Session 17 July 2022

Here are old interviews (Peter Hyatt/Richard Hall) that assess language and emotions of the parents. It does not point to the who in this case. The best I can figure out, without fully knowing, is that the 'who' that was known to the parents became a matter of national security, with Madeleine's body taken and cover stories place in the press. There was massive political pressure from the UK at every step.

Had mentioned Peter Hyatt in the Charlie Kirk thread, which caused me later to see what Peter has been up to. Sadly, from here, or for more in-depth here, one reads Peter transitioned early this year from cancer:

1760219155435.png

R.I.P.

Peter's last video (July 2024) titled Missing: Sebastian Rogers & Madeleine McCann Analysis, was checked out. Concerning the McCann's, somewhere around 7:40 mark, he mentions that supporters of the McCann's started using words that the McCann's did not use (the later was not first person) - it runs to about 10 min.

Peter's main talk was on Sebastian Rogers, a young autistic boy who went missing February 2024. Had not heard anything about this, and now checking it out, the press as late as September 2025, still talk about it as the boy never turned up. Peter did not think the stepfather was telling the truth.

YouTube here.

To get an idea how well Peter was respected, one can check out this YouTube on Body Language, Interrogation and Statement Analysis with a panel, and they all looked up to Hyatt.
 
(irjo) What are the chances that Trump will be re-elected as president of the USA in the coming elections?

A: Remote.

Q: (L) Does that mean that other weird things might happen?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Does that mean there won't be a presidential election in 2024?

A: Not exactly. Wait and see!
That kind of went sideways from remote didn't it. Regardless, a dummy is elected and the show goes on.
 
(Pierre) So it's 1100 - 400. It would be around 700. We were thinking 540.

That is pretty close to the Meyake Event of 774-5 which showed a massive spike in Carbon-14 isotope observed in tree rings from 774-775 and is most likely to have been the result of a mega solar storm impact launched from a super flare, ten times stronger than the Carrington event. That would surely have had some devastating impact to say the least.
 
Digging a bit deeper, around the beginning of 1106, the Tunu13 Greenland ice core record shows two large acid spikes, a marker for the presence of dust from volcanic eruptions and comets among other things. The second acid signal in 1109-1110 and a corresponding sulphate spike is attributed to a series of volcanoes erupting in a short amount of time, although two comets were also observed at the time and could have triggered the eruptions in the first place (Pierre explains the mechanism in ECHCC). The first acid signal was followed shortly after by a massive spike in hydrogen peroxide, H2O2. Surprisingly, this spike dwarfs all other H2O2 signals in the ice core by several orders of magnitude.

Hi there,

I just noticed your very interesting comment!

I've started studying chemical markers, using observations from the NOA database (and others). I'm just getting started. I'm using a program to generate graphs (labplot), which works really well—but installing it on Linux was complicated until I figured it out.

I wanted to ask you a few questions about this:

- Are you still studying these things (it seems to me you're quite knowledgeable, judging from your comment)?
- Do you have any advice?

Thanks!
 
Back
Top Bottom