Lately, I've been participating as a visitor in meetings of a Sufi group. I've seen that they have a sincere search for knowledge and that their Sheikhs are a married couple (a man and a woman). This latter aspect is unusual in Sufism, as the Sheikhs (masters) are generally men and almost never a couple.
Despite this, in religious ceremonies, women sit separately from the men and do not participate in the prayer and dance circles.
Sufis are very open-minded, but the rules of tradition are inviolable: such as fasting, not eating pork, saying daily prayers, and not drinking wine.
I wonder if this secondary role of women is a response to the despotic matriarchy that lasted for several thousand years. I ask myself the same question about Catholicism.
And perhaps the myth of Eve's temptation by the serpent on the tree of knowledge speaks to this era of matriarchy and Lizzie's influence on the restructuring of society.
Was patriarchy a counterrevolutionary movement? Why did monotheistic religions strengthen patriarchy? Did the 4D SAS favor periods of matriarchy or patriarchy to their advantage, only to create divisions? Does the 4D SAS not care who is in power, whether men or women? Isn't there a more favorable energy for the 4D SAS's plans, feminine or masculine?
I know that in certain Native American ceremonies, women took role that looked passive, but it was not passive at all. While sitting in silence, they were in a meditative transceiver state, holding the prayer, so to speak. This receivership capability is their natural talent, while the men took care of the structure of it all, singing, drumming, the fire, etc. To an outsider, it would look like a men active and included/women passive and excluded thing, while in reality each sex was participating according to their innate abilities.