Session 28 June 2025

Jones, what does "Dark Personality" mean to you? I found the concept of the "dark triad of personality" online, which includes Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. But I don't know if it's exactly what you're talking about.
It might be related to PP Substack series discussing the work of Karen Mitchell.
FWIW.

 
... But it made me think: surely 4D STS cannot possibly create a genuinely positive light- and love-filled experience with which to mislead us? And yet the session today mentioned just one such example which did seem to fit this description, so I find that deeply disturbing.
"Ra -The Law of One" say both STS and STO use the same mechanism for offering service:
The Creator made everything, and everything is made of love
God blinks neither at the darkness nor the light, they are both his children
STS use their portion of the Creator's love to offer lessons of pain,
STO use theirs to offer lessons of a gentler, more peasant sort.

Both are offered in love. 4d is the realm of love.
Not wisdom, mind you; that is 6th. 5th is contemplation.

We are STS. We are Lucifer, the Fallen Race. As Cassies said, we have the potential for STO.
 
That 'imbalanced system' built the civilization and the good times.
What we have now with hyperdimensional meddling
Hyperdimensional meddling was just as present during the patriarchy times in the West. The 'good times' many are longing for were around the 1950's when there was a good balance and neither extreme patriarchy or extreme feminism.

And it seems matriarchies of the past led to extermination of men and it seems that feminism like ideologies have possibily led to disasters that preceded the former.
According to the C's women blamed men for the cataclysm, so it is not clear whether it was a patriarchy or matriarchy or something else that was in power during the final downfall of the Atlantean civilization.

So they lock all the women and use them for theit base biological need of sex and feed them enough to live and to serve them and to bring forth the children so the species doesnt go extinct.
That is pretty close to what is being done in parts of the Islamic world.

Power should be with men (till we get rid of psycho and hyperdimensional interferance)
You seem to have a rose-colored view of patriarchy systems and of men in general. Just because there are crazy feminists with anti-men agendas does not mean that you should fall for this 'divide and conquer' manipulation and adopt basically anti-women positions instead.

There is even the fact that psychopaths are apparently more prevalent among men than women.

To see the absurdity of your claim that "power should be with men", do you think that this group should be led by a man instead of Laura?
 
Jones, what does "Dark Personality" mean to you? I found the concept of the "dark triad of personality" online, which includes Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. But I don't know if it's exactly what you're talking about.

It might be related to PP Substack series discussing the work of Karen Mitchell.
FWIW.


That's it. It's from the work of Political Ponerology, Dr Karen Mitchell's and other work into dark triad/tetrad personalities. Thing is, those that fall into these categories see their way of being as an adaptive advantage that gives them superiority over normal people and do not think they should change or heal. Their physiology doesn't respond the same under stress and mistaking them for wounded people could be dangerous, but it's something they'll play on in order to advance their agenda.

I'm curious about their differences and understanding ways of identifying them. In interviews with Porges on youtube, he is sometimes asked about dark personalities and there is a particular way that he directs the conversation away from that line of enquiry that has me wondering if he knows something, but is not willing to talk about it. If Mitchell is right about academia, then Porges has certainly come across them.
 
Jones, what does "Dark Personality" mean to you? I found the concept of the "dark triad of personality" online, which includes Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. But I don't know if it's exactly what you're talking about.

In my opinion, we're in our infancy in understanding how the brain works, although there have been interesting advances, such as Porges' polyvagal theory.

In my experience, I dare say there's currently an exaggerated focus on finding explanations in neuroscience discoveries. We try to study phenomena through dialectical materialism, using a scientific method to obtain measurable and quantifiable data.

I think it's more valuable to be able to understand how phenomena manifest in our lives.

For example, I see many "trauma experts" explaining on social media how emotional trauma occurs in people's nervous systems, but they don't know how to apply this to real life, whether for themselves or for others.

I'm currently supporting trauma courses and I see people with a wealth of scientific knowledge about how the nervous system works, but who are very emotionally dysregulated, with fixed survival patterns.

So, I think it's more valuable to know how to turn a light bulb on and off than to know how electricity works.

Let's suppose a narcissistic person wants to stop being narcissistic. Perhaps it's not so important whether the amygdala or the afferent fibers of the vagal nervous system are malfunctioning.

Perhaps it's more important to know whether a person's narcissism stems from one or more experiences of shame or powerlessness that created a pattern of dissociative or aggressive behaviors (like the trapped rat). This pattern can be seen as not caring about other people and only caring about their own needs.

In Somatic Experiencing, I learned that this behavior can be addressed from the body to the mind. In other words, discover how the defensive response they were unable to complete when they experienced the traumatic situation was imprinted in that person, and allow them to execute that action gently and consciously.

Because what has been discovered is that repetitive aggressive behavior occurs because the person/rat was unable to complete their fight-against-the-aggressor response, for example, because they were immobilized. To change this behavior, it has been very useful to first allow the person to be in touch with their bodily sensations (connecting the mind with the body), expand their capacity to feel what is pleasant and unpleasant, and finally, allow the body to perform the defensive action that could not be completed.

I have seen how people, after releasing this energy without dissociating and without catharsis, can modify their beliefs about themselves, become more empathetic, less aggressive, and more focused on connecting with others.

Perhaps what happened is that the nervous system created better feedback connections to the amygdala (as the person increased their ability to feel the bodily sensations of their emotions), and thus, the amygdala decreased its activity. I don't know.

My question is whether it really matters to know exactly how the brain and nervous system work, or whether it's better to learn how it expresses itself in our thoughts, our emotions, our bodies, our relationships with the world, or our connections with others.

Perhaps Stephen Porges disagrees with me :lol:.

All Knowledge is valid, so I see no reason for the either/or approach you're positing here. Understanding both the neurological science and its behavioural correlate is mutually beneficial. I've had many a-ha moments when reading about neurology, such as how dopamine works. this has helped me to use my dopaminergic system more effectively in daily life. Same with using vagal tone exercises. It's also helpful to take certain supplements to recharge and rebalance the nervous system after trauma flashbacks. Etc.

Anyways, in the case of some psychopaths, understanding their neurology is important. Some are made that way through childhood trauma, some choose to be that way because 'it works', and some are simply born evil - it's a result of brain structure and wiring, IIRC.
 
Patriarchy is an imbalanced system, but it does Hyperdimensional meddling was jus

According to the C's women blamed men for the cataclysm, so it is not clear whether it was a patriarchy or matriarchy or something else that was in power during the final downfall of the Atlantean civilization.


That is pretty close to what is being done in parts of the Islamic world.


You seem to have a rose-colored view of patriarchy systems and of men in general. Just because there are crazy feminists with anti-men agendas does not mean that you should fall for this 'divide and conquer' manipulation and adopt basically anti-women positions instead.

There is even the fact that psychopaths are apparently more prevalent among men than women.

To see the absurdity of your claim that "power should be with men", do you think that this group should be led by a man instead of Laura?

You seem like a follower type or at least being politically correct inclined and seem to be the one with rose colored glasses of reality.
I know what Im talking about is based in reality. And I know which level of knowledge Im at and the price I paid to get there. Everyone can see only up to their level that is the law.

It seems you haven't understood the simple point (fully based on the objective reality) which I repeated so many times in hopes you might get unstuck with your beliefs about this issue and face reality. Even other valuable information I shared in few other posts you rejected maybe because it hasnt yet been blessed by the authorities you follow. Idk. I give up on arguing. I've already shared my 'blasphemous' view and I dont like nitpickers.
 
It seems you haven't understood the simple point (fully based on the objective reality) which I repeated so many times in hopes you might get unstuck with your beliefs about this issue and face reality. Even other valuable information I shared in few other posts you rejected maybe because it hasnt yet been blessed by the authorities you follow. Idk. I give up on arguing. I've already shared my 'blasphemous' view and I dont like nitpickers.
You are becoming rude and insulting, which suggests that you are emotionally invested in this "sacred cow" belief that patriarchy is good and that men should have power over women. Such emotional investment to the point of lashing out is never a sign of objectivity.

None of what you said as far as analyzing the disastrous effect of extreme feminism is new to me or anyone else here. It has all been discussed repeatedly for many years, for example in this thread. As I said, what you and many others see as the "good times" around the 1950's was not even patriarchy, but more balance between the genders. That is what I see as a more natural state of being.

The devil is often in the details and what you call 'nitpicking' is actually looking at those details.
 
Less serious, but upsetting, Canada voting for Conservatives by a wide margin and here we are. It feels like nothing more than a prison.
Yeah. It's angering to hear Trump throwing his political capital around to threaten Canadian sovereignty for the sake of a "diversion." That gave the liberals the perfect pretext for rationalizing the faked poll and election results just as a reaction to Trump, with whom the government-owned and government-subsidized media maligned the Conservative opposition party.
 
Hyperdimensional meddling was just as present during the patriarchy times in the West. The 'good times' many are longing for were around the 1950's when there was a good balance and neither extreme patriarchy or extreme feminism.


According to the C's women blamed men for the cataclysm, so it is not clear whether it was a patriarchy or matriarchy or something else that was in power during the final downfall of the Atlantean civilization.


That is pretty close to what is being done in parts of the Islamic world.


You seem to have a rose-colored view of patriarchy systems and of men in general. Just because there are crazy feminists with anti-men agendas does not mean that you should fall for this 'divide and conquer' manipulation and adopt basically anti-women positions instead.

There is even the fact that psychopaths are apparently more prevalent among men than women.

To see the absurdity of your claim that "power should be with men", do you think that this group should be led by a man instead of Laura?

axj :thup:
 
You are becoming rude and insulting, which suggests that you are emotionally invested in this "sacred cow" belief that patriarchy is good and that men should have power over women. Such emotional investment to the point of lashing out is never a sign of objectivity.

None of what you said as far as analyzing the disastrous effect of extreme feminism is new to me or anyone else here. It has all been discussed repeatedly for many years, for example in this thread. As I said, what you and many others see as the "good times" around the 1950's was not even patriarchy, but more balance between the genders. That is what I see as a more natural state of being.

The devil is often in the details and what you call 'nitpicking' is actually looking at those details.
And then there's the 40 to 50% that are easily swayed ( or programmed ) , any talk of balanced gender dynamics should ( must ?) exclude those critters ( transcripts do state that water seeks its own level regarding this , however) , imo as long as most exclude it , hyperdimensional forces will have easy time in pushing for unbalance and negative outcomes at large. ( not to exclude psychos as well ofc). fwiiw / blah
 
Yes it does. It works pretty well in some islamic places that abide by laws of the free market of nature/life (and that you can see aren't headed for degeneracy) and that don't have government interferance in the male female relationships.
That 'imbalanced system' built the civilization and the good times.
Well it looks to me that you haven't really understood the difference between STS and STO. It would be worth investigating (in my opinion). Once you see that, then there (might) be a significant leap in understanding. But it is just my opinion.
 
We are STS. We are Lucifer, the Fallen Race. As Cassies said, we have the potential for STO.
Our realm is, that's for sure (STS). Why is that so? Well, it's because there is more that 50% STS on this planet. Somewhat problematic for those of an STO bent or preference (with equivalent difficultly as well). It just makes sense to me that people really understand what STO and STS really means on a fundamental level.
 
Yeah. It's angering to hear Trump throwing his political capital around to threaten Canadian sovereignty for the sake of a "diversion." That gave the liberals the perfect pretext for rationalizing the faked poll and election results just as a reaction to Trump, with whom the government-owned and government-subsidized media maligned the Conservative opposition party.
Further to this and previous posts on the Canadian election, Mark Carney is definitely a creature of the New World Order. He proved this when he was Governor of the Bank of England during the Brexit vote in the UK. The morning after the result there was turmoil in the financial markets and, as Governor, he stepped in to steady the ship as his role required. However, his whole demeanour when giving a speech to the press about the actions he was taking reeked of contempt for those who had dared to vote Brexit and upset the NWO status quo, which involves, inter alia, the creation of a socialist United States of Europe.

It truly strikes me as odd that a man who has mainly been a technocrat throughout his career should suddenly become the prime minister of Canada. What political qualifications does he have? Has he been a political activist for the Liberal Party in the past? Has he been actively involved in politics in any way before now? It just looks to me as if he has been parachuted in by the NWO to replace Justin Trudeau. As you say, Trump's ridiculous talk of absorbing Canada into the USA (has he forgotten the war of 1812 or does he even know of it) played straight into Carney's hands.​
 
'Patriarchy' is a product of life 'a.k.a.' women. Saying patriarchy is bad is not even understanding what it truly is and thus it's not seeing reality objectively.
It seems to me, Serendipity, from many of your posts throughout the Forum, that you are pretty much anti-female. You seem to have quite a bit of animosity towards women. You also seem to have the tendency to think that everything you think is correct. You don't seem to question your thinking even after several people have pointed out the errors in your thinking. There are books in the Recommended Reading list thread that cover how we have thinking errors and also many books on 4th Way principles.

You may want to start focusing your time on learning about how what we think is not always correct and how to overcome the predator's mind. Or not, it's up to you.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom