Thank you for a very rich session.
A: That will backfire tragically. Think "Tower of Babel."
(Chu) In the records, does it also show like 40, 50, or 100 years before the civilization collapses?
(L) Yeah. I would say that what's going on now started probably in 1914, or maybe even towards the close of the nineteenth century. So, we're just really kind of at the end of it. I mean, it was crazy enough according to Lobaczewski around WWI and then WWII. Then if you read that book Psychopathic God about Hitler where he goes into that extensive description of what it was like in Germany before Hitler, you see almost the same thing: people just acting freaking nuts!
Yeah, the Psychopathic God is certainly a most interesting read. One could perhaps even argue that the seed of the current collapse started in the Age of Enlightenment, when God was done away with and our society went all materialistic. In a way the head (spiritual) was cut off and people were left bereft with no overall guiding influence and with only a material view of life. The baby was thrown out with the bathwater and life lost its meaning for the most part.
(L) Lobaczewski referred to "Austrian talk", a state of mind or attitude that emerged out of Austria. And that's actually where Hitler was born. And Jung was Austrian. So was Freud and Kafka. The philosopher, Wittgenstein, Erwin Schroedinger, lot of very smart people, but some real crazy ones, too.
Small correction, Jung was Swiss and lived all of his life in Switzerland, though he did go abroad. Interestingly, Lenin (February 1916- February 1917) as well as Einstein (1895 - 1914) lived in Zurich while Jung was also living there.
Regarding Austrian talk, then here is the bit from Lobacewski that Laura is referring to. Parallels to todays world are obvious:
>The psychological features of such crises doubtless bear the
stamp of the time and of the civilization in question, but one
common denominator must have been an
exacerbation of society’s
hysterical condition. This deviation or, better yet, formative
deficiency of character, is a perennial sickness of societies,
especially the privileged elites. The existence of exaggerated
individual cases, especially such characterized as clinical, is an
offshoot of the level of social hysteria, quite frequently correlated
with some additional causes such as carriers of minor
lesions of brain tissue. Quantitatively and qualitatively, these
individuals may serve to reveal and evaluate such times, as
indicated in history’s Book of San Michele29. From the perspec-
tive of historical time, it would be harder to examine the regression
of the ability and correctness of reasoning or the intensity
of “
Austrian talk”, although these approximate the crux
of the matter better and more directly.
In spite of above-mentioned qualitative differences, the duration
of these time-cycles tends to be similar. If we assume
that the extreme of European hysteria occurred around 1900
and returns not quite every two centuries, we find similar conditions.
Such cyclical isochronicity may embrace a civilization
and cross into neighboring countries, but it would not swim
oceans or penetrate into faraway and far different civilizations.
When the First World War broke out, young officers danced
and sang on the streets of Vienna: “Krieg, Krieg, Krieg! Es
wird ein schoener Krieg ...”. While visiting Upper Austria in
1978, I decided to drop in on the local parson, who was in his
seventies by then. When I told him about myself, I suddenly
realized he thought I was lying and inventing pretty stories. He
subjected my statements to psychological analysis, based on
this unassailable assumption and attempted to convince me that
his morals were lofty. When I complained to a friend of mine
about this, he was amused: “As a psychologist, you were extremely
lucky to catch the survival of authentic Austrian talk
(die oesterreichische Rede). We young ones have been incapable
of demonstrating it to you even if we wanted to simulate
it.”In the European languages,
“Austrian talk” has become the
common descriptive term for paralogistic discourse. Many
people using this term nowadays are unaware of its origin.
Within the context of maximum hysterical intensity in Europe
at the time, the authentic article represented a typical product of
conversive thinking: subconscious selection and substitution of
data leading to chronic avoidance of the crux of the matter.
In
the same manner, the reflex assumption that every speaker is
lying is an indication of the hysterical anti-culture of mendacity,
within which telling the truth becomes “immoral”.<
Running the risk of sounding a bit pop esoteric here: when I attended a workshop I found it curiously strengthening when the therapist chose a number of people (perhaps ten) to represent my ancestors and they were all lined up behind me, each touching the shoulders of the one before them.
I also did a workshop by Hellinger 11 years ago and experienced the effect that it had on a person by lining up the ancestors behind the person to give the person strength and support and it was quite a powerful experience.
Having done quite a bit of genealogy over the years, I can say it is quite an interesting experience even if I many times have questioned the many countless hours spent doing it. Just recently while cleaning out my mothers flat with my siblings, I was handed some more family archives, so it appears that more research will be needed on a wintry night or two.