Session 27 September 2025
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
The Lake Mungo geomagnetic excursion | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences https://share.google/UtUnDUsE4eZ2SeX22
When the C's said to get off social media, my first thought was, "Right, for our safety... like people being arrested for retweets in the UK."
My second thought was that maybe there's more to it than that... Getting off social media may be necessary for the protection of our own psychic/psychological health. The "doom-scrolling" and echo chamber effects are getting bad in many cases.
Well, there might be something to that... Everyone IMO needs to read this article on SOTT:
www.sott.net
It's about Nikita Bier, who is apparently the current "head of product" at X. Excerpt:
IOW, at this point, there is no 'reaching people' on social media - just the illusion of it. Worse yet, active participation in the whole thing makes it worse, not better, and may even lead to screwing with our heads in rather sneaky ways.
How beautiful it would be to create a control system that is so 'perfect', everyone in it believes they aren't being taken in because they're smarter than that - when in reality, the only way not to be taken in is not to participate. As long as everyone is believing SOME lie (big, small, whatever), they're controlled...
My second thought was that maybe there's more to it than that... Getting off social media may be necessary for the protection of our own psychic/psychological health. The "doom-scrolling" and echo chamber effects are getting bad in many cases.
Well, there might be something to that... Everyone IMO needs to read this article on SOTT:
The Behavioral Architect
How Nikita Bier spent a decade perfecting psychological control on teenagers — and now deploys it on everyone at X "Rethink Democracy." That was the tagline for Politify back in 2011. A Berkeley student project that went viral during the...
www.sott.net
It's about Nikita Bier, who is apparently the current "head of product" at X. Excerpt:
IOW, at this point, there is no 'reaching people' on social media - just the illusion of it. Worse yet, active participation in the whole thing makes it worse, not better, and may even lead to screwing with our heads in rather sneaky ways.
How beautiful it would be to create a control system that is so 'perfect', everyone in it believes they aren't being taken in because they're smarter than that - when in reality, the only way not to be taken in is not to participate. As long as everyone is believing SOME lie (big, small, whatever), they're controlled...
When the C's said to get off social media, my first thought was, "Right, for our safety... like people being arrested for retweets in the UK."
My second thought was that maybe there's more to it than that... Getting off social media may be necessary for the protection of our own psychic/psychological health. The "doom-scrolling" and echo chamber effects are getting bad in many cases.
Well, there might be something to that... Everyone IMO needs to read this article on SOTT:
The Behavioral Architect
How Nikita Bier spent a decade perfecting psychological control on teenagers — and now deploys it on everyone at X "Rethink Democracy." That was the tagline for Politify back in 2011. A Berkeley student project that went viral during the...
It's about Nikita Bier, who is apparently the current "head of product" at X. Excerpt:
IOW, at this point, there is no 'reaching people' on social media - just the illusion of it. Worse yet, active participation in the whole thing makes it worse, not better, and may even lead to screwing with our heads in rather sneaky ways.
How beautiful it would be to create a control system that is so 'perfect', everyone in it believes they aren't being taken in because they're smarter than that - when in reality, the only way not to be taken in is not to participate. As long as everyone is believing SOME lie (big, small, whatever), they're controlled...
As I was reading this, had the thought that they will maybe set up a government owned and controlled social media app. That's the only way that banning under 16's makes sense with the above article in mind and how they can influence the younger generation.
And also that this must be associated with the increase in negativity pointed out by C's on August 23 of this year.
Since then, social media has become unbearable, constantly polarizing and irritating people. You can no longer stand the flamewars in the comments, the biases, the mixture of truths and lies. It even irritates you to read people who have very good ideas in their analysis of reality, but at some point end up inserting or projecting their own problems into their ideas, and that can be demotivating.
I was reading a Facebook page by a woman with very good political ideas and fairly objective criticism. Until she contacted me via chat and we started talking.
Leaving aside some details, she reached a point where she started talking to me about her personal situation... and by the time I realized it, her proposals were being conditioned by her personal (subjective) experiences. She made comments, for example, about how she would ban live-action movies... because she finds them disgusting and they make her anxious.
Imagine my WTF face...
I'm not talking about a very young woman. I'm talking about someone in her thirties.
People are broken by things that time and the simplest of self-care can heal, and they get caught up in the diabolical game of social media, taking advantage of that to extract the emotional juice...
And in turn, it harms you, also extracting your energy through the exhaustion of the condition itself. Social media has definitely become a toxic, life-sucking swamp, and you don't want to interact with anyone anymore.
When the C's said to get off social media, my first thought was, "Right, for our safety... like people being arrested for retweets in the UK."
My second thought was that maybe there's more to it than that... Getting off social media may be necessary for the protection of our own psychic/psychological health. The "doom-scrolling" and echo chamber effects are getting bad in many cases.
Well, there might be something to that... Everyone IMO needs to read this article on SOTT:
The Behavioral Architect
How Nikita Bier spent a decade perfecting psychological control on teenagers — and now deploys it on everyone at X "Rethink Democracy." That was the tagline for Politify back in 2011. A Berkeley student project that went viral during the...
It's about Nikita Bier, who is apparently the current "head of product" at X. Excerpt:
IOW, at this point, there is no 'reaching people' on social media - just the illusion of it. Worse yet, active participation in the whole thing makes it worse, not better, and may even lead to screwing with our heads in rather sneaky ways.
How beautiful it would be to create a control system that is so 'perfect', everyone in it believes they aren't being taken in because they're smarter than that - when in reality, the only way not to be taken in is not to participate. As long as everyone is believing SOME lie (big, small, whatever), they're controlled...
Thank you for articulating this so clearly, Scottie, that sott/substack article is definitely a must-read. I’ve had scattered thoughts about this theme myself but just haven’t managed to put it into words like this.
What stands out to me is how deep the psychological engineering runs. These platforms don’t just “harvest behavioral data” — they feed it back into the system to shape behavior, to guide emotional states, and to sustain engagement. The machinery is invisible, but it works perfectly because it gives us the feeling of agency. You think you’re participating, influencing, doing something when in reality, the system is already steering the outcome, or at minimum just tiring people out.
That’s what makes it so powerful. It isn’t just about what people believe, it’s about convincing them that they’re making a difference inside a structure designed to absorb and redirect all input. The endless scroll, the short bursts of outrage, the irritation (also at the laugh-out-loud emojis from the trolls), the “interaction” that never actually moves anything. All of it keeps people busy while the architecture quietly maintains compliance.
Over time it wears people down. Not through censorship alone, but through exhaustion via constantly pulling attention and emotion into a space where nothing really changes. It’s a psychological loop disguised as participation.
Most of us here strive to keep our intention firmly in mind, knowing we are not there to change things as ‘trying to change things’ can really take a toll on the psyche. It may be an appropriate time, considering the comment by the Cs, to look again at our intentions when on social media and how this intention matches with our overall Aim and purpose, keeping in mind the potential detrimental effects on our psychological hygiene.
axj
The Living Force
There is probably a big difference between "consuming" social media in a mostly passive way and actively sharing insights that can help others who are open towards new perspectives. I think that is why Laura was sharing a lot on Twitter/X until recently.
EmeraldR
The Living Force
Thanks Scottie - I resonate so much with what you shared -When the C's said to get off social media, my first thought was, "Right, for our safety... like people being arrested for retweets in the UK."
My second thought was that maybe there's more to it than that... Getting off social media may be necessary for the protection of our own psychic/psychological health. The "doom-scrolling" and echo chamber effects are getting bad in many cases.
Well, there might be something to that... Everyone IMO needs to read this article on SOTT:
The Behavioral Architect
How Nikita Bier spent a decade perfecting psychological control on teenagers — and now deploys it on everyone at X "Rethink Democracy." That was the tagline for Politify back in 2011. A Berkeley student project that went viral during the...
It's about Nikita Bier, who is apparently the current "head of product" at X. Excerpt:
IOW, at this point, there is no 'reaching people' on social media - just the illusion of it. Worse yet, active participation in the whole thing makes it worse, not better, and may even lead to screwing with our heads in rather sneaky ways.
How beautiful it would be to create a control system that is so 'perfect', everyone in it believes they aren't being taken in because they're smarter than that - when in reality, the only way not to be taken in is not to participate. As long as everyone is believing SOME lie (big, small, whatever), they're controlled...
imo its easy to feed the beast so to speak ! -
self reflective questions worth asking (im) are : whats my motive for being here on this .... website/media platform etc amd I contributing in a benevelont way ? Is it truly useful ?
heres the major question for me- what would I be doing with my attention and energy If i wasnt spending excessive amounts of time on social media stuff ?
Instead of over -investment with time wasted /spent on the internet - I could be maybe practicing more qigong /EE, tidying the house !!
? visiting folk in local community -etc etc
again its really down to percentages of time and energy spent
speculation can be quite an addiction if taken to extremes !
again is it useful ? whats its orientation sto or sts ?where does it take me ?(mental/physical/emotional/psychicically etc?)
It can be and has been for me very addictive and another way of ducking out of taking things further in my spiritual practice !!!
recently a group of us qigong practitioners decided to set up a zoom meeting every morning for 2 hours -its been a much appreciated jump start to my practice on all levels - and within that I ve lost alot of the compulsion /habit/tendency to jump on the internet to "see whats happening etc " - in a way its light turning round the polarity of focus from outside to inside -
as with everything Ive found theres a middle way in alot of this in terms of time/investment etc and personally Ive found a much more favorable balance with a greater sense of well being and more of an inclination to do more of whats good for me and others .
for me the thread on Charlie Kirke was quite a turning point as It showed me alot about how easy its to get overly locked into something and get pretty obsesed about it who what when and why -
I could give countless more examples of these type of scenarios and they are all over the internet /social media /news channels.
The Buddha taught that delusions, along with greed and hatred, are fundamental mental afflictions, often referred to as the "three poisons" or "three defilements," that fuel suffering and the cycle of rebirth. These delusions are not merely mistaken beliefs but deep-seated misperceptions of reality, such as the false sense of a permanent self or the mistaken belief that external things like wealth or status can bring lasting happiness. The Buddha described ignorance—often translated as delusion or mis-knowledge—as the root cause of all suffering, explaining that not knowing the true nature of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path to its cessation constitutes ignorance. This delusion leads to craving and aversion, which perpetuate the cycle of samsara.
Delusions are likened to a vicious cycle where greed, hatred, and delusion feed upon one another, as depicted in the Wheel of Life with a rooster (greed), a snake (hatred), and a pig (delusion) consuming each other's tails.
The Buddha's teachings suggest that these mental states are not inherent but arise from a distorted perception of reality, making them a primary target for spiritual practice. Rather than being permanent flaws, these defilements are seen as "gifts" that point the way out of suffering when acknowledged and examined. The path to liberation involves recognizing these delusions, letting go of attachment to them, and cultivating wisdom, generosity, and lovingkindness as antidotes.
The metaphor of "feeding" delusions is used to describe how nurturing these harmful mental states leads to negative behaviors and future regret, much like consuming poison eventually causes sickness.
The Buddha emphasized that the senses themselves do not experience attachment or delusion; rather, it is the mind's conceptual elaborations and stories about experiences that create these distortions. Therefore, the practice involves becoming aware of these mental constructions and choosing not to feed them with attention or belief. As one source notes, "Don’t eat delusions," suggesting that avoiding the mental consumption of false narratives—such as the idea that traditional Buddhism is inherently unequal or that personal problems are solely individual—is essential for a more truthful and fulfilling path.
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
