Session 27 September 2025

Safe to say he already made it into some list (again), also don´t think protection means protection from a visit by your not so friendly local popo (imo). Sad that US popo is going the same route as UK ´s even considering US constitution.
 
Thank you for this new session. My next question would be: Given that the interstellar object 3i atlas was expected to be visible on October 29th after continuing its trajectory behind the sun, is it possible that it disintegrated due to the sun's energy, or is there a possibility that it stopped?
The answer to this is mostly here:


Powerful sun activity has followed Comet 3I/Atlas, the latter discharging the solar capacitor. You can see in the prior pages of the quoted thread above how Comet 3I/Atlas triggered a most powerful X flare in the other side of the sun.

According to the electrical model, the comet should be acting as a "vacuum cleaner", attracting materials from its immediate environment and getting bigger as a result. Hence, its tail drag slows it down a bit. That means, it's impossible to predict it's timing as it goes along. It might be late for the predicted path close to Jupiter next March. Same thing happens with all other comets. Moving target, for sure.

If it was a tiny comet, the solar flare would have nuked it. Cs said the nucleus is 8 km, and according to the article above, it's well and alive and accumulating material. Hence, the comet will slow down due to its tail drag.
 
I was rather interested in the following exchange about the Cosmic Mind sending clues to future events ahead of time.

Q: (Niall) They've said in the past that a Batman movie that was released in 2012-ish, which had references to the Sandy Hook shooting in the movie, even though it came out beforehand, was an instance of the Cosmic Mind sending many clues ahead of time. With the Charlie Kirk shooting, there's a 1998 Hollywood movie called Snake Eyes that has loads of similarities with the Kirk assassination. Was this another instance of that?

A: Yes there are many such instances.

Although the examples mentioned above relate to movies, I wonder if it is also true about books. I say this because I came across an example of predictive writing only recently in an article published in the UK's Daily Mail newspaper. Because the writer was French and released his book in France, I had not encountered it before, as I don't think his work of fiction gained any traction in English speaking countries. The author was Jean Raspall, a French writer and explorer, and the book concerned was 'The Camp of the Saints', a title drawn from a verse in the Book of Revelations or the Apocalypse of Saint John, which speaks of a prophecy that when the world is about to end, Satan would gather armies from the four quarters of the Earth and send out invaders "the number of whom is as the sand of the sea". These armies will surround "the camp of the saints", the last bastions of civilisation.

The book has recently been published for the first time in Britain, more than half a century after its original publication in 1973 in France where it caused quite a stir when it first appeared. Le Figaro, the French right-wing newspaper for whom Raspall wrote, panned the novel. Left-wing newspapers refused to review it. The first print run of the book failed to sell.

So, how did this controversial novel come about? Apparently, in 1971 Jean Raspall had an apocalyptic vision whilst staying at his villa located on the coast half way between Cannes and Saint-Tropez. Staring out across the sparkling blue waters of the French Riviera he imagined an invasion involving an armada of small boats crammed with immigrants packed so tightly that many were already dead, a million hungry, desperate people swarming on to the shore. Over the next few weeks Raspall would write frantically as if inspired. Quoting him:

"I had no plan and not the least idea of how things would go, nor of the characters who would populate my story. To my great surprise, my pencil raced unhindered across the paper. If ever I was inspired while writing a book, it was this one."

As the Daily Mail writer, Christopher Stevens, states:
"The Camp of the Saints is an extraordinary novel. Not all of it has come true of course - far from it. Its wilder excesses, plotline and ending stretch the limits of credulity. It reads instead like a war reporter's despatch from the mouth of Hell. Its plot is a meaningless cascade of murders, breakdowns and atrocities. Its characters are like stickmen [MJF: perhaps a reference here to the famous paintings of English artist L.S. Lowry whose works were often filled with "matchstick men" figures.] But Raspall writes with such energy, like a man possessed, that the book's 300 pages rush by.

It's a brutal, frequently sickening read. French literature often prides itself on how shocking it can be, but even by these standards Raspall is exceptional. His descriptions of the filth, degradation, sexual degeneracy and violence among the refugees is stomach-churning and at times shockingly racist.

But the novel is prescient in two remarkable ways. Firstly, there's the image of that tragic flotilla running aground on an idyllic coastline. Every day for the past ten years or more, this terrible picture has been a sad reality on the news. His nightmare vision also accurately predicted how the West would react: tormented by liberal guilt and fashionable self-loathing, the Europeans turn on each other.

The migrants inspire pity Raspall writes. "They are weak. They are unarmed. They have the power of numbers. They are the object of our remorse and of the wet-blanket humanitarianism of our consciences. And now that they are here, are we going to receive them in our home, at the risk of encouraging other flotillas or unfortunates."

An indecisive French government has no idea how to respond. It doesn't know how to round them up and send them back. It dare not intern them in refugee camps. And the idea of sending the navy to sink their boats is barbaric. Instead it blames the ordinary French people for failing to welcome the immigrants.

As demonstrations and violence break out between the locals and the new arrivals, the authorities issue an edict: Anyone found to have incited discrimination, hatred or violence against an individual or group of individuals on account of their origin or membership of a given ethnic group, nation, race or religion shall be punished with one month to one year's imprisonment and a fine ranging from 2,000 to 300, 000 Francs.

For Raspall to have thoughts of that, decades before the dawn of social media is uncanny. No wonder in later life the novelist wondered whether some unseen power had dictated the story to him as he wrote.

At this point, and as someone who lives in England, I can say that his novel eerily describes what is happening in England at the present time. For several years now, we have had tens of thousands of illegal migrants arriving on our southern shores in rubber dinghies supplied by criminal people traffickers. We presently have a government in power that wrings its hands about what to do over this crisis. It currently welcomes these illegal, so-called refugees by placing them in four star hotels and giving them benefits and free healthcare. Most of them happen to be single men of military age of whom we know nothing since they often throw away their identity papers before landing. Some of these refugees have gone on the commit serious crimes including murder and rape. Wherever the government establishes migrant hotels and centres, fear grips the local community as numerous young men who know little to nothing of our culture mill around the streets with little to do and plenty of time on their hands as their applications for asylum are slowly processed by the authorities. Many abscond and join the black economy, as they have no legal right to work here, whilst some join existing criminal gangs and networks. Even when convicted of crimes and imprisoned, they often avoid deportation due to tax funded legal assistance from a legion of human rights lawyers and the judgments of liberal minded judges who very liberally apply the protective provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights that Prime Minister Tony Blair incorporated into English law. Meanwhile the British people look on incredulously at this state of affairs wondering who will defend their rights to a quiet and safe life.

Many of those who have spoken out on social media with sometimes ill judged and inflammatory remarks, have found themselves visited by our thought police and in some cases prosecuted and put in jail for over the top, knee jerk reactions, mirroring what Raspall said in his novel about the French authorities' treatment towards those who showed hostility to the migrants. The current Labour government's measures to combat the issue falls far short of what the people expect and has seen their poll ratings nose dive even though they won an overwhelming Parliamentary majority in the national election only last year. Current polls are predicting that the Labour Party would be almost wiped out if an election were held tomorrow. There is no doubt that this is becoming an existential crisis made worse by the fact that the Labour Party relies very heavily on the migrant vote in most of England's cities, which are becoming increasingly sectarian in their politics. Meanwhile, in much of the country, the indigenous population are asking "can we have our country back".

Raspall predicted in his book that France would eventually descend into civil war with many Frenchman fighting on the side of the migrants. Could this be England's fate? I hope not. However, President Trump gave a stern warning to European governments at the United Nations during his address that illegal migration is undermining the very fabric of western Europe's civilisation. One can only hope this warning is heeded before it is too late.

Raspall's book has become something of an underground success in recent years. Although Raspall died in 2020 at the age of 94, he lived long enough to see his prophecy come true literally. In February 2001, a cargo ship with no name and no flag ran aground on the French coast. On board were 1,000 Kurdish refugees. Just as the book described, the boat beached half way between Cannes and Saint-Tropez, only 60 yards from Raspall's villa where he had first looked out to sea and imagined the immigrant invasion.

I wonder if any French Forum members have read Raspall's book. If so, I would appreciate their feedback and comments as to whether or not they think it may have been inspired by the Cosmic Mind.​
 
Q: (L) Well, do pets have identifiers like soul identifiers of humans, or do they just have the genetic thing and the life force?

A: Many pets and other non-human creatures have soul imprints.

Q: (L) But not all.

A: No

Q: (L) And it would probably be a very tedious task to go through and ask about all the different ones that do or do not, right?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And we don't want to spend that time on that.

A: No
On Youtube, I've come across a number of 'talking' dogs and cats. The owners provide and teach their pets how to use audio, talk buttons to communicate. Some owners have multiple dogs and/or cats and only one uses the buttons to 'talk'. I figure the use of these buttons to communicate may be an indication, or one type of indication, of a soul imprint, as mentioned above.

Also, in connection to this, maybe the the inclination and ability to use the talk buttons indicates the formation, or beginning of the formation, of an inner monologue by cats and dogs.

6 July 2024 said:
(A Jay) A number of people across the internet have claimed they have no inner monologue. Similarly, a researcher specializing in inner experience claims that some people never experience inner speech. Both claims, however, rely solely on people's self reports. Is it true that some people never experience inner speech?

A: Yes

Q: (A Jay) If so, why?

A: OP.

Q: (L) Does that mean that they just think in images?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Well, that's weird. I never heard of that.

(Joe) But do they think at all when they're not actually actively...

A: No

Q: (L) So they don't really think. They're reaction machines.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) It's like a monkey doing back flips in their brain?

(A Jay) Laura, I have a follow up to it. So the researcher was saying that some people have inner speech and some people don't. And similarly, there's a total of five different inner experience: inner voice, inner vision, emotions, sensations or sensory awareness, and also unsymbolized thinking. So they said that the people who don't experience inner speech are OPs. Does that then extend out to the other five methods of inner experience that this researcher talks about?

Q: (L) So name the second inner experience?

(A Jay) Inner visualization.

(L) Okay.

(A Jay) Emotion, sensory awareness and unsymbolized thinking.

A: Emotion is body swarms, not a thinking style.

Q: (L) And what's the next one? Okay, there's inner visualization... Is inner vision... Okay. Well, the question I would have is: Do the people who do not have inner speech have all the others, or do they just have nothing?

(A Jay) Are you asking me?

(L) Yes. You're the one that was researching it.

(A Jay) So it seems like some people who don't experience inner speech do experience some of these other things, although it is not a hundred percent clear to me to what extent there is or is not an overlap. Some people experience all five. Some people seem to lack one or two, but I'm not entirely clear and I haven't read that much yet to know whether it is...

A: Do more research to clarify questions. We are not here to do the work for you.

Q: (L) I mean the C’s have said, talked about emotions and that most emotions that people feel are just chemical. And a lot of it is happening in your gut, which is why you feel it in your gut. It's not a thinking style.

(Niall) Not a thinking style. So that was kind of a comment to the researchers.

(Joe) The problem is that those kind of emotional chemical body swarms give rise to thinking and then action based on them.

(L) Yeah, they definitely do. I mean, that's what Mouravieff and Gurdjieff talked about. People thinking with their emotions or being...

(Joe) Or reacting to emotional stimuli and developing narratives or theories based on them.

(Andromeda) Yeah, or even if they don't have the ability to do that with an internal monologue, they could still react to emotions.

(L) Yeah, so if they're having emotions and they don't have any ability to think with a monologue, like ask themselves...

(Andromeda) Like to talk themselves out of anything!

(L) Yeah. I mean, you got to be able to talk yourself out of stuff. Talk yourself down! [laughter]

(Ryan) Laura, would it be relevant to ask the question: What is the primary difference between the inner experience of an OP and a souled person?

(Joe) It's a bit general.

(L) Yeah. I don't know if you can... I mean, maybe we just got the clue from the previous question, which was the inner monologue maybe. Is that our clue to the primary difference between the inner landscape of an OP and a souled person?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Is it more or less the ability to kind of see yourself to have an observer in a certain sense?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Because the inner speech kind of denotes an observer. You're talking to yourself or that one part of you is talking to some other part of you.

(Andromeda) But can OPs do that to any extent as well?

A: No

Q: (Chu) But it's still a rare phenomenon not to have inner monologue, right?

(L) Well, I don't know. We don't know how rare it is. We don't have enough information. I mean, A Jay did us dirty! He didn't have enough information! [laughter]

(A Jay) I've tried to find that number of how many people the researcher has come across that don't have that inner feature and inner monologue and the best number that I can find for him is somewhere between 30 and 50%.

(Chu) Whoa!

(Gaby) Jesus.

(L) That's about right.

(Andromeda) Holy cow.

(L) That's scary.

(A Jay) But it was only in one article that he said that, and I'm having a difficult time tracking down how he came to that conclusion.

(L) Well, another question would be, I mean it would occur to me was if a person doesn't have inner speech, would they even know it?

(Joe) Exactly. If you ask them do they have an inner monologue? They go, what's an inner monologue? What do you mean inner monologue? Would you find a lot of them at Biden rallies? [laughter] Anyway, carry on...

(L) Well, it does seem that a lot of the lefties are just driven purely by emotion: reaction machines. Completely brainwashed.

Here are a few cat and dog youtube videos or channels as examples.




 
I was rather interested in the following exchange about the Cosmic Mind sending clues to future events ahead of time.



Although the examples mentioned above relate to movies, I wonder if it is also true about books. I say this because I came across an example of predictive writing only recently in an article published in the UK's Daily Mail newspaper. Because the writer was French and released his book in France, I had not encountered it before, as I don't think his work of fiction gained any traction in English speaking countries. The author was Jean Raspall, a French writer and explorer, and the book concerned was 'The Camp of the Saints', a title drawn from a verse in the Book of Revelations or the Apocalypse of Saint John, which speaks of a prophecy that when the world is about to end, Satan would gather armies from the four quarters of the Earth and send out invaders "the number of whom is as the sand of the sea". These armies will surround "the camp of the saints", the last bastions of civilisation.

The book has recently been published for the first time in Britain, more than half a century after its original publication in 1973 in France where it caused quite a stir when it first appeared. Le Figaro, the French right-wing newspaper for whom Raspall wrote, panned the novel. Left-wing newspapers refused to review it. The first print run of the book failed to sell.

So, how did this controversial novel come about? Apparently, in 1971 Jean Raspall had an apocalyptic vision whilst staying at his villa located on the coast half way between Cannes and Saint-Tropez. Staring out across the sparkling blue waters of the French Riviera he imagined an invasion involving an armada of small boats crammed with immigrants packed so tightly that many were already dead, a million hungry, desperate people swarming on to the shore. Over the next few weeks Raspall would write frantically as if inspired. Quoting him:

"I had no plan and not the least idea of how things would go, nor of the characters who would populate my story. To my great surprise, my pencil raced unhindered across the paper. If ever I was inspired while writing a book, it was this one."

As the Daily Mail writer, Christopher Stevens, states:



At this point, and as someone who lives in England, I can say that his novel eerily describes what is happening in England at the present time. For several years now, we have had tens of thousands of illegal migrants arriving on our southern shores in rubber dinghies supplied by criminal people traffickers. We presently have a government in power that wrings its hands about what to do over this crisis. It currently welcomes these illegal, so-called refugees by placing them in four star hotels and giving them benefits and free healthcare. Most of them happen to be single men of military age of whom we know nothing since they often throw away their identity papers before landing. Some of these refugees have gone on the commit serious crimes including murder and rape. Wherever the government establishes migrant hotels and centres, fear grips the local community as numerous young men who know little to nothing of our culture mill around the streets with little to do and plenty of time on their hands as their applications for asylum are slowly processed by the authorities. Many abscond and join the black economy, as they have no legal right to work here, whilst some join existing criminal gangs and networks. Even when convicted of crimes and imprisoned, they often avoid deportation due to tax funded legal assistance from a legion of human rights lawyers and the judgments of liberal minded judges who very liberally apply the protective provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights that Prime Minister Tony Blair incorporated into English law. Meanwhile the British people look on incredulously at this state of affairs wondering who will defend their rights to a quiet and safe life.

Many of those who have spoken out on social media with sometimes ill judged and inflammatory remarks, have found themselves visited by our thought police and in some cases prosecuted and put in jail for over the top, knee jerk reactions, mirroring what Raspall said in his novel about the French authorities' treatment towards those who showed hostility to the migrants. The current Labour government's measures to combat the issue falls far short of what the people expect and has seen their poll ratings nose dive even though they won an overwhelming Parliamentary majority in the national election only last year. Current polls are predicting that the Labour Party would be almost wiped out if an election were held tomorrow. There is no doubt that this is becoming an existential crisis made worse by the fact that the Labour Party relies very heavily on the migrant vote in most of England's cities, which are becoming increasingly sectarian in their politics. Meanwhile, in much of the country, the indigenous population are asking "can we have our country back".​
Same for continental Western Europe , C´s have commented on it , (macro)social engineering designed to turned it into some version of the US with all the social fragmentation that allows for increased divide and rule. At this point for ex. the Portugal that i grew up in and knew doesn´t exist anymore ( if it ever did eh ) , Lisbon is flooded with migrants so much so that it is un-recognizable from 20 years ago , the rest of the country has been following fast in the same path , same for Spain (...)
 
Q: (L) Do you have anything particular to tell us before we get started with questions?

A: Make it a point to keep a low profile from here on. Things are about to get stranger than you can imagine.

Q: (L) Does that mean on social media?
A: Yes

Now that the 2026 World Cup is coming up, the plot thickens.

Tourists from 42 countries will have to submit five years worth of social media history to enter the U.S. under a new Trump Administration proposal. The plans to overhaul the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) – the application process for non-citizens to travel to the U.S. for vacation or business – would also make applicants provide additional information about themselves and their relatives and the emails they have used for the past 10 years.
This would impact citizens of 42 countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Israel, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea, who can travel to the U.S. without a visa, but must complete the ESTA application.

Also you'll also need to give your DNA among many other new requirements.

20251211_102811.png



 
Q: (L) Do you have anything particular to tell us before we get started with questions?

A: Make it a point to keep a low profile from here on. Things are about to get stranger than you can imagine.

Q: (L) Does that mean on social media?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So, a low profile about... Do we have to stop talking about Israel? Should we?

A: It would be best.

I'm sure many of you have noticed. Since the Bondi Beach massacre it's looking more and more clear why the Cs warned about this. Pro Israel and Zionists are pushing the line that governments around the world are not doing enough to stop antisemitism. Netanyahu spoke in a way that sounds like a threat:


The founder of 'Stop Antisemitism' pretty much says antisemitic people will be hunted down:


Trump is called the 'first Jewish president' and he replies 'it's true':


And so on.

In places like the UK some people have been prosecuted already for posting or demonstrating in favor of Palestine. How long before this becomes a generalized practice across the globe?
 
In places like the UK some people have been prosecuted already for posting or demonstrating in favor of Palestine.
I agree. I posted on the Bondi thread that Israel is supposedly helping the Aus govt. investigate the shooting, and one of the articles I quoted there speaks to the capabilities that intel agencies have to investigate people who have contrarian views.
Quoting the relevant parts of the article (emphases mine) as regards surveillance:

Bondi Terrorist Attack Enters the Digital Battlefield As Mossad Does Its Own Thing​

Technology is now at the centre of Australia’s largest terrorism investigation, as Federal and NSW Police probe the Bondi Beach attack that has left 16 people dead…
Israel, widely regarded as a global leader in counter-terrorism intelligence, has issued a blistering condemnation of the Albanese Government, with senior Israeli officials accusing Canberra of having “blood on its hands” for what they describe as a failure to confront rising antisemitism and jihadist extremism.

The criticism follows Australia’s recognition of Palestinian statehood — a move Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned in August would “pour fuel on the antisemitic fire.
Police will also examine whether the suspect or associates attended recent anti-Israel protests, and whether those events acted as points of radicalisation, recruitment, or operational planning.
Authorities are deploying tools such as Verint Systems, NICE Investigate, Penlink, SS8 Networks, and BAE Systems’ Applied Intelligence to aggregate CCTV footage, licence-plate data, mobile extractions, cloud backups, social media activity, and citizen uploads.

Seized devices are being examined using forensic tools including Cellebrite UFED, Grayshift GrayKey, MSAB XRY, and Oxygen Forensic Detective — software capable of extracting deleted data, location histories, photos, communications, and application records in a forensically sound manner.
Global Intelligence Mobilised
Australia is not acting alone. Through Five Eyes intelligence sharing, Europol, Interpol, the FBI, and UK agencies including Scotland Yard, MI5, and GCHQ, investigators have access to global intelligence databases.
Within intelligence circles, speculation persists over whether Israel may pursue its own parallel inquiries to identify overseas handlers or financiers — a reminder that terrorism investigations do not always stop at national borders.
As police and ASIO comb through vast digital evidence, one truth is already clear: in the modern era of terrorism, phones, networks, and data trails often speak louder than witnesses.
 
In terms of censorship and possibly AI deleting my stuff....
I log into my Goodreads account frequently to keep track of my reading and today I looked at my 2025 year in books. After spending some time looking it over, it donned on me that Laura's Wave books were not listed. I know for a fact I read most of them this year. I looked further into it and all of her Wave books were deleted from my account except book #2 which I read last year!? What the heck!? I've never had books removed from my account before. All of the other books I read from the recommended reading list were listed. So, I added Laura's books back to my account. I'm going to keep my eye on this...
 
Q: (Joe) Is Erica Kirk legitimate?

A: A bit shady. Notice her current behavior.

Q: (Joe) Right, but she wasn't part of that or aware of the plot to kill Charlie?

A: No

Q: (L) I mean, are all of y'all kind of keeping an eye on Twitter where they show her repeatedly in different situations? I mean, not just the rally after the death of Charlie, but taking over the whole TPUSA and... I mean, if you're not aware of it, the question is not for you, but my question to all of you is: Can any of you imagine yourself in her situation acting as she is acting? I mean, really try to put yourself in her shoes. Anybody? I guess not. So, I couldn't imagine it.

(Andromeda) No, not at all.

(L) I mean, she's got two little babies and...

(Andromeda) And she's already up puttin' on a show.
James Li, an investigative journalist takes a look at Erika Kirk. She definitely has some "shady" family ties - the Jewish mob may be one of them!

@Joe and @Niall - I can't remember which one of you gents suggested that there may have been a 'plan' involving her becoming First Lady with JD Vance? Heck it could have been both of you!

Anyway, I think that was very much a legitimate thought as well as a plan, potentially even one that is ongoing, by certain sections of the low life elites. With or without the participants knowledge. They would have to break up Vance's marriage first. Was there actually an attempt to do this? Maybe....

Madam Kirk, in my opinion is coming across as a combination of a 'handler' and a 'puppet', all the while 'performing' much like a circus poodle. 🤣 No wonder people think there something "wrong" with the way she's acting. It's like it's just a performance and not a very good one at that. (Video is 12 minutes long).



 
There was in this session:
Make it a point to keep a low profile from here on. Things are about to get stranger than you can imagine.
Session 27 September 2025
Q: (L) Do you have anything particular to tell us before we get started with questions?

A: Make it a point to keep a low profile from here on. Things are about to get stranger than you can imagine.

Q: (L) Does that mean on social media?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So, a low profile about... Do we have to stop talking about Israel? Should we?

A: It would be best.

Q: (L) Should we delete our social media accounts which are full of our rants about Israel?

A: Yes

Q: (Chu) Delete our accounts or just the posts?

A: Posts if possible.

Q: (Joe) So the more inflammatory, accusatory, pointed posts referring to specifically Israel and Jewish deep-stater type things?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) But other things we can talk about?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Well, does that mean that other people are going to have to do it too? I mean like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens?

A: Let them handle it. They are better protected. In your case, knowledge protects.

Q: (Joe) Is our forum okay for posting whatever we want?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Just not public.

(Scottie) What about SOTT? That's loaded with...

A: Yes

Q: (Chu) SOTT is okay.

(Joe) So it's individual...

(L) ...Individuals that can be targeted.
The above warning regarding exposure, including the comparison with Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, resonates with:
Session 6 June 1998
A: The "main danger" is when one reveals too much before one has enough stature or notoriety, on web pages, for example. [Discussion of repercussions of 'Diana' material on web pages after Diana's death]
The initial excerpt was from the session three months ago. Since then the steps taken against people deemed to say more than they should, have continued to progress. In the thread, "The European Union: Glorious New 'Holy Roman Empire', Anglo-American Trojan Horse, or Left-Liberal Globalist Nightmare", there was recently:
The EU has been eliminating sources of information that do not conform with its official narration on the world events. But Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Moldovans seem out-of-fashion. Now, it's reaching for its own citizens. That's unprecedented act, if I'm not mistaken.
Concerning eliminating sources of information, there are also some older observations: Fake News Overlords in the EU, but the measures taken now are more direct and personal, as the following cases illustrate:
1. Jacques Baud - 57th place on the list, added on 15 Dec 2025
2. Hüseyin Doğru - 20th, sanctioned on 20.5.2025, falsely presented by MSM as Turkish national/citizen to cover up his German (unique) citizenship.
3. Nathalie Yamb - 38th, sanctioned on 26 June, 2025
The details are serious, it is more than merely accounts frozen. The post ends:
I'm afraid, that's just the beginning.
To find out where this might all end, the following from the early sessions might apply:
World will soon have nothing but credit and debit have you not heard of this new visa debit cards this is the future of money as controlled by the world banking system i.e. the brotherhood i.e. Lizards i.e. antichrist. - You will have no choices: belong or starve.
Session 16 October 1994
Q: (L) What is the meaning of the number 666 in the book of Revelation?

A: Visa.

Q: (L) You mean as in credit card?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Are credit cards the work of what 666 represents?

A: Yes?

Q: (L) Should we get rid of all credit cards?

A: Up to you.

Q: (L) Would it be more to our advantage than not to disconnect ourselves from the credit system?

A: Isn't just credit also debit.

Q: (L) Is that an affirmative.

A: How are you going to do this?

Q: (L) Well, do you have any suggestions?

A: World will soon have nothing but credit and debit have you not heard of this new visa debit cards this is the future of money as controlled by the world banking system i.e. the brotherhood i.e. Lizards i.e. antichrist.

Q: (L) If I don't have a credit card then I don't have to belong to this system?

A: No. You will have no choices: belong or starve.

Q: (L) What happened to free will?

A: Brotherhood aka Lizards aka antichrist has interfered with free will for 309000 years. They are getting desperate as we near the change.

Q: (V) It has always been my nature to rebel against that which I did not feel was good for me. Is rebellion against this system possible?

A: If you are willing to leave the body.

Q: (L) Leave the body as in death, croak, kick the bucket?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) If we were to move...

A: Changes will follow turmoil be patient.

Q: (L) We would like to move into the country. Will it be possible to get along without this credit/debit card leading that kind of life?

A: No.

Q: (L) Are they going to have the kind of capability of controlling everything and everybody no matter where they are?

A: Yes.


Q: (L) Even if we moved to Guyana and built a log hut in the rain forest and didn't bother anybody, we'd still get sucked into this thing?

A: Laura you will feel the effect of the Lizard beings desperate push for total control no matter where you go.

Q: (L) That is inexpressibly depressing. Do you understand?

A: Why? Change will follow.

Q: (L) Will it follow soon?

A: You are slipping a bit. Refer to Literature "Bringers of the Dawn". Challenge will be ecstasy if viewed with proper perspective which is not, we repeat: not of third level reality, understand?

Q: (L) In the reference cited, Joan of Arc is described as feeling ecstatic while burning at the stake. Is that what you mean?

A: Sort of, but you need not burn at the stake.

Q: (L) That's small comfort. There's other ways to die.

A: We are not speaking of death, Laura. If you listen to those who are firmly rooted in 3rd level this is when you run the risk of slipping in your knowledge learned no matter how good the intentions i.e. L*** {Laura’s then husband, now ex-husband}.

Q: (L) What do you mean about L***?

A: Guyana.

Q: (L) What do you mean "Challenge will be ecstasy"? What sort of challenge?

A: Living through the turmoil ahead.

Q: (L) Several books I have read have advised moving to rural areas and forming groups and storing food etc...

A: Disinformation. Get rid of this once and for all. That is 3rd level garbage.

Q: (L) We feel pretty helpless at the mercy of beings who can come in and feed off of us at will. Do we have someone on our side, pulling for our team, throwing us energy or something?

A: Who do you think you have been communicating with?

Q: (L) Are you going to be able to assist us through this turmoil?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Are you going to?

A: Up to you.

Q: (L) If we call, can we get your assistance?

A: All you have to do is ask.

Q: (L) Will we go through any periods when we may be cut off from help?

A: You are never ever cut off.

Q: (L) Oh, I don't want to suffer!

A: You need not suffer. Stop thinking 3rd level.

Q: (L) I don't want anybody I love to suffer either. I don't want any pain. I've suffered enough!

A: You are stuck at 3rd level tonight.

Q: (L) It's not just that. There is so much disinformation you just don't know who to believe... I mean, how do we know we can believe you? There are so many sources out there deceiving and they do it so cleverly. Look at the Bible... for 2,000 years people have been believing that...

A: They deceive when you allow it.

Q: (L) I know you are supposed to take some things on faith... but, do you see my problem here?

A: Yes, but you don't.

Q: (L) What is my problem?

A: Mental block.

Q: (L) In the recent past you indicated that chapter 24 of Matthew and chapter 21 of Luke, were given by Jesus after his extended sleep state. Now, both of those chapters refer to the present time as being like the days of Noah. Is that a correct assessment?

A: In a sense and individual events are as yet undetermined.

Q: (L) Well, the story of Noah tells us that Noah was told to build an ark.

A: Symbolic.

Q: (L) Yet Noah built an ark. Was it true that certain individuals, whoever they were, built boats or did things to survive that terrible cataclysm?

A: No. Look at it this way. Noah built a boat because it seemed like an enjoyable enterprise and when the flood came it came in handy, see?

Q: (L) So, you are saying that if we do what we do because we enjoy it that we will be in the right place at the right time, doing the right thing when whatever happens happens, right?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Are you saying that we will be led to do what we should be doing and be where we should be?

A: You will just fall into it but if you force things you run the risk of going astray.
The above " controlled by the world banking system i.e. the brotherhood i.e. Lizards i.e. antichrist" may connect with the discussion of the illuminati in the following excerpt:
The illuminati has been described as being behind or with the brotherhood which has been described as being in connection with the Lizard beings... - Close. But not that simple.
Session 12 November 1994
Q: (L) Back to the quorum and illuminati.

A: Quorum mostly alien; illuminati mostly human.

Q: (L) Well, the quorum has been described...

A: Meet; two halves of whole.

Q: (L) Well the quorum seems to be described as being in touch with the Cassiopaeans, that is, yourselves, which you have described as beneficial beings, is this correct?

A: Close.

Q: (L) The illuminati has been described as being behind or with the brotherhood which has been described as being in connection with the Lizard beings...

A: Close. But not that simple.


Q: (L) Well, if the quorum is the good guys and the illuminati is the bad guys, and they both are at the high levels of Freemasonry, what is the story here?

A: Picture a circle or cycle first now then contemplate for a moment before follow up.

Q: (L) Okay, I am contemplating a cycling circle.

A: Now, two halves representing positive and negative. Two halves.

Q: (L) Well, what I am getting out of that is the two halves and both sides are playing with the human race. Is that it?

A: No. This is complicated but if you can learn and understand, it will be a super revelation.

Q: (L) Well, go ahead and explain.

A: Ask step by step.

Q: (L) Why do we so often have to ask things step by step?

A: In order to absorb the information.

Q: (L) The quorum is described as the good guys. The illuminati is described as bad guys. And yet, they are both Masonic. When a person in the Masonic organization reaches the higher levels, are there individuals at the higher levels recruiting masons to one side or the other?

A: First, not exactly one side or another.

Q: (L) I am beginning to not understand something here because if the Lizzies...

A: Unblock.

Q: (L) I don't have a block here. If the brotherhood AKA illuminati AKA Lizzies AKA beast are the ones who are going to do detrimental things to this planet, how are they related or connected to the quorum which is in touch with...

A: This will take time to explain be patient it will be worth it.

Q: (L) Well, are you going to explain it right now?

A: Ask step by step.

Q: (L) Okay. What is the nature of evil?

A: Blend.

Q: (L) Are the Lizzies what we would consider to be evil?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Are the Cassiopaeans what we would consider to be good?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Yet, do the Cassiopaeans use and manipulate the Lizzies to accomplish certain things?

A: No.

Q: (L) The Lizzies work independently and in opposition to the Cassiopaeans?

A: Independently, not in opposition.

Q: (L) Well then, is there somebody over and above this whole project...

A: We serve others therefore there is no opposition. Careful now. Step by step. If you do not fully understand answer ask another.

Q: (L) Part of a whole. Part of a circle.

A: Blend.

Q: (L) Does this mean...

A: Picture a blending colored circle image.

Q: (L) Are you saying that at some levels the two halves overlap?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Are you saying that some of the Quorum are good guys and bad guys and the same for the Illuminati because the two are on opposing sides of the circle but at the point of blending one is weighted more to one side and the other to the other side? And these organizations are where the interactions come together?

A: Closer.

Q: (L) Let's leave it for the time being.

A: No. Now please.

Q: (L) Okay. So it is a blending. Does it have something to do with ... in your case service to others means that you even serve those who serve self, is that correct?

A: Yes; we serve you and the Lizards have programed your race to self service remember.

Q: (L) Well, I am down a notch or two. So, I am still a service to self individual to some extent, is that correct?

A: But moving slowly toward service to others. Not all humans are.

Q: (L) Does this mean that when people who are members of the quorum or illuminati call for information or help, that you, because of your service to others orientation are obliged to answer whoever calls?

A: Yes and no.

Q: (L) What is the no part.

A: If vibrational frequencies are out of pattern we do not connect.

Q: (L) Is the work of the Lizzies part of an overall grand plan or design?

A: All is.

Q: (L) Let's go on. I am depressed because you guys told me I was a bad person.

A: You are not a bad person.

Q: (L) Well, I am feeling pretty crummy right now.

A: Lizzies induced.

Q: (L) You mean my crummy feelings are Lizzie induced?

A: As always.

Q: (L) Well I am feeling crummy because you guys let me know that I am in the same sinking boat as the rest of the poor slobs on this miserable planet. I was working pretty hard to get out of the boat.

A: Silliness; you're in your own boat.

Q: (L) I would like to know where Dr. Usui got the Reiki symbols?

A: Must answer question.

Q: (L) What question? The quorum and illuminati question?

A: You will feel ecstasy once answered.

Q: (L) Okay. A blending. Yet two halves.

A: Of a circle.

Q: (L) Who designed this circle?

A: Natural frequency wave. Some near conjunction blend both service patterns and each "camp" to create perfect balance.

Q: (L) Okay, so the Illuminati are the higher level on the pathway of service to self and somehow, by reaching these higher levels may have come to realizations or frequencies which have caused their position to be modified or blended to where service to self becomes or incorporates or moves them to service to others realizations, is this correct?

A: Continue.

Q: (L) Okay, the ones in the quorum are those who are focused on service to others and they, in their pathway of service to others begin to understand that some service to self is service to others.

A: Close.

Q: (L) And the whole idea is to blend both pathways no matter which direction you come to it from?

A: Service to others provides the perfect balance of those two realities; service to self is the diametrical opposite closing the grand cycle in perfect balance.

Q: (L) So it is necessary to have a pathway of service to self in order for the pathway of service to others to exist?

A: Yes.


Q: (L) And those who are in the quorum and the illuminati ...

A: Blends in middle.


Q: (L) So it is necessary to have the darkness in order to have the light...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And it is necessary to have the Lizzies in order to have the Cassiopaeans...

A: Close.

Q: (L) And both groups evolved through the Masonic organizations..

A: Freemasonry is human reflection in physical of these processes.

Q: (L) Okay, thank you very much. I think that is all for tonight.
The next, like Session 16 October 1994, mentions banks, and like Session 12 November 1994 also the illuminati:
When you store it in the bank, you are helping the Brotherhood AKA Illuminati AKA Antichrist multiply it for itself, all you get is the "crumbs" left over.
Session 25 November 1995
Q: (S) Rule number two is that you have to save your money.

A: You save your money by multiplying it, not storing it.

Q: (L) Are you saying that putting it in a bank is "storing" it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Are you saying that money is only "saved" if it is multiplied?

A: Yes. When you store it in the bank, you are helping the Brotherhood AKA Illuminati AKA Antichrist multiply it for itself, all you get is the "crumbs" left over. And, the Antichrist can "call it in" anytime it wants to!

Q: (L) One of the most popular ways to make money by investing is in the stock market. But, it seems to me that the stock market is also part of the Antichrist system and investing there would also amount to only getting "crumbs."

A: Yes and no. Not all stocks traded publicly are under direct control of the Illuminati.

Q: (L) Are you suggesting the stock market as a means of multiplying money?

A: We are not suggesting anything specific, we are just laying the groundwork. With the general clues we give you, you will figure out the details yourselves, which is tantamount to learning, which is how you progress as souls.

Q: (L) You said we should multiply our money and that storing it is not making it work for you....

A: If you notice, all successful business people do this. They multiply their money, expand their horizons, continuously. They multiply their money by multiplying their output, thus their intake likewise. And the process is never ending, because they understand instinctively that it is part of a cycle. For the intake to continue, it must not be only retained, but must increase in order to keep pace with the ever spiraling cycle of increase and expansion. And, for this to happen, the output must be expanded accordingly. When it stops, it collapses. And this is how the Illuminati AKA The Brotherhood AKA The Antichrist creates a "Panic," by stemming the flow, even only slightly, and then broadcasting the created impression aggressively.

Q: (S) Well, investing is fine if you have money, but Laura and Frank don't have any money to invest. What would be a way for them to do this?

A: One example would be to share their experiences, insights, and learnings. One way to replicate such would be to publish, for example.
In continental Europe and the EU, Germany plays a significant role. Some also attribute the origins of the EU, to be in part a German idea: Joseph P. Farrell has written the book, The Third Way, The Nazi International, European Union, and Corporate Fascism
Besides the Nazi plans for Europe (German Wiki), and Eastern Europe during the leadership of the USSR, there was earlier the Roman Empire, the Catholic Church with Latin being a lingua franco among the learned, the Holy Roman Empire, and the First French Empire. Consequently, the European Union has old roots.

On SOTT, there area many articles relating to the origins and policies of the EU. The following are not ordered according to date, but they give an idea of the complexity of the history behind the origin of the EU, and its policies:
Perhaps it could be said about the EU as it was said in the following about the Third Reich:

And who created the Third Reich? - Illuminati.
The context with some tape malfunction was:

Session 6 June 1998
Q: {Question lost because of tape malfunction.}

A: Part of it, but others do not want them to be found much more!

Q: {Question lost because of tape malfunction.}

A: Some.

Q: {Question lost because of tape malfunction.}

A: Yes.

Q: {Question lost because of tape malfunction.}

A: It was der Fuhrer who tried hardest. But not nearly enough.

Q: {Question lost because of tape malfunction.}

A: Find it in order to supercede the very power structure that created him.

Q: What power structure was this?

A: The "Third Reich."

Q: And who created the Third Reich?

A: Illuminati.


Q: So Hitler thought he could find something that would enable him to take complete control...

A: Sort of like a termite trying to vanquish "Orkin."
The Germans took much of the blame for WWII, but if the illuminati is not only German, but global what would be an objective and balance perspective on what happened, and what would it mean for today? Continuing with a note about money, that relates back to the earlier quoted excerpt from Session 25 November 1995, there was:

On the money issue, would it be a good idea to invest in silver or gold? - Partly, but what about "needful things"?
Session 26 April 2014
Q: (L) In short, be circumspect, I think. (KJN) What is the status of the money system in the United States? If you have money in the bank, can you leave it there, or should we be doing something more proactive?

A: If you store it with the fox, you will lose it at some point rather soon.

Q: (Odyssey) On the money issue, would it be a good idea to invest in silver or gold?

A: Partly, but what about "needful things"?

Q: (KJN) So we should spend it on things we need now, versus spending it on gold or putting in a bank or that kind of thing?

A: Mostly. Money will soon be worthless, ownership will survive awhile longer.
Concerning silver and gold mentioned above, there was yesterday a new thread: Silver goes ballistic and shakes the financial system and today, the concerns in the EU related threads gave way to: Worldwide Online and Offline Totalitarian Censorship and Dictatorship. It is too early to say how the situation will develop, but judging from the old excerpts quoted above we can have an idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom