In the Regency thread, it was suggested that a key element of the Work being done in the project was healing past-life trauma. This is done through consciously identifying with the characters, plus activation of the emotional centre, which is linked directly to the sexual centre, which is linked directly to the 7th density feminine aspect. As the characters go through it all, so do we - whether we learn to see ourselves in the protagonist lovers, and/or the antagonist tyrants. We suffer, we learn, our DNA does a little dance.
So the regency novels are set in the past - our consciousness registers this temporal setting, and in a way primes us for (1) past-life Work, and (2) our own recent past, in this life.
These Consortium books are set in the present, but gesture to a time-setting and a hyperdimensional reality that projects into the Earth's near future, and as such that registers in our consciousness, too. Given the hyperdimensional aspect in these tales, this also opens up possibilities of healing in a non-linear timeframe - not just past lives, but a clearer understanding of 'ourselves in the future', too. Again, as the characters go through it all, so do we - whether we learn to see ourselves in the protagonist lovers, and/or the antagonist tyrants.
What I'm pondering is this - in this Consortium series, if we limit our identification solely to the human protagonists who are forced to deal with psychopaths, demons, and monsters, could we be missing an opportunity to understand our own essence more fully?
For context, I watched Joker the other day. I was quite shaken. In part because of the bleak depiction of meaninglessness, manipulation, abandonment and violence. Mostly, though, I was shaken because Joker was so familiar. I got the sense that I was somebody like that in a past life - a brutalized, twisted person, driven to murder and psychosis.
Extrapolating out from there, I recalled Chapter 2 of The Wave. I could quote the whole dang mind-blowing chapter, but suffice to say, we are not who we think we are. It may be useful to re-read it while looking at these Consortium books:
So in light of the information in this chapter, it looks like these stories are giving us an opportunity to come face-to-face not with 'external threats', but with the true nature of our own multidimensional Soul essence. That includes 4D STS, with their varied attempts to turn us into them in the future. The 'external threats' designation of the antagonists in the books is, at best, only a partial truth. And with The Wave coming, I think it makes sense to take every opportunity we can get to "come to terms" with our selves, and reduce externalizations, pretensions, and projections as much as we are able.
All of this may be why people are feeling what they're feeling. The deep, embodied reaction to these Consortium tales could be the result of a fuller recognition of the darkness in our essence. We can choose to read these antagonists as ourselves in the future. As necessary for a 4D candidate with the approach of the Wave, according to the C's.
On a final note, I see a lot of people being squeamish about the sex scenes, and skimming or skipping them. I wonder if these are conscious decisions, taking into account (1) the beneficial relationship between suffering and DNA, (2) the mechanics of stimulating the sexual centre to awaken the emotional centre and therefore 'embody' the Knowledge, and (3) the opportunity presented to self-observe in a distraught state, and reflect on sexual programming.
Whatever happened to 'there are no shortcuts in the Work'?
So the regency novels are set in the past - our consciousness registers this temporal setting, and in a way primes us for (1) past-life Work, and (2) our own recent past, in this life.
These Consortium books are set in the present, but gesture to a time-setting and a hyperdimensional reality that projects into the Earth's near future, and as such that registers in our consciousness, too. Given the hyperdimensional aspect in these tales, this also opens up possibilities of healing in a non-linear timeframe - not just past lives, but a clearer understanding of 'ourselves in the future', too. Again, as the characters go through it all, so do we - whether we learn to see ourselves in the protagonist lovers, and/or the antagonist tyrants.
What I'm pondering is this - in this Consortium series, if we limit our identification solely to the human protagonists who are forced to deal with psychopaths, demons, and monsters, could we be missing an opportunity to understand our own essence more fully?
For context, I watched Joker the other day. I was quite shaken. In part because of the bleak depiction of meaninglessness, manipulation, abandonment and violence. Mostly, though, I was shaken because Joker was so familiar. I got the sense that I was somebody like that in a past life - a brutalized, twisted person, driven to murder and psychosis.
Extrapolating out from there, I recalled Chapter 2 of The Wave. I could quote the whole dang mind-blowing chapter, but suffice to say, we are not who we think we are. It may be useful to re-read it while looking at these Consortium books:
Q: (L) Now, I would like to know the name of the beings Ruth described as something like ants, flies or Praying Mantises in her hypnosis session?
A: Her essence.
Q: (L) Well, you said that the Praying Mantis beings that V encountered were called Minturians. Are these the same?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there a difference between essence beings and incarnate beings?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what were those snaky, slug-like beings that she saw?
A: Same.
Q: (L) Are you saying that all of this stuff is who she is? All of these creatures and these…
A: In some of the alternate realities.
Q: (L) Do all humans have creatures like that that are their essence?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) My essence is something that horrible and dark and icky?
A: Subjective.
Q: (L) Well, weren’t those horrible icky beings eating little children? Weren’t those real human children?
A: Yes. How do you think you are viewed by deer, for example?
Q: (L) Well, I can immediately see that. I saw that already. I mean that cows and chickens would have to view us that way. I mean, it’s pretty gross.
A: Roaches, too.
Q: (L) Is that why the night before Ruth’s session, I dreamed of ants that I could have stepped on and smashed, and for some reason I decided I did not want to take the life of even a single ant?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was that dream preparing me for what I was going to experience in that session?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, what do we do about these essence parts of ourselves? I mean, I don’t like it that there may be something of the predator in me. I would like to not have it, or get rid or it, or transform it, or whatever.
A: Wait and see.
Q: (L) Well, am I going to have to remember myself doing things like that in order to come to terms with it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is that going to happen to me, that I am going to have memories like that surfacing?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, I am having a hard time coping with it in someone else, how am I going to deal with it in myself?
A: You will.
Q: (L) Is this something we are all going to have to do?
A: All eligible fourth density candidates.
So in light of the information in this chapter, it looks like these stories are giving us an opportunity to come face-to-face not with 'external threats', but with the true nature of our own multidimensional Soul essence. That includes 4D STS, with their varied attempts to turn us into them in the future. The 'external threats' designation of the antagonists in the books is, at best, only a partial truth. And with The Wave coming, I think it makes sense to take every opportunity we can get to "come to terms" with our selves, and reduce externalizations, pretensions, and projections as much as we are able.
All of this may be why people are feeling what they're feeling. The deep, embodied reaction to these Consortium tales could be the result of a fuller recognition of the darkness in our essence. We can choose to read these antagonists as ourselves in the future. As necessary for a 4D candidate with the approach of the Wave, according to the C's.
On a final note, I see a lot of people being squeamish about the sex scenes, and skimming or skipping them. I wonder if these are conscious decisions, taking into account (1) the beneficial relationship between suffering and DNA, (2) the mechanics of stimulating the sexual centre to awaken the emotional centre and therefore 'embody' the Knowledge, and (3) the opportunity presented to self-observe in a distraught state, and reflect on sexual programming.
Whatever happened to 'there are no shortcuts in the Work'?