M
That's because it is word-salad. Interesting response to a joke, indeed.Ignatious said:Interesting response to Muhammad's cartoon, Mercurius! Please can you simplify what your point is in language that is accessible to all in the forum. Many are not English first language speakers and even myself who is, find your post confusing.
Would you like some juice from these freshly squeezed non orange oranges?Mercurious said:The complexities necessitate a higher order epistemology of non dual duality ...
About this writing style:Mercurious said:I, for the record, am INDIGENOUS to EARTH, do not care to LEAVE, believe that with COHERENCE of MIND and that means coherence of ideas of reality and emotional centerdness to love, interconectivity and complementarity -unity and pluralism, that the collective humanity and all kingdoms of earth could handle catastrophe positively, negating the REPEAT of the FEAR, DEFENCE, PROJECTION and REACTION that BIRTHED THE DOMINANT MINDSET (un)civilised(?) with all of its SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROWESS that is the very cause of the extreme global nexus of crises, and paradoxically will have the means through which such crises are negotiated, would like everyone that presumes the wonton exploitation of all that is, and the utility of technology to mindcontrol the masses and perpectuate this charade of freedom (free market (knot) free enterprise (knot) free speech (knot) which has been so firmly entrenched since the covert split between secret knowledges and mass doctrine since the scientific revolution at the hands of JAMES I, but enduring since the abstractions of the ALPHABETIC GRAMMATRIA was realised itself....
No place like home :PMercurious said:that is - a mindset that seeks to return home
Indeed. And with external considering.Mercurius said:I have many issues with text
If they are 'not merely numbers', then what are they?M said:however these are not merely numbers
Reality is under no obligation to conform to your beliefs.M said:which I believe is the INVERSE of the truth of Ultimate reality
On what evidence do you base this assumption?M said:will be "proved" by quantum and reverse computational logic
What do you mean?M said:the relationship between being and nonbeing as the archetypal complement and of true epistemology.
How does this happen? What do you mean?M said:a simple abstraction of a switch to a bit
I wonder if this thread should be in Baked Noodles.M said:The RUPTURE from the past, the close proximity to the epicentre of the catastrophe, the return to darkeness, and the cave, the mutation of white skin, and the evolution of projective psyche- the opposite of the indigenous, who on the opposite space in the world, evolved reinsured of the living the planet, in its groans and motions.
True, aristotlian logic is used when dealing with ordinary things. When talking about a non-dual duality you render the words you are using meaningless. You are confusing levels- we are at a certain level, and we use a corresponding level of language to gain knowledge.Mercurious said:Either/or dichotomies and binary logic, forces a split between complements as if the opposed aspects are separate and discrete entities.
But binary logic is based on oppositions- you are talking nonsense! In what way have they ben "allowed to be reduced to [0 and 1]"- the entire logic is based on the true/false dichotomy. If they didn't, you wouldn't be reading this on a computer right now.these are not simple oppositions 0 and 1 but have been allowed to be reduced to these notations
Perhaps, all is 0 and 1 on some level, but on our level some is 1 and some is 0. We need to deal with our level of the illusion to get anywhere.As wheeler says, all is 0 and 1 there are no real numbers.
So if it is the inverse of the truth then it would be 0. But you said 0 and 1 are the same so maybe it is the truth. See the problem with your thinking? Also, a scientific theory can't be proved with logic, but it can be proved with evidence that logically lead to its truth.the many worlds theory, which I believe is the INVERSE of the truth of Ultimate reality, will be "proved" by quantum and reverse computational logic.
Russell's logic was purely classical, like the 1 and 0 you talked about before. The heisenberg uncertainty principle has little to do with logic, you're probably thinking of quantum superposition. Classical and quantum logic are two separate subjects.We are caught under the scientifici dictatoreship of the RUSSELL logic and stochastic process of heisenbergian random indeterminism.
Many worlds hardly satisfies everyone. Most people find it disconcerting that every possible variation on themselves is a reality and many find that this renders their life meaningless. This is a little to speculative however, because we don't even know if many worlds is a correct interpretation. Non-dual duality is a meaningless term! How is pantheism realized and what does it have to do with hierarchies or voids?many worlds satifies everyone, religionist, atheists, satanist, bhuddists, as long non dual duality and panenetheism is not realised, and the heirarchy is maintained, and the void is there, then everyone can continue to exploit the guts out of the planet.
Who says "assimilation of women" is the "most important step"? In what way did the "greeks reduce the female to mere vessel"? Please use supporting evidence for your assertions or you're adding to forum noise.Assimiliation of women the most important step. Why? the greeks reduced the female to mere vessel.
I'm all for using mathematical objects for philisophical speculation, so long as your analogy is clear. Actually, there is an empty set ({}, or a set with 0 objects), but I'm not exactly sure what it has to do with consciousness- once again, please explain (with evidene) or you're just adding noise. What is "true epistemology"?This shape is the shape that ROWLANDS THEORY is close to- a continuous assymetric creation. just that there is no EMPTY SET, the empty set is CONSCIOUSNESS, and the moebius twist is the LIFE that is induce through the relationship between being and nonbeing as the archetypal complement and of true epistemology.
Do you have a source for this?Maxwel was getting to this, but the Royal society reduced his math by removing quaternions, which Rowalnds works from. Klein was a collegue of SOPHUS LIE, and SOPHUS LIE is the foundation of SANTILLI ISOEUCLIDEAN MATHS.
Again, where's your source?Pyhtagoras is the closest of the greeks, but he was a civilised and assimilated man, and the vesica piscus is obscured through the reduction of the henge science to the technological (brilliant shift but problematic) of the sun dial, placing the cosmos into a bowl, using a cross to read the information and hence presuming that the whole cosmos was a simple sphere.
I'm lost. Maxwell's demon is a thought experiment about thermodynamics. Please explain what you're talking about or you're just adding noise.it is the primacy of consoisnesss that is the DRIVER, in the position as was MAXWELLS HYPOTHETICAL DEAMON>In the aritificial world of aritificial systems, the position of the DEAMON as the GATE KEEPER is the GOD SPACE, the space that is now the artifiical space of SURVELANCE and INFORMATION GATHERING, sorting, and doling out to the different levels of the social system that is built to serve the mindset of DOMINANCE. DOMINUS DOMINION.
Have you been paying attention at all. No one is presuming the most intelligent must rule, look at our world leaders.all knowledge will be used and abused and exploited just as all kingdoms, until the unification and coherence of all which begins with a dissolution of heirarchy and presumption that only the most intelligent must rule. the most intelligent are those more privvy to the lies and the half truths, however over time, the lies and the half truths have become all that is.