Indeed, your writing has indicated that it's a "big deal" to you. It's hard to reconcile that with what you write above, that you aren't as excited/interested in it as you come across. If that's true, then it's almost as if you are arguing for the sake of arguing, trying to "be right" when others point out errors in your thinking. It may be worth examining why you come across that way and why you seem to want to put up a fight whenever anyone point out those errors. I know in reading your responses on this thread you have come across as identified with the way you see this show portraying psychopaths, and from a broader point of view, the relative merits of the show. There were a few times when others wrote their impressions of the show, which were much less enthusiastic than your impressions, and you almost seemed to take offense to those words, as if someone not taking a liking to the show was a swipe against you. That's usually a sign of identification, whether with the show itself or your impressions of it. Instead of using all that energy to defend your views of it, which is what you seem to have done, why not allow others' impressions to stand on their own and take them in without feeling a need to defend your side, which isn't even necessary. Their impressions don't erase yours. It's just a part of the sharing/networking that we do here. To try and fight against that, which is what you seem to be doing here even if you don't feel that way, is to fight against the very nature of this forum. So, again, I'm wondering, why do you feel the need to argue in that way?
