What gives you that idea?
Well, many people like to quote the Edgar Cayce statement that Russia will save the world. Fewer know of his similar predictions about China.
Decades before the rest of the world was thinking about the enormous impact that China would have upon the global stage, Edgar Cayce predicted great things for China and its people. On one occasion, Cayce told a group of people that eventually China would become “the cradle of Christianity, as applied in the lives of men.” — Edgar Cayce reading 3976-29
On another occasion, when a thirty-six-year-old book publisher asked about the destiny of China in 1943, just prior to his own trip to the country to serve in the capacity of a missionary, Cayce promised amazing changes in the country that would lead to more democracy and greater religious freedom. He also suggested that eventually the height of civilization would move from the West to the Chinese people: “And these will progress. For, civilization moves west.” — Edgar Cayce reading 2834-3
So is there evidence for these claims? I've been looking at material from Brian Berletic, Carl Zha, Matthew Ehret, Arnaud Bertrand, Michael Hudson, Eva Bartlett, and listening to Chinese politicians, looking at their domestic policies, geopolitics, etc. Plus reading SOTT articles on the topic. My conclusion is yes, there is evidence to Cayce's claims.
To be specific, China looks to have its act together and peoples interests as fundamental. Insofar as a country can be governed well in 3D during the influx of The Wave, China seems to be doing pretty good. Germane to my point - better than the West.
They also generally get geopolitics right - look at foreign minister Wang's statements on Palestine.
That's all probably because China doesn't seem to be very far along in its next cycle of ponerization. It's in good times mode, prosperity mode. Time will tell if and when these good times create an accumulation and overabundance of pathologicals, leading to another cycle of collapse into chaos. Same goes for Russia. So far, China is executing corporate fraudsters and banning others from the country (including having banned Soros), so they seem to have some grip on the pathologicals for now.
That's the general overview. As a sub-category to this, we have the question of cultural policy, and multiculturalism within China's borders. Based on my reading of the authors above (who are Sino-philes, yes, but also have pro-truth traits that probably trump that), and then looking at the internal disharmony of Western countries, China seems much more harmonious. I could be wrong, and I don't live there, but that's my current hypothesis.
Here's an example:
Historically, there were many ethnicities in what is now considered China. And yet, Han people dominate China and have done so since very long. Even with the ethnic minorities in China today, they're still grouped under the Han cultural identity, which has lately been replaced with party ideology. Throughout history, conformity towards one culture/ideology has always been the goal of Chinese culture, which is pretty much the opposite of any real multiculturalism. Ask Tibetans and people in Xinjiang how they feel about "multiculturalism".
Beware of Deep State propaganda, aka standard Western MSM talking points.
In the case of Tibet, it was a CIA/MI6 operating base, with the aim of destabilizing China. The creepy old man who is revered as the Dalai Lama was on CIA payroll, too. That's all documented. Tibet was also a violent feudal theocracy not too long ago.
PROLOGUE Tibet before 1959 was a feudal serf society. The serfs had no freedom, no land, and were often hungry. The democratic reform abolished serfdom and enabled millions of serfs to master their own life. The impoverished population in the...
www.sott.net
If I ask a Ukrainian about Russia, what will they say? It depends if they've bought into Banderite Nazism or if they're a decent human being.
So if I ask a Tibetan about their ideas on China, it all depends. Is it likely that I will find someone who is programmed, or someone who has the objective data to make an accurate assessment of their situation?
And I hope to God you're not towing the 'Uyghur genocide' line. The people in Xinjiang are doing just fine. Look at the material from the content producers I mentioned above for more details. Or just do a SOTT search.
As Putin said, this 'evil China' thing is a bogeyman, a story for children. Tibet and Xinjiang are major plot points in that fairy tale.
I'd argue that multiculturalism has a hard time surviving anywhere for long, just how people with very different vibes generally don't get along.
Yep, it's probably due to ponerological cycles.
For example, despite Chinese often bringing up the idea of a "5000 year old culture" or India trying to expand its soft-power through Ayurveda and Yoga, both states follow a very Western ideology that is founded on nihilistic philosophical materialism, the same one used around the world.
It's curious, you mentioned how cultures don't get along due to different vibes. Then you said 'for example' - but the example you bring up is actually lending evidence to how different national cultures
do get along - via an adoption of the same vibe nihilistic materialism.
Anyways, didn't China's philosophy predate the West? And same with India? So they can't really be said to 'follow' a Western ideology as you write above. That said, yeah, I agree the nihilistic materialism is definitely there in China. But so is a relatively humanist focus that ironically comes from their Marxism. I find that dash of humanism to be better than the nihilistic materialism with the transhumanism of the West. Just my preference, if I had to choose. About India I am ignorant.
Anyways, this is getting pretty far off topic.
www.jpost.com
