Session 28 June 2025

[Cordillera]

I know that in certain Native American ceremonies, women took role that looked passive, but it was not passive at all. While sitting in silence, they were in a meditative transceiver state, holding the prayer, so to speak. This receivership capability is their natural talent, while the men took care of the structure of it all, singing, drumming, the fire, etc. To an outsider, it would look like a men active and included/women passive and excluded thing, while in reality each sex was participating according to their innate abilities.

I believe the same as you, that women have a role to lead the prayer and men to pray.

But these are just my assumptions. I have no proof of this. Maybe I'm just filling in the blanks to make myself feel better about the situation.

In the Mapuche culture (an indigenous people of South America), women actively participate in rituals, singing and dancing, although they don't usually take on leadership roles, except in a healing ritual called Machitún.

 

[Ruth]

Like many others, I was puzzled over Trump’s public management of the Iran situation. But I knew, too, given his own inconsistencies (whether strategic or not), the obvious stakes of the situation, the insane behavior of the Israeli side in particular, and the forces arrayed against peaceful resolution, that he was in an incredibly difficult position. He had to thread a needle and appears unlikely to have succeeded.

I think it comes down to hubris as well as thinking the Israelis are actually genuine and honest about ANYTHING they say.

I was watching the news loop at my mother's place. She had the sound off and it was the moment that that 'demon's spawn' (i.e. Netanyahu) stood up and 'presented' Donald Trump with a nomination for a Nobel 'Peace' Prize. What a joke! And then I looked at the glum faced and less than impressed expressions of his Cabinet members. Apparently they are not as good an actor as Trump is.

Has anyone thought of nominating Netanyahu for an Anti-Christ award? I thought "they" might try and martyr him at some point in order to get their war with Iran, but it seems like they get everything they want because of Zionist plants and the Trump Administration. Netanyahu's 'overlords' can probably dispose of him now, and everyone will be relieved. I don't think he'll be coming back, seeing he's a psychopath and all. He'll have to hang out with all the other demons and be one of their minions.

I've decided to write a little song, not sure how long it'll take, but it'll go to the music of "Have some Madera M'dear" and it'll be very rude and sarcastic towards a certain Middle East Country with expansionist ideas as well as the Trump Administration's slavist devotionalist zombie supporters. Who knows, maybe we can make it a group project?

 

[uno]

Thank you for the session!

 

[Serendipity]

I found this session very interesting because they touched on matriarchy. I would love to learn more. I am doing my dissertation using decolonial feminist theory, and it is hard for me to accept that the disadvantages and suffering that women have endured, let's say, since the "New World," are justified because they massacred men. I understand the karmic and genetic part, but the C's said it was partly it. There must be more to this background, and it's surely worth discussing. Why did I think that in matriarchies, there was more peace and justice in society and towards Mother Earth? Anti-feminism is going to the other extreme. My understanding is that we have been both male and female in our journey, so we need to solve this divide for our own good.

Modern feminism (anti patriarchy and anti capitalism) and social and gender equality(of outcome a.k.a. road to communism) ideologies are in their essence anti life.

Life flows freely in accordance with the creators design and with respect to free will. It is reflected in the free market principle, and the best representation of that principle that we have in this world so far is the capitalist system (which of course has been meddled with by governments interferance and often times with the help of those same insidious ideologies like neo feminism and 'equality' and give money/power from hands of earners and builders(mostly men) to hands of consumers (mostly women). That is clear interferance in the natural flow of the free market, and thus in the natural flow of life.

Feminist ideologies are false and are actively contributing and leading to the downfall of civilisation. Women in general have always had advantage in life compared to men. It's a simple fact of life because (in general) everything that men do and create and fight for, they do for women. They go 'hunting in the wilderness' for women, they go to war for women, they build homes (and the civilisation) itself for women. Because women both can't and don't want to do that. And that is okay. We are not the same. Men are not same as women. Women (in their general aspect) mostly want to receive and men(in their general aspect) mostly want to give. Men build and provide and protect, women nurture, make house into a warm home and raise children. We are different and that is okay.

The advice that neo feminism gives to women is advice for men! 'be strong independent career oriented woman' a.k.a. be a man, a.k.a. don't be a woman, a.k.a. anti life. And simoultaneously for some devious reason it hates men, it wants to take away power from men, a.k.a make men weaker, which is a recipe for downfall of civilisation. Remember it's weak men make hard times (for a reason), not weak women.

And men have been doing those unwanted dangerous jobs (including dying in wars) so that women(and children) would be protected, sacrificing themselves for women. Almost no woman would do the same. We are not equal. And it's a basic law of life that the one who would sacrifice their life for the other is the one who is in charge. Power and responsibility come one with another. No (sane) woman wants that responsibility that comes with that power of authority. Feminism wants just the power for women (and to steal it from men unfairly avoiding the free market rules), but none of the responsibility.

And don't forget that the majority of useless jobs that have been artificially created by the government are occupied by women. Most of the bureaucracy jobs, most of the social and gender studies jobs (and not the arctic drilling jobs or construction jobs etc.) are done by women. And it seems your study is a path to that same type of useless job that is feeding the anti life system that is draining resources from men and by extension and down the line draining the resources from women too. Because men in general spend their resource on women. And just like in the self sacrifice example, the vice versa isn't true. And that is another (of the many pro life reasons) why men by natural order, the order of the free market of life itself, are the ones that are supposed to be in charge. Because a man protects, provides and is willing to self sacrifice for his woman. At least a strong man does. Patriarchy works (for the good of men and women alike and the civilisation as a whole... it's the best system that we have had that has proved that it works).

If it's up to neo feminist ideology, all men should be weak and then down the line that would lead to their extermination and the extermination of life in general. Neo feminism is like the devouring/destructive aspect of the feminine, like the example of godess Shiva the destroyer.

I read somewhere that the bravery/strength of a man is in his ability to lead and the bravery/strength of a woman is in her ability to follow. Today we have a population of weak cowardly both men and women, and it is not leading our society as a whole to nowhere good, as we can all notice. But I believe it's up to men to take charge and responsibility to become strong (because we are supposed to be leaders by natures design, and women in general aren't designed to be leaders..mostly because of their emotional/hormonal natures), and then women would naturally follow. And feminism ideology is one of the obstacles that's standing in the way of that. There are smart women out there who understand that they don't want and are mot man, and are happy to find and follow a good man who will be the head of the family.

That partly part you are missing that Cs replied as the answer to the question about islamic(still traditional) countries, likely is answered (at least in part) in my post about likely actual practical usefuleness of women body coverings (from higher perspective and in possible memory and understanding of what the feminism-like ideology corruption did to both men and women and the society as a whole in past and now extinct civilisations), the post that you very likely disliked on the emotional reaction.
But maybe I'm wrong.

 

[ElmerDirtly]

Meditate en masse.

Thank you for freely sharing this session.
The above quoted had me, for whatever reason, drawing up Marciniak’s BOTD and the pleiadians speaking of “us” (presumably with the appropriate frv) as “Keepers Of The Frequency”. Suspect that applies to the majority here, but quite possibly also to many on this planet at this time who will never read the millions of words recorded on this site, yet who live the “ideals” as a matter of course. As keepers of the frequency, because that’s who they are. And, as such, maybe all KOTF are already meditating en masse from that part of us which IS 4th or 6th density. Maybe…

 

[Viktor]

Modern feminism (anti patriarchy and anti capitalism) and social and gender equality(of outcome a.k.a. road to communism) ideologies are in their essence anti life.

Life flows freely in accordance with the creators design and with respect to free will. It is reflected in the free market principle, and the best representation of that principle that we have in this world so far is the capitalist system (which of course has been meddled with by governments interferance and often times with the help of those same insidious ideologies like neo feminism and 'equality' and give money/power from hands of earners and builders(mostly men) to hands of consumers (mostly women). That is clear interferance in the natural flow of the free market, and thus in the natural flow of life.

Feminist ideologies are false and are actively contributing and leading to the downfall of civilisation. Women in general have always had advantage in life compared to men. It's a simple fact of life because (in general) everything that men do and create and fight for, they do for women. They go 'hunting in the wilderness' for women, they go to war for women, they build homes (and the civilisation) itself for women. Because women both can't and don't want to do that. And that is okay. We are not the same. Men are not same as women. Women (in their general aspect) mostly want to receive and men(in their general aspect) mostly want to give. Men build and provide and protect, women nurture, make house into a warm home and raise children. We are different and that is okay.

The advice that neo feminism gives to women is advice for men! 'be strong independent career oriented woman' a.k.a. be a man, a.k.a. don't be a woman, a.k.a. anti life. And simoultaneously for some devious reason it hates men, it wants to take away power from men, a.k.a make men weaker, which is a recipe for downfall of civilisation. Remember it's weak men make hard times (for a reason), not weak women.

And men have been doing those unwanted dangerous jobs (including dying in wars) so that women(and children) would be protected, sacrificing themselves for women. Almost no woman would do the same. We are not equal. And it's a basic law of life that the one who would sacrifice their life for the other is the one who is in charge. Power and responsibility come one with another. No (sane) woman wants that responsibility that comes with that power of authority. Feminism wants just the power for women (and to steal it from men unfairly avoiding the free market rules), but none of the responsibility.

And don't forget that the majority of useless jobs that have been artificially created by the government are occupied by women. Most of the bureaucracy jobs, most of the social and gender studies jobs (and not the arctic drilling jobs or construction jobs etc.) are done by women. And it seems your study is a path to that same type of useless job that is feeding the anti life system that is draining resources from men and by extension and down the line draining the resources from women too. Because men in general spend their resource on women. And just like in the self sacrifice example, the vice versa isn't true. And that is another (of the many pro life reasons) why men by natural order, the order of the free market of life itself, are the ones that are supposed to be in charge. Because a man protects, provides and is willing to self sacrifice for his woman. At least a strong man does. Patriarchy works (for the good of men and women alike and the civilisation as a whole... it's the best system that we have had that has proved that it works).

If it's up to neo feminist ideology, all men should be weak and then down the line that would lead to their extermination and the extermination of life in general. Neo feminism is like the devouring/destructive aspect of the feminine, like the example of godess Shiva the destroyer.

I read somewhere that the bravery/strength of a man is in his ability to lead and the bravery/strength of a woman is in her ability to follow. Today we have a population of weak cowardly both men and women, and it is not leading our society as a whole to nowhere good, as we can all notice. But I believe it's up to men to take charge and responsibility to become strong (because we are supposed to be leaders by natures design, and women in general aren't designed to be leaders..mostly because of their emotional/hormonal natures), and then women would naturally follow. And feminism ideology is one of the obstacles that's standing in the way of that. There are smart women out there who understand that they don't want and are mot man, and are happy to find and follow a good man who will be the head of the family.

That partly part you are missing that Cs replied as the answer to the question about islamic(still traditional) countries, likely is answered (at least in part) in my post about likely actual practical usefuleness of women body coverings (from higher perspective and in possible memory and understanding of what the feminism-like ideology corruption did to both men and women and the society as a whole in past and now extinct civilisations), the post that you very likely disliked on the emotional reaction.
But maybe I'm wrong.

From Biology POV. Female exists to bring creation. While male exists to further genetic mutation in the creation.
Genetically speaking, maleness has a propinquity for diversity and adventure.

 

[Serendipity]

From Biology POV. Female exists to bring creation. While male exists to further genetic mutation in the creation.
Genetically speaking, maleness has a propinquity for diversity and adventure.

It is actually the masculine that is a creative/order building/active force/aspect of the universe. And feminine aspect is a 'passive' and receiving raw potential/canvas of the universe that receives and nurtures (or in its 'dark' aspect destroys).

And the masculine gives. And also by extension leads, while the feminine follows. At least by the grand design of life/creation.

Feminism like ideologies aim to twist the natural order of life and thus of reality itself. That's why they are anti life and thus false and destructive.

 

[axj]

Patriarchy works (for the good of men and women alike and the civilisation as a whole... it's the best system that we have had that has proved that it works).

Neither patriarchy or matriarchy (extreme feminism) really works, in my view - both seem to be extreme swings on a pendulum to bring imbalance to humanity.

And the masculine gives. And also by extension leads, while the feminine follows. At least by the grand design of life/creation.

That does not seem to be true either. A more accurate description is that the feminine directs by receiving divine guidance and the masculine leads by putting it into form.

The feminine is the Director, while the masculine is the Leader. They are different, but equal and neither is subordinate to the other.

 

[cbi]

A: Partly sabotage of unstable system. Now is not a good time in Earth's history and trajectory to become so dependent on either electrical or solar energy.
Q: (L) Why is that?
A: The systems are likely to be "fried".

---

Do you people think it will be something that will throw us back to the 19th century, totally without electricity. Or "just" cause frequent glitches and blackouts?

Most of the digital currency and bank system run on Utility Line or “Green” Solar Panels; fuel-powered generators are now not recommended in data-centers nor hospitals or medical-centers.

Have been suggested an alternate energy system not fossil based?

 

[Serendipity]

Neither patriarchy or matriarchy (extreme feminism) really works, in my view - both seem to be extreme swings on a pendulum to bring imbalance to humanity.

Patriarchy works just fine. Best structure we have had (in the current world and current level of people) that actually worked. And it's a natural result of the free market of life of both feminine and masculine exchanges on the market. If that makes sense.

That does not seem to be true either. A more accurate description is that the feminine directs by receiving divine guidance and the masculine leads by putting it into form.

The feminine is the Director, while the masculine is the Leader. They are different, but equal and neither is subordinate to the other.

Well said. 'Women are life'. Men's actions are directed by women. Women want/reward dominant and controlling and masculine and strong men. You can even say that women want patriarchichal men.
Men act and have acted in the ways that naturally result in the formation of patriarchies as directed by women themselves! By the laws of the free market of life itself (like social and sexual market value exchange).

So yes the feminine is directing men to be manly and strong, while insidious feminism is trying to direct men to be weak.

 

[Celestial Marriage]

I found this session very interesting because they touched on matriarchy. I would love to learn more. I am doing my dissertation using decolonial feminist theory, and it is hard for me to accept that the disadvantages and suffering that women have endured, let's say, since the "New World," are justified because they massacred men. I understand the karmic and genetic part, but the C's said it was partly it. There must be more to this background, and it's surely worth discussing. Why did I think that in matriarchies, there was more peace and justice in society and towards Mother Earth? Anti-feminism is going to the other extreme. My understanding is that we have been both male and female in our journey, so we need to solve this divide for our own good.

I feel like I should offer my aspect on this. I got a long history with feminism.

First I come from a planet where only one sex exists. We are hermaphrodites there. In this life on Earth I'm psychologically hermaphrodite, but physically more towards male. My puberty was delayed for 5-10 years, some things more than other.

When I didn't look like a kid anymore, I chose to present as a female. I lived as female from 19 to 33. And I studied feminism, wrote a paper on Virginia Woolf, was rather avid advocate against violence versus women. I live in Latvia which is a post USSR country and STS patriarchy was rampant here.

Along my spiritual journey I found out that I'm supposed to live as a male and my mission is to understand 2 sexes system and marriage compared to one sex system and different type of family structure from my home planet.

So from 33 I started to live as a male. I'm 38 now. That meant I had to use different hormones daily. Basically I changed my sex twice.

***

So I really want to draw separation from STO romantic relationship models and STS.

STO means that both partners help each other, do their gender roles, are happy with their bodies, dominant energy for
male is masculine and for female is feminine. But STO are givers. Both parties give their time, mental and emotional energy to sustain
the relationship, marriage, kids, family company etc.

Yes, man is supposed to provide for family, but if the man is a teacher with 1500 euros a month wage (Latvia examples), but woman is an engineer with 3200 euros a month wage, but man is a great specialist and works with devotion, you can't expect him to work 24 hours a day, just because government doesn't value teachers.



In STS model things can get dirty very quick. There is manipulation from both sides, male and female. Females can be snakes,
males can be psychopaths and tyrants. STS girls want money, gifts, time, but don't want to raise kids. They want more things.
Materialism is the key often in STS relationships. Males want pretty and young bodies without long term stuff. Pay alimony, but be free and move on to a younger girl/woman.

Without writing an essay, the main thing is - as a STO person, don't try to make things work with someone who is egoistical and thinks
hedonism, self-gratification, power for power's sake and exploitation by outsmarting sheep-type people is good.

***

Try to find another STO person and work from there. Good luck.

 

[axj]

Patriarchy works just fine. Best structure we have had (in the current world and current level of people) that actually worked.

Patriarchy is an imbalanced system, but it does not really exist in the Western world anymore. True patriarchy can still be witnessed in parts of the Islamic world. Does that work just fine in your view?

In my view, a pretty good balance was achieved around the middle of the 20th century in the West and since then there has been a push to force the pendulum towards extreme feminism, which is also imbalanced.

 

[Digmo]

(Joe) But are we talking about women who are physically stronger than men in 5000 BC?

A: No.

Q: (Joe) So why did men allow women who were physically weaker than them to massacre them?

(L) Read the myths. It'll tell you how. I mean, consider the story of Judith and Holofernes in the Bible. She waited until he was asleep, and put a tent peg against the side of his head, and hit it with a hammer. I mean, women have all kinds of ways.

This made me think of the 'Benne Gesserit' from the Dune books.

• • Mystical Practices:
    Their rituals and training methods are heavily influenced by mysticism, contributing to their mystique and aura of power.
  • Breeding Program: The Bene Gesserit have a long-term selective breeding program aimed at creating the kwisatz Haderach, a male Bene Gesserit with the ability to see into the past and future
  • Superhuman abilities: Through rigorous training, they develop abilities like heightened senses, manipulation of their bodies (including control over heart rate, blood flow, and even gender selection at conception), and the "Voice," a mind-altering vocal technique
  • Strategic Influence: They operate behind the scenes, using their skills and knowledge to subtly guide the course of galactic politics and events, often through placing their agents in positions of power and influencing key decisions

 

[Ricardo]

Not an easy answer , for one , the adamics split from what were once united parts and then there's a bunch of groups on this planet who do not share the same past , like the kantekkians for example . And then there's those whose goals are explicitly against any balanced Female /Male society/environment ,and will spare no efforts against it.

 

[Jones]

Q: (Jones) Stephen Porges Polyvagal Theory states that the ventral vagal nerve is myelinated and projects to the organs above the diaphragm, the dorsal vagal nerve is non-myelinated and projects to sub-diaphragmatic organs. However, he also mentions that there are some non-myelinated nerves that arise in the dorsal nucleus of the vagus and project to the heart in mammals. The role of these non-myelinated nerves to the heart are not definitively understood. What is the role of these non-myelinated nerves that project from the dorsal nucleus to the heart?

A: Feedback

The answer of 'feedback' makes sense from the perspective of Porges stating that the majority of the nerve fibres in the vagus nerve are afferent or sensory nerves.

He also says of this nerve that nobody really knows what it does, that when stimulated in rabbits it reduces heart rate, but has no effect when stimulated in cats and dogs. But apparently there isn't much by way of research into this nerve.

A number of questions come up about it:

- It might be that the ratio of afferent and efferent fibres can vary between individuals and species, but it's curious that in the animal kingdom rabbits are prey species and dogs and cats are predators.

- Dark personalities are shown to have differences in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex, but I suspect that if Porges is correct about the operation of the ANS and neuroception - that he describes as the nervous system picking up on signals of safety or danger, then they may also have differences in either the anatomy or function of the autonomic nervous system. But if that's the case, what comes first? Feedback from the vagus nerve and autonomic nervous system or function of the amygdala and HPA axis? Porges model, if correct, would suggest that feedback from the ANS would come first, so does that mean that the amygdala is underdeveloped in dark personalities because they are not getting feedback from the ANS?

- Years ago when I was studying fear aggression in dogs I come across some papers on chronic restraint stress. If a laboratory rat was restrained the hippocampus stopped producing new cells and started to shrink in size and under those circumstances the amygdala actually grew bigger and the subject had higher reactivity to stress triggers that could be alleviated through acts of aggression. I haven't revisited these idea's, just noted that the size of the amygdala may vary under different circumstances. So it could be that dark personalities have a smaller amygdala because they're not getting the same feedback from their ANS as a normal person. That points back to the possibility that they have different anatomy or function of the ANS. Or it could be that dark personalities are more likely to not restrain their acts of aggression indefinitely.

- A vagotomy is a surgical procedure that involves cutting the vagus nerve. It's mainly used in cases of peptic ulcer disease that are not responsive to medication and it reduces the production of stomach acid. Vagotomies can also have side effects of either bradycardia or tachycardia depending on where or why the vagus nerve is cut. I haven't really tied this into anything yet, but am keeping it in mind in light of the line of questioning because dark personalities usually have lower base heart rates.

Thanks for a super interesting session, and I'm sorry that I missed it.