Schwab’s Ultimatum. The hosts of the World Game announced their plans.
In the last article we discussed Bilderberg and trilaterals, and in this I would like to elaborate on another summit meeting. We are talking about the summit in Bali, Indonesia, of the leaders and representatives of the 20 largest powers of the world, the G20, and globalist structures such as the World Economic Forum. The actual host of the Baltic summit felt not Biden and not the President of Indonesia, but Klaus Schwab. And I watched him speak at this forum and still couldn't figure out who he looks like to me. And looking at his speech I realized he reminds me very much of Egor Gaidar. Not outwardly, but as a figure.
In this regard, I want to say a few words about this person (Schwab). Because in our country and in the West, this figure has been inflated and even demonized, saying that he is almost one of the leaders of the world government, a global player. But Schwab did write several such manifesto books that express the interests of ultra-globalists. But this does not mean that he himself is a global player. Well, in order not to return to the question of who is a player and who is not a player, I would like to say a few words about the typology that Bernd von Wittenburg proposed at the time. He's a Scientologist. That is, a member of such an occult quasi-religious-political organization working in close contact with the special services. That is, Wittenburg knows well what he is talking about. He knows how the power behind the scenes works.
And now in his book "Check the planet Earth" there is a whole typology of those people who are related to the Big Game. And Oleg Markeev in the novel "The Weapon of Retribution" very actively used this scheme and even supplemented it. So, Bernd von Wittenburg, speaking about the Game, noticed that there are three kinds of people. The first are those who influence what is happening, the second are those who look closely at what is happening, and the third are those who are surprised by what is happening. Well, naturally, those who not only do not understand what a Game is, they do not know what a Game is at all - can be surprised. They think there is some kind of life. Those who influence are to varying degrees, ranging from simple participation to setting the rules, they know that there is a Game going on. But those who are looking closely also know that there is a Game going on, do not participate for various reasons, but observe and analyze it. And they live, as it were, according to the principle of "esse non videri", "to be, but not to be visible".
Among the participants of the Game, von Wittenburg identifies the following categories. The host of the Game or the hosts of the Game, players, assistants of players, game pieces and broken pieces (figures). As I have already said, Oleg Markeev in the novel "The Weapon of Retribution" actively applied this scheme in explaining a specific situation. Who are the hosts of the Game? These are people who do not adhere to any rules. They develop them for others, change them arbitrarily and dictate to the players. Players are those who really play the Game, they have independence and freedom of action, but only within the rules that they cannot change. How do players make moves? Using figures. The task of the figure is to perform certain actions. At the same time, the figure should not pursue any own goals. It should only respond to orders from above.
Even the players do not know the final goals, only the owners (hosts) know them. The players know the rules. The figure cannot even cover the entire field of Play with a glance, this is the prerogative of the player. At the same time, a figure is not supposed to know that it is a figure. It and others should think that it is a player, and focus on it to distract attention from the real players.
This is how von Wittenburg describes the process of creating figures in the book "Check the planet Earth". How to create game figures? "Refute any thoughts that a Game is being played. Don't let them, the figures, get any benefit for themselves. Hide the goal of the Game, keep such conditions so that they, the figures, could not refuse to participate in the Game. Prevent them from feeling satisfied with the work they have done. Make sure that they really become like that. From the outside, they may seem omnipotent, but in reality they should not have any power. Sometimes the game figures get into situations, the meaning of which they cannot understand. But for various objective reasons, they still have to give up trying to figure out their role in the Game. That is, the figures are those who are used unwittingly. But if such attempts are made, then they should be severely suppressed. Otherwise, the figures would have passed into the category of players and would have violated the rules.
Sometimes some figures still grow up to players, or at least to the players' assistants. In connection with what has been said, Wittenburg raises a question. "Is it possible to classify the players or the assistants of the players of the government?" And answers. "Is there a government in the modern world that can freely make decisions concerning its country?" Loans are presented only to those who accept the rules of the Game. Well, of course, the country is different from the country. There are countries at the level of the USA, China, and the nuclear state of Russia. This is one level. Another level is, for example, Costa Rica, Chad, Malawi, Greece. That is, there is a difference here too.
So, Schwab is, of course, a figure, it's not a player. And the figure is not the first row. He is initially a protégé of Kissinger, who himself was a figure for a long time, and then he was transferred to the category of assistant players. Moreover, in some acute international situations that required an instant reaction, Kissinger appeared several times as a player. By the way, the level of Kissinger is completely unattainable for Schwab. If we take the earlier stages of the early twentieth century, then, of course, such a figure was Colonel House, an adviser to President Wilson. He certainly wasn't player. But the player was a man about whom few people know. This is Tom Ryan. Here he was a player. And House fulfilled his decisions and requests with the same impetuosity in which the leaders of the then European states fulfilled the wishes of Colonel House.
Working in the plane of the "talking head" of the maitre d' for the players and their hosts, Schwab has become very active in recent years. Moreover, in this activity he is becoming more and more like a clown. Despite all this, Schwab is accepted by presidents, prime ministers. And, despite this, the works signed with the surname Schwab, whether he wrote it or not, need to be read very carefully. Because these are the enemy's plans. They need to be studied very well. And it doesn't matter if Schwab is a clown or not a clown, whether he is a figure or a beaten figure. But he is a "talking head". Its function is to voice a certain position that corresponds to the interests of its owners.
So, Schwab played a very big role at the Bali summit. He made an introductory speech and said: "We must resist the deep systemic and structural restructuring of our world, current trends. The world will look different after we go through this transition period." That is, Schwab recognized that the world is systematically changing in a direction unacceptable to its owners. And we need to make sure that it develops in the right direction. Then I quote: "How do we cope with this transition, which will last several years? If you restructure a company, you write off costs, and shareholders suffer. But if you restructure the economy, the result will be a decrease in disposable income, which will lead to large-scale social tensions. The fourth Industrial Revolution, and we are at an inflection point, technology will completely change what we do and change who we are. That is, the economic and social crisis should be avoided (according to Schwab) with the help of the Fourth Industrial Revolution."
I want to remind you that the Fourth Industrial Revolution, according to Schwab, is fundamentally different from the first three in that - it changes the biological nature of man. That is, according to Schwab, his masters, more precisely, the Fourth Industrial Revolution has nothing to do with industry. It should biologically consolidate social inequality in order to prevent more economic crises and social tensions that are dangerous for the owners. And this medical and biological impact on a person should change him in such a way that he becomes an obedient person.
And then Schwab says: "In the 4th Industrial Revolution, the winners will take everything, so if you became the first participants of the WEF, you are the winners." That is, in fact, Schwab says that in the 4th industrial revolution there will be winners, and they will take everything, and there will be absolutely losers who will then have no chance. This will be the lower caste, and their children will be the lower caste, grandchildren, etc., etc. Well, Schwab concluded his speech at this meeting in Bali in this way: "Government and business must cooperate to become a fast fish. It's not that a big fish eats a small one, but that a fast fish eats a slow one."
That's worth a lot. The fact is that by "fast fish" Schwab means corporations, and by "slow" – states. And to become fast fish, states must work closely with corporations. From all that Schwab said, one thing follows. Corporations should dissolve the states, and by the way, both Schwab and his economic forum, and the Carnegie Foundation, constantly advocate the merger of intelligence and law enforcement agencies with banks and corporations into a single complex, such as the British East India Company, but adapted to our time. That is, this is the very deep power that is being formed, and which will have to replace, on the one hand, the state. And on the other hand, if states leave, then closed supranational structures are not needed, deep power removes this contradiction.
In fact, Schwab addressed something like an ultimatum to the heads of the 20 largest states of the world. Well, and what if someone objected to him, someone drove him from the podium? Did someone say how Alice was "in wonderland" when the queen threatened her? She told her that "you are a pack of old cards." No! They listened to him very attentively, because they understood that he was just a clerk, but his masters were behind him.
At the end of the Bali Meeting, on the basis of the 59-page bulletin G-20, Bali-2022, a final document, a declaration, was adopted. Analysts and observers have defined the declaration as "grossly violating the sovereignty of nation states." So, what was written in this declaration as "desired goals for future development":
1. Introduction of global digital passports and identity cards connected to global digital systems. Healthcare, first of all, well, and others. Moreover, to these systems regulating movement between countries. This is the so-called mandatory vaccination passport. Despite the fact that no one seems to be forcing anyone to vaccinate yet, in many countries.
2. Introduction of digital currencies of central banks. Well, I think everyone understands that digital currency is not a currency at all, it is not money, it is a means of controlling behavior by tracking purchases.
3. Internet surveillance and censorship under the guise of combating disinformation. In general, both at the Bilderberg Club meeting and in Bali, it was about the need to fight disinformation. In fact, this is precisely the promotion of disinformation.
4. Expansion of the global bio-security apparatus in the face of threats of new pandemics. That is, in fact, we are talking about creating another supranational governance body that automatically suppresses sovereignty. And, secondly, it is postulated that there will be pandemics, and they cannot be avoided (WHO is conducting 76th World health assembly where it’s new status is being negotiated -
Новости вакцинобесия)
5. The need for reforms in food production and distribution. This streamlined thesis hides a blow to small and medium-sized farms and control over what can and cannot be eaten. All participants of the meeting put their signatures. Russia was represented by Lavrov. And the Minister of Health Murashko, who was present at the meeting (Ursula von der Leyen's colleague - he, like her, is a gynecologist), said that the Russian Federation will develop cooperation with WHO…
And when I listened to it, I thought, "Did I hear right?" Is this from the very WHO that Gates and the Rockefellers are actively interacting with? That is, supranational forces. This is with the very WHO, which promotes new Western values as universal. And this is despite the fact that we stand for traditional values and sovereignty.
I understand that an official, a clerk, even a high-ranking one, is not a power, especially in Russia. Our power can pull a clerk of any rank, put him in a corner… But even stupidity and servility before the Post-West should have a limit. And there should be an understanding – an enemy is in front of you, the bread in his house is bitter. And so it should always be, and in the current conditions, it was impossible not to understand this. That is, this is the situation, one step forward, two steps back.
#Argentina Protesters demand action and criticize the IMF's debt austerity policies as the economy collapses.
)
- GET READY NOW
