Special thanks to
@Ryan for asking the scientific questions :)
While Sir Roger Penrose leans towards gravity as a link or even bridge between general relativity and quantum mechanics, I'd lean more towards Consciousness! After that, the relationship between Consciousness and Gravity isn't entirely clear, except that they're sort of mirrors of each other. It's obvious that until the conscious observer (and unconscious creator) is fully integrated into the laws of physics, the latter will remain 3D and will not be able to lead us to the mirror-like relationship between Gravity and Consciousness.
General relativity won't give us the key, since it's fundamentally limited by its 3D approach (some would say 4D, but personally, I prefer to say 3D, since the 4th dimension of space is not time... the true nature of the 4th dimension will enable us to enter into 4D consciousness). Since we're talking about a bridge between general relativity and quantum mechanics, let's ask ourselves: why doesn't what we call "antimatter" appear naturally in general relativity? This should lead us to a better understanding of the nature of the bridge between these two theories. It's a safe bet that
the very nature of the 4th dimension of space will be the KEY to answering this question.
It's easy to understand why the Einsteinian approach was unable to find the nature of this bridge, starting from a biaised 4th dimension of space. The answer is given right at the start of this memorable session :
time doesn't exist, it's an illusion due to perception :)
So there's something about the nature of Light that we don't perceive and which led Einstein to his classic computational hypotheses of relativity. More precisely, we're under an illusion as to the nature of Light.
This illusion stems from our spatial perception of Light: we project our 3D view onto our interpretation of the nature of Light. In this way, we limit Light to a 3D reality that's not false, just limited... In other words, we see Light as a classical object with 3D attributes such as speed, movement in space and time, because that's our basic 3D perception. To free ourselves from this, we need to free ourselves from 3D linear time. Then nothing is physical anymore and we enter the realm of Consciousness. Our consciousness is limited by the gravitational field inherent in our physical body - the same gravitational field that gives it its 3D structure. The less we identify with our physical body, the more our consciousness will expand to encompass 3D consciousness. To find the nature of the bridge between the two theories, we need to embrace a new way of looking at things, other than the one that gave rise to them in the first place.
We were wondering about t
he nature of the bridge between quantum mechanics and general relativity : something beyond these two theories. Let's not forget Einstein's dream:
there is a higher reality of which quantum mechanics is a child. This higher reality has a very good chance of being the bridge we've been looking for... perhaps the famous EPR interdimensional entanglement of which quantum entanglement is a faint glimpse :)
The answer to
@Ryan's question may be the one given at the outset by the Cs. When
@Laura asked "And that is apropos of what?", the Cs replied, "You will see".
As we become aware of the illusion engendered by our perception, we will realize that time does not exist and we will become aware of the nature of the bridge because we will perceive both realities, gravitational and quantum, ONE.
Can't wait to read
@Ryan's next questions on this topic!
Thanks again folks :)