Thank you, AI for making such a comprehensible analysis. It's a fascinating read over concepts which I really lack understanding of.
The idea that the law exists only when you are still subject to desire made me reflect on my recent experience with the carnivore diet, for example. As the desire for carbs is not there anymore, it is no struggle to not eat it at all. Just a simple metaphor as I try to illustrate it by real-life examples.
I would guess that you need a lot of experience in life to reach that wise state of being:
I hypothesize. To be above the law, you would have to experience the widest array of states of being then. When you haven't experienced what it is to be both rich and poor, hungry and full, and all the other polarities we can think of, you cannot know what remains inside of you. What remains might only be the Core Energy/Life Force/Reiki as pictured in HDT. This Life Force is directly connected to 'X'. It has nothing to do with the flesh, the I, though you are its vessel and help disseminate it into the world instead of dragging others life forces. I wonder how the dragging between individuals would be represented in the model.
What I find interesting too is that there are no direct links between 'I' and 'S', meaning the medium between the two is always 'X'. It encompasses the idea that you have to get struck by yourself, ie to change anything it has to be appropriated by 'I'. There comes the revelation which is internal and cannot be directly transmitted by 'S'. The effort has to be made by 'I' to search for 'X'.
Then the revelation of 'X' totally change your perspective and you strive to disseminate it as a part of 'S' to all the others 'I' through the medium of the available 'X'.
This is my understanding so far. I'll never see the crucifixion the same way now. For now, it seems difficult to me to imagine being totally dead to 'I'. I understand the necessity for it but how can 'I' not identify with my life? Don't you constantly shift from 'I' to 'S' through X even when mostly a STO candidate?
The idea that the law exists only when you are still subject to desire made me reflect on my recent experience with the carnivore diet, for example. As the desire for carbs is not there anymore, it is no struggle to not eat it at all. Just a simple metaphor as I try to illustrate it by real-life examples.
I would guess that you need a lot of experience in life to reach that wise state of being:
“…for I have learned to be content with whatever I have. I know what it is to have little, and I know what it is to have plenty. In any and all circumstances I have learned the secret of being well-fed and of going hungry, of having plenty and of being in need. I can do all things through him who strengthens me.”
I hypothesize. To be above the law, you would have to experience the widest array of states of being then. When you haven't experienced what it is to be both rich and poor, hungry and full, and all the other polarities we can think of, you cannot know what remains inside of you. What remains might only be the Core Energy/Life Force/Reiki as pictured in HDT. This Life Force is directly connected to 'X'. It has nothing to do with the flesh, the I, though you are its vessel and help disseminate it into the world instead of dragging others life forces. I wonder how the dragging between individuals would be represented in the model.
What I find interesting too is that there are no direct links between 'I' and 'S', meaning the medium between the two is always 'X'. It encompasses the idea that you have to get struck by yourself, ie to change anything it has to be appropriated by 'I'. There comes the revelation which is internal and cannot be directly transmitted by 'S'. The effort has to be made by 'I' to search for 'X'.
Then the revelation of 'X' totally change your perspective and you strive to disseminate it as a part of 'S' to all the others 'I' through the medium of the available 'X'.
This is my understanding so far. I'll never see the crucifixion the same way now. For now, it seems difficult to me to imagine being totally dead to 'I'. I understand the necessity for it but how can 'I' not identify with my life? Don't you constantly shift from 'I' to 'S' through X even when mostly a STO candidate?