Session 17 August 2024

[Ricardo]

well , my 2x cents , at the simplest level, it's about dis-empowering the locals , simultaneously , creating possibilities for more (and different ) control.

 

[Beau]

Please don't be offended but you guys do need to ask deeper questions sometimes!

It's not so easy to think of "deeper questions" that are in response to answers given in real time. By its very nature, a deeper question is something that takes time to think about and formulate. There have been plenty of questions that circled back to answers from previous sessions. A bit more patience and understanding of what it's like to be on the board on your end would go a long way.

 

[Mike]

(Chu) So if these "nanobots", as they are called, exist, what is their main purpose? Mind control or health deterioration or something else?

A: Either/or.

Q: (Joe) Can they be shed? Can you contract them from people who have had them in the batches of vaccines…?

A: Cut them up.

Q: (Joe) What was that?

(Niall) Cut them up.

(Joe) Huh?

A: Chemical cleaving.

Q: (Gaby) Like detox?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) What would you use for that?

(L) Like serrapeptase. Doesn't serrapeptase digest stuff like that?

(Gaby) Yeah. The protocols we discussed. Bromelain, nattokinase, ivermectin...

(Joe) So it is possible for them to be shed, and contracted by other people.

(L) Well, you have to cut them up and get rid of them out of your body.

(Joe) But my question was, people who have had them injected into them via the vaccine, and who have these nanobots in them... Are they "sheddable"?

A: Under some circumstances.

Q: (L) Well, I guess sex, or sharing body fluids of some sort, or...

(Gaby) Blood transfusions.

(L) Yeah, things like that.

(Joe) Yeah. But not just coughed in your face.

(Andromeda) Not like a germ.

(Joe) Not like the way you can shed the spike protein. You can't contract it the same way.

I don't know how accurate this is, and back in the Covid days somewhere on the forum La Quinta Columna might have been called into question if I remember right, but the first tweet has a video of nicotine supposedly destroying nanotechnology under the microscope.

The second tweet says that they are going to start testing nicotine on the Pfizer death jab.

If it is true, then it adds another level to why they are so against smoking and nicotine to the point of continually pushing toward trying to ban it outright in some western countries, like Australia. This would be in addition to 'aliens' not liking to eat smokers, the way smokers fared much better with Covid, and the other positive things, and benefits we know about related to smoking in general in terms of the brain and thinking.

"NICOTINE DESTROYS INJECTABLE NANOTECHNOLOGY."

https://twitter.com/x/status/1826940600337232323

We do not want with this discovery to encourage smoking in the population, only to show the evidence that nicotine, as we already suspected, apparently interacts negatively with what has been introduced to millions of people around the world.

Yeah right, smok'em if you got em! ... the nanotech?!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1826933145427448229

 

[Chetofloj]

Imagine you're at the casino, because you chose to be there because you like gambling. When the casino operator uses all sorts of manipulative incentives and ploys to keep you there (which they do), is he infringing your free will?

Sorry, Joe, because although that question wasn't for me, I can answer it. The person who entered the casino may have consented to what it means to gamble, unless they were taken against their will to a casino.
But since this 3 density reality is, it means that everything that is allowed in 3 density already makes you responsible or includes you by general law to things like a casino, whether by will or not.
since there are traps in 3 density

 

[benklerk]

Imagine you're at the casino, because you chose to be there because you like gambling. When the casino operator uses all sorts of manipulative incentives and ploys to keep you there (which they do), is he infringing your free will?

Well, I see this is. Your allowing to be manipulated same for reading or watching the news. Its their free will to do whatever they can. Its also our free will not to be sucked in and taking in by their manipulative incentives. Its when I start to question when does it stop being free will. If beings outside of us on a higher plane start to manipulated things on a grand scale to benefit them in some way or another. I do see this as infringing on people free will. But I can't really say what the whole scheme of things are and how it will play out, as their are so many levels to look out.