I got behind on this thread and Chu’s language thread and videos, but I finally caught up with them. Since this thread was started and I took in Chu’s videos and the discussion in that thread, I’ve had many ideas and thoughts that I have been ‘chewing on’ and thinking about. This post is a start to these ideas and thoughts. I plan to also post in Chu’s thread.

Using the pendulum, etc Lethbridge was able to sense/measure and distinguish between the frequency of objects, emotions, and other things (I need to re-read the book). Perhaps these measurements and observations he was able to make may be an indication of the frequency or frequency vibration of things, etc that ties into consciousness. How so?

Let’s say that consciousness (knowledge, awareness, information, and experiences that produces lasting impressions from learning) of an object/being that we can observe in 3D from Density 1, 2, or 3 is stored in that object/being geometrically, similar to the ‘language’ of the Crop Circles – geometric shapes, etc.

A C’s session quote from the ‘Hope and Glory’ article -

Hope and Glory - Will the Cassiopaeans Move With Us? by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
A 3D being that has a soul may have the soul composition related to the mathematical geometric storage of all knowledge, awareness, information, experience, and learning, etc gained from all lives and the current life. This mathematical geometric storage would relate to the ‘language’ of the crop circles and math as the universal language. Perhaps each individual being (but really each being or consciousness from density level 1 to 7) in any given moment could be described in a distinct way, which is separate from other beings, via this mathematical geometric ‘language’, like the ‘language’ of the crop circles.

There are a number of discussions with the C’s about geometry and algebra, such as this one:

Again from the article –

Maybe this was in part what Lethbridge was measuring and observing to some extent with his pendulum?

But in my mind math itself seems ‘dead’ or lacks energy or ‘life’ all by itself. It seems to me that the soul would be an energetic mathematical geometric representation of all knowledge, awareness, information, experience, etc. Maybe this energy even allows for the mathematical representation to ‘hold together’. So, consciousness/soul would be energy and a mathematical geometric representation of knowledge, awareness, experience, etc. Where this possible energy comes from is hard to say, but it could be that the energy comes from or directly relates to or is connected to the energy of love from 7D, or something along those lines. Maybe it is along the lines of my ‘Divine Couple’ post and abstraction where the Cosmic Mind provides the logic and consciousness as the medium for all information and the Cosmic Heart provides the energy/love? Or also in relation to the ‘Mother Matrix’ mentioned from the article ‘Hope and Glory’?

The Divine Couple
And that this energy would help to or fully holds the mathematical geometric pattern together. Gives ‘life’ to the math… allows information to be recorded and held it seems without matter. Allows for consciousness (geometry and energy) without matter.

So, what about algebra? Perhaps the energetic mathematical geometric composition of the soul /consciousness gives off a frequency vibration.

I remember a C’s quote about 4D STS able to easily see everything about a 3D being in terms of soul and energy body, but I currently can’t find it.

This frequency vibration from our level is not yet readily observable by us to any large degree, but it is likely there to possibly study nonetheless. Perhaps studied with something like the pendulum like Lethbridge did or something else that could be created. And perhaps a computer program could be created that takes the frequency vibration that is measured/observed and turns the frequency vibration into a mathematical geometric representation of the frequency vibration. And the frequency vibration of an object/being, which is a representation of the consciousness held via the energetic mathematical geometric composition, may be an algebraic representation of the mathematical geometric composition. All of this is kind of like trying to distinguish the ‘language’ of a person or a person’s soul similar to the ‘language’ of the crop circles.

The algebraic representation is the frequency vibration or frequency that is transmitted from the energetic mathematical geometric representation of consciousness/soul. Or perhaps algebra takes the particle of geometry and transforms it into the mathematics of the frequency and/or wave (see below). And it could be that the frequency vibration/frequency as it is transmitted from one being (being 1 - transmitter) to another (being 2 - receiver) assumes in transit the full universal representation via a wave of the information being transmitted by being 1 that is then received by being 2. What is the difference between what is transmitted by being 1 and what is received by being 2, and the full universal representation of the information transmitted as the frequency travels from being 1 to being 2?

The particle and the wave, perhaps?

To make things more simplistic, let’s imagine below what is transmitted is the spoken word instead of the resonance vibration of the energetic mathematical geometric representation of a being’s consciousness/soul.

The particular (particle) understanding, knowledge, awareness, etc of being 1 that is transmitted… which then turns into a wave right after transmission… which is then turned into the particular (particle) understanding, knowledge, awareness, etc of being 2 as it is received. Although being 1 and being 2 may have very similar understandings and agreements to the information transmitted and received, the particular understanding of being 1 and being 2 would seem to almost always have some difference due to the how different each life and experience, knowledge etc of being 1 and being 2 are, but they can get closer and closer to a full understanding between themselves as they network and learn about each other and also learn about the given subject. (Related subjects: G’s circles - esoteric/no misunderstanding, collinearity, ‘speaking the same language’, Frequency Resonance Vibration (FRV)).

Back to the ‘full universal representation’ – the wave between transmission from being 1 and reception by being 2. After the information is transmitted with its particular meaning, which stems from the understanding, etc of the transmitter/being 1, maybe it turns into, for the full duration of its travels, a wave. But a wave of what? Perhaps a wave of all possible and full meanings and information associated with the subject of the transmission as viewed from and in the medium of the Universal Consciousness/Cosmic Mind.

Since Mr. Cat has liked to jump on my desk during my thinking about this and related subjects and making notes as I started to write out these general thoughts on paper, let us say that being 1 speaks “cat” to being 2. Being 1 would have particular understandings, feelings, experiences, and meanings associated with the word “cat” that is spoken and how it was spoken. Being 2 would also have particular understandings, feelings, experiences, and meanings associated with the word “cat”. There is common understanding about the word “cat” between them, but each has their own unique personal experiences, etc associated with the subject of the word “cat”. But the universe, the Universal Consciousness/Cosmic Mind, would have all possible information in terms of experiences, meanings, and understandings about the word “cat” contained and observed in all eternity (past, present, and future). So, the particular meaning, etc of the word “cat” transmitted from being 1 (the particle – particle 1) turns into a wave of all possible meanings, etc of the word “cat” as viewed, understood, and experienced by the universe as it travels and then is received by being 2, whose receiver takes the wave and turns it into his or her particle meaning, etc (the particle - particle 2) of the word “cat”.

This quote about Stonehedge comes to mind in relation to this:

It seems to follow logically from my thoughts above that geometry is tied to the particle and algebra is tied to the wave/frequency and/or the transformation of the geometry into the frequency.

The question has been asked “What is information?” I would say information is a frequency… perhaps a multi-faceted frequency at times that we only are aware of in part.

Like I said at the start, I have many more thoughts and ideas, such as how the above possibly relates to the below C’s quote, but this post is long enough and Mr. Cat is doing his frustrated meow chirps about not getting his nightly lovies. Thanks for reading! Hope it isn’t just wild speculation and jibberjabber. I know when I open my mind to such speculation, I can start feeling nutty and ‘in the clouds’ at times.