STO vs STS

WhiteBear said:
Can you tell me in what way STS is expressed in the higher density levels?

Quotage:

950107 said:
A: [...] 4th is the last density for full manifestation of STS.
Q: (T) So, beings on the 5th and 6th level exist in pure energy?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) The 4th level is the last for full STS. Does that mean that the 5th level, which you have described as the "contemplative" level... what is the state of existence of a STS being on the 5th level?
A: Souls of 1,2,3, and 4 go to 5th.
Q: (T) So 5th level is where they go to while waiting to go back to one of the 4 for their next incarnation?
A: Exactly.
Q: (T) That is why it's called the contemplation level. You go and think about what you have done. (T) What about souls on 6th density? (L) Are there 6th density STS beings?
A: No, when you get to 6th you no longer need to recycle.
Q: (L) But still, is there an STS experience at 6th density, like the 6th density Orions?
A: These are only reflections of individuals, not unified entities. These reflections exist for balance. They are not whole entities, just thought forms.
Q: (L) Are these 6th density beings what the Bible describes as a "gathering" of angels as in the story of Job where "Lucifer" came in before the Lord...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, there are STS and STO at 6th density which balance? And they are just there, they exist?
A: Reflection for balance.
 
WhiteBear said:
I've been reading the Wave, just finished Chapter 8, and there's something that's been bugging me for the last couple chapters. STS vs. STO. I understand that it's desirable to be STO...that if given a choice between an STS action and an STO action, the STO action will be beneficial for my spiritual growth. My problem is, when decisions need to be made quickly, what fast method, if any, will tell me which is which?

A quick synopsis of any given situation is hard I believe for anyone that has not reached a higher level of consciousness. Especially for the mechanical people that we are. It is the struggle between "yes" & "no" at any given moment. Discernment http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php?id=246&lsel=All is key. What is it we want to accomplish? Are we doing it for some selfish reason like I desire those cookies for example. Even though I know they are bad for my health. But I want them anyway. And so what, if you buy them for that reason, but knowing why you bought them is the point. Sometimes helping someone else is a very STS action. If it makes you feel better about yourself, or you want to make that person like you, or you are doing it strictly so you can say to others, "well I am a good person, I buy girl scout cookies". The first step I believe is finding out why we do things in the first place. Then if we can see what the reasons are and then "choose" to change them because we would be becoming a better person and aligning more towards STO.

There are lies for self preservation and then there are plausable lies. http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php?id=976&lsel=All
Are you lying becasue it is fun to do so, no matter if it hurts another person or are you lying to save someone else? Yes a lie is a lie, but it is the intent behind the lie that is most import, osit.

This is an important start I think in finding your way here.
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=16426.0

The 'First Initiation' written by Mme Jeanne de Salzmann:

Try for a moment to accept the idea that you are not what you believe yourself to be, that you overestimate yourself, in fact that you lie to yourself. That you always lie to yourself every moment, all day, all your life. That this lying rules you to such an extent that you cannot control it any more. You are the prey of lying. You lie, everywhere. Your relations with others - lies. The upbringing you give, the conventions - lies. Your teaching - lies. Your theories, your art- lies. Your social life, your family life - lies. And what you think of yourself - lies also.

But you never stop yourself in what you are doing or in what you are saying because you believe in yourself. You must stop inwardly and observe. Observe without preconceptions, accepting for a time this idea of lying. And if you observe in this way, paying with yourself, without self-pity, giving up all your supposed riches for a moment of reality, perhaps you will suddenly see something you have never before seen in yourself until this day.


Are we not all on a similar path of enlightenment. You are not alone in your queries.
 
Bluestar said:
WhiteBear said:
I've been reading the Wave, just finished Chapter 8, and there's something that's been bugging me for the last couple chapters. STS vs. STO. I understand that it's desirable to be STO...that if given a choice between an STS action and an STO action, the STO action will be beneficial for my spiritual growth. My problem is, when decisions need to be made quickly, what fast method, if any, will tell me which is which?

A quick synopsis of any given situation is hard I believe for anyone that has not reached a higher level of consciousness. Especially for the mechanical people that we are. It is the struggle between "yes" & "no" at any given moment.

Yes, at our stage of development it is very difficult to determine just which actions are STO. We are STS, that is where we fit or we wouldn't be here, so the process is about learning what STO actions actually are. Every situation is unique so no generalisations can really be given, as it is the specific situation that must be studied with all it's possible ramifications.

However, it can be helpful in a case where one must make a snap decision, such as you describe, to try and figure out what "it" wants to do. "It" will always choose the STS way, as it is the easier way that makes less demands or in some way feeds the false personality. If "it" really wants to take one action, then it's a clue to examine and see how that action would feed the false personality.
 
Hi WhiteBear.

The way I currently understand STS as it applies to 3D is that as long as our awareness and BEing is so close to the matter fields, we are surrounded by entropic forces that climb the ontological stack from ground to the most superficial layers of structure and awareness. From the most banal or simple leakages and inefficiencies (including all the consequences of self-centeredness) to full blown destruction and end of life (as expressed by the idea of nonexistence in sleeping matter), this is STS as I see it applying to 3D.

STO represents the potential of mastering life in this state so that a next iteration through 3D life is no longer necessary from the perspective of learning our lessons. We learn to do this by making moment-to-moment choices that increase our FRV towards STO. We learn to do THAT by removing the blockages that prevent us seeing more possibilities.


WhiteBear said:
I'm happy because the little girl took the decision away from me...is that an STS reaction? Am I more likely to be indecisive in the future as a result?

I think the best answer to this is probably covered by the description of the 'do it again pleasure center' in the Wave.


Hope this helps. Where I'm off, maybe someone will step in to offer correction. :)


Edit: Additions for clarity.
 
Re: STS vs. STO

WhiteBear said:
I've been reading the Wave, just finished Chapter 8, and there's something that's been bugging me for the last couple chapters. STS vs. STO. I understand that it's desirable to be STO...that if given a choice between an STS action and an STO action, the STO action will be beneficial for my spiritual growth. My problem is, when decisions need to be made quickly, what fast method, if any, will tell me which is which? Here's a hypothetical example of my dilemma:

Since my point of view there are no methods for this. STO acts involve the sincere intention of helping others. But to be truly an act of help, we must have sufficient knowledge to determine to what extent we are helping. And this is not an ease work. I suppose we could start by trying to be aware of our true intentions before act. Doing work help us increase the self-awareness and thus to be aware of our real intentions.
 
Re: STS vs. STO

msante said:
WhiteBear said:
I've been reading the Wave, just finished Chapter 8, and there's something that's been bugging me for the last couple chapters. STS vs. STO. I understand that it's desirable to be STO...that if given a choice between an STS action and an STO action, the STO action will be beneficial for my spiritual growth. My problem is, when decisions need to be made quickly, what fast method, if any, will tell me which is which? Here's a hypothetical example of my dilemma:

Since my point of view there are no methods for this. STO acts involve the sincere intention of helping others. But to be truly an act of help, we must have sufficient knowledge to determine to what extent we are helping. And this is not an ease work. I suppose we could start by trying to be aware of our true intentions before act. Doing work help us increase the self-awareness and thus to be aware of our real intentions.

I'm understanding the need to do work on myself, removing blockages from seeing my true motivations...one of the tenets of my belief system is to "know yourself". This is the most important thing to me, above all. My concern is that, unless some of this self-work is resulting in a mystical awareness of information that is beyond my current ability to see, that no matter how pure my true intention is when I act, that there are facts that I simply do not know, that could easily cause my well-intentioned STO act to be STS.

Respect of someone else's free-will is important for an act to be STO, I understand. So, if I walk into a room and someone is hanging from a rafter by their neck, dying, do I take the time to look for a suicide note? No, I rush to help this person. There is no way to know if this person has chosen to end their life, or if they were placed there by someone else in an act of violence. This is an extreme hypothetical situation, but I hope it brings more clarity to the issue that I have failed to bring in my prior posts in this thread.
 
If you act based on your knowledge at the moment, that's what is. We all do that. And, hopefully, we all grow in knowledge.

When I didn't know any better, I bought the GS cookies to help the Girl Scouts. It made me feel better, sure, but that's okay. We live in an STS world and if feeling better is what makes things work, that's okay.

Later on, I realized that very little of the money went to the girl scouts, so I would donate the money and not take the cookies. It made me feel good and it ostensibly helped the GS troop, and that's how things work.

(I'm not concerned here about whether or not the girl is stealing the money or whether the GS idea is a good one - just buy the cookies or give the money).

However, at this point in my life, knowing for a certainty that those cookies are evil, that GS are probably ponerized and a means of indoctrinating young girls, I would simply say "no thanks." I might find some sort of pamphlet about the evils of wheat and hydrogenated vegetable oils and send it to the local troops, or write a letter about it to the local newspaper as a way of giving the lie the truth, but basically, in such casual situations, it's not worth getting tied up in knots.

It is in close relationships that the issue matters most.
 
Laura said:
If you act based on your knowledge at the moment, that's what is. We all do that. And, hopefully, we all grow in knowledge.

This is very true, the most important thing is choose the type of knowledge and be sure of it.
 
Re: STS vs. STO

WhiteBear said:
Respect of someone else's free-will is important for an act to be STO, I understand. So, if I walk into a room and someone is hanging from a rafter by their neck, dying, do I take the time to look for a suicide note? No, I rush to help this person. There is no way to know if this person has chosen to end their life, or if they were placed there by someone else in an act of violence. This is an extreme hypothetical situation, but I hope it brings more clarity to the issue that I have failed to bring in my prior posts in this thread.

I guess I rush to help this person too. Maybe after save him, you could try help him to consider all possible alternatives beyond the suicide, and help him to made aware of all the ramifications of suicide. Eventually, if this is his final decision, likely will try again more carefully.
 
Laura said:
It is in close relationships that the issue matters most.
09-19-98

Q: (L) Okay, now Eddie says: 'Laura brought up several comments about Love that confused me. I do not understand how could giving love when not being asked could harm instead of improve.' Can you remark on this?
A: "Giving" love is not giving, in such a case.
Q: So, if you give love when you have not been asked, you are NOT giving?
A: You are taking, as usual.
Q: When you say you are 'taking,' what are you taking?
A: Energy, a la STS.

How would one ask for love, without being STS?
 
WhiteBear said:
Laura said:
It is in close relationships that the issue matters most.
09-19-98

Q: (L) Okay, now Eddie says: 'Laura brought up several comments about Love that confused me. I do not understand how could giving love when not being asked could harm instead of improve.' Can you remark on this?
A: "Giving" love is not giving, in such a case.
Q: So, if you give love when you have not been asked, you are NOT giving?
A: You are taking, as usual.
Q: When you say you are 'taking,' what are you taking?
A: Energy, a la STS.

How would one ask for love, without being STS?

I don't think one can ask for love directly. It seems to me that if one works to develop the real qualities in oneself that ARE lovable, then the possibility exists to BE loved by others.
 
Richard S said:
I don't think one can ask for love directly. It seems to me that if one works to develop the real qualities in oneself that ARE lovable, then the possibility exists to BE loved by others.

But that's my point and puzzlement. If I'm waiting for someone to ask me, because I'm STO, and nobody does, because -they're- STO, it stops there, and nobody gets anything?
 
WhiteBear said:
Richard S said:
I don't think one can ask for love directly. It seems to me that if one works to develop the real qualities in oneself that ARE lovable, then the possibility exists to BE loved by others.

But that's my point and puzzlement. If I'm waiting for someone to ask me, because I'm STO, and nobody does, because -they're- STO, it stops there, and nobody gets anything?

Hi Whitebear. It might help to really grasp that you cannot be STO here - in this incarnation as an STS being on an STS planet. The most you can do is become an 'STO candidate'. So, to trouble your mind over questions like this is to waste energy. The problem is that even the way you post the question is STS, since you are STS and cannot fathom what it is like to be STO.

For example, it might be that in an STO world, there is no having to 'ask for love' since everyone, always and in everything, puts others before themselves, thus everyone, always and in everything, gets all they could ever need, including love. It's a totally foreign concept and difficult for us to grasp since we are not STO.
 
anart said:
WhiteBear said:
Richard S said:
I don't think one can ask for love directly. It seems to me that if one works to develop the real qualities in oneself that ARE lovable, then the possibility exists to BE loved by others.

But that's my point and puzzlement. If I'm waiting for someone to ask me, because I'm STO, and nobody does, because -they're- STO, it stops there, and nobody gets anything?

Hi Whitebear. It might help to really grasp that you cannot be STO here - in this incarnation as an STS being on an STS planet. The most you can do is become an 'STO candidate'. So, to trouble your mind over questions like this is to waste energy. The problem is that even the way you post the question is STS, since you are STS and cannot fathom what it is like to be STO.

For example, it might be that in an STO world, there is no having to 'ask for love' since everyone, always and in everything, puts others before themselves, thus everyone, always and in everything, gets all they could ever need, including love. It's a totally foreign concept and difficult for us to grasp since we are not STO.


Hi WhiteBear. Maybe our ability to receive is related to our ability to recognize what is being offered. This recognition might be easier once you have a certain self monitor running and a deeper understanding of 'love', fwiw.
 
Bud said:
Hi WhiteBear. Maybe our ability to receive is related to our ability to recognize what is being offered. This recognition might be easier once you have a certain self monitor running and a deeper understanding of 'love', fwiw.

I get it....my original impression was correct...I don't have enough information to form an educated opinion. Reading more, posting less...I'll hold questions till later...
Thanks, Bud :)
 
Back
Top Bottom