The Endless Mystery of Existence Itself

[Natus Videre]

From Peterson's 12 Rules For Life:

First, it is easy to assume that “nature” is something with a nature—something static. But it’s not: at least not in any simple sense. It’s static and dynamic, at the same time. The environment—the nature that selects—itself transforms. The famous yin and yang symbols of the Taoists capture this beautifully. Being, for the Taoists—reality itself—is composed of two opposing principles, often translated as feminine and masculine, or even more narrowly as female and male. However, yin and yang are more accurately understood as chaos and order. The Taoist symbol is a circle enclosing twin serpents,
head to tail. The black serpent, chaos, has a white dot in its head. The white serpent, order, has a black dot in its head. This is because chaos and order are interchangeable, as well as eternally juxtaposed. There is nothing so certain that it cannot vary. Even the sun itself has its cycles of instability. Likewise, there is nothing so mutable that it cannot be fixed. Every revolution produces a new order. Every death is, simultaneously, a metamorphosis.

Q: [laughter] (Perceval) We don't have the symbols and stuff. (Pierre) We need a special board for that!
A: There really is no such thing as "pure" randomness.

Q: (Ark) They are reading my book. [laughter]
A: How could there be when all is information? If something exists at all in your realm, it derives from a "higher" realm of information. How then could it be "random"? Sets.

Q: (Ark) Sets? (Perceval) Mathematical sets. That's the answer. (Pierre) Sets of what? (Ark) Seth! (L) S-E-T-S. (Ark) Seth. You don't remember about probabilities and Seth? (L) No, they said, "sets". (Ark) I know... [laughter] (Andromeda) Seth Speaks!
A: Your realm, that is 3D and time, are a "set".

Q: (Ark) A set.
A: A set is defined.

Q: (Ark) What? (Perceval) "A set is defined."
A: Delimited.

Even when an arrangement is deemed "chaotic", glimpses of order appear.

 

[Ricardo]

This raises the question that many silly theologians like ibn rushd , pondered , ( aka averroes ,in spanish , in his destruction of destruction book ) , that there's , no space in between divinity and itself , else , there'd be no unity , thus in a literal sense , no chaos , but consciousness in infinite facets. ( but rules nonetheless )