Think when it comes to external consideration that it works to certain degree, when the environment is normal to certain degree or polite. The more the environment is pathological and extreme you can throw external consideration out of the window, you can apply it but then your existence would not be of long duration. One is theory and another is reality and practice.
That obviously depends on how we define external considering, though. Whatever it is that you are calling external considering is not what we mean when we're using the term in a Work context. Your statement above seems to miss the whole point of Laura's opening post.
The point is, the more pathological our environment is, the more we need to be externally considerate in order to forge ourselves into something that is capable of operating in such an environment. Don Juan's attributes of warriorship: Control, Discipline, Timing, Forebearance and Will are the very things we need to develop in ourselves and we develop them through external considering - figuring out how to interact with other people (whether they're tyrannical or not) in the way that will work out best for us and best for them. What you say below is perfectly compatible with an 'existence of long duration in an extreme and pathological environment', essential for it, actually.
Because...
...there should be made clear distinction between being externally considerate and nice because some see it as same and act considerate because of naivety or fear of conflict even when that tactic does not show results, and that is one of the main reasons with ignorance and selfishness why humanity is where it is today...
Exactly. Another way of saying this is that the reason why the world is in such a mess is because people are afraid to do anything about it from fear, ignorance, selfishness. Not very warrior-like; only considering inner-ly, not externally. I think the biggest pitfall for people who are trying to be externally considerate is that they see it as 'not rocking the boat', not drawing attention to themselves, not bring active but reacting instead. But sometimes with a petty tyrant, becoming the active party, bringing up the issue, refusing to budge, standing your ground, are what is needed. Sometimes not; just depends on each situation.
When Laura asks for examples of external considering, I think anyone who ever read Gurdjieff and thought about it would have been trying to be externally considerate at all times. We're constantly interacting with other people, and I can't imagine why anyone would take their eye off the ball and not try to be externally considerate.
Of course, there's a difference between 'trying' and 'being'. One reason external considering is so difficult is because you have to think a lot, and that takes energy. And so, what often happens is that we will be faced with a person or a scenario and if we're watching ourselves, we'll see that 'plan A' would be selfish and not at all considerate. So we think a little bit, and as soon as we come up with a 'plan B' that seems less selfish, we'll go with that. But there's often plan C, plan D, maybe dozens of plans that are better, if we just put in the effort to think about it a bit more.
It requires the ability to put oneself in another's shoes, to assess them on as many levels as you can to determine who they are and what they're about, to try and determine what they're aiming at, to try to understand what it is that they're really asking for. Sometimes, they might just be asking to drain your energy. Well, we don't want that, right? So with certain people, we would want to get away from them as quickly and easily as possible. But with others, the situation we are in with them might require that we do give up some energy in the short-term, so as not to cause a much bigger energy drainage further down the road.
I had the pleasure I staying with an old friend of my mum's recently who I knew when I was a small child, but hadn't really seen for many years. It turned out that she liked to talk - A LOT. I mean, you'd mention one topic (I brought up the local sports stadium, for example) and she would then go off for fifteen minutes: who plays there now; who doesn't play there now, and why; where the previous team has gone; concerts they've had there; the political situation between the local authorities, sports authorities, and how there's a deadlock and the community are missing out; how teams won't play there because the facilities aren't as good... I could go on, as she would.
But this was every single interaction, every moment you're in the house. It's draining, it's mundane, the way she would explain anything she was talking about made it mundane and boring. She would go all around the houses, including many friends and relatives of hers, recounting unnecessary details about each single experience.
But I was only going to be seeing her for four days. Now maybe if for some reason I'd found myself in the situation of having to live with her, I might act differently, but instead of risking offending her by cutting her off, getting up and walking off, telling her I don't have time to talk, and then being stuck in a house with a frosty atmosphere, I sat there, patiently listening, trying my best not to allow my mind to wander off and dissociate (because that's the effect she would have), sip my drink, smoke cigarettes, and practice discipline, forbearance, etc.
I got to Work on myself, and it cost me energy to do it. But if I'd been impatient and egotistical, it could have been a bad situation.
Knowing myself, I know I find it more difficult to be externally considerate when I'm tired, or hungry or something like that. But, I could give many examples of when I was trying to externally consider from any day over the last week. Yesterday morning, I was driving down a narrow, busy, one-way street with cars parked either side and the driver in front of me stopped just after a space and began to parallel park into it. They were taking it slow and steady, and so I just stayed a good way behind them so as to not put any pressure on them at all and give them as much time as they needed. That way, they get to perform the manoeuvre at their own pace, and I would think that would end up being the fastest way they could do it - so it's best for them and best for me, because I get past sooner. Now, of course, there was a part inside me that really wanted to drive up much closer so as to put the pressure on and get them out of the way sooner, and someone used to habitually acting on their 'criminal/predator's mind' might feel perfectly justified in doing that - because it does make a kind of sense. But I just played the statistics: if I was in this situation ten times, I think they'd get parked faster more times if I just stay back and give them room.
So, some situations are simpler than others. The more complex they are, the more difficult it is to determine what the best course of action will be. And since I am not an omnipotent genius, I have found that unfortunately, I have to take a trial and error approach. That means often doing the wrong thing and having to learn from it. But it's the observation of the result of my actions and the analysis of how I could have done it better that matters more in the end. At the moment, I'm really trying to learn how to speak my mind without coming across as a jerk. Being honest with people in the right way, trying to figure out when to be brief and get straight to the point, or when to sugar-coat it a little, or even when not to talk at all. Every time I try it, and observe the result, there's always things I learn and take away and try to remember so that next time I'm in a similar situation, I can try to do it better.