Q: (L) What are the alien drones or probes up to?
A: Psychic reading and influencing of selected populations.
Q: (Gaby) So why are the aliens doing it now?
A: Part of ongoing plans falling into place. [ferocious dogs growl and bark during answer :)]
Q: (L) And I guess we've already been told what those plans are.
(Joe) Well, are they? Do we? Have we?
(L) We have been a number of times.
(Joe) Long term or short term?
(L) So, you say that they want to influence and read...
(Andromeda) And that's part of a larger plan.
(L) Influence and read...
(seek10) Can we ask why New Jersey is the spot?
A: Heavily programmed population there.
Q: (L) Where is that place where they had all those weird experiments going on? Montauk! Where is Montauk in relation to New Jersey?
(Joe) Isn't that New York?
(Niall) Long Island, no?
[Montauk is a hamlet located at the eastern tip of Long Island, New York]
(L) Does Montauk have anything to do with any of this?
A: Yes. It is all interrelated.
I was under the impression that shedding was related to the viral part, as opposed to the vaccine injection that is filled with nano lipids, graphene oxide, and whatever else no one was able to figure out, and it's those ingredients that get triggered with certain electromagnetic frequencies to be assembled inside the body, which then transform a person into a transmitters/receivers.I wonder if the unvaccinated who have been exposed to "shedding" now have these transmitters and receivers also??
I remember reading about Mental Blocking before because it had been mentioned previously, but I was never able to grasp how it's done.You're probably right on that. But the detox protocols including natto, bromelain, ivermectin etc. should cut apart the protein antennas and diminish or nullify the effect. Plus, awareness and mental blocking can protect against any sort of beaming that activates the antennas, OSIT.
Same feeling here. I feel revolted and outraged at this world we live in. It's just a big s-hole frankly. I've always had this feeling that things could be completely different on this planet if... or at least, that there are some people somewhere else in this universe who are experiencing a completely different reality, in a way more positive and beautiful way.The absence of justice in our world is infuriating, isn't it? It just seems to me that the odds are totally stacked against us. Even if some folk awaken and question more, they'll be playing catch-up on what has been a 20 year process for most of us on here.
Because of school & work I didn't finish the search in the main and many-page UFO thread here for the exact youtube video interview link, but one member posted there a video interview sporting a little podgy Deep State spook scientist with sparse hair, where he was intensely hesitating what he should say, but finally decided that this was safe for him to say: (quote from memory)Are the drones a strictly human-originated phenomenon?
A: No
If the general population is programed to walk into the new paradigm and experience it as they are programed, and we have refused the programing then what? What are we going to see? And how freaked out will be some of the poorly programed, and those who intuitively refuse programing, but never did the work to have a clue as to what would be going on?
Thanks for this session, it was so informative!
I was under the impression that shedding was related to the viral part, as opposed to the vaccine injection that is filled with nano lipids, graphene oxide, and whatever else no one was able to figure out, and it's those ingredients that get triggered with certain electromagnetic frequencies to be assembled inside the body, which then transform a person into a transmitters/receivers.
I'm not sure about the role of this spike protein other than to create as much damage as possible. So my guess was that by catching Covid from someone's shedding, you don't get contaminated with the graphene/nano lipid stuff.
I think this particular topic was discussed somewhere here previously. I remember reading something either in a session, its following discussion, or a thread. Maybe another member knows where to find it or wants to correct what I'm saying?
I remember reading about Mental Blocking before because it had been mentioned previously, but I was never able to grasp how it's done.
Same feeling here. I feel revolted and outraged at this world we live in. It's just a big s-hole frankly. I've always had this feeling that things could be completely different on this planet if... or at least, that there are some people somewhere else in this universe who are experiencing a completely different reality, in a way more positive and beautiful way.
The core idea of mental blocking is to assert one's position and the nature of one's being. This may take many forms. The idea is a spiritual one for which we do not have direct terms or perception, thus we look at it through the example of everyday confrontations.
One aspect of the idea is not to be drawn into the attacker's “world” via curiosity, desire to change the world or the attacker, emotional hooks, self-importance or the like.
Another aspect is to be internally certain and undivided. In aconfrontation, the attacking party generally expects some reaction, either aggression or backing out. In some cases, mental blocking can take the form of giving no response or an entirely unexpected response. The main idea is not to play by the same playbook as the adversary, thus breaking out of a pattern of expected reactions.
Getting entangled into arguments or repetitious interactions with people can be draining and as much as one sees the problem in these, it is very difficult not to be affected, thus at least implicitly accepting the rules of the game. Playing various influence games tends to affect one's FRV and/or one's basic model of reality. Thus getting dragged into hostile arguments can for example be an attack. Blocking such may involve declining to participate.
Attack often works by playing on pre-existing doubts or divisions within the self or within a group. Recognizing this and being unambiguous and not tempted to be swayed is important. “I don't want to know” is not mental blocking. Knowing things, including the nature and content of the attack is important for an objective view of the world. But once one knows about it, one can decline to again be subjected to the same arguments and simply reject the whole topic as one that has already been seen and dealt with.
Declining a confrontation is not always an appropriate strategy, for example truth cannot be defended by being invisible. It is not possible to give fixed rules for every situation. Recognizing appropriate action depends on recognizing the deeper dynamic involved, we could say the nature of the asking. Defending truth where there is no interest for it to begin with is simply wasted time whereas standing up for it when there is a possibility of it being accepted can be a service to the participants.
Knowledge of a special kind may itself be a form of protection. Since the battle concerns one's “soul” or FRV, having drawn one's circle and standing firm in it may preempt attack. Human knowledge is never absolutely certain or complete, but knowledge through choice to apply it may become something of a different quality. Information is converted into being by the process of commitment. Mental blocking is not a matter of “true belief” but rather of asserting one's choice also wile faced with attack. This is generally not an aggressive stance, since attack often expects an aggressive response.
Acting as a group may be important to the process. A single individual may be worn down by continuously defending one's position, also a group may focus “higher energies” more effectively than an individual. This is not a case of mob mentality but of strength in unity of purpose. An isolated
individual's mode of thinking and perceiving may more readily be shifted to match the attacker's, thus diminishing the STO alignment of the attacked.
In the case of mental blocking, the point is to preserve one's own nature, not to adopt that of the attacker. This is not always applicable to physical 3D conflict. We may think that in the context of higher densities, one's FRV, or polarity along the STO/STS axis determines one's strength and the realm one occupies. Deviating from one's chosen polarity represents loss. Sometimes the battle may be a “staring down contest,” sometimes it may not occur at all if the antagonists are naturally kept separate by their different natures.
Writings of mystics of the monastic traditions describe something like mental blocking when discussing the spiritual attacks confronted by the monks. The devils seek to confuse, to alternatingly flatter and to induce despair. The defense is not in arguing or engaging but in simultaneously acknowledging that the self is weak yet stands firm in giving thanks and glory to God, regardless of temptation or concern for self. The general advice not to talk to apparitions concerns this.
In our moving centre we have the polarity of active and passive states of the body, activity and repose, the di-urnal cycle, and the cycles in all our actions of tension and relaxation. We have in our instinctive centre the reaction of pleasure and pain, pleasant and unpleasant sensations, and because the moving and instinctive centers are so closely linked to one another, there is an alternation of activity and re-pose in the instinctive centre that is hardly distinguishable from the other. We have in our feeling centre the polarity of like and dislike: attraction and repulsion. We have in our intellectual processes assent and dissent, affirmation and denial.This is the crudest mechanism introduced by nature in order to produce fields of force. It is the primary distinction that is introduced into the existing world.
[...]
But the transition to this polar state occurs when something attacks our attention, stimulates us, or we dislike something, or we have a feeling of pain or pleasure, or our curiosity or intellectual activity is stimulated. This mechanism is really provided for the purpose of generating force. It is by keeping the poles of our polar nature apart that we maintain in ourselves a force. When these poles meet this force is dissipated.The first thing to realize and understand about the study of like and dislike is that it does represent a way of life and an attitude towards life that is virtually absent from the modern world. At times this has been taught as a normal thing for man; let us say by the Buddha, by the stoic philosophers. It is taught in the Bhagavad Gita that a normal man mus tnot be a slave to his likes and dislikes. On the contrary, he must know how to make use of the energies of likes and dislikes, and not allow them to make use of him.
First look at this to see if it is possible to come to a conclusion about it, whether we wish to be free in relation to likes and dislikes. If we wish to be free, there are ways and means for liberation, although it is no use to show you the ways and means if consciously, or more probably unconsciously, you do not wish to be free. One has to ask oneself the question how can we not wish to be free from it? And there is a big, very significant answer to this when one discovers and sees what it is.
Subjection to likes and dislikes really makes people's lives miserable. And some people it makes very miserable. With others it narrows down and constricts their possible responses to the world. In spite of that, there is something in us that clings to these things and which identifies ourselves. When you hear people saying, as if it were a merit, that they do the things that they like and do not do the things that they dislike, or that they know which people they can get along with and which they cannot and how they are able to keep away from people they cannot get along with and consort with the people they can, as if this were a mark of wisdom; what does it mean? It means one's shutting oneself off to a whole lot of possible experiences. In the ordinary mechanical way of life, we say we will go along with the things we approve of and avoid the things we disapprove of. Like and dislike is a kind of guardian, a kind of warden that keeps us in prison. As long as we are daunted by this, we remain in the prison of our own imagination. When we are bold enough to walkthrough, we see that the warden has no power to stop us and we can go free.
We have to bring this back to ourselves and you will have to look at it and see that you cannot be free from the tendency to take what you can until you can be free from like and dislike. This does not mean that like and dislike ceases. Freedom is not the abolition of desires, but the presence in oneself of something which can choose; which is not drawn towards what it likes, or repelled by what it dislikes, but is able to choose impartially when to take, when to refrain from taking. Only it must be very clear to us that this is not something that one does because one is told, or because there is a moral obligation to do it, but because we can see for ourselves the working of the law.
We can study likes and dislikes in terms of attention. Attention in man in a mechanical state simply follows the line of force of his likes and dislikes, his own interests. Just like filings around a magnet, they arrange themselves in the field of force of the magnet. They have no independent position orientation of their own. We have something in us that corresponds to silver, that is not affected by the magnetic field of like and dislike. We have to look and find something in ourselves. That everyone has in him, that is free from like and dislike. It is covered up and crusted over by our habitual reactions, and this in turn has a whole mechanism of justification and explanation. We even lose this power of questioning in ourselves. So automatically it does seem right for us to follow the direction of our likes and dislikes, and we have an inner orientation corresponding to this, instead of having full inward freedom.
Q: (L) What are the alien drones or probes up to?
A: Psychic reading and influencing of selected populations.
Q: (L) So my guess is that they have people there that are programmed to do things and that they're interested in determining if they're ready to perform their programmed activities or if they need additional programming... Okay... Are they planning to turn people on or off in terms of programming?
A: Yes
(L) So does that mean that when people have in the past or in other times and places been read and influenced and so forth - we kind of joke about it as being like the cryptogeographic being - that what's actually happening is some kind of orbs or something are nearby, only they are concealed from view because the veil is more secure. Is that it?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So this would be acclimatizing the public to an eventual disclosure of "aliens"?
[...]
A: Part of ongoing plans falling into place.
[...]
A: Review plans to amalgamate and rule humans after the changes.
(L) So somebody on the chat wants to know if the UFOs want to gauge how aware the population is getting? Um, do they want to...?
A: Testing of the will, yes.
Q: (L) Pretty fancy stuff. So is the government using their drones to send signals to people and...?
A: Yes and those who have been vaccinated have transmitters and receivers.
Wow, this has been alluded to, but just think of the implications... can a few drones in the sky 'switch on' hundreds of people at once? That's frightening.
(Joe) There was at least one little UFO-type thing moving very fast. We don't know if there were one or two. There was definitely one, one that was caught clearly, maybe a number of seconds before Crooks fired the shots. It flew over the building or that general area, and it had a little kind of antenna on the back of it. You could freeze frame it to see it. And then there were other camera angles that saw another further away, with a more ball-like structure, though it could be the same one. But anyway, it was some kind of an anomalous, unidentified aerial vehicle in the air at the time of the shooting. What was... who owned that?
A: Drones.
Q: (Joe) And these are 3D drones run by Intel types?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) And was it really moving at the speed it seemed to have been? Was it moving at 2000 miles an hour or something like that?
(L) No, it wasn't, because it was probably closer than you imagine.
(Joe) Maybe, but it was moving extremely fast.
(Niall) Yes.
(Joe) Way faster than any drone you can buy, even the top end, the best of them. And what was this purpose? Was it there to just monitor? Did it have any purpose other than monitoring the situation?
A: Mind control signals.
Q: (Joe) On Crooks?
A: Yes.
The microparticles or nanoparticles, referred to as "microchips," were observed communicating with each other via light signals and collaborating to self-assemble into structures resembling miniature satellites inside the body, including blood vessels, organs, ovaries, testes, and the brain.