Although tempted to just click the dislike button regarding your post, that would be a cheap shot and unworthy of this network. So I'll try to provide some perspective and facts. First off, are you at all familiar with the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 in which U.S. President John F. Kennedy confronted the Soviet Union's First Secretary Nikita Khrushchev regarding the deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba, a mere 90 mi (140 km) from Florida, the most southern part of the U.S., a peninsula between the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico:I am really struggling with the seeming implication here. It seems as though the message is that Putin's or Russia's invasion of Ukraine is somehow justified and/or positive in its outcome. Sorry, can't accept this. Where is the "higher level help" coming from? Satan? Sure, NATO has not followed up with the assurances of Russia's security needs, but countries - if they are truly sovereign - should be able to choose which club they want to join. I simply cannot accept the current situation on any level. Regardless of what Russia is concerned about, the invasion and destruction of Ukraine and its civilian population is simply and clearly just wrong.
If Russia is concerned about biological weapons labs, they should come out and say so, clearly and unambiguously. A shred of proof would be helpful as well...
And here's the current all but identical situation with Ukraine/NATO and Russia:The Cuban Missile Crisis, also known as the October Crisis of 1962 (Spanish: Crisis de Octubre), the Caribbean Crisis (Russian: Карибский кризис, tr. Karibsky krizis, IPA: [kɐˈrʲipskʲɪj ˈkrʲizʲɪs]), or the Missile Scare, was a 1-month, 4 day (16 October – 20 November 1962) confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union which escalated into an international crisis when American deployments of missiles in Italy and Turkey were matched by Soviet deployments of similar ballistic missiles in Cuba. Despite the short time frame, the Cuban Missile Crisis remains a defining moment in U.S. national security and nuclear war preparation. The confrontation is often considered the closest the Cold War came to escalating into a full-scale nuclear war.
And it is this action by Zelensky that prompted Russia's invasion of Ukraine for demilitarisation and denazification. There are many recent posts and articles pertaining to NATO's expansion that Putin has indicated repeatedly is an unacceptable threat to Russia and more - as @Laura has indicated in response to your post. Please avail yourself of them.Putin responded to the suggestion that Ukraine could pursue nuclear weapons by saying that "this is not just bragging." "Ukraine has the nuclear technologies created back in the Soviet times and delivery vehicles for such weapons, including aircraft, as well as the Soviet-designed Tochka-U precision tactical missiles with a range of over 100 kilometers.
It is no joke how extremely close the world came to a full-fledged nuclear war because of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Thankfully, cooler heads prevailed in that Kennedy was able to reason with Khrushchev despite the 1956 banging of his shoe on a podium and saying "we will bury you!" -
That outburst by Khrushchev was never forgotten by us in America - I still remember it firmly to this day.While addressing the Western Bloc at the embassy on November 18, 1956, in the presence of communist Polish statesman Władysław Gomułka, First Secretary Khrushchev said: "About the capitalist states, it doesn't depend on you whether or not we exist. If you don't like us, don't accept our invitations, and don't invite us to come to see you. Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!"[5][6] The speech prompted the envoys from twelve NATO nations and Israel to leave the room.[5][6][7]
How the missile crisis resolved:
- Publicized removal of the Soviet Union's nuclear missiles from Cuba
- Non-publicized removal of American nuclear missiles from Turkey and Italy
- Agreement with the Soviet Union that the United States would never invade Cuba without direct provocation
- Creation of a nuclear hotline between the United States and the Soviet Union
As for the bioweapon labs, @Gawan just posted about that. And again, articles on Sott and in the Coronavirus thread and elsewhere are rife with this information including from Natural News:
The official US embassy website recently REMOVED all evidence of bio-labs in Ukraine. These bio-labs are funded and jointly operated by the US Department of Defense (DOD). The laboratory documents were public knowledge up until February 25, 2022.
Why did the US embassy official website just REMOVE all evidence of Ukrainian bioweapons labs? – NaturalNews.com
The official US embassy website recently REMOVED all evidence of bio-labs in Ukraine. These bio-labs are funded and jointly operated by the US Department of Defense (DOD). The laboratory documents were public knowledge up until February 25, 2022. These documents include important construction...www.naturalnews.com
So @rs, it is your obligation to keep yourself informed of the facts - there is no excuse for you to be as clueless as your post indicates you are. If you are unable to appropriately inform yourself, and worst yet, can't see the forest for the trees, than you are indeed in the .