Simple Algebra Reveals Densities for An Average 3D Joe ?

[Alejo]

agni,

I am not sure that whatever you have decided worked for you personally translates to a harmonious participation in this forum. You have been rambling for several hours here, using foul language and then laugh it off as "come on guys! let's have some fun!" and all to really say nothing.

It is not the purpose of this forum, it's become noise.

As suggested above, maybe you do need assistance but I daresay the type of assistance you need won't be found here

 

[agni]

agni,

I am not sure that whatever you have decided worked for you personally translates to a harmonious participation in this forum. You have been rambling for several hours here, using foul language and then laugh it off as "come on guys! let's have some fun!" and all to really say nothing.

It is not the purpose of this forum, it's become noise.

As suggested above, maybe you do need assistance but I daresay the type of assistance you need won't be found here

Actually, Thank you ! Yes, because I am going through very boring times, not Exciting at all. I know you would not be. Feel free to delete if it's of no use, or keep it as a 'case study of what not to do', or display it for public embarrassment. Thank you for the all that you ever gave me. I am legit even more confused now who is the sane one.. :)

 

[Turgon]

3. How many here are real Psychiatrists that can issue diagnoses here ? Can you please help to diagnose me from my posts here ? Any hope for me to heal without that chemical shit ? Can I see a degree of a person who dishes diagnoses ?

Agni, you asked 18 questions in this one post alone. If you were in a conversation with someone who asked that many questions sequentially, you don't have to be a licensed clinician to see and know something is up.

 

[John G]

Hierarchical Indexing via Prime Factorization encodes each HTML node in a DOM tree as a unique composite number constructed from prime factors assigned at each hierarchical level. This concept ensures that a node’s numeric label reveals its parent–child relationships through the factorization of primes. The central idea is that each root-level tag is assigned a unique prime, and each subsequent child is multiplied by its parent’s prime or a new prime, resulting in a product whose factorization identifies the entire ancestry path...

Elemental Density Mapping scores each HTML node by combining content volume and structural complexity into a single density value. High-density elements often carry semantic weight, while low-density ones might be noise. This method helps highlight important sections for Ant Scouts' exploration.

Sounds like DOM tree meets P-adic tree to form a Conway Game of Life with hopes of becoming the next Feynman Checkerboard.

 

[A Jay]

If I were you I would struggle with this obsession you've developed and work on staying focused and grounded in the practical world.

Go to bed early, wake up early, go to work, cook like you want to take care of yourself, clean like you take pride in your environment, and so on.

Whatever is going on with you, indulging in the thoughts as you have been has not been helping.

 

[susy7]

Sounds like DOM tree meets P-adic tree to form a Conway Game of Life with hopes of becoming the next Feynman Checkerboard.

You know very well that there is more than just Clifford algebra. Octonions too, I no longer read any work on theoretical physics, being a mathematician, I was fed up with the "massacre" that physicists were doing with mathematics. Physicists study “physical” phenomena and when they tackle algebra and Lie groups, it becomes painful. There is a huge field in mathematics, which we would need 300 years of study. For my part, I am as much studying spinors and its algebra, but also all number theory, algebraic geometry (which is huge in research), geometries as well as non-commutative geometry, quantum groups, and so on. Quantum mechanics like field theory is not finished. Mathematics can also be studied as a world outside of "physics" and when we delve into it, we see a world that I would call "dynamic" in itself. The Cassiopaeans said to study unified field theory, did we think of this sentence in mathematical and physical terms or is there something else? Gravitation is everything, are we talking about gravitons? Or another world?

 

[John G]

You know very well that there is more than just Clifford algebra. Octonions too, I no longer read any work on theoretical physics, being a mathematician, I was fed up with the "massacre" that physicists were doing with mathematics. Physicists study “physical” phenomena and when they tackle algebra and Lie groups, it becomes painful. There is a huge field in mathematics, which we would need 300 years of study. For my part, I am as much studying spinors and its algebra, but also all number theory, algebraic geometry (which is huge in research), geometries as well as non-commutative geometry, quantum groups, and so on. Quantum mechanics like field theory is not finished. Mathematics can also be studied as a world outside of "physics" and when we delve into it, we see a world that I would call "dynamic" in itself. The Cassiopaeans said to study unified field theory, did we think of this sentence in mathematical and physical terms or is there something else? Gravitation is everything, are we talking about gravitons? Or another world?

Clifford algebra does spread into many other things. Its bivectors get you to Lie groups and bosons. It also gets you to Bott periodicity, star algebras, CCR and CAR algebras, superalgebras, and spinors and that's only the things Wikipedia talks about. Ark once referred to it as a mother algebra which means it kind of houses other math structures and can be useful without even looking at the actual Clifford algebra of the mother algebra. I think the Clifford algebra central grade relates to the classical central algebra differential geometry of Ark's EEQT model but that is outside of something on Wikipedia and could thus be something a mathematician wouldn't like about physicists (or in my case electrical engineers).

My view of Clifford algebra comes via cellular automata; I worked with the Conway one at IBM. The general idea that cellular automata has a Clifford algebra symmetry comes via a physicist that Wikipedia cites for its Feynman Checkerboard article. The 4-dim Feynman checkerboard and elementary cellular automata both have a Cl(8) symmetry. Feynman's 2-dim Feynman Checkerboard has a Cl(2) symmetry. Cl(8) and Cl(2) relate to the 8-dim real and 2-dim complex Bott periodicity and star algebras/superalgebras may be good at taking advantage of this for Hilbert and Fock spaces aka it's a number theory and quantum group thing.

Gravity as everything could just mean the general idea of taking you to a new state even if you are at the Planck scale 7th density where symmetry is not broken at all. Going state to state (learning) is probably kind of all there is including when going to another world of sorts (densities).

 

[susy7]

Clifford algebra does spread into many other things. Its bivectors get you to Lie groups and bosons. It also gets you to Bott periodicity, star algebras, CCR and CAR algebras, superalgebras, and spinors and that's only the things Wikipedia talks about. Ark once referred to it as a mother algebra which means it kind of houses other math structures and can be useful without even looking at the actual Clifford algebra of the mother algebra. I think the Clifford algebra central grade relates to the classical central algebra differential geometry of Ark's EEQT model but that is outside of something on Wikipedia and could thus be something a mathematician wouldn't like about physicists (or in my case electrical engineers).

My view of Clifford algebra comes via cellular automata; I worked with the Conway one at IBM. The general idea that cellular automata has a Clifford algebra symmetry comes via a physicist that Wikipedia cites for its Feynman Checkerboard article. The 4-dim Feynman checkerboard and elementary cellular automata both have a Cl(8) symmetry. Feynman's 2-dim Feynman Checkerboard has a Cl(2) symmetry. Cl(8) and Cl(2) relate to the 8-dim real and 2-dim complex Bott periodicity and star algebras/superalgebras may be good at taking advantage of this for Hilbert and Fock spaces aka it's a number theory and quantum group thing.

Gravity as everything could just mean the general idea of taking you to a new state even if you are at the Planck scale 7th density where symmetry is not broken at all. Going state to state (learning) is probably kind of all there is including when going to another world of sorts (densities).

If I could just look into it more but time. I've been working with Reese Harvey's Spinor and calibration and now Dirac Operators in Representation Theory by Jin-Song and Pavle Pandzic and Conformal groups in geometry and spin scrutures.

 

[susy7]

If I could just look into it more but time. I've been working with Reese Harvey's Spinor and calibration and now Dirac Operators in Representation Theory by Jin-Song and Pavle Pandzic and Conformal groups in geometry and spin scrutures.

I've started Quantum Cohomology and I need to study intersection theory again.

 

[John G]

If I could just look into it more but time. I've been working with Reese Harvey's Spinor and calibration and now Dirac Operators in Representation Theory by Jin-Song and Pavle Pandzic and Conformal groups in geometry and spin scrutures.

I've started Quantum Cohomology and I need to study intersection theory again.

The conformal group for spin structure in differential geometry is exactly what I'd like as part of the Clifford algebra middle grade. There's also a unimodular structure as in this paper:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.2159

Cohomology for me tends to just be looking at ghosts which tend to morph into annihilation operators of a Fock space. I'm sure I butcher the math a bit in thinking this way. I go back and forth between the Feynman picture and the Heisenberg Hamiltonian picture using the exact same math.

 

[susy7]

The conformal group for spin structure in differential geometry is exactly what I'd like as part of the Clifford algebra middle grade. There's also a unimodular structure as in this paper:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.2159

Cohomology for me tends to just be looking at ghosts which tend to morph into annihilation operators of a Fock space. I'm sure I butcher the math a bit in thinking this way. I go back and forth between the Feynman picture and the Heisenberg Hamiltonian picture using the exact same math.

Thank you

 

[susy7]

The conformal group for spin structure in differential geometry is exactly what I'd like as part of the Clifford algebra middle grade. There's also a unimodular structure as in this paper:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.2159

Cohomology for me tends to just be looking at ghosts which tend to morph into annihilation operators of a Fock space. I'm sure I butcher the math a bit in thinking this way. I go back and forth between the Feynman picture and the Heisenberg Hamiltonian picture using the exact same math.

That's why it's so confusing. When I tried to study certain field theoretics, all I could see was horrible integrals. The worst field, along with statistics, which I hate.