Benjamin
The Living Force
I had a memory of the first quote but I only found it via the second, so I guess I could say that both of these excerpts popped into my mind recently.
Jul. 17 2022
Sept. 23, 2023
The "organizing of molecules" sounds like what happens when something gets magnetized. And then Ryan's question regarding "subatomic structure of individual atoms" got me thinking about the TDARM and how the atomic structure of the passages in the Pyramid change atomically.
I started thinking that the picture of the Tree of Knowledge/Life might have two meanings combined into one: a technological one and, for lack of a better term, and esoteric one.
The tech idea is that it's an actual device (a TDARM?) that interacts/connects with the Pyramid grid and that the pine cones, purses, watches, etc. are all secondary devices that interact with the Tree in one way or another, attended by 4D STS and their demigod overseers.
The esoteric idea is shamanistic: the staff that represents the spine, the chakras/Rosettes creating magnetic resonance, the pituitary gland that connects to the information field, shamans, sages or priests.
If there are two different versions being shown in the same image, and the pine cone represents a physical device (telescope of sorts?) and the 'pineal gland' then what is the purse? If the pine cone is held up high, could there be something corresponding with the position of the purse being low? Some suggest the purse is a bucket (dalu, banduddu) for carrying water, pollen or for fruit collection. How about 'chi'?
This technological idea has me thinking of today's tech lust. Would it be fair to suggest that reliance on tech is an enslavement of sorts, or is that too simplistic?
As a side note, since the parietal eye is a direct extension of the pineal gland in certain exotherms, I wondered if it was being used as scientific evidence (at least after 1872) to support the idea of the pineal gland in humans being the organ of psychic abilities rather then the pituitary gland? Is it a jump-to-conclusions mistake or wilful diversion?
I thought it was interesting that the C's said the sexual centre ('lake of chi from which to draw water'?, power generator?) is the solar plexus and the pituitary gland closes the circuit in the shape of a crook.
Jul. 17 2022
Sept. 23, 2023
The "organizing of molecules" sounds like what happens when something gets magnetized. And then Ryan's question regarding "subatomic structure of individual atoms" got me thinking about the TDARM and how the atomic structure of the passages in the Pyramid change atomically.
I started thinking that the picture of the Tree of Knowledge/Life might have two meanings combined into one: a technological one and, for lack of a better term, and esoteric one.
The tech idea is that it's an actual device (a TDARM?) that interacts/connects with the Pyramid grid and that the pine cones, purses, watches, etc. are all secondary devices that interact with the Tree in one way or another, attended by 4D STS and their demigod overseers.
The esoteric idea is shamanistic: the staff that represents the spine, the chakras/Rosettes creating magnetic resonance, the pituitary gland that connects to the information field, shamans, sages or priests.
If there are two different versions being shown in the same image, and the pine cone represents a physical device (telescope of sorts?) and the 'pineal gland' then what is the purse? If the pine cone is held up high, could there be something corresponding with the position of the purse being low? Some suggest the purse is a bucket (dalu, banduddu) for carrying water, pollen or for fruit collection. How about 'chi'?
This technological idea has me thinking of today's tech lust. Would it be fair to suggest that reliance on tech is an enslavement of sorts, or is that too simplistic?
As a side note, since the parietal eye is a direct extension of the pineal gland in certain exotherms, I wondered if it was being used as scientific evidence (at least after 1872) to support the idea of the pineal gland in humans being the organ of psychic abilities rather then the pituitary gland? Is it a jump-to-conclusions mistake or wilful diversion?
I thought it was interesting that the C's said the sexual centre ('lake of chi from which to draw water'?, power generator?) is the solar plexus and the pituitary gland closes the circuit in the shape of a crook.
