Science Vs. Religion

[Mercurious]

I have written a thesis, I have a phd in epistemological resolution analysis, focussing on the kleinbottle and related topologies and the effect of the geometrisations of spacetime on the apprehension of reality.

 

[anart]

wow you guys are really nasty

See, until this point what you have experienced here is a direct 'cause and effect' situation. As a proclaimed scientist you should understand that. You write incomprehensible posts and expect to not have that pointed out. These posts are not incomprehensible because you are more intelligent or well educated than your reader - they are incomprehensible because you cannot write logically nor clearly. You write for yourself and not others. In this forum, expect to be called on this.

Now, at this point you have gone on the attack, and that is breaking forum rules.

resolving paradox has the potential to realise unity

This is a nonsense sentence. It also does not incorporate any grammatical rules - no capitalization - no punctuation - it is written for you not others.

judgement the opposite.

vive la fragmentation.

and no I am not on medication.

From your abominable writing skills, it would be difficult to discern such a thing.

cults preserve themselves by projecting blanket abuse on others whos intensions are not to pull apart, but unify. If you cannot see this by my attempt to communicate, albeit too inaccessable, then perhaps engagement with you guys is a mistake.

Now you are accusing this forum of being a cult. You just wore out your rather tenuous welcome. You have not been subject to abuse - you have experienced 'cause and effect' - you have been held accountable not only for what you have written, but how you have written it. You do not like being held accountable and have gone on the attack. That will get you removed, rather quickly, from this forum.

I am interested in the complexities that persist with either/or arguments, and will never find resolution.

EITHER you behave and write for others, not yourself - using correct grammar, external consideration and follow all forum rules OR you will be removed - is that a clear enough resolution?

 

[Mercurious]

Mercurious, please tell me you're just overmedicated. It's hard to believe that, with only 24 hours in a day, that anyone with two firing neurons would waste their time stringing together such nonsense.
And then have the nerve to post it!

no wonder there is no end to the drama of conflict.

 

[NormaRegula]

wow you guys are really nasty

Requesting external consideration and commenting with clarity (ie: objective reality via facts, not a bunch of mumbo jumbo that constitutes noise) is not being nasty. This forum does not suffer posters whose sense of self importance takes umbrage too easily.

resolving paradox has the potential to realise unity

judgement the opposite.

A forum of this sort is built on facts and objective reality. You are not even close to realizing your potential, whatever that may be. Do not expect this forum to be impressed by your nonsensical writings.

vive la fragmentation.

Fragmentation (as in our many "Is," and fragmentation of truthful knowledge) is what we're trying to eliminate here.

and no I am not on medication.

That does not excuse your demand (and, yes, it is a demand) that this forum seriously considers your ravings.

cults preserve themselves by projecting blanket abuse on others whos intensions are not to pull apart, but unify.

Ah, because members of this forum do not condone your silliness and/or expect coherent discourse, they are cult members? That tired old accusation (used by past "noisy" visitors to this site) doesn't hold water here.

If you cannot see this by my attempt to communicate, albeit too inaccessable, then perhaps engagement with you guys is a mistake.

Your biggest mistake was not researching the goals of this forum before you engaged.


EDITED after I saw Anart's reply to your post. She's not being nasty...she's giving you some sage advice on how to behave on this forum.

no wonder there is no end to the drama of conflict.

It seems that you are the one who desires the "drama of conflict."

 

[Tical1207]

Lol. That's a cool illustration, and an interesting conversation afterwards. I find it hard to believe that humans with enough knowledge to use computers actually posted some of these threads.

 

[Azur]

I find it hard to believe that humans with enough knowledge to use computers actually posted some of these threads.

Knowing how to use a pencil does not make you a Da Vinci.

Knowledge (and acquisition thereof) is limited by, and mostly usurped, by perception (of self, of self in context with the World, and by biological factors).

So when you say that you are surprised by the Quality of the posts in this thread, the first thing to be established is what you think that "quality" is.

;)

[post edit in bold]

 

[Nathan]

I wouldn't be surprised if this is only one among several dozen forums Mercurious is posting on to generate interest towards the material on her web site. Perhaps she had hoped many of us would find her strange (mis)use of language mesmerising and wander over to her web site for more? Maybe she wants to start a fan club so she can bask in the glow of idolisation ... or Klein bottle wholeness. :/