Taser's in the News - Put your taser article here!

Ellipse said:
Texas cop Tasers 72 year old, great-grandmother: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yWaE8tTlsc :scared:

The video is dated May 11, 2009.


Recent news on the above story: (imagine that, constable's name is McCain)

BTW, Utah case of "Jared Massey" was awarded $40,000 for "wrongful tasering" too which seems to have set precedent. So don't worry, it is "OK" to continue shocking the snot out of people for you see it has become lucrative now, money just solves everything, doesn't it? :thdown:


Travis County offers settlement to Taser grandma
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
October 1, 2009
Posted: October 1, 2009, 9:09 AM CDT Last updated: October 1, 2009, 9:40 AM CDT

A 72-year-old Texas woman whose Tasering by a deputy constable was shown on video nationwide has been offered a $40,000 settlement from Travis County.

Kathryn Winkfein, Tasered after she dared the constable to do so during a May traffic stop, wants $135,000 for pain and suffering, medical expenses and humiliation. But county commissioners Tuesday approved $40,000 as their "firm" counteroffer.

The incident is being reviewed by the district attorney's office, and a resisting-arrest charge is pending, said Precinct 3 Constable Richard McCain. An internal investigation found no violations by the deputy constable, McCain said.

Winkfein's lawyer Tom Tourtellotte said he would discuss the counteroffer with his client.
 
A stun gun is considered a deadly weapon, if you have one and not the police ...

So another fast food order came back wrong, but then things quickly got out of hand. A Florida woman and her friend decided to straighten out the Wendy's employee, and entered the store brandishing a stun gun. Police caught them, and by the time charges were filed the stun gun was being described as a deadly weapon.

"Reid and Bryant were arrested early this afternoon and charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a felony."

Since so other weapon was used they must mean the pink Cheetah stun gun. Aren't these the same weapons that they are always telling us are NOT lethal?


Drive-Thru Taser Incident At Wendy's
_http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0517102wendys1.html



I didn't see this posted throughout the day
 
Two deaths by taser in the UK this week -

Taser-related deaths raise concerns over 'non-lethal' police options

Campaign group Inquest believes there is a worrying increase in deaths as result of police restraint tactics

The deaths of three people in a week following police deployment of Tasers and pepper spray will raise legitimate concerns about these "non-lethal" options in the police armoury.

Inquest, which campaigns on behalf of the families of those involved in contentious deaths, believes the latest incidents are part of a worrying increase in fatalities as a result of police restraint tactics.

Last year there were four such deaths, and so far this year five people have died in controversial situations where officers have deployed force excluding firearms, Inquest says.

The deaths of the bodybuilder Dale Burns, 27, in Cumbria after he was shocked with a Taser and sprayed with pepper spray; Jacob Michael, 25, who was pepper sprayed during his arrest in Cheshire on Monday and Philip Hulmes, 53, Tasered in Bolton on Tuesday, are being examined by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Only a full investigation will establish whether these deaths are a cluster of unconnected fatalities or represent the concerns Inquest has expressed about the apparently excessive use of restraint.

In the case of Michael, witnesses have spoken of seeing him being beaten by officers while he was handcuffed. So far, inquiries suggest he was sprayed in the face inside his home, but managed to flee and was brought down by police on a verge some 30m away. No cause of death has been established yet for either Burns or Michael.

In the case of Hulmes, the situation appears to be very different. Initial inquiries suggest officers were called to reports that he had barricaded himself into his home and was harming himself. After failing to talk him out of the building, officers are understood to have entered and used the Taser gun. They then discovered that Hulmes had stabbed himself in the abdomen. He died half an hour later.

Since Tasers were introduced in 2004 three people – including Hulmes and Burns – have died after their deployment. Amnesty International believes Tasers are a legitimate option for highly trained police officers in very limited situations.

Amnesty opposed the expansion of Taser use in 2007, which meant that their deployment was extended beyond specially trained firearms officers in situations where they faced an armed suspect to the use by any officer who underwent 18 hours of training.

These so called "specially trained units" are now entitled to consider using Tasers to deal with severe violence or threats of violence, to themselves, the public or the individual being arrested.

The use of Tasers by forces differs widely. Between April 2004 and March 2010, Northumbria police, dealing with a population of 1.5 million, has used the weapons 1,054 times. There was controversy last year when the force deployed an X12 Taser in the hunt for Raoul Moat. The Taser has never been authorised by the Home Office and is considered more powerful than the weapons that are authorised – the X26 and M26. The Metropolitan police, which covers a population of 7.2 million, has used tasers 1,173 times in the same period, and Greater Manchester has deployed them 277 times.

Some groups of people are at higher risk of adverse effects from Tasers; children and smaller adults, and those who have a mental illness, according to the Association of Chief Police Officers. There are also increased risk factors if a person has an existing medical condition, or is under the influence of drugs.

The home affairs select committee – which examined the use of the unauthorised X12 Taser during the hunt for Moat – said in March that the circumstances in which Tasers can be used, the prevalence of their use and the training of officers would all merit further investigation. The latest deaths are likely to add strength to that recommendation.

_http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/24/taser-related-deaths-raise-concerns-police?INTCMP=SRCH
 
This is pretty sick and disgusting for two reasons.

The first is the unnecessary tazing of a mentally retarded individual by police.

The second is the pathological conversation of the people videotaping. "I hope he gets tazed." "If he gets tazed I'm putting this on Youtube" "It would be awesome"

Then, as soon as he gets tazed, the same people go outside and start acting all concerned about the situation. Maybe they should have done and said something BEFORE not AFTER the attack. :barf:

_http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b7d_1314560134
 
Another sick psychopathic cop attack on a helpless individual.

Blind stroke victim shot in the back with 50,000-volt taser by police who mistook his white stick for a SAMURAI sword

Retired company director Colin Farmer, 61, was shot as he walked to meet friends in Chorley, Lancashire
The unnamed officer then handcuffed Mr Farmer - a two-time stroke victim - as he fell to the ground after being hit with the stun-gun
Lancashire Constabulary has said it 'deeply regrets' the shocking blunder, and has launched an urgent investigation

Full story -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218945/Blind-stroke-victim-Colin-Farmer-shot-50-000-volt-taser-police-mistook-white-stick-SAMURAI-sword.html
 
Police wield Tasers against children 140 times in a year despite threat of fatal health problems if they are shocked by devices

Police deploy Tasers against children more than 140 times a year, figures show.

Official guidelines warn of potentially fatal health problems if youths are hit by the 50,000-volt devices.

Despite this, use of the weapons in confrontations with under-18s rose by almost 600 per cent in three years.

Police wielded the stun-guns against children 21 times between April 2006 and April 2007 – but this figure rose to 144 between 2009 and 2010, the latest period for which figures are available.

Overall, the devices were used in almost 4,500 confrontations last year – more than ever before – with three people every day now shot by the weapons.

Spending on the stun-guns and their accessories has doubled to £1.2million, and police chiefs are considering whether to extend their availability.

However, yesterday a campaigner condemned the use of Tasers on children, and called for an outright ban on firing the devices at under-18s.

Sophie Khan from McMillan Williams Solicitors, who represents Taser victims, said: ‘Tasers can kill people. They should not be used against children and this should be prohibited by law. There is a high risk of cardiac arrest and long-term injuries resulting in children being shot by them.

‘The Home Office’s own guidelines say that there are higher risks against children getting cardiac arrests.’

The official police handbook warns that children ‘and adults of smaller stature’ face a ‘potentially greater risk from the cardiac effects of Taser currents’.

The manual does not elaborate, stating that not enough research has been conducted in the area – but critics claim those hit by stun-guns can suffer cardiac arrests, burns, and serious head wounds from falling.

Other reports claim that being hit by a Taser can exacerbate pre-existing heart conditions. The latest figures were released in response to a parliamentary question asked by Baroness Stern in the House of Lords.

They show that of the 144 occasions on which police deployed Tasers against children between 2009 and 2010, they fired their weapons 31 times, up from 11 in 2006-2007. On the other occasions, officers merely drew their weapons as a threat, or possibly got as far as taking aim.

On nine occasions, officers placed the weapon directly against a youth’s body and pressed the trigger. This practice is known as a drive-stun, and causes pain without incapacitating the target.
Debate continues over the merits of the controversial American-made weapons, which were introduced in the UK in 2004.

There are around 12,000 Tasers on the streets of Britain, mostly used by trained officers. The Police Federation, which represents the force’s junior ranks, wants the Government to spend millions to increase the number to 36,000 – enough for all officers on duty.

However, critics claim that increased availability could affect the ability to control Tasers’ use. Serious questions have been raised over the weapons, after they were used in incidents involving the mentally ill, elderly and vulnerable.

The Daily Mail highlighted one such case in October, concerning an officer who fired a Taser at a blind man after mistaking his white cane for a samurai sword.

A spokesman for Amnesty International, which has campaigned against the growing use of Tasers, said yesterday: ‘Amnesty recommends that the use of Tasers on children, pregnant women, elderly people, and people with heart disease should be avoided in all circumstances unless officers are faced with an immediate threat to life or serious injury which cannot be contained by less extreme options.’

A Home Office spokesman said: ‘We are committed to providing the police with the tools necessary to do their job safely and protect the public.

‘Tasers are only used by highly trained officers and only in situations where violence or threats of violence are so severe that officers need to protect themselves or others.’

This year the Mail revealed that a two-shot Taser could soon be in the hands of British officers. The weapon could be used to hit two targets, or offer a second chance of hitting a suspect without the need to reload.

It's really difficult to not see this as basically legalized child abuse in an increasingly ponerised society.


_http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2252673/Police-wield-Tasers-children-140-times-year-despite-threat-fatal-health-problems-shocked-devices.html
 
Back
Top Bottom