Scandinavian observations and perspectives

Näthatsgranskaren / "The online hate reviewer" • Tomas Åberg
It is a S*IT SHOW

This is some really shady business. Right back to the roots. Because the career path this man has built on, started all with the infamous cases of severe animal cruelty / abuse - for which he has been hated for among the Swedish people. Or those who still can remember.

It is the same guy behind the business "The Online Hate Reviewer", in which he and his buddies, pick out elderly people who made comments on Facebook and Twitter, uttering criticism against the onset of foreign immigration to Sweden, the sudden explosion of high criminality and abuse it has caused ever since. Some old people got prison and fines, just for writing a comment (with words that were not hateful, and held in a sober style of common sense critics) thanks to this guy's "business".

Apparently this Tomas Åberg has been very successful with his new "job". Because - in my opinion - the PTB are supporting it. Apparently also the judges... (The same strong tend you find in Germany as well; albeit more severe and aggressive, on the verge of insanity with that the PTB's lakeys are getting away with, and how easy it is to fine / being people into jail for almost nothing)

It is a S*IT SHOW, against anything that resembles criticism including common sense.

Here an article from 2020 - which can give you a glimpse behind the whereabouts of Tomas Åberg.

It is a very ugly picture.

Notorious animal abuser Tomas Åberg: “I am the favorite hate object of extreme racists”

In an interview with SVT Nyheter, the notorious animal torturer and censor Tomas Åberg says he is threatened and slandered by “extreme racists”, but at the same time he feels compelled to continue his work of prosecuting pensioners.

tomas-aberg-nathatsgranskare-djurplagare-460x272.jpg

Animal abuser Tomas Åberg does the lucrative work of framing pensioners in order to “look in the mirror”. Screenshot: Youtube.

Notorious animal abuser and former police officer Tomas Åberg (750127-0255) feels “threatened and slandered”. In an interview with SVT Nyheter, he complains about how he has unwittingly received some critical reactions to his actions, but says he still needs to continue as someone has to do the job of putting politically incorrect people in jail.

- “You have to dare to step forward and speak up when something is wrong. It allows me to look myself in the mirror. And I'm not going to hide the fact that I get a kick out of knowing that I'm making a difference,” says the animal torturer.

However, Åberg - who, according to SVT Nyheter, “pays a high price for hunting down extreme racists” - is reluctant to take on the job of hunting down mainly pensioners who may have believed that freedom of expression still exists in the country. He believes that this work should really be done by the police:

- “I don't think it's a good idea. I think this should really be the responsibility of the judiciary. The police should patrol social media just like they patrol the streets.

Åberg runs the tax-funded and lucrative informer business “Näthatsgranskaren” [The online hate reviewer"], which has set up a system to maximize the use of the “Hets mot folkgrupp” (hate speech) clause, which violates freedom of expression.

The business idea is to scan the internet for statements that can be reported under the “Hets mot folkgrupp” [“Incitement to racial hatred”] section and then sue the people who wrote them. These are often older people who, unaware that there is no longer freedom of expression in the country, have expressed themselves in ways that the “Net Hate Examiner” in cooperation with the “Legal Front” can exploit.

As older people often prefer to pay than to let it go as far as a lawsuit, it is fairly easy money for the infamous reviewer of so-called “cyber hate”. For a fee of SEK 900, he can get around SEK 10 000-15 000 tax-free per report. This is money that is exempt from seizure.

Åberg, who reportedly owes SEK 800,000 to the Swedish Enforcement Authority, has been granted more than SEK 2 million by the tax authorities to hunt down politically incorrect Swedes online.

“The activities of the 'online hate crime investigator' are having a detrimental effect on the already overburdened judicial system. In the last 2.5 years alone, the organization has reported 5,000 cases, leading to 215 convictions so far. Currently, there are hundreds of charges pending before the courts.

The former police officer is a known animal abuser who severely neglected six yaks in the 2010s. He left three of them to die of starvation and dehydration in a pen with no food or water, while he allegedly killed the remaining three in a panic. He then left the country until the statute of limitations expired and changed his name from Bergström to Åberg.

Åberg resents both the spread of unpleasant truths about him and the scrutiny of his own actions. In recent days, he has tried to silence citizen journalist Joakim Lamotte, who wrote a high-profile Facebook post.

And from year 2018 - albeit the article was/is behind a paywall.

Animal Abuser Behind “The Night Hate Reviewer”: Let His Animals Starve to Death
March 7, 2018 by Andreas Jonsson

gtograf-Vinchel-Budihardjo-800x362-1.jpg

The animals tried to find something to eat and drink, but in the end they starved to death in the enclosure where they were locked up. The zookeeper was called Tomas Bergström. Today his name is Tomas Åberg and he is praised in the media for his organization “Näthatsgranskaren”, which looks for anti-immigration posts on Facebook and reports them to the police. The members themselves have a huge register. The first review begins here.


Apparently he also changed his name, which earlier was Tomas Bergström.

How befitting. I had once a zion "husband", who too changed name, when "the s*it hit the fan" - in the shape of my former diary on the internet... which was an obstacle for his new career (he is a big shot now); People who do not wish to feel or be connected to some really bad actions they have imposed on others, and simply skip the consequences (and lessons) that normally derivate from such.



Article about Åberg's animal cruelty (2013)



jak_001_la_IMG_9414.jpg
A live yak


A 38-year-old Sydnärke resident is banned by the County Administrative Board from keeping animals. The man has for a long time proved to be unsuitable as an animal keeper, according to the authority after finding yaks that had starved to death on the farm.

When the County Administrative Board carried out a check on the farm on January 23 following a complaint, the 38-year-old stated that there were five animals in the enclosure. But they found three dead yaks and three alive. There was no water or feed in the enclosure and no feed at the farm.

The County Administrative Board believes that the farm's owner could not fail to see that the animals lacked food and water and that the animals had tried in various ways to find something to eat and drink.

Autopsy showed starvation

Of the self-dead animals in the enclosure, parts of two animals were sent for autopsy. It showed a severe negative energy balance (starvation), which certainly gave the diagnosis of emaciation, which caused suffering for the animals, writes the county administrative board in its decision.

The 38-year-old does not deny that he failed in his supervision and care of the yaks in January. But the County Administrative Board points out that deficiencies in feeding have been found in previous inspections, since 2010. The man has then claimed that the animals were fed but that they were sick.

Ignored the advice

In the reasons for the animal ban, the judgment is harsh:

The 38-year-old “has for a long time shown himself to be unsuitable as an animal keeper by not understanding or taking in information about the care of deer and yaks.”

According to the County Administrative Board, several different actors have tried to make him understand that the animals need feed in the right amount and variety and water, and that they must be cared for in a way that is appropriate for the animals. “Despite this, he has continued with inadequate feeding and care, and instead blamed the animals' underweight and poor health on diseases and parasites.”

Not getting away with it

The Animal Welfare Act provides an emergency exit for those who have neglected their animals - if the authority does not believe that the misconduct will be repeated, they can avoid a ban. But this does not apply to the 38-year-old. Even if the decision is appealed, it applies immediately and until further notice.

What can i say...

Gossip via Flashback, where Swedes at a forum speak / write about anything and everything. This Tomas Åberg / former Bergström has his own thread with 21 pages ! He ain't a small phenomena...

2018

According to Samhällsnytt, Tomas Åberg has now been removed from the nomination as “Swedish hero” after the old media's revelations about animal cruelty. Of course, the old media have not written anything about the macabre revelation of the bandit Tomas. Well done by Samnytt to contact the sponsors, Agria animal insurance has reacted to the revelation.

2018

It should also be added that T has used black labor on his farm at the time the animal cruelty was committed according to sources. He was also in court for not paying craftsmen he had hired.

Financial problems meant that the animals, yaks according to the newspaper, were starved to death and then buried in a pit. Some problems with the neighbors too.

15 Aug 2018

The investigation of Tomas Åberg is now being highlighted by Näthatsgranskaren. They are all over Åberg's animal cruelty. He had a hard time with the police and therefore let his animals starve to death, they say. Very strange to put such a discharge of responsibility on an adult human being. They present it as something tragic that happened to Tomas; he mismanaged his job at the police, was fired and therefore “really” the police authority is guilty of Tomas' animal cruelty? It is, of course, great that 'Nya Tider' Online magazin and others are scrutinizing the criminals who engage in harassment of ordinary people through denunciations.*** [see further below]


21 Sep 2024

In his prime he [Åberg] had 4-5 lawsuits per month. Let's say he got 1800 € each from these. For his part, he keeps it to a minimum in terms of his overhead. Then he chooses cases that are more slam dunk for the prosecutor. Mostly older people who confess directly just talking to a police officer (or investigator more commonly but the elderly will think it is a police officer). If confessed, there is zero risk of losing a case. The person provably wrote or spread this further.

It will be a pretty decent “monthly salary”. Reasons probably to continue with it. Must be some aversion within the judiciary for this behavior. But as long as it's just one, we'll let it go on. Just having this as a trial costs us taxpayers considerably more than this money given in damages.


*** Kind of cynical isn't it ?
If the aforementioned statement is correct, the "business" of "the Hate Reviewer" - which once investigated the very same man, that later became part the very same business, to hunt down any criticism from others on the internet, by sending them to court / fines & prison.

Also; the very same animal torturer Åberg was invited to speak by Council of Europe. Boy, there is really a lot of questional stuff about that person once you dig deep.

A Petty Tyrant. Perhaps a bit more then that it seems.

 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom