The Ice Age Cometh! Forget Global Warming!

[iamthatis]

No problem at all! Another thought I had after I posted is that the slowing down and speeding up of rotation seems to come in waves, and it would be interesting to try to find data before 1973 as well to see what it was up to. It’s possible that we are in for an extended acceleration leading into the ice age, but it’s also possible that it will continue to go up and down more and more dramatically, even if the general trend, at least since 1973, is down. It’s acting like a swing that is being pushed. Unfortunately they didn’t have the tech to measure it before 1950’s or so, but I believe I read that it can be inferred from observing the moon and the stars, which we have done for a long time, I just need to see if anyone did the math.

The C’s specifically mentioned slowing down of the rotation as causing all the “opening up” on the planet, so I’ll try to see if the rotation data correlates with earthquake spikes or other weirdness in any way as well.

I checked with good ol' Ben Davidson, and his take on the acceleration is that it is caused by the severe drop in the Earth's geomagnetic field. With shields down, this allows more energy into the system. "Higher supply, faster rotation - not unlike an electric motor".

And our shields are seriously down, apparently. There the following paper cited by Davidson and crew for another one of their videos:

A new power spectrum and stochastic representation for the geomagnetic axial dipole

SUMMARY. Earth’s internal magnetic field is dominated by the contribution of the axial dipole whose temporal variations are wide ranging and reflect characteris

academic.oup.com

I admit I haven't read the article, which looks waaay over my head. But there is this nifty set of graphs.



This graph below is the one that apparently shows that the geomagnetic field is taking a nosedive.


Him and his team call the -6000 point 'the Noah Event'. I'm not very familiar with his nomenclature, but apparently it was roughly 8000 years ago, and includes a deluge at that time. Brief video here for those interested, with some linked papers. But that's a bit of a digression.

Point being, according to this paper, the magnetic field is weakening at a significant rate. The data on this graph isn't fine enough to correlate it to what you've laid out in your rotation speed graph, unfortunately. The overall picture is clear, though. According to this chart, the geomagnetic field was on a decline for the past 500 years. And now it looks like the drop is similar to an exponential curve.



I don't know if I can get behind this 'You are Here - Going Here' in the last slide, though. There's no data involved, just the intuitive finishing of a line to a supposed end point. Anyone can do that. There could be a lot of fluctuations on the way down.

In general, what this data could mean is that if the shields continue to drop, the earth would ostensibly spin faster and faster, which we can watch for.

The thought kinda reminds me of my brother and I when we were kids, and we would twist up the tire swing on the willow tree and then have 'a lot of fun' getting extremely nauseated...

Edit: grammar

 

[thorbiorn]

As suspected a few weeks ago, the icecap in Greenland has had a "good" season

While it may be hard to say exactly how much has been gained, this year has proven special in a number of ways: The melting season was shorter by a two to three weeks (both lower diagrams), the amount of melt appears to be below average (left image lower diagram), and there has been material added in many areas close to the coast (left image map). The map to the right only shows what was accumulated on August 31, so it fairly inconsequential, except to provide the grand final add-on, as seen in the spike of accumulation.

Surface Conditions: Polar Portal

polarportal.dk

It would not surprise, if there will be videos made claiming that the icecap gained 450 gigatons (left image lower diagram), but that is not true:

The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

If one looks at the left map, notice the red areas a little inland on the western side. Is that what it would also look like, if the motion of the ice was assisted from below, due to the Earth heating up or being less cold? Or is it just that less snow fell inland, while the drift of the cap, due to gravity, continued?

 

[Voyageur]

It would not surprise, if there will be videos made claiming that the icecap gained 450 gigatons (left image lower diagram), but that is not true:

No video, yet a long range look back:

Greenland Ice Loss Will Cause Dangerous Sea Level Rise

Greenland’s Ice Sheet – The thickness is generally more than 2 km (1.2 mi) and over 3 km (1.9 mi) at its thickest point. Credit: NASA’s Scientific Visualization St…

everythingclimate.wpcomstaging.com

One can read the 'Pros' and the 'Cons' within. However, reality states (less yrs. 2021/2022):


Figure 1: comparison of satellite data for Greenland ice mass loss. Cumulative ice mass loss on the left, and that same data compared to the total mass of ice on the right. Data source: http://imbie.org. Graphs originally by Willis Eschenbach, adapted and annotated by Anthony Watts.

Here is an older historical accounting of sea ice (somewhat free and thick again, waning and waxing):

Historic Variation in Arctic Ice

Historic Variation in Arctic Ice Guest post from the Air Vent by Tony B The following is a guest post by Tony B on the history of Arctic ice. I nominated him Arctic ice historian on WUWT when I not…

wattsupwiththat.com

snip:

His subsequent Account of the Arctic Regions with a History and Description of the Northern whale Fishery (1820) contained his own findings as well as those of earlier navigators. There is an intriguing entry from the book, as subsequently recorded by his chroniclers;

“The uncharted coastline of east Greenland became clear of ice around 1820, and in 1822 Scoresby, in the midst of an arduous whaling voyage, sailed along some 400 miles of this inhospitable landscape, charting it, and naming point as he went in honour of scientific and other friends, chief of which was Scoresby Sound, named for his father. Almost all his place names survive today.”

That Scoresby junior was a man to be believed when he claimed that the arctic was melting can be further seen here in this extract;

“Carrying on with great success the most demanding and arduous of all maritime activities -the hunting and capture of whales – he yet collected over a period of some 15 years data on sea currents and temperatures, ice formation and movement, wind directions and velocities, magnetic variations, marine organisms, biology of whales, structure of snow crystals and much besides, gathering all this original work in the historic-volume classic Account of the Arctic Regions. The publication of this work in 1820 marks the beginning of the scientific study of the polar regions.”

So we have clear evidence of substantial melt in the years prior to 1817, during 1817 around 1820 and that ice returned in subsequent years but then retreated again, as recorded here;

Full text of "Arctic geography and ethnology. A selection of papers on Arctic geography and ethnology"

“On the voyage to Greenland in 1828, Captain Graah fell in with the first ice in 58° 52′ lat. n., and 41° 25′ w. Greenwich, which is only 57′ s., and about 77 nautical miles to the eastward of Cape Farewell ; and he says, ” Since 1817, I do not know that the ice has been seen so far to the eastward of the Cape.” — ‘ Narrative of an Expedition to the East Coast of Greenland, by Cnpt. W. A. Graah, Royal Danish Navy,’ p. 21, (Note; Cape Farewell is at the extreme southern tip of Greenland) map here.

 

[thorbiorn]

One can read the 'Pros' and the 'Cons' within. However, reality states (less yrs. 2021/2022):

For some reason, the run-off diagrams have not been updated since 2018:
The source is: Surface Conditions: Polar Portal

 

[Voyageur]

For some reason, the run-off diagrams have not been updated since 2018:
The source is: Surface Conditions: Polar Portal

You can enter date ranges and run the animation simulator from here. If one were to narrow out the dip, it is not substantial (and likely not well represented by weather station data) - however as they say:

Data from the meteorological stations may be missing due to problems with instruments or transmissions via satellite if the power of the solar-powered battery is low or if the meteorological station is covered in snow, or, in the worst case, has toppled over.

The other thing noticed while running the simulator, is from day to day if one were to grab a screen map of that day, the swings are wild and could paint a misleading picture. An the maps below, on those dates, 3 weather stations had no data. That is long way to go to fix a remote weather station.

example:



A few days later there is mass gain (blue):

 

[hlat]

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

"Nothing To Do With Man" - Astrophysicist Says Climate-Cultists "Are On A Gravy Train" To Make Money
BY TYLER DURDEN
SATURDAY, SEP 10, 2022 - 11:00 AM

This year's heat waves and subsequent droughts resulted in the hottest summer in recorded European history, according to a report by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) - an EU-funded Earth observation agency.

“We’ve not only had record August temperatures for Europe, but also for the summer, with the previous summer record only being one year old,” said Freja Vamborg, a senior scientist at the Copernicus Climate Change Service.

Of course, this 'record' heat in the summer has prompted activists to trot out the same old tropes that this 'confirms climate change' is having a catastrophic effect on the world already. With the energy crisis facing Europe, this is not a particularly comfortable topic as numerous nations abandon - albeit apparently temporarily - their green policies in favor of not letting their citizenry starve or freeze.

Given that it's all 'settled science', the following RT News anchor was probably expecting a rote response to his questions about climate change.

He was in for a big surprise...

Piers Corbyn - physicist, meteorologist, and elder brother of former UK Labor Party leader Jeremy Corbyn - explained to the shocked RT anchor that the climate "has always been changing, but this has nothing to do with man"

The astrophysicist instead believes that changes in the Earth’s climate and its weather are dictated primarily by cyclical activity on the surface of the sun (and not, pointedly, by the effects of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere).

“For one thing science doesn’t do settled opinions,” Corbyn says.

“And for another they are all wrong.”

"Surely man has something to with this," exclaims the struggling new anchor, to which Corbyn responds:

"No, the only connection is that man is here at the same time as the sun and the moon are doing things."

The frustrated anchor falls back to consensus, asking "so how come then that so many climate change scientists disagree with you and they get so much support for that?"

Corbyn's laughing response was straightforward:

"...those that say this are just trying to make money... They're on a gravy train for heaven's sake."

Watch the brief interview below:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1568338056943665154

Finally, we note that in former UK PM Boris Johnson once lauded Corbyn as “the world’s foremost meteorological soothsayer”.

We suspect this is the last time Mr.Corbyn will be allowed on TV...

 

[Alix]

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

I saw this and thought, Welp, the PTB don't like the truth seeping out so no network is going to have this guy come on anymore!

 

[XPan]

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

I found it so "funny", when the RT reporter stated (or quoted?) "hottest summer since 1000 years".

Uhm, really ?

Did he read the "Gaillard's Medical Journal", New York, July 1884 ? (I am not sure if i published this in the forum, my guts tell me, I did in the past... but i am not sure). I post it in this context, regarding European summers in the past 1500 years, telling a very different tale, which the RT reporter/or the source from which he referred to, didn't have on the radar.



It stated following as text:

Many a man has mopped his brow during the summer months of 1884, declaring it was the hottest weather the world ever knew, which, of course, would not be true, for the extreme heat in the record of the past has not been approached during the late summer.

In 627, the heat was so great in France and Germany, says the London Slandard, that all springs dried up; water became so scarce that many people died of thirst.

In 879, work in the field had to be given up; agricultural laborers persisting in their work were struck down in a few minutes, so powerful was the sun. In 993, the sun's rays were so fierce that vegetation burned up as under the action of fire.

In 1000, rivers ran dry under the protracted heat, the fish were left dry in heaps and putrefied in a few hours. Men and animals venturing in the sun in the summer of 1022 fell down dying.

In 1132, not only did the rivers dry up, but the ground cracked and became baked to the hardness of stone. The Rhine in Alsace nearly dried up. Italy was visited with terrific heat in 1139; vegetation and plants were burned up.

During the battle of Bel, in 1200, there were more victims made by the sun than by weapons; men fell down sunstruck in regular rows.

The sun of 1277 was also severe; there was an absolute death of fornge. In 1303 and 1304, the Rhine, Loire and Seine ran dry.

In 1615, the heat throughout Europe became excessive. Scotland suffered particularly in 1625 men and beasts died in scores. Meat could be cooked by merely exposing it to the sun. Not a soul dared to venture out between noon and 4 P.M.

In 1718, many shops had to be closed; the theatres were never opened for several months. Not a drop of water fell during six months.

In 1753 the thermometer rose to one 118°F** [47.7°C]. In 1779, the heat at Bologna was so great that a large number of people died.

In July, 1793, the heat became intolerable. Vegetables were burned up and fruit dried upon the trees. The furniture and woodwork in dwelling-houses cracked and split up; meat became bad in an hour.

In Paris in 1846, the thermometer marked one hundred and twenty-five degrees** [52°C] in the sun. The summers of 1859, 1860, 1869, 1870, 1874, etc., although excessively hot, were not attended by any disaster.

**) I assume this was measured as Fahrenheit, since it was an American publication.

 

[Chad]

I found it so "funny", when the RT reporter stated (or quoted?) "hottest summer since 1000 years".

Uhm, really ?

Did he read the "Gaillard's Medical Journal", New York, July 1884 ? (I am not sure if i published this in the forum, my guts tell me, I did in the past... but i am not sure). I post it in this context, regarding European summers in the past 1500 years, telling a very different tale, which the RT reporter/or the source from which he referred to, didn't have on the radar.

It stated following as text:

Thanks for posting that Gaillard's Medical Journal page, if i had seen it before, i'd forgotten! For reference, i'm pretty sure this is the full text of the journal at archive: https://archive.org/stream/gaillardsmedical38newy/gaillardsmedical38newy_djvu.txt

 

[Laura]

What a great collection!

 

[Mark7]

I checked with good ol' Ben Davidson, and his take on the acceleration is that it is caused by the severe drop in the Earth's geomagnetic field.

If I remember correctly, lowering the field strength of a DC motor was an old-timy way to increase its rotational speed, FWIW.

 

[Adobe]

OUR CURRENT CIVILIZATION IS UNSALVAGEABLE (WHAT'S NEXT?)​

A pretty interesting ADAPT2030 (30 minutes)

A few of the points made in the video:

According to the speculation of David Dubyne, the shutting down of everything and storing of “stuff” may be for the “reset” but not the reset we are thinking of. The reset after the earth goes through a shifting, pulling, liquefaction, and turbulent times as we enter 2024. Because of the changing of the electromagnetic field.

118,000 years ago, men like us were at this same place we are at now. And some people alive now still have all that information. Thus, they are preparing for a “regular”, "cyclic" system reset.

400-year cycles

80-year cycles

Other being are here feeding off our negative energy.

Video below:

Our Current Civilization is Unsalvageable (What's Next?)

Get Your Gold IRA FREE Investor Guide Today! Click Below! https://www.patriotgoldgroup.com/download/silver-ira-investor-guide.html?src=7954844 Call (1-800-356-4470) Today! I spoke with Ransom Godwin about how the western world is being de-industri…

www.bitchute.com

 

[treesparrow]

Heavy early snowfall today - September 17th - in the Alps, up to 25cms (10 inches).

 

[Ca.]

Early September snowfalls in the southern sierra mountains of California (and other cold anomalies).
Snip:
Taste of winter, much-needed rain arrives in California After an astoundingly hot and dry summer, needed rain and cooler air is finally sweeping into portions of California -- and the pattern change is even going to result in snow for some of the highest peaks.
Published Sep. 18, 2022 4:03 PM CEST By Andrew Johnson-Levine, AccuWeather

While Southern California has been on the receiving end of multiple rounds of rain in recent days and weeks, continued dry weather in the northern two-thirds of the state has led to persistent drought conditions, as well as numerous wildfires. However, AccuWeather forecasters say a potent storm system will stall offshore for a couple of days and allow for a steady soaking rain in Northern California. For a select few areas at high elevations, a bit of wet snow may even be possible.

The culprit is an area of low pressure over the Pacific Ocean, which has been slowly strengthening in recent days. As this low pressure system gradually moves inland during the first few days of the week, it will bring moist Pacific air inland with it, providing the ingredients necessary for widespread rain for much of the Golden State.

"In Central and Northern California, rainfall may be heavy at times. On top of that, it should be a slow-moving feature, with rain lasting for a prolonged period of time in many areas," AccuWeather Senior Meteorologist Mike LeSeney explained.

Skipping down:

The storm will be accompanied by a dip in the jet stream, lowering the temperatures both at the surface and high in the atmosphere. With this growing pocket of cold air aloft, this may be enough to produce the season's first snow at the highest mountain elevations, generally above 8,000 feet.

"Snowfall will be confined to the highest elevations of the Sierra Nevada, but roads may become slushy or snow covered through the high passes, like Carson Pass along California State Route 88, Monday night," LeSeney said, noting that road accumulations were most likely during the overnight and early morning hours.

The steadiest and heaviest rain will likely be found in coastal areas into Sunday night as the center of the storm lingers just off the coast. Residents in cities such as San Francisco, Monterey, and Santa Maria, California, should plan for periods of rain.

Farther inland, cities such as Redding and Fresno, California, should have more intermittent showers, especially toward the afternoon and evening hours. Later Sunday night, rain and high-elevation snow may reach the Sierra.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1567805188462841860

The frosts are accentuated in #Finlande with up to -7.5°C locally this morning, unusual so early in September.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1571352587462492160

https://twitter.com/x/status/1570031001320955904

https://twitter.com/x/status/1571426166309015558

This Sunday, September 18 sees some monthly cold records broken: Brest: 2.6° vs 2.9° in 2017 (data since 1929) Brennilis: 0.2° vs 2.5° in 2007 (opening in 1987) St-Romain-Lachalm: -0.3° vs -0.2° in 1995 (opening in 1987) #recordefroid #weatherrecord

 

[Puma]

Catastrophes come in threes?

This morning I heard a report about the phenomenon called "la Niña of the century" and the possibility of snowfall throughout the Mexican Republic. This year La Niña was catalogued as a 'triple episode'. That is to say: for the third consecutive year, the La Niña phenomenon will occur in September, October and November 2022.

UN weather agency predicts rare ‘triple-dip’ La Nina in 2022​

La Nina’s cooling effect on the planet did not stop 2021 from being one of the seven hottest years on record.

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) on Wednesday said La Nina conditions, which involve a large-scale cooling of ocean surface temperatures, have strengthened in the eastern and central equatorial Pacific with an increase in trade winds in recent weeks.

A natural and cyclical cooling of parts of the equatorial Pacific, La Nina changes weather patterns worldwide and is usually associated with wetter conditions in some parts of the world, and drier conditions in others.

The better-known El Nino – an opposite phenomenon – is associated with warming in parts of the world.

“It is exceptional to have three consecutive years with a La Nina event,” WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas said.

Taalas was quick to caution that the “triple dip” of cooling does not mean global warming is easing.

“Its cooling influence is temporarily slowing the rise in global temperatures, but it will not halt or reverse the long-term warming trend,” WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas said.

UN weather agency predicts rare ‘triple-dip’ La Nina in 2022

La Nina’s cooling effect on the planet did not stop 2021 from being one of the seven hottest years on record.

www.aljazeera.com

... don't worry... Global Warming Cometh! Forget Ice Age says Taalas

La Niña phenomenon reminds me of what the Cs mentioned regarding the comet cluster, the weather and the spikes in the graphs

Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at present?

A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!

Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.

A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding time table of cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors cycle of catastrophe. Earth benefits in form of periodic cleansing. Time to start paying attention to the signs. They are escalating. They can even be "felt" by you and others, if you pay attention.

Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!

A: How so?

Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The fires, the heat...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time with no ostensible explanation...

A: And low, too.

Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have too. Not too long ago I noticed that the tides were so incredibly low for this time of year. (L) And also the signs in people - these kids killing their parents, all these people going berserk - you know...

A: Spike.

Q: (L) What do you mean spike?

A: On a graph...

Q: (Pierre) Now, you also mentioned in 1997 that Laura should look for a spike in the graph. Here in my hand, in front of my eyes I have an ocean index graph showing that there is a spike. Right now we're experiencing the strongest El Niño since 1950. So, first: Is this spike the spike you were hinting about 19 years ago?

A: Indeed. And it is not yet over.

Q: (Pierre) We have reached a level that is higher than ever, and it's STILL climbing up. You mentioned this spike in conjunction with a 10.4 earthquake near the West coast of the USA in the Pacific.

A: Indeed.