I plan to see the movie soon and good news, its playing in my area and hasn't been censored. Not so good news, a red flag has been raised on Angel Studios connecting people to criminal organizations, hard to believe they're unaware of the connection. Hmmm...Wow! What to make of this!
We must not allow our emotions to blind us from logic and reason
gregreese.substack.com
Check out journalist Celia Farber's Substack: "Why Doesn't Angel Studios Understand The Implications Of Pointing To Clinton/Podesta NGOs In The Fight Against Child Trafficking? A Greg Reese Report Raises Uncomfortable Questions"
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/why-doesnt-angel-studios-understand?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=257742&post_id=134867487&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email…
Farber states Greg Reese told her that within 1 hour after release of his vid (linked to above by SummerLite) the links to NCMEC & ICMEC (the Clinton-Podesta NGO's), which are seen in a screenshot in the video, were removed from the Angel Studios website. [these acronyms stand for: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and International Center for Missing and Exploited Children]
Echoing SummerLite's post, this Bitchute video contains a clip from an interview with Tim Ballard in which he states that the Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim is the primary funder of Sound of Freedom. In the same vid, Trump singles out Slim as behind sexual misconduct charges against him. He also points out that Carlos Slim is the largest shareholder in The New York Times. We learn Slim is also one of the biggest donors to the Clinton Foundation.
bitchute.com
MURKY WATERS - SOUND OF FREEDOM LINKS TO CARLOS SLIM
Smoke&Mirrors https://www.bitchute.com/channel/smoke_mirrors/ TIM BALLARD AND JIM, SOUND OF FREEDOM NOW LINKS TO CARLOS SLIM, A CORRUPT MEXICAN BILLIONAIRE WHO HAS DONATED MILLIONS TO THE CLINTON...
So, we come full circle, as now Trump is screening Sound of Freedom financed by Carlos Slim whom he accuses of setting him up for sexual misconduct (!).
Going back to Greg Reese's video, what's particularly disturbing is how these NGO's and other initiatives such as Amber Alert, which are seemingly intended to monitor world wide child sex trafficking (with Amber Alert giving parents tools for tracking their children should they go missing), in actuality are fronts masking the digitized cataloging and targeting of potential victims. As this video points out,
in the aftermath of these far reaching ["anti" child sex trafficking] initiatives the profits from child sex trafficking soared 500% from 30 billion to 150 billion dollars.
Towards the end of the Bitchute vid (where various inserts are accompanied by hip hop) you see that Hollywood insider Jerry Molen (who's worked on some of Spielberg's most successful films) is also this film's executive producer. Not only that, as described by the filmmakers, he was given the final say as to the editing/content of the film. In that respect, this is not an 'indie" film (if there ever really was such a thing). As the filmmakers state, "[Molen's] also very well connected so his name still calls down a lot of power."
I think it's safe to say that with an executive producer of that caliber and a Clinton connected backer, it's no wonder this film got distribution. The question is why do these particular players want such a film produced and distributed in the first place?
My first assumption (and I have yet to see the film) but my first take before doing any research was that the PTB has been aware for some time that the subject of child sex trafficking is getting more and more traction online, and so the idea of harnessing that growing pressure for exposure with a disturbing narrative film (without actually going into too much detail, or having to name names) could be their idea of a desirable compromise. However, after doing some research I realized things could be far worse than typical controlled opposition tactics: consider that before Angel Studios took down the link to the Clinton-Podesta NGO's, those running the show in all this (and Molen would certainly be ranked rather high since he might well be functioning as a Hollywood insider handler) but those running the show may have reveled in the idea of creating a focal point or context in which the audience's emotional reaction could then be unwittingly funneled into the very organizations and/or initiatives responsible for the dramatic rise of the child sex trafficking industry. Even without the links, it is now suggested at their website that concerned citizens do their own research, which invariably would lead them to the same outlets. Also: Polaris is still named. As per Reese's video (a transcription of which you can see under the video):
"In 2009 the Clinton Global Initiative partnered with the Polaris Project and by 2014 they created a 'Global Modern Day Slavery' database of organizations in 199 countries to monitor human trafficking."
This is not to say that everyone involved in the making of this film are in on what appears to be the larger deception implied by all this. Celia Farber in conversation with Greg Reese had this to say:
"Greg and I had a very thorough conversation. We concluded that our best guess is that Tim Ballard himself is likely a victim of something or other, and probably genuine."
Journalist George Webb was less generous. But then he lost his research partner who he claims was killed due to her investigative work related to child sex trafficking:
Last of all, Greg Reese sums things up well I think:
"Awareness of this horrific problem is good. And perhaps Angel Studios is unaware of who they are promoting. But if we think that the same NGOs whose efforts increased the child sex trade by 500% will somehow end child sex slavery, then maybe we are too emotional to think clearly. And that’s a problem. Because this same cabal is pushing a totalitarian surveillance state, they are already pushing the idea of micro-chipping your children, to keep them safe. And without logic and reason, the people will demand it. And our children will be more enslaved than ever."
