The Force is Strong With This One
Awesome post! I remember the discussions about DNA but never connected them back to this context.That seems to be the case.
Here is one of the sessions and quotes I was thinking about. Specifically, that “DNA is a sort of receiver”.
Do we think the receiver is picking up something as mundane as EM, or something on another level? (If it is E/M it can be detected and measured - and then synthesized...)
Your post has triggered an image in me whereby the DNA itself is not just the antenna, but also the transducer - acting a bit like a cross between a multi-tapped transmission line (with each rung on the DNA ladder representing a uniquely configured tap on the transmission line), and a diffraction grating. The result would be to convert an incoming signal into a holographic energy field.
My issue with single-celled organisms has always been that the visible organelles coupled with the “code” interpretation of DNA couldn’t account for their dynamic ability to respond to their environment. DNA as a code source could not behave fast enough to control this behavior, and in the absence of a nervous system, there was no visible mechanism to even drive things like an amoeba via pure remote control...
But if DNA, its shape, geometry, and the E/M properties of the rungs on the ladder, were used to generate a holographic field, then there would be no need for a separate interpreter...
(While Physics was my first love, Electronics was my second, and Computers was my third...)
I always saw DNA as computer code, needing an interpreter to actually do anything or manifest action in this reality. But if DNA has a dual role as an antenna, which due to its geometry and the sequencing of the rungs of the ladder, would respond selectively to different signals by generating unique holographic fields, it would not need a separate interpreter to be able to dynamically translate between intent and action...
Wow! Mind blown!