Sound wave focusing follow up?

[Benjamin]

Something happened yesterday and it took me a while to let it process.

While I was watching the Jay Anderson video yesterday, I noticed that I was having some trouble keeping focused. At about the 2/3's mark, all of a sudden, for a split second, a sort of bright tunnel 'appeared' (in my head?) with an image, like some kind of natural setting with blue and green, at the end of it. But the feeling that came with it was really interesting as was the word that accompanied the whole thing: "easy". The understanding that I got from this word was that the environment that was on the other end of the tunnel was 'easy', as in 'easy to do things in'. I thought about this many hours later and compared the feeling of whatever that was to our current environment, which I would now describe as thick, muddy, 'a total slog'.

I remembered the C's using the word 'easy' a few times so I did a quick search and these two stood out for me.

Nov. 7, 1994

Q: (L) Was anybody ever able to transmute lead into gold by any means?
A: Everybody is able.
Q: (L) How?
A: You must discover this yourself.
Q: (L) Is this knowledge written down somewhere on the planet?
A: Yes, but it will be easier in 4th level.

Nov. 23, 1996

Q: (T) Are you saying that the human/Aryan types can exist as long as they want in any density?
A: In 4th and 3rd.
Q: (L) They can move back and forth, existing with equal ease on either density?
A: Well, not with "equal ease," because 4th density is easier, naturally.

 

[ivanb]

!?!?!?!?WOW......o my god.....

 

[ivanb]

A few days ago, I was watching the end of a hockey game when the quote of "sound to manipulate gravity which produces sound to manipulate gravity" started to run through my thoughts. I suddenly understood what that might be, but I knew the quote was wrong. When I found it I realised that there are actually two examples.

Jun. 15, 1996


For the longest time I could not figure these out. It reads like circular thinking gobbledygook. But now I think these are two examples of a two-way antenna, like the "tuning fork" and Stonehenge. This feels like a type of unity because you can't do one without the other,

A few days ago, I was watching the end of a hockey game when the quote of "sound to manipulate gravity which produces sound to manipulate gravity" started to run through my thoughts. I suddenly understood what that might be, but I knew the quote was wrong. When I found it I realised that there are actually two examples.

Jun. 15, 1996


For the longest time I could not figure these out. It reads like circular thinking gobbledygook. But now I think these are two examples of a two-way antenna, like the "tuning fork" and Stonehenge. This feels like a type of unity because you can't do one without the other, I think. It's simultaneous.

More confirmation, wow. The small 'I' expands into the 'I AM' unified field of what we all truly are...this is exciting...
('I think. It's simultaneous.')... brilliant...

Thank you. Your helping me think along this lines again. I hope I could add my two cents to this discussion in the near future.

 

[Benjamin]

In the two images of the crop circle I posted earlier, there is a barbell type shape in the centre, two circles joined by a line, that is crossed by the 'string of pearls'. I'm wondering now if that's representing a 'two-way antenna'; two 'locations' (whatever that may be) linked by a conduit.

 

[Benjamin]

So, acoustical levitation was created to counteract gravity, a weak force. But plasma deals in the considerably stronger force of electromagnetism. Imo, that's the difference between 'acoustical levitation' and 'sound wave focusing' and the two concepts should be separated.

Hmm. In need of a fix. I can't separate gravity and electromagnetism like that.

Mar. 4, 2012

(L)... Okay, change gears: we watched this David Talbott video "Symbols of an Alien Sky". (discussion of which video it was) (L) The one about Mars was kind of compelling to me, but the other parts were silly. He just completely dumps out gravity, and yet they use gravity calculations to be able to send spacecraft up. So clearly, gravity IS what they say it is, and it does what they say it does, but there's more to it than just gravity.

A: Gravity and electromagnetism are intertwined.

Maybe I was trying to rebuke the 'mechanicalness' of the scientific treatment of 'acoustical levitation', even if I don't really like that term.