Session 29 May 2021

Hi

I think that we not only witnessed the assault on the world with the covid we also witnessed a kind of global abduction, as said here, it was a blatant deployment of 4D technology and the use of chemicals.

That said, it seems that the world chose - as if it were an abduction victim - to forget, to have amnesia on everything in an effort to return to normality.

What the Cs explained in this session from 1994 happened, is happening and will happen on a massive and global level:

Q: (L) Is the amnesia related to UFO abductions deliberately induced or is it a product of the mind's inability to deal with the event?

A: It is an equal commingling of both.

Q: (L) The part that is deliberately induced, how is that accomplished?

A: By using a cosmic energy flow to influence memory function through a combination of spiritual and chemical interaction.

Q: (L) Can you be more specific?

A: Being more specific would be in another way less specific, but a good way to put it is altering the flow of electromagnetic energy in the brain. Electromagnetic energy, electromagnetism, is the life force that exists within all that evolves through long wave or short wave cycles.

Don't you think that all of this sounds like magnetic vaccines now?

Whatever you believe about the efficacy or safety of the new vaccines, we know that it is "human-made" technology that is designed to make a modification to the natural function of the human body.

It should not be surprising that in the near future we will be living genetically modified organisms, patented and privately owned (by a "Overlords of Entropy") in this new techno-genetic tyranny.

FB_IMG_1622940819875.jpg

We have to remember the Diamond v Chakrabarty case dealing with whether genetically modified organisms can be patented: "A live, human-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. ... "

Since this determination, plants and animals have been genetically modified and the biotechnology industry has made huge profits on the back of living beings. The question would be is this the pathway for a LEGALLY owned human being?

Q: (L) Well, if we are sources of food and labor for them, why don't they just breed us in pens on their own planet?

A: They do
 
Intriguing, interesting, fascinating answer. Hopefully it is the algebra that we understand to be algebra and not a more esoteric application of it.
Just thought I'd throw some background on algebra up here. I am sure that many people here are compentent and probably can teach Algebra courses as we have them in the US today. Maybe there is something about the meaning of the word itself? I don't know, just fishing.

Here is the Wikipedia intro.

The word "algebra" is derived from the Arabic word الجبر al-jabr, and this comes from the treatise written in the year 830 by the medieval Persian mathematician, Muhammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī, whose Arabic title, Kitāb al-muḫtaṣar fī ḥisāb al-ğabr wa-l-muqābala, can be translated as The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing. The treatise provided for the systematic solution of linear and quadratic equations. According to one history, "t is not certain just what the terms al-jabr and muqabalah mean, but the usual interpretation is similar to that implied in the previous translation. The word 'al-jabr' presumably meant something like 'restoration' or 'completion' and seems to refer to the transposition of subtracted terms to the other side of an equation; the word 'muqabalah' is said to refer to 'reduction' or 'balancing'—that is, the cancellation of like terms on opposite sides of the equation. Arabic influence in Spain long after the time of al-Khwarizmi is found in Don Quixote, where the word 'algebrista' is used for a bone-setter, that is, a 'restorer'."[1] The term is used by al-Khwarizmi to describe the operations that he introduced, "reduction" and "balancing", referring to the transposition of subtracted terms to the other side of an equation, that is, the cancellation of like terms on opposite sides of the equation.[2]
 
Just thought I'd throw some background on algebra up here. I am sure that many people here are compentent and probably can teach Algebra courses as we have them in the US today. Maybe there is something about the meaning of the word itself? I don't know, just fishing.
The education system did a "very good job" at obscuring the link between reality and algebra. By subjecting entire generations of students to repeated, meaningless calculations year after year after year, the system has successfully crushed the potential of entire nations. Imagine being forced to "find x, in this equation" for 10-15 years!

No wonder people say "I'm not a math person" or "math is too hard for me."
Some are even proud of saying they don't know...
In fact, the cognitive dissonance is such that people are running away from mathematics like the plague even though
equations are everywhere!

It is saddening, but not surprising, that conceptual reasoning has remained asleep, under-developed in the minds of the majority.
Sometimes I wonder if some people realize that "2 + 2 = 4" is actually a universal truth.
If somebody comes along tomorrow and claims "2 + 2 = 5", it better be a typo. 😉
 
The education system did a "very good job" at obscuring the link between reality and algebra. By subjecting entire generations of students to repeated, meaningless calculations year after year after year, the system has successfully crushed the potential of entire nations. Imagine being forced to "find x, in this equation" for 10-15 years!

No wonder people say "I'm not a math person" or "math is too hard for me."
Some are even proud of saying they don't know...
In fact, the cognitive dissonance is such that people are running away from mathematics like the plague even though
equations are everywhere!

It is saddening, but not surprising, that conceptual reasoning has remained asleep, under-developed in the minds of the majority.
Sometimes I wonder if some people realize that "2 + 2 = 4" is actually a universal truth.
If somebody comes along tomorrow and claims "2 + 2 = 5", it better be a typo. 😉
Well it is definitely true that math and physics are not taught with any meaning (you are talking to a former math and physics teacher).
I tried within the confines of the system I was teaching in, but the kids I "taught" were old enough (apparently) to have already come to their own conclusions about everything, including math, phyysics, chemistry, biology, etc.
 
The education system did a "very good job" at obscuring the link between reality and algebra. By subjecting entire generations of students to repeated, meaningless calculations year after year after year, the system has successfully crushed the potential of entire nations. Imagine being forced to "find x, in this equation" for 10-15 years!

No wonder people say "I'm not a math person" or "math is too hard for me."
Some are even proud of saying they don't know...
In fact, the cognitive dissonance is such that people are running away from mathematics like the plague even though
equations are everywhere!

It is saddening, but not surprising, that conceptual reasoning has remained asleep, under-developed in the minds of the majority.
Sometimes I wonder if some people realize that "2 + 2 = 4" is actually a universal truth.
If somebody comes along tomorrow and claims "2 + 2 = 5", it better be a typo. 😉
And to agree with you again, there are way too many that believe that math is "too hard" for them. Lots of reasons for that perspective.
 
Totally. The story from the book always stuck in my mind too.. I've been thinking about how to apply it in covid world in general..don't really have a clue though.

My only idea on how I'll deal with it when someone tells me to get vaccinated is to grin friendlyly and say "oh, no thanks :)" as if they're offering me a cup of tea but I don't feel like one just now. Like it's a matter of no consequence that I can't imagine they could possibly care about one way or the other.
Yes I’ve been thinking about this also and just read the story of Don Juan and the petty tyrant.
I just had this idea, that just take the vaccine if it becomes too difficult to avoid it but ensure to use fasting, endurance exercise, supplements, breathing etc etc to fortify the body. In fact the extreme discipline itself will be the fire that forges the warrior. The discipline forges the warrior, and from this the confidence to be gained from knowing that even this (vaccines, mRNA treatments) has no power over oneself. These things gained by the spirit from applying an all out harm reduction protocol would be immense. The vaccines and mRNA shots are the petty tyrant perhaps?
Just an idea
 
This made me think:

There's a real tendency, not just here but amongst everyone taking part in the wider truth movement, to succumb to a certain hysteria founded in, I think, two things. The first is focusing on worst case scenarios (e.g. "the vaccine will kill everyone who takes it and they're going to force everyone to take it at gunpoint!") The second is to imagine all of the bad things that could happen in the future, happening to you, personally.

That's usually not the case, and I think it's symptom of information overload: receiving data from the entire planet, and then identifying with it as though it is (or could be) happening to one personally.

Will bad things happen? Sure. Freaky, weird stuff? Without doubt. But will all of the bad, weird things happen to you, personally? Almost certainly not. And, knowledge protects - if you're paying attention, you're much less likely to get hit by a car crossing the street ... and there's no reason to be consumed by anxiety about what you'll do if you do get hit by a car, as while such a thing is certainly possible in general (and inevitable for some), it is vanishingly unlikely for you so long as you look both ways each time you cross.

Think back to the last year of lockdowns. Certainly there's been some weird, tyrannical stuff. But how much of it has affected you, personally? Certainly it has ... But I doubt nearly as badly as those who succumbed to the fear porn and other elements of operant conditioning. For me, personally - and for many others - this year has been a fantastic opportunity for personal growth - to read, to think, to get myself in shape, to fix relationships, and generally to prepare. And I know that's the case for many others, as well ... Those who "pay attention to reality, left and right." Which isn't to say it hasn't been challenging. But it hasn't been all bad, either.

As the old song goes, "it's the end of the world as we know it/And I feel fine."
Living (or so I think) in Hawaii, a lot of it affected me personally and continues to do so.
 
It's not just for our own knowledge, but also for spreading good ideas.
Yes I think that’s important, not everyone is going to be open to the C’s material but gaining knowledge and having stimulating conversations with anyone we meet is a good ‘doing more’ thing.
I have had success inviting my mother and a good friend to read Mary Balogh. And I can report they appear to have benefited from the process the reading stimulates.
 
Q: (Ark) What kind of mathematics is needed to describe consciousness?

A: Algebra.

...

(Ark) Oh, oh, oh! Do we need second time dimension?

A: Yes

Q: (Ark) Do we need third time dimension?

A: No

Q: (Ark) Aha! THAT'S an information!

...

Q: What is the proper algebra type to describe consciousness then?

(L) Honey?

(Ark) Yeah... I am interested in this question. [laughter]

(L) Oh! [laughter] He doesn't have the answer, but he's interested.

A: Complex for sure!

Q: (L) Is it Clifford Algebra?

A: Close

Q: (Ark) Okay.
Intriguing, interesting, fascinating answer. Hopefully it is the algebra that we understand to be algebra and not a more esoteric application of it.
Ark's algebra with two time dimensions would be part of a bigger Clifford algebra. Lots of people use big algebras that contain Ark's "two time" algebra but almost nobody uses this "two time" algebra. This is because of symmetry breaking where people take a big algebra that everybody is comfortable with and break it into smaller parts and lots of people have different ideas for how to legally break the big algebra into smaller parts.

When my nephew was in high school I showed him Pascal's triangle and he was very excited about it and even showed it to his math teacher. It's kind of a good way to introduce Clifford algebra and its smaller parts:
PascalTriangleFibonacci.png

This particular graphic also relates Pascal's triangle to Fibonacci numbers. There are lots of cool number patterns in Pascal's triangle. If you think of these rows as labeled 0 through 10 then adding the numbers in the row gives you the number of dimensions of the Clifford algebra Cl(n) where n is the row number thus for example Cl(8) would have 1+8+28+56+70+56+28+8+1=256 dimensions=2^8. Even though this is for algebra, you can see it is very information related as in the idea that 8 bits give you 256 possibilities. Ark's 2-time algebra has 4-space and this 2+4=6 means use row 6 for Cl(6). Ark's algebra has bivectors which means don't use the first one of row 6 (0-vector aka scalar) or the 6 next to it (1-vector aka vector) but use the 15 (2-vector aka bivector). The names for these 15 2-vector things are rotations (XY, XZ, YZ), boosts (XT,YT,ZT), translations (XL,YL,ZL,TL), conformal transformations (XC,YC,ZC,TC) and dilation (LC). L and C would kind of be the extra space and time. Now even if you figure out how big your Clifford algebra should be, the n in Cl(n), and figure out what all 2^n dimensions do, you would still only figure out one vertex of spacetime. You would then have to figure out all the things you can do with lots of spacetime vertices. As the Cs said, complex for sure! This is kind of a pun since Ark's Cl(6) bivector algebra allows you to have a spacetime with complex number coordinates.
 
And to agree with you again, there are way too many that believe that math is "too hard" for them. Lots of reasons for that perspective.
I used to be one of those although I loved math I kept saying to myself and others that it didn't love me back. I realised that I wasn't lacking in math abilities because I use to play in my head with calculations of speed, probability, distance etc... But I never was able to do well at school. Imagine the frustration when my Whole family, mum, brothers and sister, kids could follow and seemed to "understand" it.
Well I come to the conclusion now that it's not me but the teaching of it which is faulty 😉
 
Back
Top Bottom