Session 3 August 1996

One can imagine a group of bodies, with some larger some smaller, loosely bound by gravity, having a center of gravity outside each of them and then moving together at the same time in an highly elliptical orbit.
What it would be like to move like that through on orbit with huge differences in electrical charge, which is what helps to make some comets glow. There might be additional effects not present with the usual comet. Here are some quotes that might be relevant:
Q: (L) Okay, next question: When an F5 tornado can form in a matter of minutes, what is the connection with what is going on in 4D? How does it happen? What's the mechanism?

A: Once again you must think in terms of information and electrical charge. The charge on earth is building in several ways and a tornado is an electrical phenomenon similar to ball lightning.
If the comets hold electrical charge, the surrounding space too, and the comets also rotate around a moving point in space, then there is an unusual electrical phenomenon that might be able to create a natural transdimensional portal that is moving.
(Ark) Let me take opportunity to ask about ball lightning. Are they purely electric phenomena, or are they also related to consciousness or...?

A: Transdimensional portals made manifest.


Q: (Ark) Does it mean that the current theory of electromagnetism is really bad because it has nothing to do with transdimensionality?

A: Yes.
(Anart) Can I ask a clarification question on the tornado? If it's similar to ball lightning, does that mean they're both portals? Physical manifestations of portals?

A: Yes.


Q: (Perceval) Do people ever disappear in tornadoes?

A: Yes.
In this passage of the spiraling cluster there are other influences that will have an even greater infuence; the wave, the realm border.
A: No. Wave comet cluster all using same energy.

Q: (L) Using same energy to what?

A: Pass through space\time.

Q: (L) Does this mean that without this comet cluster they cannot pass through space/time?
A: No. Slower. message follows here. Quiet for one moment please: From now on when word to follow is in quotes we will designate as follows: mark then word then mark. Now, "slower."

{We installed quote marks on the board after this. From this point on, when words in the Cassiopaean responses are in quotes, it is because they have so designated.}
Q: (L) So, it is slower for them to come here without this wave. Where is the wave coming from?

A: Follows cluster.

Q: (L) It follows the cluster. What does this wave consist of?

A: Realm border.


Q: (L) Does the realm border wave follow the comet cluster in a permanent way?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is the realm border loosely associated with the comet cluster each time it comes?

A: No. Realm border follows all encompassing energy reality change; realm border will follow this cluster passage and has others but not most.

Q: (L) Is this realm border a dimensional boundary?

A: Yes.


Q: (L) Okay, this realm border, do dimensions...

A: Pulsating realms. Fluctuating realms.

Q: (L) Is our realm fluctuating or pulsating?

A: No.

Q: (L) But this other realm does?

A: No.

Q: (L) What fluctuates?

A: Residence.

Q: (L) Whatever is in that realm fluctuates?

A: No. Your planet fluctuates between realms.

Q: (L) How often does this fluctuation occur?

A: About every 309,000 years.

Q: (L) In other words we can expect to be in 4th density for about 300,000 years?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Does this mean that the Edenic state existed for about 300.000 years before the "Fall?"

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Now, you say these Nephilim are coming and there is about 36 million of them, correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And they are the enforcers of the Grays and Lizzies, is that correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, let's sit back and watch the show! You are saying that the planet fluctuates...

A: No, realms do planet merely occupies realm.

Q: (L) What is the source in space/time of this other realm?

A: Too complex.

Q: (L) What is the generative source?

A: Part of grand cycle.

Q: (L) Is this the cycle understood by the Mayans?

A: They understood partially.

Q: (L) Their calendar extends to 2012... is that accurate as to the time of the realm border change?

A: Close. Still indefinite as you measure time. Lizzies hoping to rule you in 4th density. Closer to 18 years.
 
I understand that looking for the sun's twin to come close to the sun, in order to ignite it, may or may not happen. Basically it is not visible to us. Will it ever be? No one knows. That was an example of what could happen, I think.

I am still wondering if the worldwide pandemic scare, the hope placed in an attempt to mitigate it and the relief from fear the general population is experiencing also fits the bill? Things are pretty crazy now. I would even go as far to say, humanity is pretty much getting out of control over it.

All taken into consideration, it may not be out of the realm of possibilities to watch for the arrival of visitors.

Thanks for posting this @thorbiorn.
 
I understand that looking for the sun's twin to come close to the sun, in order to ignite it, may or may not happen. Basically it is not visible to us. Will it ever be? No one knows. That was an example of what could happen, I think.

According to the transcripts, we might have chance to see the Sun’s Twin brown star.

July 4, 1998

Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a cosmology, and I have some questions mainly about the coming events. First there was the story of the sun's companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come?

A: Flat elliptical.

Q: (A) But how close will it come?

A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.

Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A) Solar system... (L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have nine planets... which one? (A) I understand that this brown star will enter the Oort cloud... (L) I think they said it just brushes against it and the gravity disturbs it...

A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has done this on its way "in."

Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?

A: Has passed through.

August 3, 1996

Q: (L) What is the significance of the brown star?

A: Dark star.

Q: (L) Well, will you put me out of my misery and tell me? (T) Wait, a dark star is dark because it doesn't give off light. It is still a star, and acts like a star...

A: Yes. And if it has an elliptical orbit... would it, maybe, like, "come and go?"

Q: (T) What science, astronomy, has described as double stars, are two stars that are close together with some sort of interactive orbit. But that is not necessarily the only way two stars can exist.

A: Close. As you perceive from your vantage point. But how would you like to embark on a bicycle trip between them?

Q: (L) So the ones that we are aware of and see can be so far apart that there can be a lot between... (T) So our astronomers have not recognized this possibility?

A: Yes they have.

Q: (T) They know, but don't talk about it. So, we may have, in this theory, a dark star orbiting...

A: And what would happen if you did?

Q: (L) Well...

A: And it, like, comes and goes?

Q: (T) Like every 3600 years?

A: Maybe.

Q: (T) And maybe this dark star also has some planets orbiting it?

A: Ok, change of direction: Oort cloud and comet cluster and sun twin occasionally passing through the former like a bowling ball through pins.

Q: (L) How does the dark star passing through the Oort cloud relate to the comet cluster?

A: Cause and effect.

Q: (L) So, the comet cluster is caused by the dark star smashing through the Oort cloud? (T) Well, not necessarily smashing, but passing close enough for its gravity to change things... (L) But they said "like a bowling ball through pins." (T) The gravity of that star would cause the comets to be flung in all directions. (J) Is the earth like a pin? A bowling pin? (L) No, that's the Oort Cloud.

A: Explain what the Oort Cloud is, Laura.

Q: (L) Does everybody know what the Oort Cloud is? (J) I don't. {explanation of Oort cloud.} Okay, so we are looking at something...

A: Now, think of how your Biblical prophecies speak of a very terrifying period, followed by an apparent renewal of normalcy, followed by the "End."

Q: (T) We learned about a "comet cluster" very early on. Now you are going beyond that and giving us a reason as to why this comet cluster...

A: Laura, please clarify exactly what the prophecies say.

Q: (L) Well, actually, "The Noah Syndrome" is primarily prophetic exegesis with a little science thrown in to help clarify why such occurrences must be along a "natural" order. [Discussion of primary passages in "Noah."] In the prophecies it is said: "If those days were not shortened, would no flesh be saved. But, for the elects' sake, will those days be shortened." Now, can you tell me what this means?

A: Not yet.

Q: (T) Where are we? We have a dark star flinging comets like bowling pins...

A: Your Biblical prophecies speak of a period of terror and chaos followed by calm, and then, unexpectedly, amidst seeming overwhelming peace and renewal and prosperity, the end.

Q: (L) Okay, I would say that this "end" is the passing through the "realm border," the "wave."

A: Yes, but don't you know of the prophecies we are referencing?

Q: (L) Are you talking about the book of Daniel where a number is given regarding the time period between the one event and the other?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Well one thing we can establish...

A: What would happen if the brown star that is the sun's twin were to get close enough to be illuminated by the sun?

Q: (T) Well, if it were close enough to be illuminated, the obvious result is that it would be SEEN. People would panic...

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Governments would fall...

A: And terror and chaos. And when it departs again?

Q: (L) Everything will seem to be fine! But, they won't realize that the Oort cloud has been hit! Oh, sugar!

A: And then what?

Q: (L) It is not the Oort cloud or the comets that is going to cause all this terror and carrying on, it is going to be the seeing of the illuminated brown star, which will go away, and then no one will see what is coming! And this IS talked about in both the Bible and Nostradamus - but it was incomprehensible before! Okay, how long will it take the comets to get from the Oort cloud to here?

A: Let us just say that the cluster travels much faster than the usual cometary itinerary.
 
I am still wondering if the worldwide pandemic scare, the hope placed in an attempt to mitigate it and the relief from fear the general population is experiencing also fits the bill? Things are pretty crazy now. I would even go as far to say, humanity is pretty much getting out of control over it.
Getting out of control can be in different ways. If "the war is on normal people", some may get out of control in order to act against normal people.
Q: (Atriedes) So, cutting out the evil is more important than cutting out the calories. (L) Pretty much! (Andromeda) So, there's no intent of pushing people to a revolution with some of this revolution hype and drama...?

A: Sure! It will make billions for some people and others plan to come in and set up shop on the ashes.
But as we just asked: When have their plans for results actually worked as they present them?

Q: (Ark) I think there is another reason. You start the war, and then you let some kinds of these rebels to have access to nuclear weapons. Can you imagine how much more Homeland Security you will be able to have then if you let all these "Islamist rebels" get these weapons? Give your enemy advanced weapons, pretend you are helping them to get rid of Assad, and then later, "Oh, we didn't know they are terrorists, but now they have access to these weapons! We have to close our borders! We have to control everything!" (Andromeda) It's creepy, some of these reports of Homeland Security making these huge orders of hollow point bullets, and building these compounds with fences... It looks like they're kind of getting ready for some revolution or something. (Perceval)I wondered if those reports are just...

A: The real war, as you know, is on normal people via proxies.
And perhaps some people and populations are exposed as shown in this exchange, only it has gone more global.
Q: (L) To put a stop to the UFO conference in Gulf Breeze? Does this mean we ought to stay home?

A: Up to you, but, suggest deferment, we could tell you of titanic battle!!!!

Q: (L) So, hurricanes are a reflection of battles at higher levels? Did the good guys win?

A: Yes, but not concluded, and we fear for those drawn to locator because of sinister plans by 4th density STS.

Q: (L) Plans such as what? More weather phenomena or something more direct?

A: Both, several options open to them, and in works; monstrous hurricane to hit during conference, or tornado strikes Embassy Suites hotel, or bomb blast levels conference center, of mass abductions and mental controls initiated in order to cause dissention and possibly violence, followed by extreme factionalization.

[Strangely, in a weird sort of way, the above sounds very much like the events of 9-11 and all that followed, though the location and context is different.
One wonders if this was a bleed-through of that future reality in some sense? After all, 9-11 was still six years in the future at the time of this session and if it was already in the planning stage, it may have been that the venue and MO had not been entirely finalized.]

Q: (L) So, there is the possibility that something really positive could come from the connections made at the conference. Was this directed at us specifically?

A: Yes, why do you suppose it has been disrupted as of now? And have you noticed that the hurricanes have been increasing in October, rather than decreasing as would normally be true?

Q: (L) Well, then, I guess we will be staying home.

A: Free will.
And ouf course some normal people may be getting out of control in the process of "the breaking of the shell of illusion and delusion":
A: Realizing one's blindness and ignorance can be shattering but with the breaking of the shell of illusion and delusion, one can be born into the light!

Q: (L) I noticed you used the words "illusion" and "delusion". What's the difference between an illusion and a delusion, aside from our normal dictionary definitions?

A: Illusion is mostly self-generated; delusion is mostly induced from without.

Q: (L) So, if you create fantasies in your own head and believe in them, you're living in an illusion. If you're programmed to believe wrong things or induced into something by life circumstances or other people's words or actions, that would be a delusion. Well, that's a little bit different I think than the dictionary definition. It's interesting to get their view of why they use different words. Anybody else have questions?
 
If we end up seeing a dark star light up, how long would we have before it is not visible again? Wait and see!

Not that my purpose is to rush things along. We still have roofs to clean and concrete to waterproof plus preserve permanently. Actually, what can be done with concrete these days could easily rival construction of old sites that stand for thousands of years.

Also, it really isn't that clear as to how much the time travel and meddling done by the Lizzies has altered what we will see. I would still like to see something like that. It would be magnificent to behold, breathtaking.

Bottom line, keep waking up and keep working.
 
A: Realizing one's blindness and ignorance can be shattering but with the breaking of the shell of illusion and delusion, one can be born into the light!
Wow what a lovely quote, I had forgotten this one.

Each time a personal illusion or delusion shatters I beat myself up a little, how could I have allowed myself to be so ignorant? But in truth I should celebrate moving one step closer to the light.

Thank you for sharing, it’s a great reminder.
 
A: Now, think of how your Biblical prophecies speak of a very terrifying period, followed by an apparent renewal of normalcy, followed by the "End."
A: Your Biblical prophecies speak of a period of terror and chaos followed by calm, and then, unexpectedly, amidst seeming overwhelming peace and renewal and prosperity, the end.
A: What would happen if the brown star that is the sun's twin were to get close enough to be illuminated by the sun?

Q: (T) Well, if it were close enough to be illuminated, the obvious result is that it would be SEEN. People would panic...

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Governments would fall...

A: And terror and chaos. And when it departs again?

Q: (L) Everything will seem to be fine! But, they won't realize that the Oort cloud has been hit! Oh, sugar!

A: And then what?

Q: (L) It is not the Oort cloud or the comets that is going to cause all this terror and carrying on, it is going to be the seeing of the illuminated brown star, which will go away, and then no one will see what is coming!
As a refresher, the end doesn't happen until we see the sun's twin first, then panic, then peace, then the end.
 
As a refresher, the end doesn't happen until we see the sun's twin first, then panic, then peace, then the end.

Yes. And the thing about it is that it could literally happen at any time. In the session above, I think the idea at the time was that the light of the sun would shine on Nemesis and this would illuminate it. In that case, I think we could expect it to slowly get brighter over a long period.

But with what we know about the electric universe, Nemesis could be totally dark one moment, and then due to its interaction with the Sun could all of a sudden flare up out of nowhere to become dazzlingly bright in an instant.

So the chaos on the planet could increase a thousand-fold in the blink of an eye, at literally any moment, without warning.
 
It is possible that in the inner circle you already have a similar conclusion.

I believe that the period of terror and chaos followed by calm where the companion sun was seen, was the fall of the Roman Empire and the medieval dark ages.

Then Peace (in terms of celestial destruction) renewal and prosperity (related to the same terms).

So my hypothesis is that we are in the time when the end will come at any moment, without warning.

The prophecies that emanate downwards from higher densities are not well understood in relation to the time factor, that is to say something that is seen as quite immediate is so in terms of those densities, but in ours it takes a little longer.

Perhaps something like a thousand years.
 
I suppose that this will be a quick little post, as what I have to briefly present here, I found only two or so days ago. It all came from a little hunch as I remembered that through whatever means, that little companion star to our Sun, or "Helios -- Ἥλιος" got afforded an impoverished title of "Nemesis -- Νέμεσις". I thought to myself that choice of moniker was somewhat strange. Contemporary knowledge of ancient dialects of Greek or Latin is largely lost to us, within our modern lifestyles, as almost nearly no one has a working understanding of those languages. The fundamental mappings of interrelations and meaning through one's use, as being exemplified by a common culture, is roughly at least a thousand years disparate from the last wide-spread utility of those languages to transmit knowledge. To offer an example, I'll offer a brief image of some iconography of Helios, the Sun, being used in the ancient past.

Ilion---metopa.jpg
(1) "Relief showing Helios, sun god in the Greco-Roman mythology. From the North-West pediment of the temple of Athena in Ilion (Troy). Between the first quarter of the 3rd century BC and 390 BC. Marble, 85,8 x 86,3 cm. Found during the excavations lead by Heinrich Schliemann in 1872, now in the Pergamon-Museum in Berlin, Germany."

Helios, being personified into a graphical representation, bearing emblazon of rays radiating from its head, or stylistically from his gaze. It is also not without affinity to a set of horses, or a chariot, indicating swift movement, and within both motifs, its presentation affords astronomical significance, relating to the Sun itself, especially as it races across the sky on a daily basis, to at least our perception, as being a consequence of Earth's axial rotation.

This own interpretation of mine regarding a visual example of a presentation of Helios might be rather off point, since I'm eventually getting to what I want to say regarding the companion star called Nemesis. However, this interpretive effort will become rather stark at the end.

Even if we might use a term from the ancient past to denote something, our understanding of it might be completely different. Consider the term nemesis in a contemporary setting. We have no outright use for it in a mythological, or religious approach, and any common use of it should otherwise be scarce to find. The closest thing that I can immediately think of, is within a narrative setting, using nemesis itself to placard an antagonist through some innovative quip, phrase, or reference in a text, as opposed to the ordinal protagonist. The usual nouns that would come to at least my mind, are: "enemy", "foe", and "rival".


So I took to look for when this name was attached to the companion star. It seems that there was no use of it before some posing on March 11th, 2010, and it seems to have subsequently caught on, as evident in the session transcripts from June 21st, 2014, and March 25th, 2017.

... From The Universe: Nemesis, The Sun's Evil Twin:

"Nicknamed "Nemesis" or "The Death Star," this undetected object could be a red or brown dwarf star, or an even darker presence several times the mass of Jupiter."

... From Session June 21, 2014:

"(Pierre) We asked that question about the size of Nemesis, and it was 0.56 the mass of the sun."

... From Session March 25, 2017:

"Q: (Pierre) Nemesis.

......

Q: (L) In other words, by any other name...

(Pierre) Yeah, well, we can call it Nemesis. The sun's companion. "

I'm not aware of other manifestations, so lets go over to Wikipedia to see what we can get as a first pass, of sorts. (2)

Etymology

"The name Nemesis is derived from the Greek word νέμειν, némein, meaning "to give what is due",[2] from Proto-Indo-European *nem- "distribute".[3]"

Family

"According to Hesiod's Theogony, Nemesis was one of the children of Nyx alone.[4] Nemesis has been described as the daughter of Oceanus, Erebus, or Zeus,[citation needed] but according to Hyginus she was a child of Erebus and Nyx. Some made her the daughter of Zeus by an unnamed mother.[5] In several traditions, Nemesis was seen as the mother of Helen of Troy by Zeus, adopted and raised by Leda and Tyndareus.[6] According to the Byzantine poet Tzetzes, Bacchylides had Nemesis as the mother of the Telchines by Tartarus.[7]"

Mythology: Fortune and Retribution:

"The word nemesis originally meant the distributor of fortune, neither good nor bad, simply in due proportion to each according to what was deserved.[citation needed] Later, Nemesis came to suggest the resentment caused by any disturbance of this right proportion, the sense of justice that could not allow it to pass unpunished.[citation needed]

O. Gruppe (1906) and others connect the name with "to feel just resentment". From the fourth century onward, Nemesis, as the just balancer of Fortune's chance, could be associated with Tyche.

Divine retribution is a major theme in the Greek world view, providing the unifying theme of the tragedies of Sophocles and many other literary works.[8] Hesiod states: "Also deadly Nyx bore Nemesis an affliction to mortals subject to death" (Theogony, 223, though perhaps an interpolated line). Nemesis appears in a still more concrete form in a fragment of the epic Cypria."

Going over Poesia Latina's compendiums of collected Greek works yields similar semantics (even though I could not for the life of me work out how to access the denoted references -- they are probably listed somewhere on that site, even though the references are passed over in plain language). (3)

In Greek:
"[157] Νεμεσητικός: ὁ ἐναντίος τῷ φθονερῷ. ὁ μὲν γὰρ φθονερὸς λυπεῖται ἐπὶ ταῖς τῶν καλῶν εὐπραγίαις, ἐπεὶ καὶ ὁ φθόνος τοιοῦτον, νεμεσητικὸς δὲ ὁ λυπούμενος ἐπὶ ταῖς τῶν κακῶν εὐπραγίαις· τοιοῦτον γὰρ ἡ νέμεσις. ὥστε ὁ νεμεσητικὸς οὐ φθονερός. ἔστι δὲ τὸ πρόβλημα ὁρικόν. ζήλῳ ῥητόρων τοῦτο λέγει· ὁριζομένου γάρ τινος φθονερὸν εἶναι καὶ τὸν λεγόμενον νεμεσητικόν, ἐπειδὴ καὶ αὐτὸς μέμφεταί τινας, ἀνθοριζόμεθα, οὐ τὸν νεμεσητικὸν τοιοῦτον εἶναι, εἴπερ ὀρθῶς τινας μέμφεται, ἀλλὰ τὸν μὴ δέοντα μεμφόμενον· αὐτὸς γάρ ἐστι φθονερός.

[162] Νέμεσις: ἡ δίκη. Ἀριστοφάνης· ἰὼ Νέμεσι, βαρύβρομοί τε βρονταί.

[163] Νέμεσις: μέμψις, δίκη, ὕβρις, φθόνος, τύχη. τὴν τῶν ἀλαζόνων τιμωρὸν συνέντες Νέμεσιν, ἥπερ αὐτοὺς μετῆλθε σὺν τῇ δίκῃ. καὶ αὖθις· οὐκ ἔλαθε τὴν ἅπασιν ἐναντιουμένην τοῖς ὑπερηφάνοις Νέμεσιν, ἀλλ' ἐν ταῖς ἰδίαις ἠναγκάσθη παιδευθῆναι συμφοραῖς. παρῆν δ' ἡ Νέμεσις, ἣ τὰ γῆς ἐποπτεύει· ἢ καὶ ἄλλως, ἣ τἄδικ' ἐποπτεύει. Βάβριός φησιν ἐν Μυθικοῖς. καὶ Αἰλιανός· Νεμέσεως ἐφόρου, τρόπους ὑπερόπτας καὶ ὑπερηφάνους κολαζούσης, ἐναργῆ μαρτύρια. καὶ παροιμία· Νέμεσις δέ γε πὰρ πόδας βαίνει· παρόσον μέτεισι ταχέως ἡ δαίμων τοὺς ἡμαρτηκότας. λήθουσα δὲ πὰρ πόδας βαίνεις, γαυρούμενον αὐχένα κλίνεις, ὑπὸ πῆχυν ἀεὶ βιοτὰν κρατεῖς."

---------

Machine translated into English:
"[157] Nemesistic: the opposite of the envious. For the envious man grieves over the good deeds of good people, and envy is also such, but the nemesistic is the one who grieves over the good deeds of bad people; for such is nemesis. So the nemesistic is not envious. But the problem is finite. He says this with the zeal of rhetoricians: for a certain one is envious of someone and the so-called nemesis, because he also reproaches someone, we conclude that it is not the nemesis of this kind, because he rightly reproaches someone, but the one who is unduly reproached; for he is envious.

[162] Nemesis: the trial. Aristophanes: O Nemesis, the thunders are heavy.

[163] Nemesis: scorn, trial, envy, luck. Nemesis, who punished the arrogant, after whom she shared the trial. And now she did not receive the apasis against the proud Nemesis, but in the same she was forced to be taught by troubles. Nemesis is present, who watches over the lands; or else, who watches over the unjust. Vabrius tells in Myths. And Aelianus, the ephor of Nemesis, who punishes the arrogant and the proud, a slow martyrdom. and a proverb: Nemesis walks on foot; for the devil quickly devours sinners. But forgetting, you walk on foot, you lean on the anchored anchor, you hold eternal life under your arm."

And simply whisking over my own copy of Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon's yielded similar results. (4)

"nemesis: just or deserved indignation, anger at anything unjust, righteous resentment; indignation at undeserved good fortune: jealousy, vengeance, especially of the gods, of men: grudging, envy; that which causes or deserves just indignation, the object of just resentment; in one's own person, a sense of sin, remorse.

Nemesis: personified as the goddess of Retribution, who brings down all immoderate good fortune."


From all of that looking, I was slightly befuddled. Clearly there is a common motif of nemesis as being the guarantor of a form of justice, a justice well due to those who have earned it, and also a form of justice that is beyond, or outside the scope of human ideas and implementations of their own forms of justice. This motif is only expounded when nemesis is embodied, or personified into the form of Nemesis, being the Goddess of that same noun. So then what would be its implication in the form of contemporary use? ....

And then I noticed that Albrecht Durer did indeed pain through the process of making a copper engraving, printed circa 1502, of a novelty... That novelty being Nemesis herself (5). Seeing that I have not noticed Albrecht Durer, and Nemesis being connected in any form whatsoever on the innumerable forum threads, I'll use this opportunity to present it. : ) [I've scaled the images down to a reasonable level. The originals can be viewed at their respective links below]

ADurerFortunaengraving1.jpg

(5) "Nemesis. Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528). Copper Engraving | Print. circa 1502. height: 332 mm (13.07 in); width: 232 mm (9.13 in). Nuremburg."

So what exactly do we have depicted on this print? I'll use the same interpretive method as I gave example with the Helios iconography. You see the beauty of Nemesis in the foreground, standing upon a three dimensional sphere. The shadows lain from her figure denote its three dimensional nature, as opposed to just being a plain two dimensional circle, devoid of shadow. The sphere also has no emblazon of radiance, as opposed to Helios -- signifying it's non-luminous nature. Nemesis is depicted as being partly nude, and her figure is tangential to the viewer. Her side facing the viewer is without garb, yet the her opposite side is shrouded. This could mean that she initially is seen as purely nude, yet to a cautious viewer, she is not without a garment of sorts... a garment, or shroud that does flail beside her along an indication of movement. The attribution of wings to her personification indicate a celestial nature. In her left hand, she holds what seems to be a horse harness, indicating that she is either just coming from a journey, or about to set off on one; taken with both possibilities of meaning, and Nemesis would then be on a constant, never-ending journey. In her right hand, she holds what seems to be goblet of some sorts. The position of her right hand is in that of extension, or in the Latin: 'ab corpus', and thus what she holds in the right is as an offering to another person. Her casual smirk would also indicate that this offering could be bittersweet. This silverware is unusual, in that it seems to depict some natural process -- akin to a plant sprouting, and eventually forming some edible fruit -- but this fruit is unusually large for the stem of that plant, and with all things unusual, it must be metaphorical, indicating that this goblet/fruit thing, is quite the gift to obtain from Nemesis herself.

Looking at the background now, we have a typical depiction of third dimensional life on the surface of the planet (at least how it was when this engraving was made). Mountains, trees, rivers, and a whole host of human development and activity. Since there seems to be no apparent tumult or discord engraved, the approaching front of that "wave" is thus not apparent to the life that it's completely enveloping from above. The "negative" impression of motion is also recorded in the "fabric" of this wave, with its V, or U presentation straight down the middle. Also note the darkness underlying this fabric -- it should be taken metaphorically. Since the aforementioned sphere is "riding" on this wave of fabric, along with everything so mentioned about Nemesis and her presentation, what can be said of Nemesis, and the companion dark star that she represents, is that she, or it, acts as a harbinger of what is coming .... or rather currently ongoing. The presentation of this wave of fabric is also strange. Ordinarily we should expect to see a massive wave of tidal water, or a massive fog bank, or a fluffy envelopment of clouds to overtake a landscape. But this is not the case here. Hmm, an undisclosed wave of fabric, too regular, yet too strange to be something that is already depicted within natural phenomena. It's also even more curious that the wave of fabric is not etched after a certain progression -- there's no folds, creases, or even detail to denote what it actually is, aside from the immediate effects of its "event horizon" on all the denizens it enshrouds. Is its bare, white tapestry, the subject of pure possibility? Perhaps its designed to tell the viewer nothing, as the fabric itself is a tapestry of a different reality, potentially amounting to that fourth density reality that will eventually befall this planet, as it oscillates from its third density existence of about 300,000 years, into a fourth density existence of another 300,000 years... and thus a third density soul, or perspective, simply cannot imagine it.

Considering what was already said about the sun's dark companion star, in various sessions, I would think it best to use what's already on this session thread to tie in the significance of nemesis, especially with Albrecht Durer's Nemesis (1502), as opposed to putting it somewhere else, on related threads or sessions. The other sessions include metrics and estimates, yet this one here seems to be without most of those things, along with presenting enough "suggestions" that fit right alongside Durer's Nemesis.

... From This Session August 3, 1996:

"Q: (L) It is not the Oort cloud or the comets that is going to cause all this terror and carrying on, it is going to be the seeing of the illuminated brown star, which will go away, and then no one will see what is coming! And this IS talked about in both the Bible and Nostradamus - but it was incomprehensible before! Okay, how long will it take the comets to get from the Oort cloud to here?

A: Let us just say that the cluster travels much faster than the usual cometary itinerary.

Q: (T) And this is because they are traveling in the wake of a large sun sized gravity well...

A: And we have spoken of the comet cluster before, and we have told you that this time, it rides the Wave.

Q: (L) Is the wave the energy from this brown star?

A: No.

.......

Q: (L) Okay, now... (T) Well, the wave is a form of energy. (L) Yes, they once told us that it was "hyper-kinetic sensate."

A: Realm border, this is your quantum factor, Laura, so plug it into "Noah" accordingly, and check out the results."


Of course, my own interpretative efforts are just that -- interpretations. I'm pretty sure 1,001 or more different interpretations of this engraving could be had. However the symbology presented in Durer's work is extremely uncanny, from work done more than 500 years ago. Did he receive prophetic inspiration through a dream, enough to shock him out of a state of malaise to produce this piece of art? Did he receive patronage, whose records or indications have been lost to time, or simply never recorded? Was he part of some secretive group that was encoding things through writing and art, to give to future generations as inheritance? Is there more to such questions that could give truthful insight? I suppose from everything that everyone on this forum has already seen, considered and discussed.... I would put my money on all of the above!

Anyways, thanks for reading.


References

(1) Helios Relief. Hisarlik, Turkey. Wikipedia. Uploaded May 11th, 2011. Helios - Wikipedia
(2) Nemesis. Wikipedia. Nemesis - Wikipedia
(3) Poesia Latina. http://www.poesialatina.it/_ns/greek/testi/Suda/Lexicon.html
(4) Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon. Simon Wallenberg Press. Reprint: (2007). United States. ISBN: 1-84356-026-7. Clarendon Press. (1909). Oxford.
(5) Nemesis. Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528). Copper Engraving | Print. circa 1502. height: 332 mm (13.07 in); width: 232 mm (9.13 in). Nuremburg. File:ADurerFortunaengraving.jpg - Wikipedia

Selected Notes -- Wikipedia

[1] Suda, rho, 33 http://www.poesialatina.it/_ns/greek/testi/Suda/Lexicon.html
[2] "Nemesis – Origin and history of nemesis by Online Etymology Dictionary". Etymology of "nemesis" by etymonline
[3] R. S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Brill, 2009, pp. 1005–06.
[4] Hesiod, Theogony 223. Hesiod, Theogony, line 207
[5] Stasinus of Cyprus or Hegesias of Aegina, Cypria Fragment 8. Hesiod ; The Homeric hymns ; And Homerica : Hesiod : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
[6] Pausanias, Description of Greece 1.33.7–8. Pausanias, Description of Greece, <a target="_blank" onclick="openPopupWindow(this); return false" href="entityvote?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0001&auth=tgn,7002681&n=1&type=place">Attica</a>, chapter 33, section 8
[7] Gantz, p. 149; Bacchylides fr. 52 Campbell, pp. 298, 299 [= Tzetzes on Hesiod's Theogony 80–6 (Matranga, p. 580)]. Fragments and Anecdota graeca e mss. bibliothecis Vaticana, Angelica, Barberiniana
[8] Examples of Nemesis in Literature, 19 August 2013, retrieved October 12, 2013. Nemesis - Examples and Definition of Nemesis
 
FYI: the tenth and last feature film in the next generation Star Trek franchise is called Nemesis (2002) wherein captain Picard encounters his evil 'twin' clone named Shinzon from the planet Remus.
 
Back
Top Bottom