EU.

Only a unified EU can be a good partner, but the solution to the crisis should not be made at the expense of its members.

On the Syrian Crisis

Answering to the question on which of the Syrian opposition members should participate in the talks on the settlement of the Syrian crisis, the minister answered that there should be a wide spectre of opposition leaders present, including the Syrian Kurds.These talks should be aimed at ceasefire and political reforms in Syria, so there should not only be opposition, which fights against President Assad.

About the Kurds

"We see Kurds as a very important nation and an efficient unit to fight against Daesh (ISIL/ISIS)."

"We fully respect the territorial sovereignty and integrity of Iraq," Lavrov said referring to recently voiced trends to split the territory of Iraq.

On the Nuclear Problem of the Korean Peninsular

"The problem is not only to prevent North Korea of obtaining a nuclear weapon, but to prevent everyone on the Peninsular, including South Korea, of obtaining the one," said Lavrov.

Russia has been working actively with its colleagues, including China, on this matter. Six party talks on the issue should be resumed. it is not a good idea to meet without North Korea, which would mean that we are trying to isolate some participant. We should not repeat a mistake of isolating a state, similar to the one which was made with Iran, when it was at first left out from the talks on its nuclear program.

On the Relationship With Bulgaria

"Russia and Bulgaria are closely tied historically, culturally and spiritually," the minister noted.

Russia has never advocated for any roll back in the relationship.

With regards to the South Stream project, the Foreign Minister noted that it was hindered by the European Commission in Brussels, without any consultation with its member states, so Russia had to search for an alternative.

"It is quite distirbing and alarming for Russia,' Lavrov said referring to the expansion of NATO, including on the territory of Bulgaria, which is also a NATO member state.

On the Development in Donbass
 
BREAKING:

17 dead in double bombing in Homs, Syria - reports

https://www.rt.com/news/330141-homs-syria-bombing-killed/

DETAILS TO FOLLOW
 
goyacobol said:
Just so you know this was just posted by angelburst29 above. It's a lot to read but it helps to follow the whole thread. I don't mean to discourage your efforts.

Thanks goyacobol. angelburst29 brings home the bacon with the information.

Will look a little more closer to her's and all post, so as not to be repetitious with the thread.
 
Russian Air Force strikes ISIS around Deir ez-Zor as jihadists prepare to storm key Syrian city
Published time: 25 Jan, 2016 16:33
RT
https://www.rt.com/news/330085-syria-russia-deir-ez-zor/
Supported by Russian war planes, Syrian government troops have been successful in defeating Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) militants in Latakia province. In the past 24 hours, more than 92 square kilometers (35 square miles) of territories were regained from terrorist groups. The Syrian Army has regained control over 28 towns, including the strategically important town of Rabia in Latakia
Массированный удар самолетами Дальней авиации по объектам инфраструктуры ИГИЛ в Сирии
Published on Nov 17, 2015
 
c.a. said:
goyacobol said:
Just so you know this was just posted by angelburst29 above. It's a lot to read but it helps to follow the whole thread. I don't mean to discourage your efforts.

Thanks goyacobol. angelburst29 brings home the bacon with the information.

Will look a little more closer to her's and all post, so as not to be repetitious with the thread.

Small misdemeanor - no problem. Plus, C.A.'s link to PRAVADA.RU is the "source" which I failed to link back too! We must be on the same "wavelink" with thoughts of the information important enough to Post? On another note, I mess up on every photo I try to insert - so C.A. - keep them comin'......
 
Yemen’s healthcare system is in tatters, with 130 attacks on facilities since a bombing campaign (supported by Britain) began. Enough is enough, says Médecins Sans Frontières.

Yemen's healthcare system left in tatters due to Saudi bombing campaign - supported by Britain (Photos - Video)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/yemens-healthcare-system-left-in-tatters-due-to-saudi-bombing-campaign-that-the-uk-supported-a6833546.html

When the men and women who worked at Shiara hospital heard the explosion, there was little surprise. Just half an hour’s drive from the border with Saudi Arabia, in Yemen’s mountainous northern region, they were used to the sound of shelling.

What they did not expect 10 months into the Saudi-led campaign of airstrikes was that it would be their own hospital that had been hit. The bombing on 10 January left six people dead, including three staff members. Many more were injured.

“The wounded were hit by shrapnel from the missile, and also by shards of metal from the fence [around the hospital]. The injuries were brutal,” said Teresa Sancristoval, the head of the emergency desk at Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), which operates in the hospital.

The attack was among 130 on health facilities hit in Yemen since the Saudi-led coalition began its bombing campaign in March last year. It was the fourth on a facility supported by MSF – which says it gives detailed co-ordinates for its hospitals to both sides of the conflict. The attacks have left a healthcare system barely functioning.

In the latest bombing, on Thursday, an MSF ambulance driver was killed in a strike on the northern town of Dahyan, blamed on the Saudi-led coalition. “The driver had already put his life at risk to work for MSF,” Juan Prieto, an MSF project co-ordinator in the capital, Sanaa, said. “He had no idea that Thursday would be the last day of his life.”

MSF has called for an independent investigation into the attacks on its facilities and said the conflict in Yemen was being conducted with “total disregard for the rules of war”. The comments were the most strongly-worded yet from the charity which has asked the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission (IHFFC), the independent body with a mandate to investigate suspected violations of international humanitarian law, to conduct an investigation.

MSF also reserved criticism for the British government which has supported Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the war, and provides arms to the country, for its “offensive and irresponsible” response to the attacks. The Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond had said there have been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law.

In this climate, people have become too afraid to go to hospital. In the immediate aftermath of the 10 January attack, two of the wounded refused to be treated, fearing a so-called “double tap” attack, when the same targets are hit twice in succession. Since the attack, pregnant women in the area have chosen to give birth in caves. Staff at hospitals have become too afraid to work.

“People ask to spend the minimum time possible in the hospital,” Ms Sancristoval said. “This is the opposite to the many wars I have worked in over the last 25 years, when staff would ask to sleep at hospitals at night because they are considered the safest place.”



Media Silent as US Helps Saudis Starve Half a Million Yemeni Children
http://russia-insider.com/en/media-silent-us-backed-saudi-forces-starve-half-million-yemeni-children/ri12406

ADEN, Yemen — While the media was flooded with images of the starving children of Syria, the thousands of children suffering from Saudi Arabia’s U.S.-backed onslaught on Yemen made far fewer headlines.

The mainstream media was eager to report on the struggle for survival in Madaya. The mountain town near Syria’s southwestern border was once known as a popular resort destination in the Middle East, but its population is now reportedly being starved under a siege by the Syrian army.

However, the actual situation is far more complex. The U.S.-supported, so-called “moderate” rebels including the Nusra Front, the Syrian branch of al-Qaida, had first laid siege to the cities of Kefraya and Fua, leading to a retaliatory siege on Madaya by the Assad government. Those same rebel groups were also, in turn, responsible for allowing the starvation in Madaya to continue by occupying the city and keeping humanitarian aid out of reach of the populace as a strategic tactic. Additionally, many images used in media reports on Madaya turned out to be fake or misleading.

Meanwhile, far fewer journalists are covering the large-scale starvation and displacement taking place in Yemen, a situation caused by a bombing campaign and blockade led by Saudi Arabia and its allies and backed by U.S. military aid. The Nusra Front, one of the groups responsible for skyrocketing food prices in Madaya, also has the backing of the Saudi government, like many of the rebel forces in the region.

Saudi Arabia is currently engaged in a proxy war with Iran, who Riyadh blames, inaccurately, for the rise to power of the Houthis in Yemen and setbacks to the kingdom’s agenda in Syria, leading to a bombing campaign and embargo on crucial resources that began in April.

UNICEF reported in October that 537,000 Yemeni children were at risk of severe malnutrition nationwide, while Alexi O’Brien, reporting for Al-Jazeera in September, noted that the United Nations warned that 96,000 children were “starving and close to death” in the port city of al-Hodeidah, and an additional 8,000 children faced starvation in Aden in 2016.

The situation was so dire nationwide that, in June, the U.N. reported “that at least six million people in Yemen are in urgent need of emergency food and life-saving assistance, a new United Nations (UN) investigation has found … 10 out of Yemen’s 22 governorates are facing an ‘emergency level’ food security situation amid the ongoing conflict, including major areas like Aden, Taiz, Saa’da and Al Baida.” In July, Oxfam reported that the number of starving people in Yemen had topped 6 million — nearly half the country’s population of 13 million. Aid workers are struggling to reach the needy, with the World Food Programme reporting that it had served 3.5 million Yemenis by August.

While the suffering of the residents of Madaya is heart-wrenching, some critics have questioned the motives behind the media’s focus on this single town rather than suffering in Yemen or even elsewhere in Syria. Vladimir Safronkov, Russia’s deputy ambassador to the U.N. Security Council, lamented recently that the timing of the reports seemed calculated to undermine the budding peace process in Syria, according to a report from RT. “It looks like that, under the pretext of the deterioration of the situation in besieged cities, attempts are being made to undermine the launch of the inter-Syrian dialogue scheduled for January 25,” he told an emergency meeting of the Security Council on Saturday.

Safronkov said the West practices a “double standard” by raising the alarm about Madaya while ignoring cities besieged by anti-Assad forces: “Much is being said about Madaya, but not a word about the villages of Nubul and Az-Zahra in the province of Aleppo. And we are talking about the fate of tens of thousands of people.”

On Monday, Ben Norton, politics staff writer for Salon, cited the siege of Yemen, as well as Israel’s decade-long blockade of Gaza, when he questioned why some atrocities are condemned and others are “barely even acknowledged.” He wrote:

“All sieges are of course tragic, because they harm civilians. There should be outrage at the siege on Madaya, but there should be proportionate outrage. All of the other ongoing sieges — and the much larger blockades — that happened to be supported by the West should not conveniently be ignored.

Americans, in particular, should be concerned about the millions upon millions of people being starved in policies backed by their ostensibly democratic government, right at this very moment.”

Watch “It’s not #Madaya. It’s #Yemen … Thank you Saudi regime” from Stop The War On Yemen: Link
 
Russia on Tuesday argued strongly against Turkey's demand to keep a leading Kurdish group out of Syrian peace talks, and said it expects the U.N. envoy to resist "blackmail" by Turkey and others, reflecting sharp differences that remain ahead of the talks.

Russia Urges for Including Kurds in Syria Talks
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/russia-urges-including-kurds-syria-talks-36518745

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also denied allegations that Moscow had urged Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down and could offer him political asylum.

He specifically shrugged off reports last week claiming that Russia's military intelligence chief had traveled to Damascus to try to persuade Assad to go. Lavrov said there was no point in such a trip as Assad visited Moscow in the fall and had extensive talks with President Vladimir Putin.

"No one has asked for or offered any political asylum," he said, adding that Assad had promised Putin he would sit down for peace talks with opposition, including armed groups, and engage the "patriotic" opposition in the fight against the Islamic State group alongside the Syrian army.

Lavrov emphasized that the Kurdish group, the Democratic Union Party, or PYD, plays an important role in fighting the Islamic State group and is an essential part of political settlement in Syria.

Turkey sees the PYD and its YPG militia group as branches of the Kurdistan Workers' Party, a Kurdish resistance group it has long fought and considers a terrorist group.

Lavrov warned that it would be a "grave mistake" not to invite the PYD. "How can you talk about political reforms in Syria if you ignore a leading Kurdish party?" he said, adding that the Kurds account for 15 percent of the population.

Lavrov also warned against Saudi Arabia's proposal to invite only opposition groups that it hosted at a meeting last month, saying the Syrian peace process should also include other opposition representatives, like those that met for talks in Moscow last year.

The current opposition negotiating team announced in Saudi Arabia last week includes Saudi-backed Islamic rebel factions like Jaish al-Islam, or the Army of Islam, which Russia considers terrorists.

The nearly five-year Syrian conflict that began in 2011 with protests against Assad's rule, has morphed into an all-out war that has killed a quarter-million and displaced millions.

Lavrov's statement at a news conference reflects the tough posturing ahead of Syria peace talks set to start Friday. U.N. special envoy Staffan de Mistura will be sending invitations amid intense jockeying between countries like Russia and Turkey about who should be invited.


France hopes Russia sanctions could be lifted if Minsk accords enacted
http://rbth.com/international/2016/01/25/france-could-lift-russia-sanctions-if-minsk-agreements-fulfilled_562211

France is hoping that the sanctions will be lifted from Russia after the Minsk agreements are implemented, French Economy, Industry and Digital Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron said.

"You know, the imposed sanctions were closely connected to certain events and their lifting is linked to the observance of the Minsk agreements. We are hoping that our two countries will promote the observance of the Minsk agreements, and if these agreements are implemented, that position was confirmed by the president of the republic [France] several days ago, one can indeed talk about softening and revision of the current situation," Macron told during a briefing following a meeting of the Russian-French council on economic, financial, industry and trade issues held in Moscow on Jan. 25.


Kerry believes sanctions against Russia could be lifted in 2016
http://rbth.com/international/2016/01/22/kerry-says-moves-to-lift-russia-sanctions-could-begin-in-months_561701

The U.S. may be able to consider lifting sanctions imposed on Russia over its involvement in Ukraine later in 2016 if the Kremlin complies with the Minsk peace agreements, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on January 22 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

“With effort and with bone fide, legitimate intent to solve the problem on both sides, it’s possible in these next months to find those Minsk agreements implemented,” Kerry said according to the Bloomberg news service. If the agreements were realized, the secretary of state said we would “get to the place where sanctions can be appropriately - because of the implementation - be removed.”


Russian diplomats to meet with pilot Yaroshenko held in U.S. prison soon
http://rbth.com/news/2016/01/26/russian-diplomats-to-meet-with-pilot-yaroshenko-held-in-us-prison-soon_562367

Russian diplomats intend to meet with pilot Konstantin Yaroshenko, who is held in a U.S. prison and has recently undergone an operation, in the coming days, the Rossiya 24 television station reported on Jan. 26.

"According to lawyer Alexei Tarasov, the health of his client invites some questions. The prison administration is not giving Yaroshenko the pain relief medicines that have been prescribed. And, on the whole, there are no conditions for his post-surgery recovery," it said.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said earlier that the Russian authorities had drawn the American side's attention to the need to provide Yaroshenko with medical care, and Moscow was hopeful that his health would continue to receive due attention.

Yaroshenko was arrested in Liberia on May 28, 2010, on charges of preparing to transport of a large haul of cocaine and was then deported to the United States. A U.S. court sentenced the Russian citizen to 20 years in prison on September 7, 2011.

The health condition of the pilot deteriorated in early February. The family and the lawyer said Yaroshenko complained of chest pain and difficulty breathing.



Russian pilot Yaroshenko convicted in U.S. has undergone an operation
http://rbth.com/news/2016/01/24/russian-pilot-yaroshenko-convicted-in-us-has-undergone-an-operation_561883

Russian pilot Konstantin Yaroshenko, who is held in a U.S. prison, has undergone an operation, after which he is unable to walk, and Russian diplomats have already been informed of this situation, Yaroshenko's lawyer Alexei Tarasov has said.

"Konstantin is now in his prison cell. He is unable to walk and is in terrible pain. He says that it has not hurt so much in a very long time. Russian diplomats, the Embassy and the Consulate General in New York have been informed of this situation," Tarasov told the Rossiya 24 (VGTRK) television station on Jan. 24.

According to Rossiya 24, Yaroshenko was not been notified of his upcoming surgery, but was awakened by security guard in the middle of the night and was taken to a hospital in a city near the Fort Dix prison.

"After Yaroshenko regained consciousness on a hospital bed in Trenton after the anesthesia, security guards approached him, handcuffed him and then said: enough lying in bed, come with us. Yaroshenko was transported back to prison and was put in an ordinary cell, his previous one. At night, his cellmates themselves, seeing how bad Konstantin was feeling, took him to the prison infirmary on a stretcher," the lawyer said.

Yaroshenko was arrested in Liberia on May 28, 2010, on charges of preparing to transport of a large haul of cocaine and was deported to the United States. A U.S. court sentenced the Russian citizen to 20 years in prison on Sept. 7, 2011.

The health condition of the pilot deteriorated in early February The family and the lawyer said Yaroshenko complained of chest pain and difficulty breathing.

After the first health check, the Russian Foreign Ministry expressed its indignation at the fact that the urgent medical examination of Yaroshenko promised by the Fort Dix prison administration appeared to be formal and cursory and that neither the lawyer nor Russian diplomats were informed about its results.

Yaroshenko was examined again, but these results were not disclosed either.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the U.S. side had set unrealistic conditions for visits to Yaroshenko by Russian diplomats and doctors. For instance, the American side conditioned giving permission to Russian doctors to examine Yaroshenko on their possession of a medical license issued by the state of legal residence of the prison, New Jersey. This condition practically nullified the possibility of accomplishing this humanitarian mission.

In mid-November 2015, the Russian Foreign Ministry made a representation to the U.S. Embassy, citing a serious deterioration of Yaroshenko's health.


Russia questions charges brought against its citizen by U.S. to have him extradited from Lithuania - diplomat
http://rbth.com/news/2013/07/24/russia_questions_charges_brought_against_its_citizen_by_us_to_have_him_e_28342.html

July 24, 2013 - In particular, Moscow is concerned about the U.S. practice of sending extradition requests for Russian citizens to third countries and the exterritorial application of U.S. laws to them, he said.

"We reaffirm our position that the exterritorial application of U.S. law to Russian citizens, including their arrests in third countries and their further extradition to the U.S., where, as the record shows, justice is not guaranteed for them, is unacceptable," Dolgov said.

The Vilnius District Court ruled on Monday to grant the Prosecutor General's Office request on extraditing Ustinov to the U.S. for his criminal prosecution in this country.

The request said Ustinov was suspected of acting as a member of a group of accomplices in smuggling and planning to smuggle long-range night vision devices and video cameras equipped with infrared and thermal sensors used by the U.S. armed forces.

The U.S. also claimed that, having smuggled this equipment, Ustinov legalized the proceeds by transferring thousands of dollars to his accomplices' accounts.
 
angelburst29 said:
Small misdemeanor - no problem. Plus, C.A.'s link to PRAVADA.RU is the "source" which I failed to link back too! We must be on the same "wavelink" with thoughts of the information important enough to Post? On another note, I mess up on every photo I try to insert - so C.A. - keep them comin'......

In bold is what keeps us all untied with sharing the truth. In opposition of the Psychotics and there attempted lies.

Thanks for the inspiration angelburst29.
 
This is a long article but it provides "educational value" along with making a reasonable point. Also note, the sharp contrast in Obama's speeches, compared to those who are versed in Diplomatic Statesmanship.

President or king? Translated, that’s what the Supreme Court is asking about Obama (Photo - Video)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/01/25/obama-immigration-and-10-words-in-the-constitution-that-mean-mr-president-dont-be-a-king/

All is forgiven if you’re not familiar with the “take care” clause in Article II of the Constitution about the presidency, the words that say he shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.” The Supreme Court hasn’t fooled with it in many years. The words are buried below the State of the Union clause, and the business of receiving “Ambassadors and other public Ministers.” They lack resonance; they sound polite.

But their meaning, traced back through hundreds of years of history and translated into today’s colloquial English is indeed a command: They mean “Mr. President, don’t act like a king” — administer the law, but don’t dispense with it or change it.

Is the president acting like a king? It’s one of those questions ordinary people have asked in recent years, but not the Supreme Court. That’s why it’s a been a bit of an abstraction, until last week, when suddenly the justices, or some of them at least, took an interest.

When the court decided to review a lower court order temporarily blocking President Obama’s 2014 decision to defer deportations of “dreamers,” an action he took in the wake of Congress’s failure to pass the “DREAM Act,” the court surprised everyone by dusting off the clause and asking for arguments about whether, in doing so, the president had “faithfully” executed the nation’s immigration laws.

That the justices would review the case, decided on less lofty grounds in the lower courts, was expected. The question about the “take care” clause was not.

One law professor called it a “bombshell.”

[Supreme Court to review Obama’s power on deportation policy]

To be clear, administration lawyers regard the Constitutional question as absurd. The president followed the law, they say. He didn’t change it.

But Texas and 25 other states believe they have a smoking gun: after announcing the immigration “guidance” on dreamers, Obama came out and said: “I just took an action to change the law.”

The fact that the court asked the question does not mean it will answer it. It’s long shot. If it does answer it, and if it answers it broadly, the decision could alter the presidency in ways neither Obama nor his successors will like.

Either way, it’s fair to ask, what is it? Here’s a primer.

Unlike presidents, English monarchs, as legal scholar Zachary S. Price wrote in the Vanderbilt Law Review, enjoyed the right to change laws, “to suspend (either permanently or temporarily) the operation of existing statutes, or grant dispensations” for particular individuals. If the king or queen wanted to let someone import French wine despite a legal prohibition, they just did it — sometimes in exchange for cash. If they wanted to let someone celebrate religion without regard to the rites of the Church of England, they just did it. Sometimes they’d even let someone get away with murder, the law notwithstanding.

“The power to dispense,” wrote historian Carolyn A. Edie, gave the royals a “license to act as if the law dispensed with did not exist.”

King James II went a little too far in 1686, dispensing with a religious test “to bring Catholics into the church, the army and the government,” Edie wrote, “a policy calculated by everyone except James himself to arouse fear and hostility in his subjects’ hearts.”

It did just that. Soon he was fleeing the country, replaced by William of Orange and his wife Mary, and the Glorious Revolution. The royal dispensing power disappeared.

And it became part of English common law that the “principal duty of the King is, to govern his people according to law.” All this was familiar stuff to the drafters of the Constitution, particularly the lawyers among them. It wasn’t a crown that made a monarch; it was power, the power to dispense with the laws of Parliament.

The delegates who gathered in Philadelphia in 1787 to consider a new form of government started out with few firm ideas of what exactly they wanted to do. But they knew what they did not want to do: create anything resembling a monarchy.

They worried so much about public perception on the monarchy issue that they broke their silence one day during their convention to deal with a rumor that deeply alarmed them. The story appeared in August of 1787, that they were preparing to create a monarchy and install a monarch, specifically Frederick, Duke of York and Albany, the second son of George III, apparently a man in need of a job. Panicky at the suggestion that after having thrown off the shackles of a monarchy, they were about to create one, they put out their first and only communique: “Tho we cannot affirmatively tell you what we are doing,” it said, “we can, negatively, tell you what we are not doing — we never once thought of a king.”

Indeed, they were taking steps to do just the opposite, creating an elected presidency with a set term, separating the powers, and defining, albeit with little detail, the power of the office and the limits on its power.

They were not starting entirely from scratch. New York’s constitution, among others, included the language, applied to the governor, that he shall take care to faithfully execute the laws.

It was a grant of “authority, not to make, or alter, or dispense with the laws, but to execute and act the laws,” one of the chief architects of the presidency, James Wilson, would write later.

What of the word “faithfully?” That’s tough because it entails motive, which entails a little mind-reading. The “term ‘faithfully,’ particularly in eighteenth-century usage, seems principally to suggest that the President must ensure execution of existing laws in good faith,” wrote Price, “a meaning consistent with the Clause’s core purpose of ensuring congressional supremacy. Yet the word also implies that executing laws ‘faithfully’ could be different from executing them strictly.”

Randy Barnett, a scholar at Georgetown University who helped lead the challenge to Obama’s Affordable Care Act and who teaches contracts law, puts it in the context of a contract. “What distinguishes good faith from bad faith performance of a contract is not the exercise of discretion but is the motive or purpose for which discretion is exercised,” he wrote. If discretion is being exercised as a pretext to avoid the spirit of the contract, that’s bad faith.

Everyone, including the courts, agrees that the “take care” clause gives some flexibility to the president, a kind of prosecutorial discretion. Presidents “don’t have to enforce the law in every particular case,” Price, an expert on the clause at the University of California’s Hastings Law School, said in an interview with The Post. There are limits to the government’s resources. And the laws are often vague, or have gaping holes. “The power of executing the laws necessarily includes both authority and responsibility to resolve some questions left open by Congress that arise during the law’s administration,” wrote Justice Antonin Scalia in a 2014 environmental case. “But it does not include a power to revise clear statutory terms that turn out not to work in practice.”

But how does all this fit in with the immigration case? And why might Obama be at least theoretically vulnerable to a charge that he acted in bad faith, as opposed to, for example, simply exercising prosecutorial discretion, as the government’s lawyers argued.

As Texas and its allied states argued in the lower court, Obama had tried for months to get Congress to enact the “DREAM Act.”

Failing that, in June 2012, a frustrated president announced that he was moving ahead on his own.

“I have said time and time and time again to Congress that, send me the DREAM Act, put it on my desk, and I will sign it right away …. In the absence of any immigration action from Congress to fix our broken immigration system, what we’ve tried to do is focus our immigration enforcement resources in the right places” and “the Department of Homeland Security is taking steps to lift the shadow of deportation from these young people. Over the next few months, eligible individuals who do not present a risk to national security or public safety will be able to request temporary relief from deportation proceedings and apply for work authorization.”

In November 2012, the administration then proceeded to implement initiatives that would offer three years of deportation relief to as many as 4 million undocumented parents of U.S.-born children as well as to another group of younger illegal immigrants. Administration lawyers called it “guidance” — picking and choosing and prioritizing deportations.

The states challenging Obama used Obama’s own words as evidence that this exercise in discretion was, in fact, an end run around Congress, a pretext for dispensing with the immigration laws already on the books, which the “DREAM Act” would have changed. Obama as much as admitted it, they claimed.

On the one hand, he said repeatedly that he lacked the power to do anything in the absence of a change in law, and then, when the law didn’t change, he went ahead and did it anyway.

For example, in a Univision Town Hall in March 2011 he was asked this:

In the spirit of your push for immigration reform, would you consider a moratorium on deportations of non-criminals? Remember, these are your words: “This is not about policy. It’s about people.?”

To which he replied:

Well, I think it is important to remind everybody that, as I said I think previously, and I’m not a king. I am the head of the executive branch of government. I’m required to follow the law.


After Obama announced the deferrals, The Washington Post’s Fact Checker Glenn Kessler called it a “royal flip-flop on using executive action on illegal immigration.”

Perhaps even more damaging, and also cited by Texas, was Obama’s response to hecklers, after he announced his immigration policies in the wake of the Dream Act’s failure, who accused him of not doing enough.

“Listen, you know — here. Can I just say this, all right? I’ve listened to you. I heard you. I heard you. I heard you. All right? Now I have been respectful, I let you holler. All right? So let me just — nobody is removing you. I have heard you, but you have got to listen to me, too. All right? And I understand you may disagree, I understand you may disagree. But we have got to be able to talk honestly about these issues, all right?

“Now, you’re absolutely right that there have been significant numbers of deportations. That’s true. But what you are not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law. Point No. 2, the way the change in the law works is that we’re reprioritizing how we enforce our immigration laws generally.”


In the view of Texas and others, Obama admitted both that he had no power under the law and that he thus, in his words, “changed the law” while pretending that he wasn’t. Bad faith.

“There generally wouldn’t be any evidence of bad faith,” Georgetown University Law Professor Randy Barnett, who formulated the winning Commerce Clause argument in the Supreme Court challenge to the Affordable Care Act, said in an interview. “But here we have public declarations [from Obama] that ‘I don’t have the authority, I don’t have the authority, I don’t have the authority’ and that ‘Congress won’t act, Congress won’t act, Congress won’t act’ and then you also have the enactment of what looks like legal rules, not just discretion, but whole classes of people who are exempt from the law, the very same law the president was urging Congress to pass….it suggests that he’s not acting in good faith.”

In their response to the lawsuit, Department of Justice lawyers dismissed the “take care” claim as “radical,” one that would yield “absurd” results of the government having to deport every single illegal in the country. In order to make a case, they argued, the challengers would at the very least have to show that the administration “has acted inconsistently with the statutes Congress has enacted,” which they can’t, because it didn’t.

Even then, the issue is statutory, not constitutional. “The [Homeland Security] Secretary’s discretion to grant deferred action draws upon the Secretary’s broader discretion in enforcing the Nation’s immigration laws …. Congress has authorized the Secretary to ‘establish such regulations; . . . issue such instructions; and perform such other acts as he deems necessary for carrying out his authority’ under the statute” and “that is all the administration did.”

How that squares with Obama’s original statements that he needed the DREAM Act to do what he ultimately did, may be a question for the likes of Justice Scalia at oral argument.

When the U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen in Brownsville, Tex., issued an order blocking the policies, he did not reach the question raised by Texas on the “take care” clause. He based his decision to issue a temporary order on the likelihood that the administration breached the rules set out by the Administrative Procedure Act. Nor did the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals deal with the take care clause, as it’s a principle of constitutional adjudication that if a case can be resolved on statutory grounds, any constitutional issue should be avoided.

Then, suddenly last week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and in the fine print of its order, said it also wanted to know whether the immigration guidance “violates the Take Care Clause of the Constitution, Article II, section 3.”

No one knows how many justices agreed to add that question. And nobody knows whether, in the end, the court will try to answer it and if so, what the answer will be. With so many ways to avoid it, including the great case killer called “standing”— the states must show they are legally entitled to sue — it’s a long shot.

But for the first time in memory, that question — is the president acting like a king, asked so often in politics of Republican and Democratic administrations, may wind up squarely before the Supreme Court.
 
Rouhani heads to France as Iran rebuilds relations with Europe

http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/2/8/186015/World/Region/Rouhani-heads-to-France-as-Iran-rebuilds-relations.aspx

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani wraps up his visit to Italy Wednesday before heading to France on the second leg of a trip signalling the dramatic rapprochement between Tehran and the European powers since the lifting of sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
Rouhani's visit to Paris is expected to result in the signing of important business contracts, after sealing multi-billion dollar deals in Italy.

A major order for 114 Airbus planes to modernise Iran Air's ageing fleet is expected to be confirmed in France, along with tie-ups with carmakers Peugeot and Renault.

Before heading to Paris, Rouhani will conclude his two-day trip to Rome with a visit to the Colosseum with Italian Culture Minister Dario Franceschini.

The president is accompanied by a delegation of more than 100 ministers, officials and businessmen marking the return of Iran on the international economic stage with the lifting of sanctions after a historic deal over Tehran's nuclear programme.

Rouhani, a 67-year-old former academic and diplomat who is seen as a pragmatist, was elected in 2013 on a pledge to end sanctions and improve relations with the West.

The Iranian leader on Monday met with his Italian counterpart Sergio Mattarella and Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, with whom he attended the signing of several economic agreements in the prestigious setting of the Capitole.

Italian officials said contracts signed in Rome would be worth up to 17 billion euros ($18.4 billion), underlining the huge economic stakes involved in Iran's re-opening, particularly for Europe's manufacturing and engineering sectors.

On Monday, Rouhani attended a business forum at which he portrayed Iran as the ideal base for companies seeking a foothold in a region of 300 million people, reassuring would-be investors their contracts would be honoured.

"Iran is the safest, the most stable country in the entire region," Rouhani said.

"Everyone understood that the nuclear negotiations represented a win-win situation for both sides.

"Now we have created the conditions for investment and for the transfer of know-how. There has to be an advantage for both sides: we invite you to invest and we will provide stability and ensure that you can make adequate returns."

Rouhani then visited the Vatican for the first time and met Pope Francis, who has urged Iran to work for peace in the Middle East.

In a statement afterwards, the Vatican said Francis had urged the Iranian leader to use Iran's important role to promote, together with other countries, "adequate political solutions" to the problems afflicting the region and to help combat terrorism and arms trafficking.

It was the first official visit to the Vatican by an Iranian president since Mohammad Khatami was hosted by John Paul II in 1999.

Rouhani is due to arrive late Wednesday afternoon in Paris where he will meet the following day with President Francois Hollande and French business leaders.

Ahead of Rouhani's European trip, Iranian Transport Minister Abbas Akhoundi on Sunday announced a major contract with Airbus for 114 planes.

Akhoundi, quoted by Iranian media, said the deal "will be signed between Iran Air and Airbus" when Rouhani is in Paris. An Airbus spokesman declined to comment.

Akhoundi's deputy, Asghar Fakhrieh Kashan, told AFP that Iran "essentially wants to buy Airbus A320s, A321s and A330s".

"We will take delivery in 2016 and 2017 of Airbus A320s and A321s, with the A330s coming later," he said.

"From 2020, we will take delivery of Airbus A350s and A380s. We want eight A380s and 16 A350s."

Before flying to Europe, Rouhani himself mentioned economic projects between Iran and France.

"We need to modernise our aviation fleet and buy locomotives," he said Monday.

He indicated Iran was also looking at the automotive sector.

"Important contracts will probably be signed on this trip including with Peugeot and Renault," he said.

A joint press conference is planned after Rouhani's meeting with Hollande on Thursday, the French presidency said.

Iran has been rebuilding its relations with Italy and France which were among Tehran's main economic partners before the tightening of international sanctions in January 2012.

Competition to tap the Iranian market has been fierce as it emerges from international isolation with the lifting of sanctions.


Iran is going to start gas supplies to Europe in two years

http://www.interfax.ru/business/491711

Moscow. January 27. INTERFAX.RU - Iran is seeking new opportunities for export and production of natural gas, including the development of LNG facilities, to begin its supplies to Europe for two years, told The Wall Street Journal managing director of National Iranian Gas Export Co Alireza Cameli.

One project involves the renewal of the project Iran LNG, which was completed by 40% before the introduction of international sanctions in 2012. To complete the project will take 3-4 years.

Another project that can be implemented within two years, involves the construction of a gas pipeline in Oman, where there are already facilities for liquefied natural gas.

In addition, the Iranian company is negotiating with the European partners on the construction of the floating terminal for the liquefaction of Iranian gas.

In the long term, Iran as stated earlier, I would like to bring gas exports to the EU of up to 30 billion cubic meters a year.

Last week, Greece has bought the first Iranian oil after the lifting of sanctions.

Iran has the world's largest reserves of natural gas, he now delivers small volumes of gas to neighboring countries - a total of about 9 billion cubic meters per year.
 
sitting said:
These "blow-off" phases have their own unique characteristics ... and there's usually a point of exhaustion. An end point.

There's a distinct possibility we might've witnessed that exhaustion point for dollar/ruble. The spike to 86 on Jan 21. A quick retreat followed -- presently at 78.

In an overall sense, this is good for Russia. And aside from what's visible in market action, there may well have been hidden maneuvers (i.e. serious covert threats) which made this reversal happen. My sense is Putin did not simply sit idly by -- watching his country's currency go into the tank. The stakes are too high, and the economic consequences (for Russia) too severe.

Now onto a somewhat nonsensical article in the news. Also related to currencies:

http://www.sott.net/article/311045-Soros-warned-off-declaring-war-on-Chinas-currency

Remember it was the Chinese themselves that lowered the yuan. (Which provoked a serious reaction.) To say they now are worried that Soros may help this along is rather strange ... putting it mildly.

This may well be their means of deception. Our task however, on this and other matters, is not to be deceived.

I could be quite wrong.

FWIW.
 
A further note if I may on guys like Soros and his ilk. (Buffett, Schwarzman, Cramer, the rest of the hedge fund - private equity gang.)

They are presently riding high. Espousing investment and philosophical "wisdom" of various kinds. The surprise (and tragedy) is how the public eats it up.

Truth is, these people basically have one guiding rule in life. And it's simple: Buy low ... sell high. It's really no more and no less than that.

Nothing else really matters to them.

FWIW.
 
Back
Top Bottom