Also, if the agenda changes when the snap back comes, the above documents also suggest remedy. The only way to end a war is a formal declaration of peace - knowing that they will try to incite angry reactions.
The Gay "Germ" Hypothesis
- Thread starter H-KQGE
- Start date
Also, if the agenda changes when the snap back comes, the above documents also suggest remedy. The only way to end a war is a formal declaration of peace - knowing that they will try to incite angry reactions.
All matter is under the influence of entropy. ALL of it is on the road to extinction. It's like winding up something up or putting a battery in it and setting it going. From there on, it's energy and therefore 'existence' (as such) is on the way down. Even the machine that holds the energy is subject to the forces of decay. ALL matter, eventually decays and expires, until someone or something comes along to start afresh again with a new input of energy, or add energy (and corrections) to the breaking down or broken down system so that it can continue on.
Think of the time energy and creative input it takes a baker to make a intricately designed and beautiful cake. Now take such a cake and stick that cake outside in the sun and watch what happens over time. That's human beings. Yes, we're all different types of pastry.
Last edited:
Yup.
What seems evident to me is that the instant the prototype was set running, however and whenever, mutations and copying errors began to happen, i.e. entropy began to do its work. There were probably also pre-installed variations on themes such as height, strength, tolerances to this or that, and more. Very soon there were cross-effects of various mutations or gene duplications or deletions - whatever - and homosexuality became part of the general homo sapiens prototypical phenotype. It appears to have been a very small percentage and remains very small for various obvious reasons, mainly lack of reproduction under most circumstances. We can't exclude deliberate manipulative engineering of some humans who may have had some gene sequence that was/is very beneficial in some way.
We should not forget for a moment the creative imperative that was represented in the human prototypes - as above, so below - that is, male and female as the two yardstick type styles of being, keeping in mind that any graph of about any feature is going to have the bell curve majority and outliers at each end. But the tallest person and the shortest person in a graph are still basically the same except for that apparent feature of height which may, or may not, relate to other genetic implications because genes are so cross-active involved with one another!
And the analogy of differences in height is probably a better one for homosexuality vs. heterosexuality, than thinking in terms of physical disabilities, I think.
But still, we have to consider the idea of the implications of a gene which apparently affects psychology and how else it might affect psychology along with inclining a person to homosexuality against the norm, i.e. the main part of the bell curve. That is not to say that it is a negative thing at all because, as many studies have shown, there are definite psychological differences between males and females in general, and ranged along the spectrum from a lot to a little. So it is only natural to think that homosexuality would entail certain psychological features that are more or less normative within that population. That should be studied and understood so as to best optimize functioning, I think. It's always a good thing to know one's strengths and weaknesses.
Finally, as PtE pointed out, the emphasis needs to be removed from sexuality among homosexuals - and everybody, for that matter - as the Cs have said, that's what got us into this mess in the first place! The emphasis needs to be placed on Positive Contributions to Society as a WHOLE.
So, that's where I am at the moment.
So, from ancient times, there was tinkering from 4D STS that preventing from human evolution.
But, nowadays more than ever, because the magnetic field from cosmic ray increases.
Anyway, I think the Homosexual is not harmonic with universal orders.
But, nowadays more than ever, because the magnetic field from cosmic ray increases.
Anyway, I think the Homosexual is not harmonic with universal orders.
I think , as adults, this is what we are striving for, that space where we can make our choice. It's very difficult as we are programmed to react instead of using that momentary space. Children, however, in most cases and particularly in abusive home settings are not given that opportunity and so it's implanted in us very early. An instinctive reaction must be one of the hardest habits to break. The results we can see everywhere.
The subject of genetic entropy reminds me of what Gurdjieff said about evolution, that it cannot proceed mechanically, it must proceed consciously. Like computers can have algorithms that can catch syntax errors and repair programs, I believe that 4D STO intended for intelligence to be used as a counterbalance for entropy in 3D beings. The mutations would occur, and each would present a different challenge or puzzle or test which must be overcome and would grant a wider understanding of reality or reason to view things in a different way. At some point, the wider understanding combined with increased intelligence would allow one the ability to change one's DNA in a rather direct way in order to adapt to any circumstance and become master of resiliency. The STO beings might come in and make an occasional tweak, but in general it wasn't really necessary. However, there have been so many redesigns and modifications since that design that I pretty much consider 4D STS to be the de facto designer of humanity, full stop. In regards to genetic entropy I subscribe more to this point of view:
session960504 said:
Just like we have planned obsolescence and products that are made with inferior parts for economic reasons, I think that long-term genertic entropy is also largely by design. Humanity as we know it has outlived its usefulness and it is time for it to be discarded. We are also told that the Lizard beings are involved in this hybridization project partly to mitigate their own genetic entropy, however their minds might be too far gone to fulfill any sort of meaningful mitigating or error-correcting role.session980725 said:
DianaRose
Jedi Master
Actually, for me it kind of make sense that we're all entropic. In this realm, humanity was never meant to survive. I kind of see our lives as kind of like a Sims game, or even a long drama piece. The game/ story has already been designed. We're just the characters bumbling along until the game/ play ultimate conclusion. In a story, characters grow, you have twists and turns. You may even have happy and positive scenes. Moments where it seems that the character will see the light or have a positive end. However, if an author has written his play to be a tragedy, then you will have tragedy. The story of humanity is like an epic tragedy. Our civilisation was meant to fade into oblivion and reflecting this inclination, our body are also degrading as time goes on. I don't think there is any kind of purpose or anything. You're just there to live, and preferably be a good person. However, if you went outside your house tomorrow and got run over by a car, it wouldn't really change anything. If you had children or a spouse, yeah things would get harder for them. There would be sadness and grief. But ultimately, life would go on whether you're in it or not.
Also, if we take the "everything is lesson" to its core. Then, gabbling with esoteric concept and looking for answer, no matter how painful even though there's no hope of changing humanity as a whole or really have any kind of meaningful impact is yet another lesson. I guess that if every realm is a different school room, then realms like Earth is where souls are sent to learn about destruction and rebirth again and again. Many civilisation have gone before ours and perhaps there will be other civilisations that will come after us and then destroy themselves like we are. Perhaps, the few that survive the coming cataclysm might act like those faraway ancestors and leave little clues in caves or other part of nature for those in the future, only to be once again ignored or discarded. And the cycle will go on and on.
I suppose that if you work very hard, perhaps you won't have to reincarnate in the same realm again. Perhaps, I'm wrong. I don't know how these things work.
I've been thinking about intent. I'm wondering if intent having the opposite effect is specific to the time frame of the beginnings of behaviours getting out of control, or if it's static across the ages? So long as LGBT acted with respect and support for the rights of children and other adults then intent worked the way it should. But when things were on the path of getting out of hand, then intent starts having the opposite effect and the appearance of the opposite effect is like a warning - the first raindrops before a deluge?
From what I can see, Jahn and Dunne conducted their experiments between 1997 and 2005. If they were conducting those experiments now, would the opposite of intent figure be double or higher now to what it was then for homosexual couples for example?
From what I can see, Jahn and Dunne conducted their experiments between 1997 and 2005. If they were conducting those experiments now, would the opposite of intent figure be double or higher now to what it was then for homosexual couples for example?
With the question of homosexuality being caused by deleterious mutations, I think some of the original articles shared by Laura suggest that the genetic link is a very tenuous one. One of the quotes from the C’s in the session of March 18th 1995 also seems to suggest that homosexuality is as old as sexuality itself is, instead of something that sort of cropped up after as a result of genetic entropy:
But notice the exact statement: "It originated when sexuality did."
That does not mean exactly what you have inferred from it. The more likely meaning is that as soon as sexual reproduction began, i.e. when the prototypes were set running, homosexuality rapidly appeared.
Was that a result of mutations? Probably some.
Was that a result of STS manipulation? Probably a lot.
And the two answers are not mutually exclusive.
And yes, the articles do suggest that the genetic link is not as strong as some would like it to be and that puts possibly more weight on the STS manipulation side of things.
I don't know about you, but once I learned about STS manipulations etc, it really p*ssed me off. What kind of person would enjoy being a puppet?
1peacelover
Jedi Master
What about heterosexuals who are unable/choose not to procreate? How do they fit into the cycle? I don't care what people (consenting adults) do in their intimate relations. It is none of my business. How would a person know someone is in a same gender relationship? What qualifies it as such? Can people in same gender relationships have relations that have nothing to do with sexual intimacy? Are human beings strictly determined by gender/sex? Who determines these constraints?
This reminded me of this other session about STS manipulation. Although it started off being about the Semitic types, what the Cs said at the end probably applies to many situations:
I think it is the 5th density contemplation that determines the general school curriculum we choose before those questions arise for us here in 3rd density.
Session 7 October 1995:
Well, you can't know if someone is in a relationship unless you ask them, but you can know (most often) if someone is likely to be in a same gender relationship (as opposed to a heterosexual one) by the usual means that I think everyone here is aware of.
A same gender relationship?
Sure.
No, but some tend to identify with their sexuality a lot.
