Russia Begins Operations in Syria: End Game for the US Empire?

sitting said:
bjorn said:
[quote author=sitting]Being thoughtful strategists, I believe Putin and his team have worked this through.

Indeed, without Putin and team WW3 might of already have happened.

I truly believe Putin shifted the time line.

And the C's have confirmed such a shift. (Along with the contribution this group had made, unbelievable as it may seem.)

It shows that world events are not simply the dictates of evil alone. (The mosaic takes everything into account.) Had Putin and Russia not acted, the consequences for Syria would have been dire. Another Libya ... or something much much worse.

A clear recognition and acknowledgement of this shift is important I think -- for going forward. It can help focus our minds & our efforts, in a direction most conducive for better outcomes. It matters, even in the smallest way.

I could be wrong.

FWIW.
[/quote]

Sitting,

I do believe that the "positive protection" that president Putin is providing in Syria is maybe one of the biggest indicators for the Cs affirmation that we have had a timeline shift. If is was not for the continued determination of Putin I would have not much hope for the direction of the future.

I also believe that Laura, Ark and the forum have played a part in the process even if it seems as you say in the "smallest way". Hopefully, there are other conduits that we are not even aware of who share our hopes for the future. I can not help but acknowledge that things have shifted to a different direction which seems more hopeful (at least in my opinion).

Thanks for sharing :)
 
sitting said:
bjorn said:
[quote author=sitting]Being thoughtful strategists, I believe Putin and his team have worked this through.

Indeed, without Putin and team WW3 might of already have happened.

I truly believe Putin shifted the time line.

And the C's have confirmed such a shift. (Along with the contribution this group had made, unbelievable as it may seem.)

It shows that world events are not simply the dictates of evil alone. (The mosaic takes everything into account.) Had Putin and Russia not acted, the consequences for Syria would have been dire. Another Libya ... or something much much worse.

A clear recognition and acknowledgement of this shift is important I think -- for going forward. It can help focus our minds & our efforts, in a direction most conducive for better outcomes. It matters, even in the smallest way.

I could be wrong.

FWIW.
[/quote]
That's a good assessment.

As we take care of our self's only then, may we help others.

Russia Insider
Full Speech of Putin at the Gala Evening Celebrating Defenders of the Motherland Day
Published on Feb 22, 2016
Putin stated that ur armed forces must stop any aggression against Russia - Gala evening dedicated to the Day of Defender of the Fatherland.
 
sitting said:
I truly believe Putin shifted the time line.

And the C's have confirmed such a shift. (Along with the contribution this group had made, unbelievable as it may seem.)

It shows that world events are not simply the dictates of evil alone. (The mosaic takes everything into account.) Had Putin and Russia not acted, the consequences for Syria would have been dire. Another Libya ... or something much much worse.

A clear recognition and acknowledgement of this shift is important I think -- for going forward. It can help focus our minds & our efforts, in a direction most conducive for better outcomes. It matters, even in the smallest way.

I could be wrong.

FWIW.

I agree and especially the part about focusing our minds and efforts and continuing the "cyber battle" day after day as long as we can. It's not huge in the grand scheme of things, but it could be the flapping of the butterfly wings...
 
Syria conflict: US-Russia brokered truce to start at weekend
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35634695

The US and Russia have announced that a planned ceasefire in Syria will come into effect at midnight on 27 February.

Their statement said the truce did not include so-called Islamic State (IS) and the al-Qaeda-linked Nusra Front.

World powers had on 12 February agreed a truce to come into effect within a week, but that deadline passed and scepticism remains over the new plan.

Violence has continued unabated in Syria, with 140 killed in bombings in Homs and Damascus on Sunday.

More than 250,000 Syrians have died in the conflict which began in March 2011.

Some 11 million others have been forced from their homes, of whom four million have fled abroad - including growing numbers who are making the dangerous journey to Europe.

The joint Russian-US statement said the truce applied to "those parties to the Syrian conflict that have indicated their commitment to and acceptance of its terms".

This excluded IS, Nusra and "other terrorist organisations designated by the UN".


Air strikes by Syria, Russia and the US-led coalition against these groups would continue, the statement read.

It said that armed opposition groups taking part would have to confirm their participation by midday on 26 February.

Russian and Syrian planes would halt any attacks on the armed opposition groups.

Russia and the US will work together to "delineate territory where groups that have indicated their commitment to and acceptance of the cessation of hostilities are active".

The deal also sets up a communications hotline and calls for a working group to monitor ceasefire violations.

US Secretary of State John Kerry welcomed the deal, saying: "If implemented and adhered to, this cessation will not only lead to a decline in violence, but also continue to expand the delivery of urgently needed humanitarian supplies to besieged areas."

Russia and the US back opposing sides in the war; Moscow is President Bashar al-Assad's strongest ally.

On Saturday, President Assad had said he would be ready for a ceasefire, if what he termed "terrorists" did not take advantage of the lull in the fighting. But he had previously cast doubt on the success of a truce.

Air strikes will continue and it is unclear whether Kurdish forces, which have been making ground in the north, sparking artillery fire from Turkey, will abide by any truce.

The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group said fighting and air strikes continued unabated on Monday, with IS fighters attacking the army's main supply route between Damascus and Aleppo.

Islamic State militants said they carried out the attacks in Homs and Damascus on Sunday.

Russia said the attacks were aimed at "subverting attempts" to reach a political settlement.

'Fractured state'

Meanwhile, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria reported its findings on Monday. They include:
◾Syria is a "fractured state on the brink of collapse"
◾War crimes by the government and IS are widespread and rampant
◾The conflict should be referred to the International Criminal Court in The Hague
◾The international community must "curb the proliferation and supply of weapons to warring parties"
◾"Indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks on the civilian population must end"



Saudi Arabia recommends giving surface-to-air missiles to Syrian rebels to 'change balance of power'
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-recommends-giving-surface-to-air-missiles-to-syrian-rebels-to-change-balance-of-power-a6886206.html

Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister has said Syrian rebels should be armed with surface-to-air missiles to “change the balance of power” against Bashar al-Assad.

Adel al-Jubeir repeated his country’s offer to send ground troops to fight Isis in an interview with Der Spiegel, but did not specify whether they would directly battle the regime.

He claimed that Assad will not feature in Syria’s future, whether the conflict is resolved through peace talks or battle.

“In the long term, it will be a Syria without Bashar Assad,” Mr al-Jubeir added. “The longer it takes, the worse it will get.”

But the Syrian President has gained the upper hand in the conflict in recent months, with regime troops gaining swathes of territory from rebels in Aleppo province backed controversial Russian air strikes.

As well as alleged civilian deaths, the advance has raised fears that diminishing the ranks of anti-government rebels who have been fighting could help the terror group hold territory in its so-called Islamic State.

Mr al-Jubeir told Der Spiegel that giving “moderate” fighters surface-to-air missiles would “change the balance of power on the ground”.

“It will allow the moderate opposition to be able to neutralise the helicopters and aircraft that are dropping chemicals and have been carpet-bombing them,” he added.

“This has to be studied very carefully, however, because you don't want such weapons to fall into the wrong hands.”

But the minister did not specify how that possibility would be prevented as Isis continues to battle for more territory and other Islamist groups, including those affiliated with al-Qaeda, mingle with the Free Syrian Army in an ever-shifting network of alliances.

Saudi Arabia is still ready to support the US-led coalition against Isis with special forces on the ground, he said before angrily rejecting similarities between the terrorist group and his country’s own Wahhabist ideology.

Like Isis, Saudi Arabia bases its legal system on an interpretation of Sharia law that punishes blasphemy, apostasy, homosexuality and adultery with death, beheadings and stonings.

Dismissing comparisons as an “oversimplification”, Mr al-Jubeir said the group’s “psychopaths” were trying to destroy his country.



Largest ever US-South Korea military drill planned as a 'warning to Pyongyang' (Photos)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/12168110/Largest-ever-US-South-Korea-military-drill-planned-as-a-warning-to-Pyongyang.html

The US will deploy a combat aviation brigade to South Korea for the duration of the manoeuvres, as well as a mobile US Marine brigade.

The joint US-South Korean exercises scheduled for March will be largest military drills ever staged on the Korean Peninsula and are both a warning to Pyongyang and an effort to reassure the jittery public in the South.

The parallel Key Resolve and Foal Eagle exercises are scheduled to commence on March 7, with the field-training exercises that make up Foal Eagle lasting until April 30. The drills will involve 15,000 US troops, twice the number of previous years, and will serve to demonstrate Washington's firepower.

The US will deploy a combat aviation brigade to South Korea for the duration of the manoeuvres, as well as a mobile US Marine brigade, an aircraft carrier and its attendant fleet, a nuclear-powered submarine and aeriel tankers to refuel fighter aircraft.

South Korea will commit some 290,000 personnel, including special forces, more than double its usual deployment for the annual drills.

The joint exercises will commence just weeks after North Korea carried out its fifth underground nuclear test and launched a rocket in what analysts claim was a disguised test of long-range ballistic missile technology.

In an additional shot across Pyongyang's bows, the drills will for the first time simulate scenarios in which the regime of Kim Jong-un, the North Korean leader, has collapsed.

The multiple-stage exercises will require the US and South Korean forces to react to war breaking out, operations in and around Pyongyang and the recovery of "key facilities that are located deep within North Korea", a Defence Ministry official told The Korea Herald.

North Korea's two rocket facilities are in the far north of the country, while analysts believe that many of its military assets are also concealed in networks of tunnels and bunkers close to the Chinese border.

This year's amphibious manoeuvres - known as the Ssangyong exercises - will be larger and more elaborate than ever before, with 7,000 US troops practicing coming ashore aboard Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and from landing craft from the USS New Orleans.

As well as sending a message to Pyongyang, the exercises are designed to reassure the South Korean public of their security, said Rah Jong-yil, a former head of South Korean intelligence and an expert on the regime in Pyongyang.

"Recent events here have made South Korean people feel a little insecure, especially the rapid development of the North's nuclear and missile programmes, so the exercises are a welcome sign of Washington's guarantee of the alliance", he told The Telegraph.

North Korea is expected to express its displeasure at the drills through its state media. In previous years, Pyongyang has described the exercises as the prelude to a pre-emptive nuclear strike "to infringe on the sovereignty and dignity of the DPRK".
 
INTERNATIONAL MILITARY REVIEW – SYRIA, FEB. 22, 2016

http://southfront.org/international-military-review-syria-feb-22-2016/

On Feb.20, the Syrian Arab Army (SAA), mainly the “Tiger Forces” and the Cheetah Forces “Team 3”, supported by Russian warplanes launched a successful advance west along the imperative Aleppo-Raqqa Highway in order to complete the encirclement of ISIS-controlled area in Eastern Aleppo.

Following heavy clashes, the SAA took control of Umm Turaykiyah in the Al-Safira Plains. It had been that last terrorist stronghold between the SAA positions aling the Aleppo-Raqqa Highway and the Jibreen district of the Aleppo city. At least 800 ISIS militants were encircled in the newly appeared pocket.

On Feb.21, the SAA continued the advance and imposed full control over the villages of Jubb al-Safa, Kabarah, Rayyan, Al-Halabiyah, Dakwanah, Tall Istabl, Ain Sabil and Tall Riman, smashing the terrorists encircled there. Al-Safira Plains are under the full control of the SAA.

In a separate development, ISIS cut the government’s supply route, the Ithriyah-Khanasser road, leading to the Aleppo province. According to reports, ISIS was able to do it by capturing Rasm Al-Nafal from the National Defense Forces (NDF).

The Ithriyah-Khanasser road is a vital supply route of the Syrian forces located in Aleppo and an integral roadway that gives the latter access to several regions in northern Syria. It’s the second time in the recent months ISIS cut this supply route. This shows how vulnerable the SAA’s logistics in the region. According to reports, the SAA are going to launch a military operation to recapture Rasm Al-Nafal.

The SAA is continuing military operartions aganist ISIS along the Salamiyah-Raqqa Highway. Last weekend, the SAA and its allies liberated Al-Massbah, Point 4, Point 5, and a number of other small hilltops near the Zakiyah Crossroad located at the Hama-Raqqa border.

ISIS is widely using roadside bombs in order to slow down the loyalist forces’ advances along the road. Moreover, the strategic town of Zakiyah near the crossroad is still under the terrorists’ control. The SAA’s mid term goal in the area is to reach the Strayef Crossroad and launch an operation to liberate the Tabaqa Military Airport.
 
Russia and US Agree on Steps to Stop Fighting in Syria
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160222/1035184257/putin-syria-ceasefire.html

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the Syrian ceasefire agreement is a "real step that can stop the bloodshed."

On Monday, the Kremlin released details of the Syrian ceasefire plan the US and Russia agreed upon.

On Monday, the Kremlin released details of the Syrian ceasefire plan the US and Russia agreed upon. The two countries had to conduct several rounds of secret negotiations before settling all details and making them public. According to Russian President Vladimir Putin, the plan of ceasing hostilities presents a "real step that can stop the bloodshed."

The Russian leader held a private telephone conversation with US President Barack Obama to discuss the ending the violence in Syria. During the conversation, President Putin stressed that the cooperation between Moscow and Washington can serve as an example of efforts against terrorism.

He said that Russia will do "whatever is necessary" to ensure that the ceasefire is implemented, working closely with the Syrian government, and expects the US to convince Syrian opposition groups to respect the agreement.

"We will do whatever is necessary with Damascus, with the legitimate Syrian authorities," Putin said. "We are counting on the United States to do the same with its allies and the groups that it supports."

The two countries will work jointly to determine which groups the ceasefire applies to.

Putin also said he expects Gulf countries to support the plan.

Speaking to reporters, White House spokesman Josh Earnest confirmed that the White House contacted the Kremlin on Monday.

"This is a moment of opportunity and we are hopeful that all the parties will capitalize on it," Earnest said. He cautioned, however, that "this is going to be difficult to implement."

Moscow plans to continue "intensive dialogue" with all parties involved in the conflict.

The ceasefire agreement was reached after several rounds of talks behind closed doors. It is set to take effect on Saturday.


Breakthrough: US, Russia Agree on Syria Ceasefire Starting February 27
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160222/1035176230/us-russia-syria-ceasefire.html

Cessation of hostilities in Syria is expected to start on Saturday, February 27, according to a joint statement issued by the US State Department.

"The United States and Russia, as co-chairs of the ISSG [International Syria Support Group] and ISSG Ceasefire Task Force, announce the adoption on February 22, 2016, of the Terms for a Cessation of Hostilities in Syria attached as an Annex to this statement, and propose that the cessation of hostilities commence at 00:00 (Damascus time) on February 27, 2016," the statement reads.


Fighting due to end in Syria February 27 — media
http://tass.ru/en/world/858384

An agreement to stop fighting in Syria is expected to come into force at midnight February 27, the Al Jazeera channel said on Monday, citing a document negotiated by the United States and Russia.

The channel said that the deal reached by the U.S. and Russia implied that the cessation of hostilities was to come into force at midnight on February 27.

Along with this, the terrorist groups Islamic State and Jabhat al-Nusra (outlawed in Russia) are not included in the deal, it said.

Besides, the document contains an appeal to the warring sides in Syria to stop fighting by noon February 26.

On Sunday, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said that Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in a telephone conversation continued discussing modality and terms for truce in Syria, with the exception for the operation against terrorists.
 
Loaded: US sends 5,000 tons of ammunition to Germany ‘to help NATO alliance’ (Video)
https://www.rt.com/news/333248-us-germany-ammunition-supply/

Washington has dispatched more than 5,000 tons of ammunition to Germany, the largest amount in 10 years, the US military announced, adding that the shipment will help to “continue to enable the NATO alliance” and to defend its allies.

“In the largest single Europe-bound US shipment of ammunition in 10 years, the 21st Theater Sustainment Command … transported over 5,000 tons of ammunition …to the Theater Logistics Support Center Europe’s ammunition depot in Miesau [Germany] Feb. 17-18,”said a statement on the US army website.

“This critical shipment will help us to continue to enable the NATO alliance, and the fact that it’s the largest single shipment in 10 years demonstrates our continued commitment to the defense of our allies,” 21st TSC chief of staff, Colonel Matthew Redding, said.

Maintaining a stockpile of ammunition means the US and NATO “can quickly draw ammunition in support of short notice NATO operations,” says Redding.

“All that effort pays off when we’re able to quickly deliver ammo and other supplies to those down-trace units that need them,” he went on.

The ammunition was taken in 415 shipping containers and stored in Miesau. It will be available for various troops to support operations, including exercise Anakonda 2016, one of US Army Europe’s premier multinational training events, which will be held in Poland in June.

The Anakonda 2016 drills will involve more than 25,000 participants from 24 nations, including the UK, the US, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Spain, Sweden and Turkey.

NATO intensified its military activities in Europe following the start of the Ukrainian crisis and Russia’s reunification with Crimea in 2014.

In 2015, the alliance carried out a number of massive military drills including “Trident Juncture 2015”, the biggest since 2002, which included 36,000 international troops, as well as more than 60 warships and about 200 aircraft from 30 states.

Moscow has long called on NATO to refrain from expanding into Eastern Europe, saying that such moves have the potential to destabilize the security situation in the region.



Russia wants to fly over US with advanced digital camera
http://news.yahoo.com/russia-seeks-fly-over-us-high-powered-digital-083532712–politics.html?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma

Russia will ask permission on Monday to start flying surveillance planes equipped with high-powered digital cameras amid warnings from U.S. intelligence and military officials that such overflights help Moscow collect intelligence on the United States.

Russia and the United States are signatories to the Open Skies Treaty, which allows unarmed observation flights over the entire territory of all 34 member nations to foster transparency about military activity and help monitor arms control and other agreements. Senior intelligence and military officials, however, worry that Russia is taking advantage of technological advances to violate the spirit of the treaty.

Russia will formally ask the Open Skies Consultative Commission, based in Vienna, to be allowed to fly an aircraft equipped with high-tech sensors over the United States, according to a senior congressional staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the staff member wasn’t authorized to discuss the issue publicly.

The request will put the Obama administration in the position of having to decide whether to let Russia use the high-powered equipment on its surveillance planes at a time when Moscow, according to the latest State Department compliance report, is failing to meet all its obligations under the treaty. And it comes at one of the most tension-filled times in U.S.-Russia relations since the end of the Cold War, with the two countries at odds over Russian activity in Ukraine and Syria.

“The treaty has become a critical component of Russia’s intelligence collection capability directed at the United States,” Adm. Cecil D. Haney, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, wrote in a letter earlier this year to Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., chairman of a House subcommittee on strategic forces.

“In addition to overflying military installations, Russian Open Skies flights can overfly and collect on Department of Defense and national security or national critical infrastructure,” Haney said. “The vulnerability exposed by exploitation of this data and costs of mitigation are increasingly difficult to characterize.”

A State Department official said Sunday that treaty nations had not yet received notice of the Russian request, but that certification of the Russian plane with a “digital electro-optical sensor” could not occur until this summer because the treaty requires a 120-day advance notification. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to discuss the issue publicly.

The official also said that the treaty, which was entered into force in 2002, establishes procedures for certifying digital sensors to confirm that they are compliant with treaty requirements. The official said all signatories to the treaty agree that “transition from film cameras to digital sensors is required for the long-term viability of the treaty.”

In December, Rose Gottemoeller, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, sought to temper concerns about Russian overflights, saying that what Moscow gains from the observation flights is “incremental” to what they collect through other means.

“One of the advantages of the Open Skies Treaty is that information — imagery — that is taken is shared openly among all the treaty parties,” she said at a joint hearing of the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services committees in December. “So one of the advantages with the Open Skies Treaty is that we know exactly what the Russians are imaging, because they must share the imagery with us.”

Still, military and intelligence officials have expressed serious concern.

“The open skies construct was designed for a different era,” Lt. Gen. Vincent Stewart, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told lawmakers when asked about the Russian overflights during a congressional hearing. “I’m very concerned about how it’s applied today.”

Robert Work, deputy secretary of defense, told Congress: “We think that they’re going beyond the original intent of the treaty and we continue to look at this very, very closely.”

Steve Rademaker, former assistant secretary of state for the bureau of arms control and the bureau of international security and nonproliferation, told Congress at a hearing on security cooperation in Europe in October that Russia complies with the Open Skies Treaty, but has “adopted a number of measures that are inconsistent with the spirt” of the accord.

The treaty, for instance, obligates each member to make all of its territory available for aerial observation, yet Russia has imposed restrictions on surveillance over Moscow and Chechnya and near Abkhazia and South Ossetia, he said. Russian restrictions also make it hard to conduct observation in the Kaliningrad enclave, said Rademaker, who believes Russia is “selectively implementing” the treaty “in a way that suits its interests.”



Experts fear US abandoning Syrian rebels
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/270101-experts-fear-us-abandoning-syrian-rebels

The Obama administration is allowing moderate Syrian rebels, which the U.S. spent hundreds of millions training and equipping, to be slowly destroyed, experts warn.

The groups are targeted by Russian air strikes and new attacks from a Kurdish militia known as the YPG that's also backed by the U.S.

The attacks have led to criticism that the administration is standing by while its allies are killed. But the debate also highlights the confusing nature of the Syrian conflict, and the difficulties the Obama administration has faced in finding local forces on the ground in Syria.

"You can use the cliche of choice — it's a deal with the devil or beggars can't be choosers," said Frederic C. Hof, who served as President Obama's special adviser for the transition in Syria.

The administration launched the CIA program to train and equip the rebels with hopes of building a moderate Sunni ground force in Syria that would pressure the regime of Bashar Assad to negotiate a political solution. Officials also believed that force could help enforce the peace under a new Syrian government.

Separately, the Pentagon began a $500-million effort to train moderate opposition rebels, but the program struggled to find recruits who would only target ISIS and not the Syrian regime and was effectively ended after the U.S. spent $384 million to field 145 fighters, which the Pentagon says are still active.

Officials say it's just not realistic to protect the rebels from the Russians or the Kurdish militia, which receives U.S. support including ammunition and airstrikes.

Officials and experts say the U.S. is choosing the Kurdish YPG militia over the rebels.

"By and large the only people who have been willing to fight ISIS on the ground in Eastern Syria is this Kurdish militia. But this militia has its own agenda. It has its own objective. Its objective is to establish a Kurdish autonomous zone, " said Hof, who is a resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.

The YPG is also working with the Russians and the regime against the rebels, a U.S. official said. The militia has even given Russian air forces the coordinates to a rebel headquarters in northern Syria, the official said.

State Department press secretary John Kirby, though, defended U.S. support for the Kurdish rebels earlier this week.

"They’ve been some of the most effective fighters against Daesh, and they have been supported by the air from the coalition," he told reporters on Thursday, using a derogatory Arabic name for ISIS.

"And going forward, I would expect that that sort of support — where and when appropriate, as before — would continue," he added.

Syria experts and critics of the administration's policy blame the situation on the decision to go after ISIS while avoiding a military confrontation with Russia or the Syrian regime at all costs.

The administration also recently came under fire for notifying Russian air forces where U.S. special operators are operating in Syria.

Officials made the move to protect U.S. forces even as the administration has blasted the air campaign for shoring up Assad and vowed not to cooperate with Russia. They say that protection did not extend to the rebel forces.

"The U.S. has rather consistently undermined the very rebels it claims to be supporting," said Shadi Hamid, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. "Undermined is probably putting it mildly."

"If you wanted to go a little bit further, you would say betrayed, and that's certainly how the mainstream Syrian rebels view it — as a betrayal from the U.S.," he added.



Canadian rifles may have fallen into Yemen rebel hands, likely via Saudi Arabia (Video)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/canadian-rifles-may-have-fallen-into-yemen-rebel-hands-likely-via-saudi-arabia-1.3455889

Canadian-made weapons may have fallen into the hands of Houthi fighters in Yemen's civil war, raising new concerns about Canada's arms exports to Saudi Arabia.

The rifles were most likely seized from Saudi forces, and it appears to have happened more than once, according to Armament Research Services, an international intelligence consultancy that traces arms.

The weapons first appeared in photos and video featured on a Houthi-linked TV channel and social media, showcased as "modern weapons" captured in battle with "Saudi border guards." It seemed a coup for a group that's been under a UN arms embargo for the past year.

Experts at ARES investigated the photos and concluded they almost certainly show an LRT-3 sniper rifle made by Winnipeg-based PGW Defence Technologies.

Several other Canadian and international experts consulted by CBC News agree.

"They're so distinctive visually that there aren't many rifles that look like them," ARES director Nic Jenzen-Jones said of the LRT-3, a .50 calibre sniper rifle with a potential range of nearly two kilometres.

Asked by the CBC to comment, the manufacturer declined to confirm that, saying only that all its exports follow Canadian export rules.

Another photo and a brief video also show the suspected LRT-3 next to what is believed to be a PGW Timberwolf sniper rifle, among other weapons, lying at the feet of three Houthi fighters with fists in the air.

"There are a couple of paths the weapon could have followed, but for us the most likely is that it was captured, from Saudi land forces," says Jenzen-Jones.

The weapons in question were most likely exported legally to Saudi Arabia. One of a few indications: on a media tour last year, Saudi soldiers were photographed on Yemen's border carrying a rifle that weapons experts believe is a PGW Timberwolf.

The apparent presence of such rifles in Yemen's battlefields, and how they got there, raises difficult questions for the Canadian government. (Article continues at link)
 
Obama Praises Putin for Resurrecting Russia's Global Position In Only 2 Years (VIDEO)
http://russia-insider.com/en/obama-praises-putin-engineering-remarkable-climb-russias-strength-only-2-years/ri12992

On March 25, 2014 US President Barack Obama described Russia as no more than a "regional power" whose actions in Ukraine are an expression of weakness rather than strength.

But hold it....less than two years later, on February 18, 2016, Obama conceded that “Russia is a major military” and that “obviously a bunch of rebels are not going to be able to compete with the hardware of the second-most powerful military in the world," at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) conference in California.

So, just how is it that Russia went from "regional power" to "the second most powerful military in the world" in less then two years? And this is stated just when many are predicting that it is only a matter of the time before Russia collapses? This statement must come as big disappointment to many "professional Russophobes" in the West.

Is it only Russia’s intervention in Syria, which has made Obama reassess Russia’s military might, or did Obama purposely stigmatize Russia as a regional power in order to publicly humiliate Russia after Crimea's return to the motherland? Or is it that even a deeply delusional president like Obama can no longer deny obvious facts about Russia's increasing global power?

Perhaps it is possible to be at the same time regional (political power) and the second most powerful military in the world.

No. By its sheer size and having the largest total nuclear arsenal, no matter how politically and economically weak at certain moments, Russia cannot be merely a regional power. Or in the words of Russia’s ambassador to the United States: “If you consider Russia ‘a regional power,’” he said, “look at our region — it is from Europe to Asia.”

So, the "region" Russia belongs to is actually entire northern hemisphere so from that point of view, he is not far from the truth.

And how come a mere regional power is the greatest threat to US national security? One would assume it would take a global threat to be at the top of the American list of the of biggest security menaces, not just being some regional misbehaving pariah state.

It sounds like Obama is drumming up for more support for even greater military expenditure. The Pentagon budget for European defense in 2017 has already quadrupled in light of "Russian aggression".
 
Laura said:
I agree and especially the part about focusing our minds and efforts and continuing the "cyber battle" day after day as long as we can. It's not huge in the grand scheme of things, but it could be the flapping of the butterfly wings...

Thank you Laura.

All of this is possible because of your courage, determination, and generosity. And I'm grateful to be a small part of this heroic endeavor.
 
Video: Vladimir Putin on the Ceasefire in Syria: “I Have Just held a Phone Conversation with President Barack Obama”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/vladimir-putin-on-the-ceasefire-in-syria/5509868

Video with English subtitles

Translated from Russian

“Dear friends, I have just held a phone conversation with the President of the United States, Barack Obama. The conversation was initiated by Russia, however interest toward dialogue was undoubtedly mutual.

We have agreed on common grounds of understanding for a ceasefire in Syria. Preceding this discussion was the intensive work of Russian and American experts. We were able draw upon previous experience, such as our combined efforts in eradicating chemical weapons from Syria.

Previously, our negotiators held a number of closed consultations. As a result, we were able to reach a concrete decision. We have agreed on ceasefire to take place from midnight of 27th February 2016, Damascus time.

The requirements are as follows. Until midday on the 26th of February 2016, all warring parties in Syria must show either to ourselves or to our American partners their dedication to stopping the war. Russian and American personnel can together pinpoint on a map where exactly such groups are operating.

The Syrian Arab Army, the armed forces of the Russian Federation, as well as the US-led coalition, will not carry out military operations against these opposition groups. In response, oppositioners must cease all military activity against the Syrian Arab Army, and parties supporting them.

As for ISIL, Jabhat al-Nusra, and other terrorist groups (as confirmed by the United Nations Security Council) these parties are excluded from the agreement. Military operations against terrorists will continue.

It is critical that the US and Russia put into practice a mechanism for the realisation of this ceasefire, ensuring that military activity from the Syrian government, as well as its opposition, stops. We will set up a “hotline” and a working group, as required, for the exchange of information between parties. Russia will work closely with Damascus – with the legitimate president of Syria. We consider, that the United States will do the same with the groups that they support.

I am assured that our cooperation with the United States can radically change the critical situation in Syria. Finally, we have a chance to stop this ongoing bloodshed and torture. All routes and avenues for the delivery of humanitarian aid to the people of Syria must be freed up.

Very importantly, we are launching a long-term, political consultation process for pan-Syrian discussions in Geneva, to be overseen by the United Nations. Recent history has shown that one-sided actions, that are carried out without a UN resolution, and geared at short term political benefits, lead to tragic results. These examples are on everybody’s tongues; Somalia, Iraq, Libya, Yemen.

It is with this background that we approach the current situation. Russian-American negotiations and efforts to coordinate between all parties, have the potential to become a leading international precedent. This ceasefire is based on principles of international law and the guidelines of the United Nations. It reflects the efforts of the international community in the fight against international terrorism.

I would like to hope that the Syrian government, our partners in the region and further abroad, will all support the given plan of action.”


The original source of this article is EurAsia Daily
 
One of the many topics of interest discussed in this article - is how news outlets and other Countries reported or didn't report, on this "Historical" moment.

The Syrian Ceasefire Has Revealed Russia's Superpower Status
http://russia-insider.com/en/putin-syria-peace/ri13007

Yesterday’s evening news in Russia was dominated by one story: the announcement by Vladimir Putin on national television that the United and Russia had concluded an agreement to facilitate the start and supervise the implementation of a ceasefire in Syria between government and opposition forces, set to begin on 27 February. The agreement was sealed by a telephone conversation between Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama that took place shortly before the broadcast. Putin’s televised address was less than 10 minutes long and it has been rebroadcast in entirety on state television at hourly intervals. Understandably, it has been the number one topic in the Russian print media this morning.

Since political correctness in Russia barred mention of the President’s demeanor in his broadcast, I will say what went unsaid: Putin looked stressed, downcast, without his characteristic buoyancy.

Indeed there can be no doubt that many Russians were less than delighted by this news, which interrupts the dramatic winning streak of the Syrian Army under the protection of Russian airpower, and likely brings their ground operations to a halt before they complete the liberation of Aleppo, the second largest city in the country which would give Bashar al-Assad control of most of the population of his country even if large swathes of territory to the east in the direction of Iraq remain in jihadist hands. Moreover, Aleppo, with its northern suburbs, is key to sealing the paths of incursion into Syria from neighboring Turkey and cutting off the jihadists from their main bases of supply.

However, one would be seriously mistaken in reading disappointment into Vladimir Putin’s facial expressions last night. They may be attributed to something quite different: what must have been his first experiment with delivery of a talk using a teleprompter. In fact, Putin has always spoken either from a written text that he holds before himself at the lectern or he has spoken extemporaneously. It will take some practice before he attains the unaffected radiance of a Barack Obama before the cameras when reading from a teleprompter.

Be that as it may, Putin’s address carried several important points. He described in some detail the architecture of the ceasefire agreed with the Americans. The deal foresees liaison of US-Russian military forces to determine where the opposing forces that are clients of the two countries are located on the ground as of the ceasefire’s coming into force, this to prevent any abuse that would give one or another side the possibility of gaining unilateral advantage, and also to ensure that Russia’s continued bombing raids against the Islamic State, allowed under the agreement, do not run afoul of American-protected forces. It also foresees a hot line between the brokers of this ceasefire to deal with problems as they occur. In fact, these were Russian proposals presented to the US-led coalition in Syria from the very start of the Russian air intervention at the end of September, proposals that were either ignored or ridiculed by the United States and its allies ever since.

Putin also used the speech to drive home a core message from his vision of international relations: that this agreement in Syria, which enjoys the full backing of the United Nations and adheres to the terms of the UN Charter, should be seen as a model for settlement of the kinds of conflicts that for the past two decades have been tackled by (US-led) coalitions acting outside the rules of international law and in contravention of the UN Charter. He named in particular, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan.

It stands to reason that the US-Russian agreement announced in a joint communique yesterday and which was the subject of Vladimir Putin’s televised address would be considered ‘breaking news’ by all major news organizations globally given the way eighty or more countries have been drawn into the Syrian civil war in one way or another. In the short survey of the press which follows, let us see to what extent this simple journalistic rule has been followed in Europe and America.

As of 9.00 am Central European Time today, 23 February, not one of the U.S. newspapers of record makes any mention in its online editions of the US-Russian communique on a ceasefire in Syria: not The New York Times, not The Washington Post, not The Wall Street Journal. And even a leader in instant, 24-hour global communications like Bloomberg.com is totally silent about the deal.

A couple of tentative working explanations may be put forward. First, the time difference between Russia and the U.S. East Coast might be thought to play a role. But in this case, the U.S. journalists and their editors had 6 hours more than their European peers to get their arms around the story. Yet, almost all leading European press nonetheless did find the time and the space to post articles on the agreement, as we shall see.

When I say ‘almost’ about the European print media, I have in mind one very significant exception that matches the U.S. 1:1, namely
Germany. This morning there was absolutely no mention of the US-Russian deal on Syria in Die Welt, Der Spiegel, the Frankfurter Allgemeine, the Sueddeutsche Zeitung. Nothing.

As a working hypothesis, I suggest the explanation that has been appropriate in similar cases of news blackouts that I have monitored. In particular, there was no news in US media for several days following the Russian Ministry of Defense’s news conference at the start of December 2015 when the Russians set out unwelcome and inconvenient proofs of Turkish involvement in financing ISIL through its massive illicit oil purchases. That news like this news of the US-Russian agreement was at odds with the official type-casting of Russia as the enemy and with Vladimir Putin regularly vilified in vicious personal attacks. For these reasons, the media waits for signals from on high before reacting.

In Germany today, news of the Russian-American deal is unwelcome because it challenges directly the entire recent stance of Chancellor Angela Merkel with respect to Russia, with respect to the migrant crisis that is threatening her hold on power. In recent weeks Merkel has denounced Russia for being the cause of the mass migration of refugees from Syria to Europe due to its support from al-Assad in his civil war and due to the recent bombing campaign. She has insisted that Turkey is the cure for as opposed to the source of the crisis, siding with Turkish President Erdogan against Russia ever since the downing of the Russian military jet by Turkish forces. Moreover, she has been pressing her EU colleagues to extend large financial grants to Turkey to create conditions that keep the Syrian refugees on its soil, rather than on the move to Europe. This is a policy which ignores who is on the move and why. And the countdown is underway for key state elections in mid-March that may bear on the viability of the coalition government Merkel heads. News commentary on the pending ceasefire brokered jointly by the U.S. and Russia will unavoidably be construed in Germany as politically motivated by one or another of the parties standing for imminent elections.

Even Poland, which has no fondness for Russia, saw fit to do better than the Germans. The Gazeta Wyborcza this morning splashed across its home page a picture of Lech Walesa and the revelations of how the former president was likely a police informer for much of his life. And yet the paper also posted a small notice on the home page about Vladimir Putin’s televised address which takes you to an ‘inside’ article on the pending ceasefire in Syria. The report is dry but informative.

Meanwhile, In France both leading centrist, Le Monde and Le Figaro, presented articles on the ceasefire announcement in their morning editions. They are factual and almost impartial. They do not go into the question of the basis for American-Russian cooperation. Instead, they weigh the possibilities of the deal’s working given the failure of the latest conference of the International Syrian Support Group in Munich to produce results on the ground.

In the United Kingdom, the Times of London and the tabloid Daily Mirror both had no coverage and The Financial Times had coverage similar in nature to the French dailies. Meanwhile, The Guardian was odd man out with an in-depth article by Patrick Wintour, their Diplomatic Editor, posted today at 1.00 am British time.

Wintour stresses the key role of the United States and Russia as brokers and guarantors of the pending ceasefire, which he expects will make all the difference in its viability. He describes in full the implementation arrangements agreed between them.

One interesting feature of the Wintour’s article is that it is accompanied by a click-on one minute video excerpt from Vladimir Putin’s televised address with English subtitles. The editors have cleverly chosen precisely the most meaty section of Putin’s presentation, his description of the architecture of implementation agreed with the Americans.

The second remarkable point in Wintour is his choice of words to describe what has just transpired: an “agreement brokered between the two superpowers….” In his many recent public appearances, Vladimir Putin has explicitly denied Russia’s aspirations to be reckoned as a superpower. However, the reality of the present situation in Syria speaks for itself to savvy observers.

The speed and depth of Wintour’s article, written and posted within a few hours of Putin’s televised address shows that the real issue driving mainstream news coverage in the USA and in Europe has been journalistic independence or the absence of it.

In this regard, it bears mention that The Guardian has had above-average volume of coverage of Russia-related issues ever since the start of the West-Russia confrontation two years ago. Its reporters and reports have never fit a clear mold as regards blame allocated to the parties in conflict.

Its greater claim to attention in this period came from its defense of Edward Snowden and participation in the publication of his trove of documents on US intelligence abuses. As Wikipedia notes, “The Guardian was named newspaper of the year at the 2014 British Press Awards, for its reporting on government surveillance.”

The Guardian had a long tradition as the favorite read of British educators and intellectuals in its former incarnation as The Manchester Guardian. Its independence and daring is partly explained by its financing from a trust. Today it is one of the few major world newspapers to provide unlimited unpaid access to its news and features. This may explain why The Guardian was cited in October 2014 as having the fifth most widely read online edition in the world, with 42.6 million readers.
 
Here is Putin's address yesterday below{bold mine} :

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51376

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Friends,

I just had a telephone conversation with President of the United States of America Barack Obama. The phone call was initiated by the Russian side, but the interest was certainly mutual.

During our conversation, we approved joint statements of Russia and the US, as co-chairs of the ISSG, on the cessation of hostilities in Syria. Adoption of the statement was preceded by intensive work by Russian and American experts. We also made use of the positive experience we accumulated over the course of cooperation in eliminating chemical weapons in Syria.

Our negotiators held several rounds of closed consultations. As a result, we were able to reach an important, specific result. It was agreed that the cessation of hostilities in Syria commences at 00:00 (Damascus time) on February 27, 2016 on terms and conditions that are a part of the Russian-American statement.

The essence of these conditions is as follows: by 12:00 pm on February 26, 2016, all parties warring in Syria must indicate to the Russian Federation or our American partners their commitment to the cessation of hostilities. Russian and American troops will jointly delineate the territories where these groups are active. No military action will be taken against them by the Armed Forces of the Syrian Arab Republic, Russian Armed Forces and the US-led coalition. In turn, the opposition will cease all military action against the Armed Forces of the Syrian Arab Republic and other groups supporting them.

ISIS, Jabhat Al-Nursa, and other terrorist organisations designated by the United Nations Security Council, are excluded from the cessation of hostilities. Strikes against them will continue.

It is fundamentally important that Russia and the US, as co-chairs of the ISSG, are prepared to launch effective mechanisms to promote and monitor compliance with the ceasefire by both the Syrian Government and the armed opposition groups.

To achieve this goal, we will establish a communication hotline and, if necessary, a working group to exchange relevant information. Russia will conduct the necessary work with Damascus and the legitimate Syrian leadership. We expect that the United States will do the same with regard to their allies and the groups they support.

I am sure that the joint actions agreed upon with the American side will be enough to radically reverse the crisis situation in Syria. We are finally seeing a real chance to bring an end to the long-standing bloodshed and violence. As a result, humanitarian access to all Syrian citizens in need should be made easier.

Most important is the creation of conditions for launching a long-term political process through a broad inter-Syrian dialogue in Geneva, under the auspices of the UN.

Unfortunately, recent history has many examples where one-sided actions not sanctioned by the UN, which favour short-term political or opportunistic interests, have led to dramatic results. These examples are on everyone’s lips: Somalia, Iraq, Libya, Yemen.

Against this background, Russian-American agreements on the cessation of hostilities in Syria, and their joint implementation in coordination with all nations participating in the International Syria Support Group, can become an example of responsible actions the global community takes against the threat of terrorism, which are based on international law and UN principles.

I would like to hope that the Syrian leadership and all our partners in the region and beyond will support the set of actions chosen by representatives of Russia and the US.
 
Damascus to Consider Any Group Breaching Ceasefire to Be Terrorists

http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160224/1035249640/syria-ceasefire-terrorists.html

Armed groups unwilling to abide by the ceasefire agreement will be considered terrorists by the Syrian government.

BEIRUT (Sputnik) – The Syrian leadership will consider any group not observing the ceasefire to be terrorists, Al Mayadeen television reported Wednesday citing an official source in the Syrian Foreign Ministry.

“Armed groups refuting the decision on a ceasefire and conducting military actions will be considered terrorists,” the broadcaster reported a Syrian Foreign Ministry official as saying.

On Monday, US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced an agreement on cessation of hostilities between the Syrian government of President Bashar Assad and the armed opposition factions had been reached. The agreement will come into force on February 27.

The deal between Russia and the United States was approved by the International Syria Support Group (ISSG). During its meeting on February 12, the ISSG agreed a final communique calling for swift humanitarian access to all besieged areas in Syria, and set a one-week deadline for measures to be implemented toward the cessation of hostilities in the country.
 
Amnesty Int'l: US Continues to Violate Human Rights Under CIA Program

http://sputniknews.com/us/20160224/1035252344/amnesty-slams-cia-torture.html

The United States continues to violate human rights as part of the secret detention program operated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), as well as at the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a rights group said in a report.

LONDON (Sputnik) — Amnesty International also slammed Washington for continuing to detain alleged criminals without charge or trial at the Guantanamo Bay detention center.

"By the end of the year [2015], no action had been taken to end the impunity for the systematic human rights violations committed in the secret detention programme operated by the CIA, under authorization granted by former President George W. Bush after the attacks of 11 September 2001," the rights group said in its annual report 2015/2016.

The annual report targeted US law enforcement's repeated excessive use of force, such as using Tasers on unarmed victims, which has resulted in at least 670 deaths since 2001.

Washington’s policies and violations of migrants’, women’s and prisoners’ rights were also criticized by the Amnesty International.
 
Back
Top Bottom