Session 26 April 2025

Coming back to the question of what it will feel like suddenly finding yourself in 4th density, it may be worth considering what exactly the C's meant when they spoke of being like Alice when she went through the looking glass:​
Q: (L) Well, if a person transitions directly from 3rd to 4th density without cycling through 5th density via dying, that implies that persons can transition directly from 3rd to 4th density without dying. Is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How does that feel? How is that experience...
A: Alice through the looking glass.
Q: (A) Okay, they say that knowledge is supposed to protect from trauma and confusion. On the other hand, all is lessons, so trauma is a lesson. Why are we supposed to work to avoid a lesson?
A: You are correct, it is a lesson, but if you have foreknowledge, you are learning that lesson early, and in a different way.
Q: (L) So, if you learn the lesson in a different way, does that mitigate the need or the way or the process of the way of learning at the time of transition?
A: Yes. Smoother.
Q: (L) I do have to say that thinking about it all, not being able to do anything about it, not being able to talk to people about it because they don't believe, is certainly more painful than being hit by the shock of it...
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, you are suggesting that I CAN tell others such things?
A: You can convey, but suggest it be done in a subtle fashion.
Q: (L) Well, how subtle can it be? I mean, 'hello folks, you know the words munch, crunch, yum yum???'
A: It is not all that way, and you know it! Most are not eaten, just manipulated. Knowledge protects in the most amazing ways. Mathematics are "taught' in your realm in such a way that only a select few will learn. And mathematics is the language of all creation. For example, advanced math studies, such as algebra, provide the keys to unlocking the doors between the matter and antimatter universes. Suggest those present who still need to, learn algebra.
Q: (L) Okay, you suggest that those present learn algebra...
A: Who need to.
Q: (L) Are you saying that we can unlock doors between matter and anti-matter universes? Is that what you are getting at here?
A: Maybe...
As to exactly what "through the looking glass means", I found this quote from Raymond McGuire on line:
Through the looking glass meaning. This expression is used in two different ways in the English language. One meaning of this expression is “mirror”, as “glass” here is the same meaning of “mirror”. It is a quote and phrase also used first in Lewis Carroll's book “Alice Through the Looking Glass”. In this book, it means “Contrary to what is expected or normal”.

It’s somehow a confusing word showing mirror philosophy. It was present in literature even before the invention of the mirror. It originated from the publication of Lewis Carol in 1871. After him, many poets used this expression in literary works in different ways.
What does the phrase “through the looking glass mean”? This phrase first appears in the title of a book written by Lewis Carrol as a sequel to 1865’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. It does not mean to look through glass or a mirror exactly. It means “ Opposite to What’s expected by someone”. Here it symbolizes things in an alternative universe, totally opposite to the real world.

In this context, the phrase means “ Where things are not as expected”. When we see in the glass, we expect our image to be as it is. But looking through glass symbolizes a different world in which things are totally different from their image or reflection. It also means going through a place where things are unexpected, unfamiliar, and different.
The question is, did Lewis Carroll have such a "looking glass" experience himself and, if so, did he use that experience within his book? The answer may be yes.

Carroll was allegedly a member of a Victorian English secret society called the Orphic Circle. The Circle was led by an English aristocrat, Lord Edward Bulwer-Lytton, who happened to be the Colonial Secretary in Benjamin Disraeli's Conservative government. The group also contained such other luminaries as Charles Dickens (an active spiritualist), Sir Richard Burton (a famous English explorer) as well as the Prime Minister Sir Benjamin Disraeli, who like Carroll, Dickens and Bulwer-Lytton was an author (one of the characters in his 1844 book Coningsby is meant to be based on the banker Lionel de Rothschild, the "hidden hand" behind the British throne who bankrolled the Crimean War).

Bulwer-Lytton was a noted author as well and his book Vril: The Power of the Coming Race would be a great inspiration to the German Thule Society and later the Nazis. The book also popularised the Hollow Earth Theory. The main character in the book finds his way into a subterranean world occupied by beings, the Vril-ya, who seem to resemble angels [4th density?] and are the descendants of an antediluvian civilisation called the Ana [MJF: Hmmm... sounds a bit like the Mesopotamian Anu, the leader of the Anunnaki, to me}, who live in networks of subterranean caverns linked by tunnels. Originally surface dwellers, the Vril-ya fled underground thousands of years ago to escape a massive flood and gained greater power by facing and dominating the harsh conditions of the Earth. Their society is a technologically supported Utopia, chief among their tools being an "all-permeating fluid" called "Vril", a latent source of energy that the spiritually elevated hosts are able to master through training of their will, to a degree that depends on their hereditary constitution [a reference to special bloodlines perhaps?]. This mastery gives them access to an extraordinary force that can be controlled at will.

When you consider what the C's have told us about the underworld civilisation called the Nation of the Third Eye who are the descendants of Atlantean Aryans who went underground over 14,000 years ago, i.e., before the Deluge in 10,800 BC, then you have to wonder whether like the Thule Society and the Antareans in the 20th century, Bulwer-Lytton had some sort of an encounter with the Nation of the Third Eye, which inspired him to write his book. Consider here what the C's had to say about the Nation of the Third Eye:​
Session 4 May 1996:
Q: (L) Are you saying... (TK) They have given birth and these children have never seen our world... (L) How can an entire race of people, or groups of people, live under the surface of this planet, without the whole 6 billion of the rest of us on top, or at least a large number, realizing that there is anything going on? This is so wild an idea...

A: No. How much space exists underground, as opposed to that on the surface?

Q: (L) A lot, I suppose. You aren't saying that the earth is hollow, are you?

A: No, not exactly.

Q: (L) Well, how deep is the deepest of these underground cities?

A: 3,108 miles.

Q: (L) That's pretty deep! But wouldn't it be too hot at that depth?

A: No. Temperature averages 68 degrees F.

Q: (TK) That's pretty comfortable! (L) How do they have light?

A: Magnetic resonance.

[.....]

Q: (L) Do these people being bred and raised in these underground cities have souls?

A: Yes, most.

Q: (TK) Are they just like us only raised differently?

A: More complicated than that.

Q: (L) How long have they been doing this?

A: 14,000 years, approximately.

Q: (L) If they have been doing it that long, obviously the ones they have taken at the beginning have croaked and are of no use to replace anybody on the earth unless they have been replacing people from time to time for various reasons...

A: No, their technology makes yours look like Neanderthal by comparison! Hibernation tubes... One heartbeat per hour, for example.

The hero of Bulwer-Lytton's book discovers that the Vril-ya have great telepathic and other parapsychological abilities, such as being able to transmit information [telepathy], get rid of pain, and put others to sleep [hypnosis]. Interestingly, the C's have told us that the bi-density beings who form the Nation of the Third Eye are, like the Vril-ya, psychic projectors who can place thoughts directly into surface dwellers minds:​
Session 21 September 1996:

Q: (T) Is there any significance to the ID4 movie?

A: Sure.

Q: (L) What was the primary intention of the makers of this movie? The primary message that they attempted to convey?

A: Infuse thinking patterns with [planchette swirled a few times here] concept of aliens.

Q: (L) They intended to infuse thinking patterns with concept of aliens... was there any particular slant on aliens, per se, that was seen as desirable in the making of this movie?

A: Slant?

Q: (L) Slant, in other words, did they wish to present them inaccurately to confuse people, to present them as something to be feared and fought against, or to make them appear so completely erroneous, so that when actual aliens do appear, that they will not be perceived as negative?

A: Infuse.

Q: (L) Infuse. Just the concept, the concept of aliens in general. OK...

A: Part of a larger project.

Q: (L) And what is this project?

A: Called "Project Awaken."

Q: (L) And who is behind, or in charge of, this project?

A: Many.

Q: (L) Who are the primary group, groups or individuals? I'm sure you're not going to give us individuals, but just the grouping.

A: Thor's Pantheum.

Q: (L) And what is Thor's Pantheum?

A: Subselect trainees for transfer of enlightenment frequency graduation.

Q: (L) What is enlightenment frequency graduation?

A: Think!

Q: (L) Enlightenment frequency graduation... so, subselect trainees...

A: Self explanatory.

Q: (L) Well, is this group STS or STO?

A: Both.

Q: (L) OK... (T) Are they working at cross purposes?

A: No.

Q: (T) They're working together? Bipartisan?

A: No.

Q: (J) Are they aware of each other? Working on this?

A: Yes.

Q: (J) Are they screwing each other up? (L) No, that's going in the wrong direction...

A: There is more to all of this than you could dream.

Q: (T) There's more to all of this...were you referring to... Who are they? Thor's Pantheum. And they're subselect trainees...That's the group behind this movie; OK...

A: An army of Aryan psychic projectors.

Q: (T) Well, that explains a lot more than Thor's Pantheum of subselect trainees! An army of psychic projectors. (L) And what do they project?

A: Themselves... Right in to one's head.

Q: (T) Into one's head... this is better than 'Must See TV!' (L) Project right into one's head... is anybody subject to this projecting?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And, when they project themselves right into someone's head, what does that someone perceive?

A: Inspiration.

Q: (L) Inspiration to what, or to do what?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Yes? To do what, to do something?

A: And...

Q: (L) To do something, and to understand or perceive something, is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (J) To believe something? (L) Yes. So, how many are in this army?

A: 1.6 million.

Q: (L) When they're doing this projecting into someone's head, where are they projecting from?

A: Mostly subterranean.

Q: (L) Subterranean, so these are the people of the tunnels, the underground bases and all that sort of thing. Are they 3rd or 4th density beings?

A: Both.

Q: (T) Let me back up to a question here. If they can do all this projecting on their own, what was the point of the movie?

A: No, you misunderstand... This is an intense activity, directed towards influencing the high level creative forces.

Q: (T) Projected against? Because this movie, if you've been following the reviews and the people talking about it, this movie has had more repeat business than any movie in years and years and years and years. People have seen it ten and twenty times! (L) Was there something subliminal in the movie? That opened something? (J) That's a good question!

A: Sure.

Q: (L) And was this subliminal activity with the movie designed to create an opening for this further...

A: Not for you, but for others.

Q: (L) Why? Do you mean me, personally, or us as a group? (T) Well the movie didn't affect me.

A: Group.

Q: (L) What made us immune?

A: You already have the knowledge.

Q: (T) The movie wasn't meant for us; we already know. The movie was meant for all of those who don't understand.

A: Say hello to Gene Roddenberry.

Q: (L) Is Gene Roddenberry present?

A: No.

Q: (L) In other words, say hello to him because he was doing that sort of thing a long time ago?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is Gene Roddenberry one of these people from Thor's Pantheon...

A: No.

Q: (L) Why did you bring up Gene Roddenberry? (J) Because he was doing it in Star Trek?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) He was doing a whole different thing with Star Trek... (L) Well, let’s not get too far off track...

A: It's not the exact "Slant," it's "the concept, stupid."

[…]

Q: (J) We knew that!! (T) I was just teasing. Mirth!! Mirth! (L) Hold everything. When you say influencing high level creative forces, do you mean as in gathering, what would you call it, gravity waves...?

A: No.

Q: (L) What are these high level creative forces that are needing to be influenced, or desirable of being influenced?

A: Those in the creative arts.

Q: (L) So in other words, I see, this group is using their projecting ability to influence those in the creative arts to do creative things that will therefore influence the people on the planet. Is that it?

A: Yes.

Perhaps Bulwer-Lytton, like Gene Roddenberry a century later, was inspired by Thor's Pantheum when writing his book but it is uncanny how accurately his book reflects what the C's have said about the Nation of the Third Eye. It is also worth noting here that Gene Roddenberry was a Rosicrucian, being a long term member of AMORC. Bulwer-Lytton was also considered in his time to be the leading Rosicrucian in England, although he always denied this publicly. However, his 1841 book Zanoni, alluded to deep Rosicrucian mysteries regarding the four elements, secrets that only initiated Rosicrucians have the power to reveal and which enable them to attain the ultimate goal: the discovery of the Elixir of life and the attainment of immortality and eternal youth. This mention of the Elixir of Life makes me think of the medieval alchemists and their quest to transmute base metal into gold through the Philosopher's Stone and also what the C's had to say about monoatomic gold:
Q: (L) OK, now, this David Hudson tape, about what he calls the Philosopher's Stone. What is this substance that David Hudson has discovered?

A: Watch developments there only from a distance.

Q: (L) Is taking this substance as he is talking about, is it dangerous, as I kind of think it is?

A: Possibly.

Q: (L) So, in other words, I should not get involved in that, either?

A: Up to you.

Q: (L) I know it's up to me, but you said to watch it from a distance, so I'm assuming that is a clue...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) OK, my feeling is that there is some negative energy behind that, even though he is trying to be a positive person and do positive things, and that...

A: This is often true!

Q: (L) I think that taking something like that to transform your consciousness without doing the work or having it occur naturally is black magic. That's what I think. (F) It's too easy... I read over the years bits and pieces from various different sources that all the things he described in there which to us would appear to be an extreme ethereal and spiritual level, such as some of those in India achieve, and all that... are possible for those who are willing to sacrifice. (L) I don't think you even have to sacrifice so much as have the desire and the natural destiny and ..... (F) Well, did Jesus take this gold powder?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did Adolph Hitler take this kind of powder, or something similar?

A: Yes.

Q: (F): That paints a rather bleak picture, doesn't it? (L) Could this powder be utilized to transform a person into a very positive entity doing great good?

A: Or could it be utilized to transform an entire race of beings into hypnotic submission !!!!!!!!!!!*
*Given that Abraham/Moses (an Egyptian prince and High Priest who no doubt was acquainted with Egyptian alchemical secrets) forced the rebellious Israelites to ingest powdered gold made from the smelted down Golden Calf, one has to wonder if the C's could have had the Israelites of the Exodus in mind here.

And
A: Tis magnetite that acts as a conduit, and perhaps, just perhaps, allows for transference back and forth at will?!? And what about the legend about the alchemists? Is not the key term there really transformation?!? And has not the "smoke screen" really been delivered so effectively by all the concentration upon the substance?!? And does not this remind one indeed of all the misguided concentration upon substance rather than meaning that one finds so regularly on 3rd density??

Q: I get it! So, it is the magnetite in the body, that collects and holds the charge, and it has absolutely nothing to do with an external substance at all! Is that it?

A: You are getting "warmer."

Q: Am I right, we need more iron for magnetite, or am I completely off base here?

A: You are right, but, do not underestimate the significance of that just delivered! What better deception than to divert the meaning of alchemy, by focusing upon substance, then addicting those souls bound to 3rd density to the substance?

Q: Okay, it is the magnetite that acts as a conduit. And the concentration is upon the substance, that is, the magnetite. Let me conjecture that the thing that is believed to be distilled out of the alchemical operations is magnetite, is that correct?

A: No, because no need, if not deceived by other efforts.

Q: Were these other efforts involved with sexual function?

A: More like the results of same.

Q: Okay, they were concentrating on...

A: Today's version of the deception could be your favourite and mine, "monoatomic gold."

Q: Oh, the David Hudson fiasco...

These references to alchemy and the Elixir of Life connect us with the mysterious enclave of alchemists in the Pyrenees who seem to possess the secret to longevity of life given what the C's said about the famous 14th century French alchemist Nicolas Flamel:​

Q: (RC) And the guy died... (L) That's interesting... Okay, change of subject. Back when we were talking about the pit on Oak Island, and you asked me to do some research on it, the answers I came up with were that the responsible group were alchemists. Is this correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was one of the alchemists involved Nicholas Flamel?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is it true that there is an enclave of alchemists that live somewhere in the Pyrenees...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is this the group that you referred to as "The Quorum" in a previous session?

A: Partly.


Q: (L) Do these alchemists use this power as talked about by David Hudson to enhance their longevity and their physical health?

A: And to control.

Q: (L) Are there people in this enclave who live for literally hundreds, if not thousands, of years?

A: Open.

As a leading Rosicrucian, could Bulwer-Lytton have been aware of the enclave of alchemists and the powers associated with monoatomic gold?

There is another possibility though and that is that Bulwer-Lytton may have received the information about the Vril-ya (the Nation of the Third Eye) through channelling sessions conducted by the Orphic Circle, just as the Thule Society did when they were in contact with the 4D STS Antareans:
A: Now, some history... as you know, the CIA and NSA and other agencies are the children of Nazi Gestapo... the SS, which was experiment influenced by Antareans who were practicing for the eventual reintroduction of the Nephalim on to 3rd and or 4th density earth. And the contact with the “Antareans” was initiated by the Thule Society, which groomed its dupe subject, Adolph Hitler to be the all-time mind programmed figurehead. Now, in modern times, you have seen, but so far, on a lesser scale: Oswald, Ruby, Demorenschildt, Sirhan Sirhan, James Earl Ray, Arthur Bremer, Farakahan, Menendez, Bundy, Ramirez, Dahmer, etc...

And

Q: (L) Okay, change of subject: On a couple of occasions you mentioned a group called the Antareans. Who were these people or aliens?

A: Antareans were the name given by 4th density groups in contact with the Thule Society on third density Earth, before and during World War One.

If this was the case, such contact may have occurred during channelling sessions (using trance mediums) conducted by the Orphic Circle at which Lewis Carroll may have been present. It should be noted that the Orphic Circle (named after the Greek mythic figure of Orpheus who descended into the underworld in search of his lover) also used sacred mirrors at their sessions perhaps like the 'Spirit Mirror' the 16th century English magus Dr John Dee used in his scrying sessions, which was presented to him by King Phillip II of Spain in gratitude for his services as an astrologer to the king and his wife, Queen Mary I of England. This mirror of polished obsidian, which is now held in the British Museum's collection, was allegedly an Aztec artefact brought back to Spain from Mexico (see: 'Spirit mirror' used by 16th-century occultist John Dee came from the Aztec Empire). This in turn makes me think of what the C's said about John Dee and his encounter with angels:
Q: I don't know what will happen here... Oh, John Dee supposedly had a vision of the Angel Uriel who gave him a highly polished black stone which was convex, and into which he gazed to communicate with other realms. This sounds very much like a psychomantium. Okay, these beings would appear on the surface of the stone and reveal all the secrets of the future. This was not an imaginary stone because it now resides in the British Museum. However, he later hooked up with Edward Kelly who was, apparently, a complete con-artist. What kind of beings did Dee and Kelly conjure through their polished stone?

A: Fourth Density.

Q: STS or STO?

A: Both.
This raises the possibility that the Orphic Circle may have made contact with fourth density in a similar fashion to John Dee by using sacred spirit mirrors. If Lewis Carroll was present at such a session, what he saw could perhaps have inspired him to write Alice Through the Looking Glass. We should also take into account here that Lewis Carroll was a brilliant mathematician who was a strict algebraist and had no time for new fangled mathematics such as quaternions invented by his contemporary William Hamilton and used by James Clerk Maxwell in his original Electromagnetic Theory before it was gutted by Oliver Heaviside post Maxwell's death. As the C's said:
For example, advanced math studies, such as algebra, provide the keys to unlocking the doors between the matter and antimatter universes.

It is curious to note that in his book Through the Looking Glass, Lewis introduced the characters of the identical twins Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb, which the C's seemed to link with the matter and antimatter universes in the extract shown below:
Session 22 June 1996:

Q: (F) Well, they mentioned twice to be careful about putting in the designated quotes. (L) One of the crop circles you interpreted was an "astronomical twin phenomenon." What is an astronomical twin phenomenon?

A: Many perfectly synchronous meanings.

Q: (L) Synchronicity is involved. Does this have something to do with "image?"

A: Duplicity of, as in "Alice through the looking glass."

Q: (L) Double images. Does this relate to matter and antimatter?

A: Yes, and...

Q: (L) Gravity and manifesting on one side and manifesting a mirror image on the other...

A: Yes, and...

Q: (L) And images of 4th density bodies with tenuous fibers connecting to DNA as in manifesting imaginal bodies on 4th density?

A: Astronomical.

Q: (L) Okay, that relates to stars and planets... astronomical in terms of another universe, an alternate universe composed of antimatter?

A: Yes, and....

This makes me wonder whether Lewis may have been aware of an antimatter universe, a concept which I believe Clerk Maxwell accepted, as he did a dynamic aether. As the C's said in another session:
A: It is not all that way, and you know it! Most are not eaten, just manipulated. Knowledge protects in the most amazing ways. Mathematics are "taught' in your realm in such a way that only a select few will learn. And mathematics is the language of all creation. For example, advanced math studies, such as algebra, provide the keys to unlocking the doors between the matter and antimatter universes. Suggest those present who still need to, learn algebra.​
Curious then that the C's should recently point Ark to Clifford algebra in the 29 March 2025 session as regards Ark's quest for a Unified Field Theory:​
(Ark) Yes? So I write about my research usually on my blog and most of the time I know what to do. But at some point in the past, I remember in one session I was directed to look at algebra and in particular geometric algebra. At the time I thought I know what it is, but after a while I decided that maybe, I don't know. And then it came to my mind that I know two kinds of geometric algebra, which may be used to go into the information and consciousness business. One kind would be the Clifford algebra. Usually it is in mathematics and physics they consider the geometric algebra. But then there is also Penrose algebra of twistors can be also twisted into the term geometric algebra. Or maybe there is something else that I cannot see. What can it be? So I wanted to ask for a direction here.

A: Clifford with enhancements.
However, returning to the subject of psychomantiums, the C's had more to say about their use in other sessions:
Q: (A) They said that, in physics, we have one seventh of the equation... (L) When they said that, they were talking about matter and the direction in time of an anti-particle, which was referred to as the one-seventh. (A) But, what I mean is, animals, minerals, they are described by just one physics that we learn in school. We do not see that this is a different density.

A: Only because you know it is there. You cannot measure that which is above your level! Of perception, when you are using measuring tools which only can measure that which you perceive.

Q: (A) We are the form makers. I mean it's not Nature that is creating, it is us seeing order in potential disorder. And we see more order than animals, so it seems. Is this what is meant by higher density, being able to see more order?

A: Well, close, maybe, but you are attempting to employ a mirror to see outside.

Q: What we are trying to understand is: you have described seven densities. Three physical densities, three ethereal densities, and the one in the middle, the variable density. What we are trying to find out here is some way to express this mathematically. Some way to understand this in the universal language of mathematics. Because, if we could do that, mathematically speaking, that would help our understanding and perceptual abilities.

A: Yes, but first you must unravel the part of the puzzle which has nothing to do with mathematics. You would have your best luck finding the mathematical formula while in a "dreamstate,"
* or under hypnosis, or in meditation before a psychomantium.
*The well known phrase "life is but a dream" suggests that our entire lives are like a series of warped, unreliable memories similar to a dream. The origins of this phrase are not known, but it has been popularised by the nursey rhyme "Row Row Row Your Boat". Interestingly, Lewis Carroll wrote a poem titled "Life is but a Dream", which explores the logic and illogic of dreams and life. The poem juxtaposes the brevity of childhood with the enduring nature of imagination, mirroring themes found in Carroll's "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland". The enigmatic final line - Life, what is it but a dream? - questions the nature of reality, suggesting that life itself may be an illusion.

Indeed, in Through the Looking Glass, the twin brothers Tweedledum and Tweedledee draw Alice's attention to the Red King—sleeping under a nearby tree — and provoke her with idle philosophical banter that she is but an imaginary figure in his dreams. This idea ties in with the simulation hypothesis which proposes that what one experiences as the real world is actually a simulated reality, such as a computer simulation. In turn, this hypothesis ties in with something the C's once said in the transcripts:
A: First of all, confusion abounds here due to incorrect interpretations of the last subject discussed. Dimensions are not densities!!!! Dimensions are strictly the result of the universal consciousness as manifested in the imagination sector of thought. Density means level of development as measured in terms of closeness to union with The One... Cycle. So, obviously, the "chupacabras" is a manifestation of human consciousness, and, human beings are a manifestation of the Chupacabras consciousness. Get it? Now, a shocker for you: You would not exist if someone didn't "dream you up."

Q: (L) Who dreamed me up?

A: Not important just yet. You literally are the "figments" of someone's imagination, and nothing more!!!

Q: (L) You mean God dreams and brings us into existence?

A: Remember, "God" is really all existence in creation, in other words, all consciousness. This is because all existence in creation is consciousness, and vice versa.
And
Session 31 January 1998:

(A) I want to ask about monopoles. Do monopoles exist?

A: Yes.

Q: My thought was that if monopoles exist, the only way they can exist is that if somewhere, under some conditions, the opposite of the pole exists... I mean they cannot exist in third density without being a duality... (A) Yes...

A: And third density cloaks so many truths.

Q: Do you say cloaks in the sense that it cloaks the monopoles from our observation?

A: Measureability.

Q: Cloaks them from our measureability.

A: Psychomantium.

Q: Okay, is a psychomantium something that utilizes monopoles? When you use the mirror are you seeing the other 'half' of them?

A: Window to many vistas.

This last comment by the C's brings me back to Lewis Carroll's Alice Through the Looking Glass [Mirror]. Could Carroll have been given a view to "many vistas" by seeing things through a psychomantium at sessions held by the Orphic Circle. If so, did he then try to encapsulate what he may have learned from these sessions into his two Alice books, which reflected the weird things he may have glimpsed at 4th density after having gone down the rabbit hole so to speak? Think here, for example of how Alice shrinks after drinking a potion in Alice in Wonderland, which could be an attempt to reflect the nature of variable physicality in 4th density.

At the beginning of the book Alice wonders what life on the other side of the mirror may be like:
How would you like to live in Looking-glass House, Kitty? I wonder if they'd give you milk in there? Perhaps Looking-glass milk isn't good to drink--But oh, Kitty! now we come to the passage. You can just see a little PEEP of the passage in Looking-glass House, if you leave the door of our drawing-room wide open: and it's very like our passage as far as you can see, only you know it may be quite different on beyond. Oh, Kitty! how nice it would be if we could only get through into Looking- glass House! I'm sure it's got, oh! such beautiful things in it! Let's pretend there's a way of getting through into it, somehow, Kitty. Let's pretend the glass has got all soft like gauze, so that we can get through. Why, it's turning into a sort of mist now, I declare! It'll be easy enough to get through--' She was up on the chimney-piece while she said this, though she hardly knew how she had got there. And certainly the glass WAS beginning to melt away just like a bright silvery mist.​

It is a curious feature that people who have had encounters with fairy folk (who are 4D beings) often speak of encountering them in a mist, which suggests they may have found themselves in 4th density when experiencing these encounters.

As to living on the 'other side of the mirror', this phrase brings to mind what the C's once said about the ancient Etruscans of Italy, who were the predecessors of the Romans.​
Q: Ark suggested that the Etruscans may have gotten their alphabet as a mirror image. Could it be that they lived on the 'other side' of the mirror?

A: Latter is closer.
In what way could the Etruscans have lived on the other side of the mirror? Could they have had a close connection with 4th density perhaps and specifically to the subterranean Nation of the Third Eye?

Mount Musinè, near the city of Turin in Italy, has been the site of several notable modern UFO encounters but UFO incidents there appear to stretch back over thousands of years. Perhaps one of the most world-changing UFO incidents that occurred near there was that of the Roman Emperor Constantine who claimed to see a “cross in the sky” appear in the heavens on the night prior to the pivotal Battle of Milvian Bridge, which is in the region of Mount Musine. According to this legendary account – one which was seemingly witnessed by many of his soldiers too – Constantine would “swear his allegiance” to the cross in return for victory the following day. With victory secured, Constantine ensured that the Roman Empire would henceforth embrace Christianity as the state religion.

The persistence of UFO sightings in this area, which sits on the famous St Michael ley line, has led some UFO researchers to propose that the Susa Valley, and specifically Mt. Musinè, may be the site of an underground alien base. This may perhaps seems far fetched but then the C's have recently confirmed that Skinwalker Ranch in Utah, another location that is linked to long standing paranormal phenomena, is the site of an underground 4D STS base.

I don't know whether the Etruscans ever had a major settlement in the area (there are certainly ancient ruins in the vicinity some dating back to at least the Late Bronze Age circa 1700 BC) before the Romans occupied it and built the city of Turin but the American researcher William Henry has claimed that the Romans destroyed a technologically advanced civilisation that was already established there. Insofar as I am aware, he has failed to produce any evidence to support this claim but, if we take it at face value, is it possible that the 4D Nation of the Third Eye may have given refuge to local Etruscans fleeing the marauding Romans within their underground base in the same way they would do in Antarctica in the 1940's for a large group of defeated Nazis? If so, could it make some sense of the enigmatic comments the C's made about the Etruscans in the following extract from the transcripts:​
Q: Change of subject: I am tracking the clues through the various languages and alphabets. I would like to know which of these alphabets, Runic, Greek, or Etruscan, preceded the others, and from which the others are derived?

A: Etruscan.

Q: Well, who were the Etruscans?

A: Templar carriers.

Q: What does that mean?

A: Seek and ye shall find.

Q: Well, how am I supposed to do that? I can't find anything else on the Etruscans!

A: No.

Q: What do you mean 'no?' You mean there is more out there on the Etruscans?

A: Yes.

Q: Okay. What are Templar carriers?

A: Penitent Avian Lords.

Q: What does that mean?

A: For your search. All is drawn from some more ancient form.

On a sobering note to finish with, Bulwyer-Lytton ended his book Vril: The Power of the Coming Race by having the hero warn that in time the Vril-ya will run out of habitable space underground and will claim the surface of the Earth, destroying mankind in the process, if necessary.

Well we know that the Orions wish to control mankind after the transition to 4th density and to replace most of us with their new hybrids:​
Q: (TK) Well, we'll never explore all of what is under the ocean. (L) It just staggers the mind to think about it. What do they want these people for?

A: To replace you.

Q: (TK) And why? Because they can control them better. Right?

A: Completely.

[...]

Q: (TK) With their technology, they can fix all of that. (L) This is really horrible, you know! To think of all this... (TK) Apparently, from what I am understanding, they can't just come in and wipe us out and replace us, because the 'rules' won't allow it.

A: Yet the natural cycles within the framework of the natural order of things will allow all these things to fall into place.

Q: (L) Is there some law within the realm of these beings, sort of like the law of gravity, that prevents them from just coming in and taking over?

A: No.

Q: (TK) I don't think it is like the law of gravity...

A: What "law" is there that inhibits you from manipulating 2nd density beings at will?!?

Q: (L) Well, I don't go out and deliberately hurt or manipulate anything or anybody. (TK) Of course, in our handling of these 'critters,' we are conserving them in some ways so that we will have an ongoing food supply... I think there are rules to the game. It's like a chess game. They can't just come in and change things, it has to progress in some way. But, there are loopholes and they can sneak in and manipulate and get away with some things... (TH) Then, there aren't rules - there are just guidelines.

A: Two important points there: 1) When we said "you," we meant 3rd density collectively. 2) You missed our statement about the natural cycle and order of things almost completely. We suggest you reread and ponder... Also, what if your race is manipulated to destroy yourselves, or, just hang around until the next natural cataclysm?

 
Hmm, likely this thread’s question still could benefit of more review and contemplation by us. Okay, it seems safe to assert that there are many possible events (and so, sensations?) during the transition from 3d to 4d —such as like the thermonuclear blast cited by C’s?!!! Yet, if we look to other C’s statements we also realize that 4D can not be defined by 3D conceptions. Just, it is the way it is, and in not a familiar way at all. But then still can we have “smooth” transitions to 4D for either initial, short or long periods, or whatsoever? So, for some the change to 4D is like a common walking, while for others may be vivid like (literally?) a cosmic explosion?

Okay. Therefore, is our awareness what define boundaries between 3D and 4D states? Thus a blending of both is a possible resultant state? See, indeed such “blending” can last millenniums if we consider as such the account of Paul Dienach. Moreover, the C’s have pointed out to us the “Nation of the 3rd Eye.” That inner earth race apparently lives also in a hybrid environ transiting between 3d and 4D. Indeed the C’s asserted that they are 3D and 4D at the same time. So, can one not only transit, but also graduate to 4D and not realize it? Reviewing:

But then 4D has some things in common with 3D? Well, like 2D is a shadow of 3D, then 3D maybe seems a micro-subset of 4D. But 4D is not 3D, we know that. Indeed according to the C's the 4th density seems nothing like 3rd density:

So, again, how can someone transit to 4D and think he/she is still in 3D? As we have reviewed in this post this may happen for particular conditions, but always the awareness is at the root. That is, it seems that the appearance of a 4th density environ can be “conformed” and covered by 3D pre-conceptions of who just arrived there from 3D. As an example of that, more than once has been pointed out Lewis Carrol's description such as that seen in the Paul Dienach's thread. So, adding to that, we could remember that 4D sts entities —in this case applying to sts humans graduated from 3D earth— will see only what they wish to see:

Moreover, how much disorientation gets someone when the 3D universe becomes a “cosmic blast” as one is pushed to integrate in the self a number of conscious versions of oneself? So, could be considered that sometimes the awareness of someone can be confused during a transition between 3D and 4D (or vice-versa) to the point that such an individual can become lost into an entanglement of 3D realities? Has this happened? Indeed, as we realize in some legends, that seems to be the case of some 4D personages, and even a group or an entire race, that became stranded in the physical 3D universe during the crossing between densities.

Now, would not be “funny” if that character or race could not remember that they came from a 4D state? See, this supposed entity would be not a “wanderer” exactly, but could turn into one as long memories start to be recovered.

And so, while writing down these notes, unexpectedly comes popping up to the mind the number 72 …like a beacon. Why, could be ask? Oh, yes, afterwards and promptly it recalls the Biblical “confusion of the tongues”. But on top of that and frankly saying, how could this number connect to the previous post which quotes the touching Beethoven's opus with some translation at the bottom of the last quotation?

So, we know that Babel Tower was an (STS or STO) effort for some unification of men. Then could be wondered: Was it like a failed transition to 4D? Then did it fail because not only the 4D STS overlords interrupted it, but also inverted its purpose resulting in the “Confusion of the Tongues? In any case and more to the point, at that era what kind of men were those building?

Well…. There are ancient traditions claiming that 72 —or 70— kings built the Babel Tower, and then we have that in China is told of 72 ancient rulers counted in this almost immemorial and last eon. Anyway, why 72?!! Is this number a symbol or what?!! Maybe factors of simple math?!! See? here does chime the celestial 9th symphony!!!

See, leaving out fanciness then we could recall the beforehand time of the Tower, i.e. earlier than the “confusion.” Therefore we can look into some peculiar passages in the Chinese and Celtic records, as well as, again our C’s:

So, notice that “Hebrew, Greek and Latin” further than languages rather may apply to “3 unique categories.” And of course the memento:
500px-010.The_Tower_of_Babel.jpg

Confusion o the Tongues, 1864, Gustave Dore
I am deeply grateful for your knowledge and response. Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Coming back to the question of what it will feel like suddenly finding yourself in 4th density, it may be worth considering what exactly the C's meant when they spoke of being like Alice when she went through the looking glass:​

As to exactly what "through the looking glass means", I found this quote from Raymond McGuire on line:


The question is, did Lewis Carroll have such a "looking glass" experience himself and, if so, did he use that experience within his book? The answer may be yes.

Carroll was allegedly a member of a Victorian English secret society called the Orphic Circle. The Circle was led by an English aristocrat, Lord Edward Bulwer-Lytton, who happened to be the Colonial Secretary in Benjamin Disraeli's Conservative government. The group also contained such other luminaries as Charles Dickens (an active spiritualist), Sir Richard Burton (a famous English explorer) as well as the Prime Minister Sir Benjamin Disraeli, who like Carroll, Dickens and Bulwer-Lytton was an author (one of the characters in his 1844 book Coningsby is meant to be based on the banker Lionel de Rothschild, the "hidden hand" behind the British throne who bankrolled the Crimean War).

Bulwer-Lytton was a noted author as well and his book Vril: The Power of the Coming Race would be a great inspiration to the German Thule Society and later the Nazis. The book also popularised the Hollow Earth Theory. The main character in the book finds his way into a subterranean world occupied by beings, the Vril-ya, who seem to resemble angels [4th density?] and are the descendants of an antediluvian civilisation called the Ana [MJF: Hmmm... sounds a bit like the Mesopotamian Anu, the leader of the Anunnaki, to me}, who live in networks of subterranean caverns linked by tunnels. Originally surface dwellers, the Vril-ya fled underground thousands of years ago to escape a massive flood and gained greater power by facing and dominating the harsh conditions of the Earth. Their society is a technologically supported Utopia, chief among their tools being an "all-permeating fluid" called "Vril", a latent source of energy that the spiritually elevated hosts are able to master through training of their will, to a degree that depends on their hereditary constitution [a reference to special bloodlines perhaps?]. This mastery gives them access to an extraordinary force that can be controlled at will.

When you consider what the C's have told us about the underworld civilisation called the Nation of the Third Eye who are the descendants of Atlantean Aryans who went underground over 14,000 years ago, i.e., before the Deluge in 10,800 BC, then you have to wonder whether like the Thule Society and the Antareans in the 20th century, Bulwer-Lytton had some sort of an encounter with the Nation of the Third Eye, which inspired him to write his book. Consider here what the C's had to say about the Nation of the Third Eye:


The hero of Bulwer-Lytton's book discovers that the Vril-ya have great telepathic and other parapsychological abilities, such as being able to transmit information [telepathy], get rid of pain, and put others to sleep [hypnosis]. Interestingly, the C's have told us that the bi-density beings who form the Nation of the Third Eye are, like the Vril-ya, psychic projectors who can place thoughts directly into surface dwellers minds:


Perhaps Bulwer-Lytton, like Gene Roddenberry a century later, was inspired by Thor's Pantheum when writing his book but it is uncanny how accurately his book reflects what the C's have said about the Nation of the Third Eye. It is also worth noting here that Gene Roddenberry was a Rosicrucian, being a long term member of AMORC. Bulwer-Lytton was also considered in his time to be the leading Rosicrucian in England, although he always denied this publicly. However, his 1841 book Zanoni, alluded to deep Rosicrucian mysteries regarding the four elements, secrets that only initiated Rosicrucians have the power to reveal and which enable them to attain the ultimate goal: the discovery of the Elixir of life and the attainment of immortality and eternal youth. This mention of the Elixir of Life makes me think of the medieval alchemists and their quest to transmute base metal into gold through the Philosopher's Stone and also what the C's had to say about monoatomic gold:


*Given that Abraham/Moses (an Egyptian prince and High Priest who no doubt was acquainted with Egyptian alchemical secrets) forced the rebellious Israelites to ingest powdered gold made from the smelted down Golden Calf, one has to wonder if the C's could have had the Israelites of the Exodus in mind here.

And


These references to alchemy and the Elixir of Life connect us with the mysterious enclave of alchemists in the Pyrenees who seem to possess the secret to longevity of life given what the C's said about the famous 14th century French alchemist Nicolas Flamel:



As a leading Rosicrucian, could Bulwer-Lytton have been aware of the enclave of alchemists and the powers associated with monoatomic gold?

There is another possibility though and that is that Bulwer-Lytton may have received the information about the Vril-ya (the Nation of the Third Eye) through channelling sessions conducted by the Orphic Circle, just as the Thule Society did when they were in contact with the 4D STS Antareans:



If this was the case, such contact may have occurred during channelling sessions (using trance mediums) conducted by the Orphic Circle at which Lewis Carroll may have been present. It should be noted that the Orphic Circle (named after the Greek mythic figure of Orpheus who descended into the underworld in search of his lover) also used sacred mirrors at their sessions perhaps like the 'Spirit Mirror' the 16th century English magus Dr John Dee used in his scrying sessions, which was presented to him by King Phillip II of Spain in gratitude for his services as an astrologer to the king and his wife, Queen Mary I of England. This mirror of polished obsidian, which is now held in the British Museum's collection, was allegedly an Aztec artefact brought back to Spain from Mexico (see: 'Spirit mirror' used by 16th-century occultist John Dee came from the Aztec Empire). This in turn makes me think of what the C's said about John Dee and his encounter with angels:

This raises the possibility that the Orphic Circle may have made contact with fourth density in a similar fashion to John Dee by using sacred spirit mirrors. If Lewis Carroll was present at such a session, what he saw could perhaps have inspired him to write Alice Through the Looking Glass. We should also take into account here that Lewis Carroll was a brilliant mathematician who was a strict algebraist and had no time for new fangled mathematics such as quaternions invented by his contemporary William Hamilton and used by James Clerk Maxwell in his original Electromagnetic Theory before it was gutted by Oliver Heaviside post Maxwell's death. As the C's said:


It is curious to note that in his book Through the Looking Glass, Lewis introduced the characters of the identical twins Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb, which the C's seemed to link with the matter and antimatter universes in the extract shown below:




This makes me wonder whether Lewis may have been aware of an antimatter universe, a concept which I believe Clerk Maxwell accepted, as he did a dynamic aether. As the C's said in another session:


Curious then that the C's should recently point Ark to Clifford algebra in the 29 March 2025 session as regards Ark's quest for a Unified Field Theory:

However, returning to the subject of psychomantiums, the C's had more to say about their use in other sessions:

*The well known phrase "life is but a dream" suggests that our entire lives are like a series of warped, unreliable memories similar to a dream. The origins of this phrase are not known, but it has been popularised by the nursey rhyme "Row Row Row Your Boat". Interestingly, Lewis Carroll wrote a poem titled "Life is but a Dream", which explores the logic and illogic of dreams and life. The poem juxtaposes the brevity of childhood with the enduring nature of imagination, mirroring themes found in Carroll's "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland". The enigmatic final line - Life, what is it but a dream? - questions the nature of reality, suggesting that life itself may be an illusion.

Indeed, in Through the Looking Glass, the twin brothers Tweedledum and Tweedledee draw Alice's attention to the Red King—sleeping under a nearby tree — and provoke her with idle philosophical banter that she is but an imaginary figure in his dreams. This idea ties in with the simulation hypothesis which proposes that what one experiences as the real world is actually a simulated reality, such as a computer simulation. In turn, this hypothesis ties in with something the C's once said in the transcripts:

And


This last comment by the C's brings me back to Lewis Carroll's Alice Through the Looking Glass [Mirror]. Could Carroll have been given a view to "many vistas" by seeing things through a psychomantium at sessions held by the Orphic Circle. If so, did he then try to encapsulate what he may have learned from these sessions into his two Alice books, which reflected the weird things he may have glimpsed at 4th density after having gone down the rabbit hole so to speak? Think here, for example of how Alice shrinks after drinking a potion in Alice in Wonderland, which could be an attempt to reflect the nature of variable physicality in 4th density.

At the beginning of the book Alice wonders what life on the other side of the mirror may be like:



It is a curious feature that people who have had encounters with fairy folk (who are 4D beings) often speak of encountering them in a mist, which suggests they may have found themselves in 4th density when experiencing these encounters.

As to living on the 'other side of the mirror', this phrase brings to mind what the C's once said about the ancient Etruscans of Italy, who were the predecessors of the Romans.

In what way could the Etruscans have lived on the other side of the mirror? Could they have had a close connection with 4th density perhaps and specifically to the subterranean Nation of the Third Eye?

Mount Musinè, near the city of Turin in Italy, has been the site of several notable modern UFO encounters but UFO incidents there appear to stretch back over thousands of years. Perhaps one of the most world-changing UFO incidents that occurred near there was that of the Roman Emperor Constantine who claimed to see a “cross in the sky” appear in the heavens on the night prior to the pivotal Battle of Milvian Bridge, which is in the region of Mount Musine. According to this legendary account – one which was seemingly witnessed by many of his soldiers too – Constantine would “swear his allegiance” to the cross in return for victory the following day. With victory secured, Constantine ensured that the Roman Empire would henceforth embrace Christianity as the state religion.

The persistence of UFO sightings in this area, which sits on the famous St Michael ley line, has led some UFO researchers to propose that the Susa Valley, and specifically Mt. Musinè, may be the site of an underground alien base. This may perhaps seems far fetched but then the C's have recently confirmed that Skinwalker Ranch in Utah, another location that is linked to long standing paranormal phenomena, is the site of an underground 4D STS base.

I don't know whether the Etruscans ever had a major settlement in the area (there are certainly ancient ruins in the vicinity some dating back to at least the Late Bronze Age circa 1700 BC) before the Romans occupied it and built the city of Turin but the American researcher William Henry has claimed that the Romans destroyed a technologically advanced civilisation that was already established there. Insofar as I am aware, he has failed to produce any evidence to support this claim but, if we take it at face value, is it possible that the 4D Nation of the Third Eye may have given refuge to local Etruscans fleeing the marauding Romans within their underground base in the same way they would do in Antarctica in the 1940's for a large group of defeated Nazis? If so, could it make some sense of the enigmatic comments the C's made about the Etruscans in the following extract from the transcripts:


On a sobering note to finish with, Bulwyer-Lytton ended his book Vril: The Power of the Coming Race by having the hero warn that in time the Vril-ya will run out of habitable space underground and will claim the surface of the Earth, destroying mankind in the process, if necessary.

Well we know that the Orions wish to control mankind after the transition to 4th density and to replace most of us with their new hybrids:​
Some reflections on the subject.

A monkey that is a second density being.

What are the differences between a monkey and a human being?

Can we see them?

Is a rainbow seen in the same way?

Then levels.

A person from a primitive tribe sees the rainbow in the same way than a city person with average education?

Can a person have overcome the lessons of third density and not knowing it?

So where is that person?
 
Some reflections on the subject.

A monkey that is a second density being.

What are the differences between a monkey and a human being?

Can we see them?

Is a rainbow seen in the same way?

Then levels.

A person from a primitive tribe sees the rainbow in the same way than a city person with average education?

Can a person have overcome the lessons of third density and not knowing it?

So where is that person?
By the way, when this post is translated into Spanish using an automatic translator, the output is somewhat incomprehensible sometimes and other no.

It does not always present the same translation.

Sometimes is perhaps 70 or 80 percent accuracy of what is expressed in the English text.

I suppose that in other languages the disaster could be even bigger.
 
Last edited:
Further to my previous posts, I have been thinking more about what the C's said about the "astronomical twin phenomenon" that was depicted in a crop circle (if anyone knows the particular crop circle Laura had in mind, please feel free to post a picture of it) as discussed in the session dated 22 June 1996:

Q: (F) Well, they mentioned twice to be careful about putting in the designated quotes. (L) One of the crop circles you interpreted was an "astronomical twin phenomenon." What is an astronomical twin phenomenon?

A: Many perfectly synchronous meanings.

In a previous post, I quoted from the session where the C's discussed the significance of supernovae and confirmed that the Great Pyramid of Giza had been aligned to the three belt stars of Orion and had in part been built and lined up to supernovae - see: Session 26 April 2025.​

In the extract below, the red supergiant Betelgeuse is mentioned as a star that is ready to go supernova:

Q: (L) Having done my homework on supernovas to some extent, and having discovered that either supergiant red stars are in the process of going supernova, or supergiant blue stars are getting ready to be ready to go supernova, as well as eruptions of massive interstellar clouds, I note that Betelgeuse, in the right shoulder of Orion, is a red supergiant, and Rigel, in the foot of Orion, is a blue supergiant, both of which could go supernova. Am I going in the right direction?

A: You have begun to trek down the right path.

Q: (L) We noticed that the supernova that occurred in Cassiopaea 300 years ago did not seem to have been widely noticed by people on earth. What is the reason for this?

A: Distance.

Q: (L) Now, formerly I asked about the ‘two new stars in Cygnus and Serpentarius’ that were written about in the Rosicrucian Manifesto of about this period of time, and you said they were talking about ‘novae.’ But, it seems that there are no new stars in either of these constellations. Yet, at approximately this time, was the supernova in Cassiopaea.

A: Yes, those with foreknowledge were looking.

This makes me wonder what foreknowledge the C's are referring to. Is this knowledge that was preserved within secret societies and passed down through the generations, secret societies such as the Rosicrucians who through their links with the Rosteem of Rostau (today's Giza) may have inherited knowledge that had been buried under the Sphinx by Atlantean survivors/descendants, who were possibly the same group who built the Pyramids. And then there is the issue of time travellers and another secret group, the Illuminati (who the C's said are the upper echelons of Freemasonry) who apparently are linked with a mysterious group the C's called the 'Sword Keepers of the Lock' [MJF: is this lock a time-lock I wonder?]:
Q: Which reminds me: who REALLY burned the library at Alexandria, since I have heard two stories, one that the Christians did it and the other that the Arabs did it. Which?

A: Neither.

Q: Who DID burn it?

A: Sword keepers of "the lock."

Q: Who are the Sword Keepers of the Lock?

A: Has to do with Illuminati.

In my earlier post, I proposed that the star that the C's have suggested will go supernova and trigger the human DNA changes they have spoken about is another red supergiant, Antares, that is located in the Constellation of Scorpio. This is the same constellation where the Orions are supposedly assembling the future human race on a planet they called D'Ankhiar:​

Q: (L) You said the other night that the Nephalim came from some area around the constellation Scorpio, is that correct?

A: Originally seeded there but you were too.

Q: (L) We were originally seeded somewhere else? Where? Orion? What is the name of that planet?

A: D'Ankhiar. Ankh is ancient symbol of the planet. Is female symbol. Stands for mother planet.

Q: (L) Is this other planet our original home?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) What is it like back Home?

A: Spent. Cindered. Burned up.

And

Q: (L) Now, you said that the Nephilim were seeded on a planet called D'Ankhiar as were human beings. When you said we were seeded there, what did you mean.

A: Was proper environment for molecularization.

Q: (L) Are you saying that the physical bodies on planet earth, the various types of mankind such as Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, Australopithicus etc., were generated on that other planet and then brought here?

A: Yes.

However, the C's later told Laura that the star in question had not yet gone supernova and would only do so at the point when we shift to 4th density:​
Session 16 November 1994:

Q: (L) If the mother planet that the human race was seeded on originally, is burned up, or turned into a cinder, I would like to know how it burned up?

A: Star expanded.

Q: (L) Well, if the star expanded, it must have expanded recently, is that correct?

A: Time does not measure that way in that realm.

Q: (L) What realm is that?

A: Time/space warp.

Q: (L) What do you mean by a time/space warp?

A: Too complicated but you already have some understanding of concept.

Q: (L) So, the star expanded and the mother planet was turned into a cinder. If this was the case, it means that it must have turned into a cinder very close to the point, using time loosely, when human beings were created?

A: You can't even use it loosely.

Q: (L) Would you help me out here. I'm trying to figure out why, if that planet was turned into a cinder, why were human beings seeded there... what was the point in being brought into being on a planet that was very shortly to become a cinder... a crispy critter...

A: Okay. Now: "Shocker" For you. It hasn't become a cinder yet.

Q: (L) Okay. What is it. You told us it was a cinder... burned up... what is the real story here?

A: It will be at the same "time" that you go to 4th density. The human race is currently being formed on D'Ahnkiar.

Q: (L) What do you mean that the human race is currently being formed on that planet? Is that because that planet is this planet?

A: No. That closes realm grand cycle.

Q: (L) Are you saying that there are human beings being created on that planet at this current time...

A: Yes, you are. Your race is forming there.

Q: (L) How?

A: Realm crossing understand?

Q: (L) Are you saying that there are 4th density bodies being formed there...

A: No. 3rd.

Q: (L) There are 3rd density bodies... are we going to leave the bodies we are in and go into other bodies?

A: You are drifting... Think carefully. Realm is derivative of reality. Cycle.

Q: (L) So the human race is being formed on this other planet at the present time...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And at the time of the realm border crossing, this other planet will then become cindered... burned up...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Where will the human beings go that are being formed on that planet at the time of the realm border crossing?

A: Ancient earth.

Q: (L) They will go to ancient earth?

A: There is no time as you know it; its all just lessons for the collective consciousness.

Q: (L) So at the closing of this grand cycle everything will just start all over again?

A: Not exactly; you see, there is no start.

Q: (L) Are a lot of souls on the earth going to recycle into these new bodies coming onto the earth?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) As ancient mankind?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And do the whole thing all over again?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, in other words, a lot of people are going back to square one?

A: Close.

This leads me to wonder whether there is any connection between the "Time/space warp" referred to above and the "Time-locks" the C's have also referred to and by extension the Illuminati 'Sword Keepers of the Lock'.

However, I would like to refer to something Laura raised with the C's concerning a relationship between the constellations of Orion and Scorpio:​

Q: (L) There was an interesting reference in one of the books of the relationship of Orion to Scorpio, that Orion's bow is drawn at Scorpio. And, at one other point, you said that the physical bodies of mankind were molecularized, and ARE being molecularized, on a planet called D'Ankhiar, which is in the constellation Scorpio.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) What is the relationship of Orion to Scorpio? The Orion "bad guys," shooting at Scorpio which is the place of origin of the physical manifestation of the human race...

A: Bad guys?

Q: (L) Forget I said bad guys. "Shooting at Scorpio." Is there any relationship, symbolically, to the fact that the human bodies...

A: It is all interrelated.

Laura mentions above how Orion the Hunter is meant to be aiming his bow at Scorpio, the scorpion. Quoting from Wikipedia:
According to one version, Orion boasted to the goddess Artemis and her mother, Leto, that he would kill every animal on Earth. Artemis and Leto sent a scorpion to kill Orion. Their battle caught the attention of Zeus, who raised both combatants to the sky to serve as a reminder for mortals to curb their excessive pride. In another version of the myth, Artemis' twin brother, Apollo, was the one who sent the scorpion to kill Orion after the hunter earned the goddess' favour by admitting she was better than him. After Zeus raised Orion and the scorpion to the sky, the former hunts every winter but flees every summer when the scorpion comes.​

1748030559274.png

However, is there a deeper cosmic significance to this imagery? The C's have warned us to look out for major astronomic events in the near future:​
Q: (A) Now, about the relation between the phenomenon of physical disasters that are going to happen and psychic changes related to the realm border. What is cause and what is effect?

A: One precedes the other.

Q: (L) Okay, so disasters happen and then the reality changes in psychic terms?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Is the approach of the realm border, is the change in the magnetic field... does the reversal of the poles and the broadening of the magnetic field, is that going to be before the realm border crossing?

A: Intersection.

Q: (L) So, in practical terms, it may be that, what we observe will be a series of cataclysms, disasters, the 'cleansing' of the Earth...

A: This has already begun.

Q: (L) So, it is already happening. It will accelerate and intensify. And what we will observe is all of these things happening. And, as a result of the intersecting of these various energies, this realm border, this reality change, this change in the magnetics because of the interaction with the comet cluster, the sun's companion, the realm border, and so forth, it will then have an effect upon the people left on the planet who will then change in some way as a result of this, is that correct?

A: Your Bible says that there will be many wonders on the Earth and in the Heavens in the last days.
Of course a massive supernova explosion may be one such heavenly wonder, where the ensuing light from the nova may make it seem like daytime when it is night, as was the case with the supernova that was observed in Cassiopeia in 1572. You will note that the supernova evidently excited the Rosicrucians since they wrote about it in their Manifesto. I wonder if we are about to see a simultaneous or synchronous set of supernovae explosions occurring, one in the constellation of Orion (Betelgeuse) and the other in the constellation of Scorpio (Antares) when Orion the Hunter shoots his arrow at the scorpion? If so, this might explain the C's reference to "astronomical twin phenomenon" in the session dated 22 June 1996 previously quoted from above, as reflected in the crop circle imagery that no doubt the C's (6th density) were responsible for creating:​
Q: (F) Well, they mentioned twice to be careful about putting in the designated quotes. (L) One of the crop circles you interpreted was an "astronomical twin phenomenon." What is an astronomical twin phenomenon?

A: Many perfectly synchronous meanings.

Q: (L) Synchronicity is involved. Does this have something to do with "image?"

A: Duplicity of, as in "Alice through the looking glass." [MJF: a reference perhaps to the strange bickering twins Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum who appear in that book]

Q: (L) Double images. Does this relate to matter and antimatter?

A: Yes, and...

Q: (L) Gravity and manifesting on one side and manifesting a mirror image on the other...

A: Yes, and...

Q: (L) And images of 4th density bodies with tenuous fibers connecting to DNA as in manifesting imaginal bodies on 4th density?

A: Astronomical.

Q: (L) Okay, that relates to stars and planets... astronomical in terms of another universe, an alternate universe composed of antimatter?
Two red supergiant stars going supernova together at approximately the same time would certainly qualify as an astronomical twin phenomenon. But there may be much more to this matter since the scorpion in Scorpio lost its claws when they were added to the constellation of Libra:
Session 9 August 1997:

Q: Okay. Now, next question: I understand that Libra was added to the zodiac and broke Scorpio and Virgo apart. Were there originally 10 or 11 sign in the zodiac?

A: Originally?

Q: You know what I mean!

A: There have been many combinations.


Q: Well, when did the present 12 sign zodiac begin to be established as it is?

A: 1302 A.D.

Q: And how many signs were there before that?

A: 11

Quoting from Wikipedia:

The entire constellation of Libra was considered to be the claws of Scorpius (Chelae Scorpionis) in Ancient Greek times, with a set of scales held aloft by Astraea (represented by adjacent Virgo) being formed from these westernmost stars during later Greek times. The division into Libra was formalised during Ancient Greek or Roman times.

As we all know, Libra is represented by a set of weighing scales and this in turn conveys the sense of balance. And the C's have certainly spoken a lot recently about the need to achieve balance in our present world, balance which we see represented in the constellation of Libra.
1748031643158.png

So who was responsible for breaking Scorpio and Virgo apart to create the zodiac sign of Libra in 1302 AD. Curiously, this date is only five years before the the fall of the Knights Templar in 1307, a group who were rumoured to have possessed the Grail and the Ark of the Covenant. The C's have suggested that the Rosicrucians played a major part in the Templars' downfall:
Q: Who or what brought about the end of the Knights of the Temple?

A: Rosicrucians move as a "thief in the night."

Q: (L) But, as I understand it, the Rosicrucians did not come into being until after the end of the Templars...

A: No.

Q: (L) Do you mean that the information that came out, that pamphlet about "Christian Rosenkreutz," that is a purported fable, might be correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, goodness sake! The Rosicrucians advertise in magazines!!! Is this worldwide organization that promotes itself so blatantly...

A: Well, the "world-wide" order is not all inclusive.

Q: (L) Is there an inner circle of this order that is unknown?

A: Yes.

And as we know, the C's have said that the Rosicrucians are the modern manifestation of the Rosteem who were connected to Rostau or Giza and thus in some way to the Great Pyramid of Giza. Could the Rosicrucians have been responsible for establishing the new zodiac sign of Libra? If so, why did they introduce it in AD 1302 and what were their reasons for doing so? Does the modern zodiac represent perhaps an ancient story, a story that involves mankind's history, a history that encompasses the Grand Cycle which is about to close?

Imminent Supernova

Is there any indication that Betelgeuse or Antares are about to go supernova? There are certainly some astronomers who think Antares may go supernova at any time (which to an astronomer could mean tomorrow or the next million years). By contrast, Betelgeuse is expected to go supernova within the next 100,000 years. But what if they are wrong?

Recent updates from observatories worldwide suggest that Betelgeuse may be nearing the end of its life and the countdown to a spectacular supernova explosion may have already begun. The recent dimming episodes of Betelgeuse — the most notable being the "Great Dimming" of late 2019 and early 2020 — have captured the attention of the world and concern. Observations showed that the star had lost significant brightness, dropping by nearly 40%. Initially thought to signal imminent supernova activity, scientists later attributed this to a massive ejection of dust obscuring the star. However, Betelgeuse's erratic behaviour has continued, leading many to question whether its demise is much closer than previously thought. (see: Countdown to Betelgeuse Supernova May Have Already Begun! Stellar Updates From our Cosmic Vicinity). Indeed, some pundits think it may even go supernova (from an optical point of view) this year.

Antares is approximately 550 light years (170 parsecs) from the Sun. In comparison Betelgeuse's distance from the sun has for various reasons been quite difficult to measure but current best estimates are of the order of 400–600 light years from the Sun. If we take the middle point of 500 light years, then it is a similar distance from Earth as Antares is. Having been ejected from its birthplace in the Orion OB1 association – which includes the stars in Orion's Belt – Betelgeuse is now a runaway star that has been observed to be moving through the interstellar medium at a speed of 30 km/s, creating a bow shock over four light-years wide.

So, is it out of the question that we may see a double supernova explosion involving two red supergiant stars at around the same time, thus creating an astronomical twin phenomenon? Were this to happen, would it shed any light (excuse the pun) on what the C's once said about "The status of Trine":​
Q: (L) Do supernova create portals to other universes?

A: The doors may be redirected.

Q: (L) Does any of this supernova business have anything to do with the constellation Leo?

A: In a way.

Q: (L) In what way?

A: Through geometric configuration.

Q: (L) What do you mean ‘through geometric configuration?’

A: Status of Trine.
 
Two red supergiant stars going supernova together at approximately the same time would certainly qualify as an astronomical twin phenomenon.
While this seems extremely unlikely, it is interesting that both stars have been mentioned by the C's as supernova candidates.

And the similarities are indeed striking: both are about 500 ly away, both are red giants and they are located almost opposite of each other in the sky.

When I googled "Betelegeuse Antares", this was the first result - pointing out that they are twins:

 
Thank you again for the session.

  • Youger Dryas is around 10,600 BCE.
  • Venus capture is around 3000 BCE ( 2676 BCE last interaction/Bible Exodus). i.e. it is around 2600 BCE.
There is around 7000 years between though there are 2 Oort cloud comet arrivals in between - 8800 BCE (no damage) and 5200 BCE ( Native Americans moved from Asia to Americas by Grays).

See the cosmology chart. from 10K to 2600 BCE. If the character is too small, See the attach pdf of the total cosmology.

View attachment 108269
Thank you also for the timeline as per the C's, it helps grandly.
I've noticed that cooking meat in an air fryer removes too much fat. We are going to start cooking meat more in a pan with onions, and for carbs, if any, a few small potatoes, black beans, carrots, or organic non-wheat noodles, which can absorb any liquid fat.
Beans are supposed to be containing anti-nutrients, binding with minerals which prevents their absorption in the body.
 
Yes, I think so. I don't eat a lot of beans, so maybe I shouldn't eat any beans; perhaps some are better than others.
It is interesting to note that the great Greek philosopher Pythagoras and his followers preached against the eating of beans:

Pythagoras advised followers to “abstain from beans because they are flatulent and partake most of the breath of life; and besides, it is better for the stomach if they are not taken, and this again will make our dreams in sleep smooth and untroubled” (Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 8.1.24).

See: Pythagoras prohibition against beans - Suchen Videos

Was this prohibition based on some inherited wisdom from an earlier age perhaps?
 
Although I cannot know what Laura had in mind, the full harvest of crop circles in 1996 can be found here and the most likely candidate looks like this IMO:

1996_06_17_east-field-alton-barnes-wiltshire-barley-35mm-neg.jpg


My 2 cents...
Thank you for posting this photograph.
1748282988047.png

It is certainly a weird looking crop circle. It seems to show two interweaving wave motions or cycles between two large circles that could possibly represent stars. The C's have suggested that one should take these 2D crop images and project them into 3D images.

Session 14 December 1996:​
Q: (L) I know that's not the point! Is what we're saying here, is that we can use these prime numbers to derive something out of something else?

A: We told you about the mystics.

Q: (T) They're using prime numbers to... (L) Oh, ok, I get it. So, mystics... the mystics, the mystical secrets... dwell in the prime numbers if used as a code.

A: Name the primary mystical organizations for key to clue system.

Q: (L) ...key to clue system?

A: Yes.

[We named: Catholicism, Christianity, Judaism, Cabalism, Sufism, The Koran, Mysteries. Laura realized that she had just set aside the book "Understanding Mysticism," it was next to a book on Caballa on the bookcase in the room. Jesuits, Masons, Knights Templar, Rosicrucians]

Q: (L) All right. With our little list that we're making, are we on to something, or are we completely off track?

A: Yes, now check out those crop circles photos... any prime number combos there?

Q: (L) Do you mean in terms of dimension, or do you mean in composition?

A: Composition and dimensions... anything you can find. [Discussion: Sacred geometries, all sects listed use prime numbers. John 3:16-19, Corinthians 13. Genesis, Ch.2, verse 22 "rib taken from the man and made woman" - 2 is the only even prime number. Ch 3, v5..."your eyes shall be opened and ye shall be as the gods." (Eating from the Tree of Knowledge)]

Q: (T) ...to find a way of decoding it to get an answer, to get something, to get a message, to get something from it... (L) Are we thinking in any of the lines of something we ought to follow, or are we drifting?

A: All are lines you ought to follow. Now, look at the photos on the wall! [Referring to large photocopy of a number of crop circles we had pinned to the wall.]

Q: (L) OK, we're looking at them: point out something...

A: Count the large spheres in photo three.

Q: (L) There are seven.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And what does that photo represent?

A: Not yet.

Q: (T) OK, there are seven large circles; a large central one, and then six outer ones that are smaller. Each of the six smaller circles is connected to the larger circle by a shaft, or a line, or a conduit of some kind.

A: Add large and small spheres.

Q: (L) OK, there's seven. Add the large to the small and there's seven; add the little teeny ones, there's thirteen; and then even the little teeny-teeny, the little knobs on the ends, there would be six more, so that would be nineteen.

A: Yes...

Q: (T) So, that's another prime: nineteen is a prime number. (L) OK, they're prime numbers. And... (T) Are they... just as an offshoot here, do the six circles, the first set surrounding the large circle, are those the sixth density attached to the seventh density?

A: No comment.

Q: (T) OK now, and then, outside of that are smaller spheres, each one connected one to the next, in a line. We're looking at prime numbers here. What are we looking at? We've got a central one, six outer: large, six outside of that: smaller, six outside of that: tiny... Could, and I'm just thinking off the top of my head here, nothing cast in concrete, is this a representation of... a sphere, getting smaller and smaller... going that way. Or, coming in, this way. Or that way and this way. Like the infinity mirrors...

A: If you three-dimensionalize.

Q: (L) It would be circles, like balls, like spheres. (T) Ohhh, it's an axis, an x-y-z axis! A three-dimensional axis. Three-dimensionally, it would be like this [Holds up hand, forefinger pointed up, thumb pointed to himself, third finger at the horizontal] Larger, smaller, smaller... A three-dimensional axis. Are we going somewhere with this, or am I out in left field again?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) I'm going somewhere with this?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Ahhhh, I now see this as a three-dimensional object as opposed to a flat circle.

A: Do that to the others too.

If one three-dimensionalises this crop circle, does the wave motion start to resemble the DNA Double Helix I wonder?
1748281226878.png
If so, it would certainly fit in with what the C's have said about supernovae causing DNA changes if the supernova is close enough to the Earth:​
Q: (L) What would be the effect of cosmic rays emitted by a supernova that is in some proximity to the earth on the human body?

A: Genetic splice of strand.

Q: (L) How close would a supernova have to be to have this effect?

A: 2000 light years.

Q:
(L) So that either of these stars in Orion that are potential supernova prospects could have this effect since they are approximately 1500 light years away?

A: Yes.
As Axj has pointed out, both Antares and Betelgeuse are about 500 light years away from Earth and are thus well within the proximity needed to have an affect on human DNA.

And where Terry says "Ohhh, it's an axis, an x-y-z axis! A three-dimensional axis", this axial concept can also be linked with that of DNA base pair geometry:​
The geometry of a base, or base pair step can be characterized by 6 coordinates: shift, slide, rise, tilt, roll, and twist. These values precisely define the location and orientation in space of every base or base pair in a nucleic acid molecule relative to its predecessor along the axis of the helix. Together, they characterize the helical structure of the molecule. In regions of DNA or RNA where the normal structure is disrupted, the change in these values can be used to describe such disruption.​

For each base pair, considered relative to its predecessor, there are the following base pair geometries to consider:
  • Stretch
  • Stagger
  • Buckle
  • Propeller: rotation of one base with respect to the other in the same base pair.
  • Opening
  • Shift: displacement along an axis in the base-pair plane perpendicular to the first, directed from the minor to the major groove.
  • Slide: displacement along an axis in the plane of the base pair directed from one strand to the other.
  • Rise: displacement along the helix axis.
  • Tilt: rotation around the shift axis.
  • Roll: rotation around the slide axis.
  • Twist: rotation around the rise axis.
  • x-displacement
  • y-displacement
  • inclination
  • tip
  • pitch: the height per complete turn of the helix.
See diagram below:

1748282878711.png


Admittedly, I could be way off target here and the crop circle imagery could have another meaning altogether.
 
Was this prohibition based on some inherited wisdom from an earlier age perhaps?
The human body is very complex and I remembered the following information about legumes and Butyrate.
Sodium butyrate alleviates cholesterol gallstones by regulating bile acid metabolism


Cholesterol overloading and bile acid metabolic disorders play an important role in the onset of cholesterol gallstone (CGS). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) can regulate bile acid metabolism by modulating the gut microbiota. However, the role and mechanism by which sodium butyrate (NaB) targets bile acids to attenuate CGS are still unknown. In this study, continuous administration of 12 mg/day for 8 weeks was decreased the incidence of gallstones induced by lithogenic diet (LD) from 100% to 25%. NaB modulated SCFAs and improved the gut microbiota. The remodeling of the gut microbiota changed the bile acid compositions and decreased cecal tauro-α-muricholic acid (T-α-MCA) and tauro-β-muricholic acid (T-β-MCA) which are effective farnesoid X receptor (FXR) antagonists. The quantitative real-time PCR examination showed that NaB significantly increased levels of ileal Fxr, fibroblast growth factor-15 (Fgf-15) and small heterodimer partner (Shp) mRNA and subsequently inhibited bile acid synthesis. In addition, NaB enhanced bile acid excretion by increasing the levels of hepatic multidrug resistance protein 2 (Mdr2) and bile salt export pump (Bsep) mRNA, and it enhanced bile acid reabsorption in the intestine by increasing the levels of ileal bile acid transporter (Ibat) mRNA. In addition, NaB reduced the absorption of cholesterol in the intestine and inhibited the excretion of cholesterol in the liver, which reduced the cholesterol concentration in serum and bile. Furthermore, the protective effects of NaB administration were abolished by FXR antagonists.

Legumes are one of the few foods with reasonable amounts of protein and fiber, the secret weapons of satiety (study). In addition, its carbohydrate is slow-release, avoiding insulin peaks.

For your intestine, they are a double-edged sword.

On the one hand, they provide fiber and a certain amount of resistant starch. This is beneficial for your microbiota (butyrate production), and also improves insulin sensitivity.

On the other hand, legumes have a high amount of FODMAPs, which is problematic for many people (detail). If you are sensitive to this type of carbohydrate you will notice gas and bloating. If your system doesn't tolerate them well, don't eat them.


So a traditional legume stew to create butyrate a week and a good cured sheep cheese to maintain it.

Practically it was and in many cases is the diet of the people of the small towns of northern Spain. People who easily reach close to 100 years of life.

Very long-lived.
 
Was this prohibition based on some inherited wisdom from an earlier age perhaps?
The fermentation process of indigestible carbohydrates in the large intestine leads to the generation of SCFAs, including butyrate.

Various commensal bacteria, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia spp., and Eubacterium rectale, are involved in this process.

The quantity and availability of butyrate in the colon depend largely on fermentable fiber intake and microbial diversity.

Eating foods rich in fermentable fiber is key to butyrate production in the colon. These foods include:

Green leafy vegetables.
Tubers and roots.
High-fiber fruits.
Legumes and whole grains.
Some fermented dairy products.
 
Thank you for posting this photograph.

It is certainly a weird looking crop circle. It seems to show two interweaving wave motions or cycles between two large circles that could possibly represent stars. The C's have suggested that one should take these 2D crop images and project them into 3D images.

Session 14 December 1996:​


If one three-dimensionalises this crop circle, does the wave motion start to resemble the DNA Double Helix I wonder?
If so, it would certainly fit in with what the C's have said about supernovae causing DNA changes if the supernova is close enough to the Earth:

As Axj has pointed out, both Antares and Betelgeuse are about 500 light years away from Earth and are thus well within the proximity needed to have an affect on human DNA.

And where Terry says "Ohhh, it's an axis, an x-y-z axis! A three-dimensional axis", this axial concept can also be linked with that of DNA base pair geometry:​

See diagram below:



Admittedly, I could be way off target here and the crop circle imagery could have another meaning altogether.
( fwiw ) these quotes seem relevant to this post ( related? ) :

Session 11 November 1995 :

(...)

Q: (L) Okay, that's 1. I don't get it. A math genius I am NOT. What is the concept here?

A: Look: 3 5 3 5 3 5.

Q: (L) What is the 3 5 sequence?

A: 5 minus 3.

Q: (L) Okay, we have strange math. But, you can do anything with numbers because they correspond to the universe at deep levels...

A: Is code.

Q: (L) What does this code relate to? Is it letters or some written work?

A: Infinite power.

[Laura’s note: It is obvious now that the Cs were talking about a phi spiral, Fibonacci Sequence, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, etc., Golden Ratio: The ratio between two consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci Series tends to the Golden Number Φ: 0.618… or 1.618; The ratio of each successive pair of numbers in the sequence approximates phi (1.618. . .), as 5 divided by 3 is 1.666…, and 8 divided by 5 is 1.60. but I was ignorant of all that at the time. Poor Cs were SOO frustrated I think.]

Q: (L) How is infinite power acquired by knowing this code? If you don't know the correspondences, how can you use a numerical code?

A: Lord of Serpent promises its followers infinite power which they must seek infinite knowledge to gain, for which they pledge allegiance infinitely, for which they possess for all eternity, so long as they find infinite wisdom, for which they search for all infinity.

Q: (L) Well, that is a round robin... a circle you can't get out of!

(...)

--------------------------------------------------

Session 21 December 1995 :

(...)

Q: (L) Is there any particular number sequence that could be used?

A: 353535...

Q: (L) Is this also a genetic code?

A: Much is missing between "point A and point B."

Q: (L) You mean by jumping from documents to DNA?

A: Yes.

(...)
 
While this seems extremely unlikely, it is interesting that both stars have been mentioned by the C's as supernova candidates.

And the similarities are indeed striking: both are about 500 ly away, both are red giants and they are located almost opposite of each other in the sky.

When I googled "Betelegeuse Antares", this was the first result - pointing out that they are twins:

There is one other marker that may help to pin this issue down and that is what the 'Cs said later in the session dated Session dated 5 September 1998:
Q: (L) Having done my homework on supernovas to some extent, and having discovered that either supergiant red stars are in the process of going supernova, or supergiant blue stars are getting ready to be ready to go supernova, as well as eruptions of massive interstellar clouds, I note that Betelgeuse, in the right shoulder of Orion, is a red supergiant, and Rigel, in the foot of Orion, is a blue supergiant, both of which could go supernova. Am I going in the right direction?

A: You have begun to trek down the right path.

Q: (L) We noticed that the supernova that occurred in Cassiopaea 300 years ago did not seem to have been widely noticed by people on earth. What is the reason for this?

A: Distance.

Q: (L) Now, formerly I asked about the ‘two new stars in Cygnus and Serpentarius’ that were written about in the Rosicrucian Manifesto of about this period of time, and you said they were talking about ‘novae.’ But, it seems that there are no new stars in either of these constellations. Yet, at approximately this time, was the supernova in Cassiopaea.

A: Yes, those with foreknowledge were looking.

[....]

Q:
(L) What clue can I follow to determine which star it is?

A: Instincts.

Q: (A) But, if it already occurred, then this means that the instantaneous effects have already been felt, even if it was lesser than the optical effects. It must have been recorded by anomalous changes in genes? (L) Is that true?

A: Close.

Q: (L) So what, in the records, should we be looking for?

A: Sign of struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of Royal Blood Lines.

Q: (L) In other words, the usurpation of the blood lines?

A: Close.

The major clue here is to look for a struggle out of sequence where the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines are concerned. The C's subsequently explained that these pre-ordained activities were those relating to control:
Q: I have two last questions: at one point you said to note the "struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines." Now, of course, I made the remark about usurpation of a throne, but later I realized that we don't really know what the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines really are. They don't necessarily have to do with a secular position, they could be a function. What are the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines?

A: Control.

Q: Control of what? People?

A: Close.

Q: Control of the reality in some sense?

A: Not as close.

Q: Control as in STS domination?

A: Yes.

Q: Are there any other pre-ordained activities?

A: Need there be?

Q: Okay, "struggle out of sequence." Loss of control? The royal bloodlines lose control?

A: Only when energies build prior to completion of cycle.

Q: What sign am I looking for? Struggle out of sequence... a rebellion that breaks out... a particular cycle to these events... a period of time?

A: You need to review.
The question is which particular royal bloodlines are we concerned with here? I once suggested to Laura that it may be that of the Stuart bloodline in Great Britain when King James II (James Stuart) was deposed and then replaced as monarch by his daughter Mary Stuart and her Dutch Husband Prince William of Orange after the so called 'Glorious Revolution' in 1689, even though James had a young baby son, also called James, who should have succeeded him through a regency under the laws of primogeniture. His son would become the 'Old Pretender to the throne' and would make a failed attempt to seize the throne back in 1715. The final attempt to wrest the throne back for the Stuart bloodline would be made by James's grandson, Bonnie Prince Charlie, in 1745, which would end in catastrophic defeat at the Battle of Culloden Moor, thus securing the throne for the Hanoverian dynasty, which in Charles III continues to reign in Britain to this day.

However, it is arguable that this struggle did not start in 1689 since James II was the younger son of Charles I who famously lost his head to the axe in 1649 after losing the English Civil War to the Parliamentary/Puritan forces led by Oliver Cromwell, who briefly established a republic under his leadership as the Lord Protector. This event can arguably be said to be a prime example of what the C's said about a usurpation of the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines when the Stuart's lost control, albeit briefly since Charles's son, Charles II, would return to the throne on 29 May 1660. However, the violent deposition of King Charles I and the creation of a people's republic would become a template for later revolutions in France, with the execution of Louis XVI) and in Russia, with the execution of Czar Nicholas II and his family. Indeed, the English journalist and writer Douglas Reed would link all three regicides together in his brilliant book The Controversy of Zion, which I would strongly recommend reading - see Douglas Reed - The Controversy Of Zion : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive for a free copy.

Why have I focused though on British royal bloodlines and history rather than other European royal bloodlines. The answer is the United States of America, which is the dominant world power at the present time and the country currently most involved in creating the New World Order, which it even advertises on the reverse side of the one-dollar bill with the Latin words Novus Ordo Seclorum, meaning "New Order of the Ages". The C's have said that the USA is today the main military muscle of the World's secret government that is attempting to institute the New World Order. It would also seem to be playing the main role in the replay of the destruction of the Atlantean civilisation, the C's comparing today's version of Atlantis with NATO. But what does the USA have to do with the usurpation and loss of control of the royal bloodlines, especially the Stuart bloodline?

The answer to this question takes us back to the Rosicrucians who you will recall were looking at the ‘two new stars in Cygnus and Serpentarius (novae) that were then written about in the Rosicrucian Manifesto (the Fama) of the early 17th century. They saw this event as the heralding of a new golden age, which seems a bit premature since it may well be another double supernovae event in our own time that heralds the shift to 4th density and a true golden age for humanity. As the C's have said on more than one occasion "a new world is coming":​
Session 28 May 2013:

Q: (L) Today is 28 May 2013. And we apparently have a bunch of questions written down here, and a lot of things on our minds. So I guess we might as well get started here. Hello.

A: New world coming.

Q: (L) And who do we have with us tonight?

A: Miecekaii of Cassiopaean Future.

Q: (L) What did you mean by, "New world coming"?

A: You are in the transition and it will accelerate dramatically soon.
So what does this all have to do with England and the toppling of the Stuarts? Well the answer to this question lies with one man and that man is Sir Francis Bacon (1560-1623), a man who would become Lord Chancellor of England under the original Stuart monarch James I and a man who many think was the leading Rosicrucian of the early 17th century, who may have written the Rosicrucian Manifestos. I would add here that there are many who think he was also the true author of the works of William Shakespeare. However, there was another work he wrote that would only be published after his death in 1623 and this work was The New Atlantis. This book would be very influential in the next century where it was read by some of the key founding fathers of the United States of America, i.e., George Washington, Benjamin Franklin (who may himself have been an initiated Rosicrucian) and Thomas Jefferson. Indeed, such was the influence of Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians that at least one American writer, Steven Sora, describes the USA as 'Rosicrucian America' (see:https://www.amazon.co.uk/Rosicrucian-America-Society-Influenced-Destiny/dp/1620559064. Quoting from the blurb on Amazon for Sora's book Rosicrucian America: How a Secret Society Influenced the Destiny of a Nation:​
Dr. John Dee and his polymath protégé Sir Francis Bacon were the most influential men in the court of Queen Elizabeth I, part of an elite group with invisible control throughout Europe. And, as Steven Sora reveals, not only were they key members of the Rosicrucians, they were the driving force behind England’s colonization of the New World and the eventual establishment of the United States.

From Avalon in Newfoundland to New England to Pennsylvania and Virginia, Sora shows how Bacon and Dee’s Rosicrucian impact is felt throughout North America. He details Bacon’s possible authorship of the anonymous Rosicrucian texts of the early 1600s, his connections with Sir Walter Raleigh’s School of Night, and the origins of Rosicrucianism in Bacon’s Order of the Helmet. He explains how Bacon envisioned America as the New Atlantis, a utopia where liberty and freedom of learning prevailed--a key tenet of the “Invisible College” of the Rosicrucian Order--and how Dee convinced the Queen that England had rightful claims in the New World by drawing on legends of both King Arthur and Welsh Prince Madoc voyaging West to America.

Sora looks at Rosicrucian influences on the Founding Fathers and earliest settlers of America, such as Washington, Franklin, and William Penn of Pennsylvania, on the American Revolution, and on American colonies, such as the Williamsburg colony. He details how Penn invited Rosicrucians to Philadelphia and how the city’s layout follows esoteric principles, including a direct reference to Bacon’s New Atlantis. Moving into the 1800s and beyond, he reveals how a handful of Rosicrucians served as the Inner Sanctum of the Knights of the Golden Circle and how Rosicrucians are behind the Georgia Guidestones, carved granite monoliths with messages in ancient languages.

Providing a thorough and expansive view of Rosicrucianism, its occult origins, and its deep imprint on America, Sora shows how this secret society still continues to exert invisible influence on the modern world.
It is curious that Sora makes a connection to Sir Walter Raleigh’s School of Night since Raleigh was another influential Elizabethan courtier who had a role in establishing a colony in what would become the future United States of America. Whereas Bacon would be involved in establishing the fledgling colony of Virginia (as a lawyer and the secretary to the Virginia Company, he wrote the colony's original constitution, which would influence the later Constitution of the United States), Raleigh was the driving force behind the ill-fated Roanoke colony that mysteriously disappeared. The C's said the colonists were victims of an alien abduction, which makes me wonder whether the colonists were deliberately targeted by the Greys to ensure that the Roanoke Colony would not succeed but the Virginia Colony would, given its future importance to the American project - for more on this see my earlier post Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians.

However, we have one problem linking Bacon and the Stuart dynasty and its struggles within the timeframe of a double supernova explosion and that is the dating. If Antares and Betelgeuse are over 500 light years away, then the earliest we can date the attempt to usurp the controlling role of the Stuart dynasty (a dynasty which believed in the doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings) is the year 1603 when a group of English Catholic conspirators sought to remove King James I from the English throne and to replace him with his cousin Lady Arbella Stuart. This plot, called the Main Plot, was preceded by another similar plot called the Bye Plot in which Sir Walter Raleigh was implicated and, as a result, thrown into the Tower of London for thirteen years, although he was never actually brought to trial.

A subsequent and more serious attempt to remove James I from the throne and replace him with his nine year old daughter Princess Elizabeth was the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. The plotters had planned to blow up the House of Lords during the State Opening of Parliament on Tuesday 5 November 1605 as the prelude to a popular revolt or uprising in the English Midlands. As we all know, the plot failed when one of the major figures in the conspiracy, Guy Fawkes, was discovered the night before with a large Stache of gunpowder concealed in a storage room under the Houses of Parliament. I would point out that if the plot had succeeded, Princess Elizabeth would have usurped her older brothers Henry and Charles who were next in line to the throne (Henry would pre-decease his father allowing Charles to assume the throne as Charles I).

If we take the year 1605 as a benchmark date for the commencement of the cycle to the proposed struggle out of (dynastic) sequence, then we get only 420 years. This is close to the 500 plus light years distance of Antares and Betelgeuse from Earth but not close enough for horseshoes :-). So, is there any other dynastic struggle that occurred in the appropriate timeframe, which saw a struggle out of sequence? Well yes there is and this involved the culmination of the War of the Roses, a period of political instability and periodic open civil war in England during the second half of the 15th century, which paved the way first for the Tudors and then for the Scottish Stuarts to replace the previous ruling dynasty in England, the Plantagenets.

Richard III (2 October 1452 – 22 August 1485) was the last king of the Plantagenet dynasty. His defeat and death at the Battle of Bosworth Field in August 1485 at the hands of his enemy and successor, Henry Tudor (who then became Henry VII), marked the end of the Middle Ages in England. It would truly prove to be a watershed moment in history as it paved the way for Henry VIII (Henry Tudor's son and successor) to lead England away from the control of the Roman Catholic Church in the English Reformation of 1534 and subsequently for Henry's daughter, Elizabeth I, to commence the establishment of the British Empire, which would see England establish colonies in North America under the guidance of men such as Dr John Dee and Sir Francis Bacon. If England had remained a Catholic country under the Plantagenets, then it is highly unlikely that the 13 English colonies that would form the nascent United States of America in 1776 would ever have been founded, since the Papacy had determined under the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494 that the New World (North, Central and South America) should be divided between Spain and Portugal.

If we take 1485 as a benchmark date, then this gives us a period of 540 years, which comfortably brings us within the 500 plus light years distance of Antares and Betelgeuse from Earth. But was there any struggle out of dynastic sequence during this time period? Well, it turns out there was. Richard III ascended the throne after the death of his older brother Edward IV. There was one problem though and that was his brother had left behind two young sons, the elder of which, Edward V, automatically became king after his father died. Richard, as the boys' uncle, should have ruled as proxy for his nephew under a regency until the boy was old enough to assume the role of King. Instead, as Wikipedia relates:​
Before arrangements were complete for Edward V's coronation, scheduled for 22 June 1483, the marriage of his parents was declared bigamous and therefore invalid. Now officially illegitimate, Edward and his siblings were barred from inheriting the throne. On 25 June, an assembly of lords and commoners endorsed a declaration to this effect, and proclaimed Richard as the rightful king. He was crowned on 6 July 1483. Edward and his younger brother Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York, called the "Princes in the Tower", disappeared from the Tower of London around August 1483.

Recently, new evidence has come to light that the two young princes did not die but instead escaped to the Continent from where they would later launch ill fated attempts (like those of James Stuart, the Old Pretender, and Bonnie Prince Charlie over two centuries later) to regain the throne. As I wrote in my article The Princes in the Tower:
Evidence has been unearthed by Philippa Langley, an amateur historian who was the person who found Richard III's remains under a car park in the city of Leicester in 2012, that supports the case that both princes survived their incarceration in the Tower to escape to Europe where they carried on the Plantagenet’s cause, much like the Stuart pretenders would do over two centuries later. Mrs Langley claims that documents discovered in European archives point to the princes' escape and later bids to invade England to regain the crown. She carried out her investigation with 300 freelance researchers to find out what really happened to the princes.

Experts have authenticated it [a witness statement] as being written during that period. It tells how the boys were separated in the Tower before two men 'swore by honour and oath to hide me secretly until certain years were past'. Written in the first person in 1493, it describes how Richard was smuggled from the Tower of London by Henry and Thomas Percy. Experts have authenticated it as being written during that period. It reads: 'I was brought to my brother, who was already there, in the Tower of London. 'We were separated. I was secretly taken into a room in a place where the lions were kept. 'Lord Howard came to me and encouraged me. 'At last, he ordered the guards to leave and then brought two other men to me. They were called Henry Percy and Thomas Percy.' It adds: 'They shaved my hair and put a poor and drab shirt on me and we went to St Katharine's [dock].' It goes on to say that he was taken by boat to France before travelling to Portugal.

You will note here that two senior members of the Percy family (who the incumbent Duke of Northumberland was and still is the family head), the same Percy family that Laura is related to, were involved in the escape of the two princes.​

Phillipa Langley proposes that Lambert Simnel, who was the main figurehead of the 1487 Yorkist invasion of England, was really the young King Edward V. Edward’s forces would clash with those of Henry VII at the pivotal Battle of Stoke Field near the town of Newark in Nottinghamshire where on 14 June 1487 they were routed, and Edward was presumed to have been killed.

As to Edward's younger brother Richard, a man claiming to be Richard Duke of York subsequently landed in England with a small army in the hope of gaining the throne. When an initial attempt failed, he fled to Scotland and then launched another bid in 1497. It should be noted here that whilst in Scotland he entered into a marriage contracted with a Scottish noblewoman at the behest of the Scottish King (a Stuart). As I wrote:​
Having been captured, Richard signed a confession where he declared that he was really Perkin Warbeck, a boatman's son, but Mrs Langley believes it was likely Prince Richard. Philippa Langley argues that the confession had been pre-prepared. Henry VII instead of executing the young prince (in the guise of Perkin Warbeck) treated him very well at first. He had royal lodgings at the Tower of London provided to him and Henry even took him to Westminster Hall (Parliament) where he was introduced and shown around, which seems a very odd way of treating a traitor who had tried to seize one’s throne. Could the fact that the young man was the younger brother of Henry’s queen, Elizabeth of York, and therefore his brother-in-law have played a part in this unusual treatment of someone who was supposedly an enemy of the crown. However, the documentary revealed that this apparent show of clemency and goodwill on the part of Henry did not last long since, when Warbeck subsequently escaped from the Tower and was quickly recaptured, Henry lost patience and had him executed.​
For those who want to delve further into this fascinating historical development, I am attaching a copy of my article The Princes in the Tower to this post.

If Lambert Simnel really was King Edward V and Perkin Warbeck was Edward's brother Richard Duke of York, as Philippa Langley has argued, then it really does support the case for there having been an ongoing struggle out of dynastic sequence, first by Richard III when usurping his nephew Edward V's claim to the throne and then by Henry Tudor destroying his Yorkist rivals, Richard III, Edward V and Richard Duke of York, completing the triumph of the House of Lancaster over the House of York and thus bringing to an end the 'War of the Roses'. As to the significance of the ultimate triumph of the red rose of Yorkshire over the white rose of Lancaster, I wrote:​
It is curious then that it was the red rose of Lancaster that won the war, given that this would become a key part of the emblem of the Rosicrucians (the Rosy Cross) who would subsequently emerge in the early 17th century. Does this tell us anything or is it just mere coincidence? As a result of this battle, the Tudors would go on to rule England for over a century and under Henry VIII, Edward VI and Elizabeth I they would oversee a Protestant Reformation and break with the Church of Rome, the destruction of the monastic system and with it the establishment of a new landed gentry class, and the creation of what would become the British Empire. Was all this by chance or the product of a brilliant long-term strategy executed by someone or something? How different might history have turned out (particularly that of the USA) if the Plantagenets had retained their throne and it had not been seized by the Tudors. Would there have been any British Empire or a USA?​
I concluded my article by saying:
Whatever the truth of the separate fates of the two princes, Phillipa Langley’s diligent research suggests that this period of English history may need to be rewritten by today’s historians. The Tudors were master propagandists and through their effective supremacy over all matters of state in England were in a position to have their scribes write their version of history. But, as I said at the beginning of this article, you might ask so what. How does this change anything?

Well, I still think that the toppling of James II may be the particular period the C’s had in mind for when the upcoming visual super nova occurs, since it brought to an end the absolute monarchic regimes of the male Stuart kings and ushered in a new style of constitutional monarchy where the real power would shift to an elected government, who would govern in the monarch’s name but have the real power to set state policy and taxes. By these means, the absolute control of the royal bloodlines was effectively undermined. However, the sea-saw switching of the ascendancy of the Houses of Lancaster and York during the War of the Roses, which culminated in victory for the House of Lancaster in the person of Henry Tudor (Henry VII) and the earlier usurpation of the throne by his rival Richard III who had deposed his nephew Edward V, could provide a viable alternative period for the “struggle out of sequence” leading to the royal bloodlines losing control (as they eventually did in 1689), as suggested by the C’s. If so, this could take the date for the super nova back a further 200+ years. Using 1485 as a starting date, this would mean looking for a star that is currently 538 light years from Earth.​

And both Antares and Betelgeuse fit the bill.
 

Attachments

Back
Top Bottom