Thanks for taking the time to post this, Laura.
Although the session seemed to be corrupted, perhaps by a combination of 4-d STS wanting to feed Frank justifications for his continued behaviour and thought patterns), the C's usually try to find a way to get something through the noise, which I find quite difficult in this session.
Some of the responses could be seen on two levels and interpreted in two different ways. For example
A: That repels attacking forces because they thrive upon blase passivity.
Could suggest being passive attracts attack (something STS would want us to think, since there are advantages for controllers if we are apathetic and do nothing. However, on another level this could be true, the not doing and not caring, is a way of giving up ownership and control of oneself. One needs to care for oneself and others and act in the interest of those involved in a given situation. To be blasé and passive while the house burns would be surrendering one's control over the self. Therefore, one should care and take action.
As a side note, it surprises me that the C's didn't correct you when you referred to Frank as the primary channel. I seem to remember seeing that before as well, and they didn't correct it, even though I've seen them correct you other times, be it directly or through hints. Would that be because you needed to discover about Frank and who was primary on your own and they had to respect your learning path?
It's interesting to see how much you have evolved since then, Laura. Granted, you were drained, but it seems to me your logic, beliefs and approaches have changed considerably over the years.
Once again, thanks,
Gonzo