Session 23 November 2024

IFS has helped me a lot. There's no magic bullet, tho. It has taken a lot of work with various approaches to find the remedy.
Thank you iamthis for all the amazing input! The IFS model is one of the approaches that has supported my inner self work very positively. I tend to come back to it often.
I agree, there is no magic bullet and personally, I wouldn't be able to pinpoint one single remedy that has helped me. I think it is a veritable potpourri of various remedies, people, events, activities etc. that propel us forward and help us heal, if it is even possible. And somehow it all links together. Sometimes we need to do something first before we can move onto the next thing.
I also very much agree, as that´s my experience too after trying out and experiencing many different approaches and even learning some myself, like kinesiology and a little on functional medicine. I think to be open and connect input is important, because it trains the ability to learn to notice what (various remedies, people, events, activities etc.) is individually relevant and when.

One thing I have learned in kinesioloy that became a helpful guide for me in general is the concept to observe if the "self regulation ability" is open or blocked. Self regulation, meaning the ability for healing, regeneration, detoxification, etc. - vs. blocked regulation.

What supports to open self regulation seems to be individual. It seems an intricate play of many factors/levels/systems (physical, emotional, mental, spiritual). Its looking from a bird´s eye view onto all levels. What level and when to support, seems to be guided in the background by this natural ability to self regulate. My experience is, when this view is overlooked, ignored or worked against, regulation will block. You summarize it here: "Sometimes we need to do something first before we can move onto the next thing."

Unfortunately we live in a world of defragmentation reflected in every area. This supports that many approaches, schools and practitioners focus on their specific field and sometimes overlook that what might be missing is to keep a bird´s eye view, connecting the physical, emotional, mental (and spiritual) - on a practical basis for clients. Often the specification in approach - even holistic - can produce stress within the treatment itself - if not observing if self regulation is supported as the overall focus. If its blocked, this adds additional stress to the client, and then stress inflames and inflammation stresses. Its a complex interplay. From my own experience as a patient, awareness and openess for self regulating processes, what-when, would be of practical help in many fields of health.

As you emphasize, it all links together. When I began to put in self work into focus to observe "what-when", to my surprise blocks started to naturally open. Mental, emotional and physical blocks, I dealt with for many decades. I am learning that self regulation contains and teaches, if it is allowed to flow, that Life regulates itself, it´s self. Seems obvious. For me, this "what-when" focus made it practical and physical to connect to this self regulating ability. Maybe that´s helpful for others too.
 
Q: (L) And that leads to another question that I had that came up in my mind over the last couple of weeks. As everybody knows, we've had a difficult time dealing with the loss of Pierre. It's been over a year, and we still haven't touched anything in his room. It's his room. Nobody wants to mess with his stuff. And I almost feel like he's still in his room. Question is, does Pierre spend a lot of time in the house here?

A: Fair amount.

Q: (L) So in a sense he's still partly with us?

A: Yes. Same for J*** and S***.
I have to admit that I analyze a lot of content on the forum concerning the topic of "passing after death." One of the issues for me is understanding the phenomenon of entering the tunnel, which has been discussed in other transcripts. The Cs have provided information that people remaining on the earthly plane in the astral realm are vulnerable to abductions and also do not behave naturally—in other words, after death, they do not enter the tunnel.

I have a few questions, and perhaps someone can help me understand this better. Maybe we can broaden this topic further.

From what I’ve learned so far, if everything goes well, the tunnel appears, allowing us to return to the 5th density, to the contemplation sphere. This transport is safe and cannot be interrupted by beings from the 4th density. I also notice this in Laura, who is deeply worried about Pierre and previously asked the Cs in earlier sessions whether everything went okay and if he is now alright.

If Pierre is already in a safe place, why does he return to a sphere where he might not be safe (his old room)? Does the fact that he is still close to his loved ones, returning to them, mean something? Is he doing this deliberately for some reason?

Therefore, I conclude that the passage allows us to reach our home (5th density), but after returning, we can also, in some way, come back to the earthly plane to be with our loved ones without risking abduction by other beings.
 
Thank you for this session.
As soon as I saw the discussions around the Oreshnik’s light phenomena resemblance to comets and plasma phenomena I suspected it wasn’t by pure coincidence, maybe intended at some level. STS forces trying to keep people distracted from celestial intentions unfolding around them seems a possibility.

I guess the intent would be to support the current system of control, which is focused around a very human centric and materialistic view point. It’s difficult to promote human made climate change as the biggest global issue when space rocks are wrecking the place.

Not that these forces don’t have plans for future control systems less vulnerable to awareness of such phenomena. But they have heavily invested in the current one so they probably want to get as much gains out of it as possible before it expires.
 
Back
Top Bottom